Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:54:23.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accurate perceptions do not need complete information to reflect reality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2017

Shabnam Mousavi  and
David C. Funder
Shabnam Mousavi
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, Washington, D.C. 20036shabnam@jhu.eduhttp://carey.jhu.edu/faculty-research/directory/shabnam-mousavi-phd/ Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, 14195 Berlin, Germanymousavi@mpib-berlin.mpg.dehttps://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/en/staff/shabnam-mousavi
David C. Funder
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521. david.funder@ucr.eduhttp://www.psych.ucr.edu/faculty/funder/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social reality of a group emerges from interpersonal perceptions and beliefs put to action under a host of environmental conditions. By extending the study of fast-and-frugal heuristics, we view social perceptions as judgment tools and assert that perceptions are ecologically rational to the degree that they adapt to the social reality. We maintain that the veracity of both stereotypes and base rates, as judgment tools, can be determined solely by accuracy research.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e12
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brunswik, E. (1952) The conceptual framework of psychology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (1987) Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin 101:75–90.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (1995a) On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review 102:652–70.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (1995b) Stereotypes, base rates, and the fundamental attribution mistake: A content-based approach to judgmental accuracy. In: Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences, ed. Jussim, L., Lee, Y.-T. & McCauley, C., pp. 141–56. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Gage, N. L. & Cronbach, L. J. (1955) Conceptual and methodological problems in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review 62:411–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gigerenzer, G. (2005) I think, therefore I err. Social Research 72:195–218. (Reprinted in Psychologica 2006:93–110).Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. & Todd, P. M. (2008) Rationality the fast and frugal way: Introduction. In: Handbook of experimental economics results: Vol. 1 (Handbooks in Economics No. 28), ed. Plott, C. R. & Smith, V. L., pp. 976–86. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. & Todd, P. M. (2012) Ecological rationality: The normative study of heuristics. In: Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world, ed. Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G. & the ABC Research Grouppp. 487–97. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M. & the ABC Research Group (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jussim, L. (2012) Social perception and social reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. (1955) The psychology of personal constructs: Vol. I. A theory of personality. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Krueger, J. I. & Funder, D. C. (2004) Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(3):313–27.Google Scholar
Mousavi, S. & Gigerenzer, G. (2011) Revisiting the “error” in studies of cognitive errors. In: Errors in organizations, ed. Hofmann, D. A. & Frese, M., pp. 97–112. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Neth, H. & Gigerenzer, G. (2015) Heuristics: Tools for an uncertain world. In: Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences, ed. Scott, R. & Kosslyn, S., pp. 1–18. Wiley. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0394 Google Scholar
Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G. & the ABC Research Group (2012) Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982) Evidential impact of base rates. In: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, ed. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A., pp. 153–60. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar