Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6bnxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T14:51:03.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biological evolution and behavioral evolution: Two approaches to altruism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Howard Rachlin
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500. howard.rachlin@sunysb.eduhttp://www.psychology.stonybrook.edu/psychology/index.php?people/faculty/howard_rachlinmatthew.locey@stonybrook.eduvvsafin@gmail.com
Matthew L. Locey
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500. howard.rachlin@sunysb.eduhttp://www.psychology.stonybrook.edu/psychology/index.php?people/faculty/howard_rachlinmatthew.locey@stonybrook.eduvvsafin@gmail.com
Vasiliy Safin
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500. howard.rachlin@sunysb.eduhttp://www.psychology.stonybrook.edu/psychology/index.php?people/faculty/howard_rachlinmatthew.locey@stonybrook.eduvvsafin@gmail.com

Abstract

Altruism may be learned (behavioral evolution) in a way similar to that proposed in the target article for its biological evolution. Altruism (over social space) corresponds to self-control (over time). In both cases, one must learn to ignore the rewards to a particular (person or moment) and behave to maximize the rewards to a group (of people or moments).

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable