Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T05:22:09.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disentangling the sense of ownership from the sense of fairness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Luca Tummolini ,
Claudia Scorolli  and
Anna M. Borghi
Luca Tummolini
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italian National Research Council, 00185 Rome, Italy. luca.tummolini@istc.cnr.ithttp://www.istc.cnr.it/people/luca-tummoliniannamaria.borghi@unibo.ithttp://laral.istc.cnr.it/borghi/
Claudia Scorolli
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy. claudia.scorolli2@unibo.ithttp://www.emco.unibo.it/groupCS.htm
Anna M. Borghi
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italian National Research Council, 00185 Rome, Italy. luca.tummolini@istc.cnr.ithttp://www.istc.cnr.it/people/luca-tummoliniannamaria.borghi@unibo.ithttp://laral.istc.cnr.it/borghi/ Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy. claudia.scorolli2@unibo.ithttp://www.emco.unibo.it/groupCS.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both evolutionary and developmental research indicate that humans are adapted to respecting property rights, independently (and possibly orthogonally) of considerations of fairness. We offer evidence from psychological experiments suggesting that enforcing one's rights and respecting others' possessions are basic cognitive mechanisms automatically activated and grounded in humans' sensory-motor system. This may entail an independent motivation that is more profound than considerations of fairness and impartiality.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 101 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chen, M. & Bargh, J. A. (1999) Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25:215–24.Google Scholar
Constable, M., Kritikos, A. & Bayliss, A. (2011) Grasping the concept of personal property. Cognition 119:430–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freina, L., Baroni, G., Borghi, A. M. & Nicoletti, R. (2009) Emotive concept-nouns and motor responses: Attraction or repulsion? Memory and Cognition 37:493–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, O. & Neary, K. R. (2008) Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition 107:829–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gianelli, C., Lugli, L., Baroni, G., Nicoletti, R. & Borghi, A. M. (2011) “The object is wonderful or prickly”: How different object properties modulate behavior in a joint context. In: European perspectives on cognitive science, ed. Kokinov, B., Karmiloff-Smith, A. & Nersessian, N. J.. New Bulgarian University Press. Available at: http://nbu.bg/cogs/eurocogsci2011/proceedings/Google Scholar
Gianelli, C., Scorolli, C. & Borghi, A. M. (in press) Acting in perspective: The role of body and of language as social tools. Psychological Research. doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0401-0.Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2007) The evolution of private property. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 64(1):1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanngiesser, P., Gjersoe, N. & Hood, B. M. (2010) The effect of creative labor on property-ownership transfer by preschool children and adults. Psychological Science 21:1236–41.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. & Parker, G. A. (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Animal Behaviour 24:159–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neary, K. R. (2011) Children's and adults' reasoning in property entitlement disputes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
Rochat, P. (2011) Possession and morality in early development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 132:23–38.Google Scholar
Rochat, P., Dias, M. D. G., Guo, L., MacGillivray, T., Passos-Ferreira, C., Winning, A. & Berg, B. (2009) Fairness in distributive justice by 3- and 5-year-olds across 7 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 40(3):416–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, H. S. (1996) Negotiating principles of entitlement in sibling property disputes. Developmental Psychology 32:90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossano, F., Rakoczy, H. & Tomasello, M. (2011) Young children's understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition 121:219–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M. & Tummolini, L. (2012) The owner is closer and is the first to discover objects: Exploring the embodied nature of object ownership. Paper presented at the Workshop on Concepts, Actions and Objects (CAOS 2012), Rovereto, Italy, May 24–27, 2012.Google Scholar
Tucker, M. & Ellis, R. (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24(3):830–46.Google ScholarPubMed