No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Putting the pieces together: Self-control as a complex interaction of psychological processes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 April 2021
Abstract
Ainslie's account of willpower addresses many important mechanisms (e.g., habit, visceral activation, and implementation intention). We argue that a model of willpower should be grounded in general psychological principles and with a primary focus on their interplay. We discuss the reflective-impulsive model that covers willpower and impulsiveness as special constellations of processes that govern various forms of cognition and behavior.
Information
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Creative Commons
- The target article and response article are works of the U.S. Government and are not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Deutsch, R., & Strack, F. (2020). Changing behavior using the reflective-impulsive model. In Hagger, M., Cameron, L., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. & Lintunen, T. (Eds.), The handbook of behavior change (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 164–177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108677318.012.Google Scholar
Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (2014). Dual-process theories of the social mind. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiers, R. W., Eberl, C., Rinck, M., Becker, E. S., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2011). Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science, 22, 490–497. doi: 10.1177/0956797611400615.Google ScholarPubMed
Target article
Willpower with and without effort
Related commentaries (26)
Aspiration fuels willpower: Evidence from the addiction literature
Beyond willpower
Evolving resolve
Increasing resolution in the mechanisms of resolve
Is resolve mainly about resisting hyperbolic discounting?
Is “willpower” a scientific concept? Suppressing temptation contra resolution in the face of adversity
It's not a bug, it's boredom: Effortful willpower balances exploitation and exploration
More dynamical and more symbiotic: Cortico-striatal models of resolve, suppression, and routine habit
Pleas for patience from the cumulative future self
Present-state dependency in valuation of the future
Putting the pieces together: Self-control as a complex interaction of psychological processes
Resolve is always effortful
Self-control (or willpower) seeks to bias the resolution of motivational conflicts toward an individual's long-term interests
Self-control from a multiple goal perspective of mixed reward options
Self-organization of power at will
Socializing willpower: Resolve from the outside in
Stress and imagining future selves: resolve in the hot/cool framework
Suppression, resolve, and habit in everyday financial behaviour
The complex nature of willpower and conceptual mapping of its normative significance in research on stress, addiction, and dementia
Weighting on waiting: Willpower and attribute weighting models of decision making
When will's wont wants wanting
Willpower is a form of, but not synonymous with, self-control
Willpower is overrated
Willpower needs tactical skill
Willpower through cultural tools: An example from alcoholics anonymous
Willpower without risk?
Author response
Reply to commentaries to willpower with and without effort