Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-88psn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T17:20:07.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring heritability: Why bother?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2022

David M. Shuker Open the ORCID record for David M. Shuker [Opens in a new window]  and
Thomas E. Dickins
David M. Shuker
Affiliation:
School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK david.shuker@st-andrews.ac.uk https://insects.st-andrews.ac.uk
Thomas E. Dickins
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science & Technology, Middlesex University, London NW4 4BT, UK. T.Dickins@mdx.ac.uk http://tomdickins.net/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Uchiyama et al. rightly consider how cultural variation may influence estimates of heritability by contributing to environmental sources of variation. We disagree, however, with the idea that generalisable estimates of heritability are ever a plausible aim. Heritability estimates are always context-specific, and to suggest otherwise is to misunderstand what heritability can and cannot tell us.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e175
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blows, M. W., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2005). A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology, 86, 1371–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmantier, A., Garant, D., & Kruuk, L. E. (Eds.). (2014). Quantitative genetics in the wild. OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dochtermann, N. A., Schwab, T., Anderson Berdal, M., Dalos, J., & Royauté, R. (2019). The heritability of behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Heredity, 110, 403–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th Ed.). Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. F., Pélabon, C., & Houle, D. (2011). Heritability is not evolvability. Evolutionary Biology, 38, 258–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houle, D. (1992). Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics, 130, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, M., & Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. OUP.Google Scholar
Mathieson, I. (2021). The omnigenic model and polygenic prediction of complex traits. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 108, 1558–1563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mousseau, T. A., & Roff, D. A. (1987). Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity, 59, 181–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirling, D. G., Réale, D., & Roff, D. A. (2002). Selection, structure and the heritability of behaviour. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 15, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. G., & Wray, N. R. (2008). Heritability in the genomics era – Concepts and misconceptions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weigensberg, I., & Roff, D. A. (1996). Natural heritabilities: Can they be reliably estimated in the laboratory? Evolution, 50, 2149–2157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, A. J., Kruuk, L. E., & Coltman, D. W. (2005). Ontogenetic patterns in heritable variation for body size: Using random regression models in a wild ungulate population. The American Naturalist, 166, E177–E192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar