No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Interpreting and reinterpreting heritability estimates in educational behavior genetics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 September 2022
Abstract
Interpreting heritability estimates through the lens of cultural evolution presents two broad and interlinking problems for educational behavior genetics. First, the problem of interpreting high heritability of educational phenotypes as indicators of the genetic basis of traits, when these findings also reflect cultural homogeneity. Second, the problem of extrapolating from genetic research findings in education to policy and practice recommendations.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Addey, C. (2017). Golden relics & historical standards: How the OECD is expanding global education governance through PISA for development, Critical Studies in Education, 58(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1352006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asbury, K., & Plomin, R. (2014). G is for genes: The impact of genetics on education and achievement. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Asbury, K., & Wai, J. (2020). Viewing education policy through a genetic lens. Journal of School Choice, 14(2), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2019.1705008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., Little, C. W., Olson, R. K., Larsen, S. A., Coventry, W. L., & Weymouth, R. (2020). Comment on Asbury and WAI (2019), “viewing education policy through a genetic lens”. Journal of School Choice, 14(3), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2020.1779577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., Olson, R. K., & Samuelsson, S. (2019). Behavior-genetic studies of academic performance in school students: A commentary for professionals in psychology and education. In Kilpatrick, D., Joshi, R. & Wagner, R. (eds), Reading development and difficulties, (pp. 213–232). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26550-2_9.Google Scholar
Chow, B. W.-Y., Ho, C. S.-H., Wong, S. W.-L., Waye, M. M. Y., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on Chinese language and reading abilities. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16640. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coventry, W. L., & Keller, M. C. (2005). The extent of parameter bias in the classical twin design: A comparison of parameter estimates from the extended twin-family and classical twin designs. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8(3), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.8.3.214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harden, K. P. (2021). “Reports of my death were greatly exaggerated”: Behavior genetics in the postgenomic era. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-052220-103822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, M. C., & Coventry, W. L. (2005). Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.8.3.201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovas, Y., Tikhomirova, T. N., Selita, F., Tosto, M. G., & Malykh, S. B. (2016). How genetics can help education. In Kovas, Y., Malykh, S. B., & Gaysina, D. (Eds.), Behavioural genetics for education (pp. 1–23). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Panofsky, A. (2015). What does behavioral genetics offer for improving education? The Genetics of Intelligence: Ethics and the Conduct of Trustworthy Research, (Hastings Center Report, 45, no. 5), S43–S49. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2013). Behavioral genetics (6th ed.). Worth.Google Scholar
Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Final report. (Department for Education and Skills Report). Retrieved from https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5551/.Google Scholar
Shero, J., van Dijk, W., Edwards, A., Schatschneider, C., Solari, E. J., & Hart, S. A. (2021). The practical utility of genetic screening in school settings. Npj Science of Learning, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00090-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G. D. (2011). Epidemiology, epigenetics and the “gloomy prospect”: Embracing randomness in population health research and practice. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(3), 537–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, P. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Using research and reason in education. (National Institute for Literacy Report). Retrieved from https://lincs.ed.gov/publications/pdf/Stanovich_Color.pdf.Google Scholar
Thomson, S., Hillman, K., Schmid, M., Rodrigues, S., & Fullarton, J. (2017). Reporting Australia's Results: PIRLS 2016. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=pirls.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E. (2015), Genetic prediction. Hastings Center Report, 45, S32–S38. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (1997). Child development and the purpose of education: A historical context for constructivism in teacher education. In Richardson, V. (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building New understandings (pp. 15–37). The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Woods, A. (2021). Are we there yet? Research with and for teachers and children and the possibilities of schooling in a complex world. The Australian Educational Researcher, 48(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00431-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Cultural evolution of genetic heritability
Related commentaries (29)
(Super-)cultural clustering explains gender differences too
A cultural evolutionary behavior genetics will need a more sophisticated conceptualization of cultural traits
Changes in heritability: Unpredictable and of limited use
Cultural dynamics add multiple layers of complexity to behavioural genetics
Cultural evolution and behavior genetic modeling: The long view of time
Cultural evolution may influence heritability by shaping assortative mating
Cultural evolution: The third component of mental illness heritability
Cultural evolutionary theory is not enough: Ambiguous culture, neglect of structure, and the absence of theory in behavior genetics
Culture and causal inference: The impact of cultural differences on the generalisability of findings from Mendelian randomisation studies
Culture is reducing genetic heritability and superseding genetic adaptation
Developmental noise is an overlooked contributor to innate variation in psychological traits
Differential application of cultural practices at the family and individual levels may alter heritability estimates
Evolving the blank slate
From the trajectory of heritability to the heritability of trajectories
Genetic solutions to cultural problems?
Going beyond heritability: Mechanisms of gene–culture coevolution
Heritability is a poor, if not unhelpful, measure of complex human behavioral processes
Hidden clusters beyond ethnic boundaries
Interpreting and reinterpreting heritability estimates in educational behavior genetics
Measuring heritability: Why bother?
Models of gene–culture evolution are incomplete without incorporating epigenetic effects
The dubious precision and utility of heritability estimates
The evolutionary dance between culture, genes, and everything in between
The implications of the cultural evolution of heritability for evolutionary psychology
The many geographical layers of culture
There is no such thing as culture-free intelligence
This time I mean it: The nature–nurture debate is over
Understanding cultural clusters: An ethnographic perspective
Unpackaging cultural variability in behavioral phenotypes
Author response
Integrating cultural evolution and behavioral genetics