Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-bzm8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-23T06:24:25.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The puzzle of ideography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2022

Olivier Morin Open the ORCID record for Olivier Morin [Opens in a new window]
Olivier Morin*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology, Minds and Traditions Research Group, Jena, Germany morin@shh.mpg.de; https://www.shh.mpg.de/94549/themintgroup Institut Jean Nicod, CNRS, ENS, PSL University, Paris, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An ideography is a general-purpose code made of pictures that do not encode language, which can be used autonomously – not just as a mnemonic prop – to encode information on a broad range of topics. Why are viable ideographies so hard to find? I contend that self-sufficient graphic codes need to be narrowly specialized. Writing systems are only an apparent exception: At their core, they are notations of a spoken language. Even if they also encode nonlinguistic information, they are useless to someone who lacks linguistic competence in the encoded language or a related one. The versatility of writing is thus vicarious: Writing borrows it from spoken language. Why is it so difficult to build a fully generalist graphic code? The most widespread answer points to a learnability problem. We possess specialized cognitive resources for learning spoken language, but lack them for graphic codes. I argue in favor of a different account: What is difficult about graphic codes is not so much learning or teaching them as getting every user to learn and teach the same code. This standardization problem does not affect spoken or signed languages as much. Those are based on cheap and transient signals, allowing for easy online repairing of miscommunication, and require face-to-face interactions where the advantages of common ground are maximized. Graphic codes lack these advantages, which makes them smaller in size and more specialized.

Keywords

graphic communicationideographyliteracynumerical notationsrepairsemasiographysemioticssign languagewriting

Information

Type
Target Article
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e233
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acerbi, A., Tennie, C., & Mesoudi, A. (2016). Social learning solves the problem of narrow-peaked search landscapes: Experimental evidence in humans. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160215. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthur, W. B. (1990). Positive feedbacks in the economy. Scientific American, 262(2), 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Baines, J. (2007). Visual and written culture in ancient Egypt. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Banham, D. (2015). The old English monastic sign language. In Bakken Jepsen, J., Lutalo-Kingii, S., De Clerck, G., & McGregor, W. (Eds.), Sign languages of the world a comparative handbook (pp. 901–910). De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Battestini, S. (2006). L’écriture nsibidi de la Cross River Region (Nigeria). In Battestini, S. (Ed.), De l’écrit africain à l'oral: Le phénomène graphique africain (pp. 245–262). L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. S. (2018). Cantonese as written language in Hong Kong. Global Chinese, 4(1), 103–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/glochi-2018-0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., & Gerwing, J. (2011). The listener as addressee in face-to-face dialogue. International Journal of Listening, 25(3), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2010.508675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. V., & Paegle, A. (2021). Ethnic markers and how to find them: An ethnographic investigation of marker presence, recognition, and social information. Human Nature, 32(2), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-021-09401-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blissymbols. (2022). Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blissymbols&oldid=1086221021Google Scholar
Boltz, W. G. (1993). The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system. American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Boone, E. H. (1994). Aztec pictorial histories: Records without words. In Boone, E. H. & Mignolo, W. (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 50–76). Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Boone, E. H., & Mignolo, W. (1994). Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. (1962). On interpretation (Cajetan, T. de V. & Oesterle, J. T., Eds.). Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, C. A., & Smith, K. (2012). Cultural evolution and perpetuation of arbitrary communicative conventions in experimental microsocieties. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043807CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casati, R. (2016). The structure of standard music notation. In Zaibert, L. (Ed.), The theory and practice of ontology (pp. 187–201). Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55278-5_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Changizi, M., Zhang, Q., Ye, H., & Shimojo, S. (2006). The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. The American Naturalist, 167(5), E117–E139. https://doi.org/10.1086/502806CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, P., & Ping, C. (1999). Modern Chinese: History and sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, T. (2016). Stories of your life and others. Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Chouteau, M., Arias, M., & Joron, M. (2016). Warning signals are under positive frequency-dependent selection in nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(8), 2164–2169. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519216113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrisomalis, S. (2020). Reckonings: Numerals, cognition, and history. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohn, N. (2013). The visual language of comics: Introduction to the structure and cognition of sequential images. A&C Black.Google Scholar
Cooperrider, K., & Gentner, D. (2019). The career of measurement. Cognition, 191, 103942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coulmas, F. (1996a). Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1996b). Typology of writing systems. In Gunther, H. & Ludwig, O. (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit (pp. 1380–1387). De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164597Google Scholar
Cowan, R., & Hultén, S. (1996). Escaping lock-in: The case of the electric vehicle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(96)00059-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2017). Evolutionary complexity of social cognition, semasiographic systems, and language. In Coupé, C., Pellegrino, F., & Mufwene, S. S. (Eds.), Complexity in language: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 101–134). Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107294264.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Częstochowska, J., Gligorić, K., Peyrard, M., Mentha, Y., Bień, M., Grütter, A., … West, R. (2022). On the context-free ambiguity of emoji. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 16, 1388–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damerow, P. (2006). The origins of writing as a problem of historical epistemology. Cuneiform Digital Library Journal, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. T., & Bright, W. (1996). The world's writing systems. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
David, P., & Rothwell, G. (1996). Standardization, diversity and learning: Strategies for the coevolution of technology and industrial capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(2), 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.Google Scholar
Davis, J. (2015). Plain Indians sign language. In Bakken Jepsen, J., De Clerck, G., Lutalo-Kingii, S., & McGregor, W. (Eds.), Sign languages of the world: A comparative handbook (pp. 911–931). De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayrell, E. (1911). Further notes on “Nsibidi signs with their meanings from the Ikom district, southern Nigeria.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 41, 521–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/2843186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. University of Hawai'i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFrancis, J., & Unger, J. M. (2009). Rejoinder to Geoffrey Sampson, “Chinese script and the diversity of writing systems.” Linguistics, 32(3), 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.3.549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S. (2010). Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. Viking.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56(2), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meaning of life. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & von Grumbkow, J. (2008). Emoticons and online message interpretation. Social Science Computer Review, 26(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307311611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, F. (2011). Course in general linguistics. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dideriksen, C., Christiansen, M. H., Tylén, K., Dingemanse, M., & Fusaroli, R. (2023). Quantifying the interplay of conversational devices in building mutual understanding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(3), 864–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
du Ponceau, P. S. (1838). A dissertation on the nature and character of the Chinese system of writing. To which are subjoined a vocabulary of the Cochin Chinese language by J. Morrone [&c.]. (J. M. Morrone, Ed.). American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2017). How we talk: The inner workings of conversation. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D. (2020). Hierarchy processing in human neurobiology: How specific is it? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1789), 20180391. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fusaroli, R., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K. (2014). Dialog as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galantucci, B., Kroos, C., & Rhodes, T. (2010). The effects of rapidity of fading on communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T. (2007). Foundations of representation: Where might graphical symbol systems come from? Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701703659CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawne, L., & McCulloch, G. (2019). Emoji as digital gestures. Language@Internet, 17(2), 1–10. https://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2019/gawneGoogle Scholar
Gelb, I. J. (1963). A study of writing. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Brentari, D. (2017). Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, E46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15001247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldin-Meadow, S., McNeill, D., & Singleton, J. (1996). Silence is liberating: Removing the handcuffs on grammatical expression in the manual modality. Psychological Review, 103(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Granito, C., Tehrani, J., Kendal, J., & Scott-Phillips, T. (2019). Style of pictorial representation is shaped by intergroup contact. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 1, E8. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, J. (2007). Drawn from the ground: Sound, sign and inscription in central Australian sand stories. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griaule, M., & Dieterlen, G. (1951). Signes graphiques soudanais. Hermann.Google Scholar
Guilbeault, D., Baronchelli, A., & Centola, D. (2021). Experimental evidence for scale-induced category convergence across populations. Nature Communications, 12(1), 327. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20037-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handel, Z. (2015). Logography and the classification of writing systems: A response to Unger. Scripta, 7, 109–150.Google Scholar
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heintz, C., & Scott-Phillips, T. (2022). Expression unleashed: The evolutionary & cognitive foundations of human communication: Version December 2021. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, E1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22000012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A A. (1967). The typology of writing systems. In Austin, W. M. (Ed.), Papers in linguistics in honor of Léon Dostert (pp. 92–99). Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshorn, E. A., & Harris, L. N. (2022). Culture is not destiny, for reading: Highlighting variable routes to literacy within writing systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1513(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houston, S. D. (2004). The archaeology of communication technologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, M. D. (2006). Of glyphs and glottography. Language & Communication, 26(3), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1964). On visual and auditory signs. Phonetica, 11(3–4), 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1159/000258396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jee, H., Tamariz, M., & Shillcock, R. (2022). Systematicity in language and the fast and slow creation of writing systems: Understanding two types of non-arbitrary relations between orthographic characters and their canonical pronunciation. Cognition, 226, 105197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, P. (2019). Australian message sticks: Old questions, new directions. Journal of Material Culture, 25(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183519858375Google Scholar
Kelly, P., Winters, J., Miton, H., & Morin, O. (2021). The predictable evolution of letter shapes: An emergent script of West Africa recapitulates historical change in writing systems. Current Anthropology, 62(6), 669–691. https://doi.org/10.1086/717779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Paek, T. S. (1998). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S., Tamariz, M., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2015). Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure. Cognition, 141, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowlson, J. R. (1965). The idea of gesture as a universal language in the XVIIth and XVIIIth centuries. Journal of the History of Ideas, 26(4), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, H. (1991). Comment: Dr. Harlan and Mr. Lane. In Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception: Proceedings of a conference to Honor Alvin M. Liberman (pp. 171–174). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). The development of cognitive constraints on notations. Archives de Psychologie, 64(248), 3–26.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2006). On the human “interaction engine.” In Levinson, S. C. & Enfield, N. J. (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 39–69). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Li, D. C. S. (2006). Chinese as lingua franca in greater China. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190506000080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Peng, D., Liu, L., Booth, J. R., & Ding, G. (2014). Brain activation during phonological and semantic processing of Chinese characters in deaf signers. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–11. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, A. M. (1992). The relation of speech to reading and writing. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Advances in psychology (Vol. 94, pp. 167–178). North-Holland. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62794-6Google Scholar
Lin, T.-J., & Biggs, M. (2006). A preliminary study of learnable pictogram languages. IADE. Retrieved from http://uhra.herts.ac.uk/handle/2299/7435Google Scholar
Liu, X., Vermeylen, L., Wisniewski, D., & Brysbaert, M. (2020). The contribution of phonological information to visual word recognition: Evidence from Chinese phonetic radicals. Cortex, 133, 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lock, A., & Gers, M. (2012). The cultural evolution of written language and its effects a Darwinian process from prehistory to the modern day. In Grigorenko, E., Mambrino, E., & Preiss, D. (Eds.), Writing: A mosaic of new perspectives (pp. 11–36). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lurie, D B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the Critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26(3), 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macgregor, J. K. (1909). Some notes on Nsibidi. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 39, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.2307/2843292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallery, G. (1879). Sign language among North American Indians compared with that among other peoples and deaf-mutes. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mallery, G., & Ethnology, S. I. B. of A. (1886). Pictographs of the North American Indians: A preliminary paper. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Matsunaga, S. (1996). The linguistic nature of kanji reexamined: Do kanji represent only meanings? The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, 30(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/489563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, I. G. (1972). Reading, the linguistic process, and linguistic awareness. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Mattingly, I. G. (Eds.), Language by hand and by ear: The relationship between speech and reading (pp. 133–148). MIT Press.Google Scholar
McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J.-R., Liu, H., Wagner, R. K., Shu, H., Zhou, A., … Muse, A. (2005). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(2), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBride-Chang, C., Tong, X., Shu, H., Wong, A. M.-Y., Leung, K., & Tardif, T. (2008). Syllable, phoneme, and tone: Psycholinguistic units in early Chinese and English word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430801917290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1992). Linguistic aspects of musical and mathematical notation. In Downing, P., Lima, S. D., & Noonan, M. (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 169–190). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meissner, M., Philpott, S. B., & Philpott, D. (1975). The sign language of sawmill workers in British Columbia. Sign Language Studies, 9, 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A., & Thornton, A. (2018). What is cumulative cultural evolution? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1880), 20180712. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, H., Thebault-Spieker, J., Chang, S., Johnson, I., Terveen, L., & Hecht, B. (2016). “Blissfully happy” or “ready to fight.” Proceedings of the 10th international conference on web and social media, ICWSM 2016, pp. 259–268.Google Scholar
Mohr, S. (2015). Tshaukak'ui – hunting signs of the Ts'ixa in northern Botswana. In Bakken Jepsen, J., De Clerck, G., Lutalo-Kingii, S., & McGregor, W. (Eds.), Sign languages of the world (pp. 933–953). De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, O. (2018). Spontaneous emergence of legibility in writing systems: The case of orientation anisotropy. Cognitive Science, 42(3), 664–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12550CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morin, O., Kelly, P., & Winters, J. (2020). Writing, graphic codes, and asynchronous communication. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12, 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12386CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morin, O., & Miton, H. (2018). Detecting wholesale copying in cultural evolution. Evolution & Human Behavior, 39(4), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, O., Müller, T. F., Morisseau, T., & Winters, J. (2022). Cultural evolution of precise and agreed-upon semantic conventions in a multiplayer gaming app. Cognitive Science, 46(2), e13113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, I. (2014). The measure of civilization: How social development decides the fate of nations (new edition). Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okrent, A. (2010). In the land of invented languages: Adventures in linguistic creativity, madness, and genius. Random House.Google Scholar
Olson, D. (1991). Literacy as metalinguistic activity. In Olson, D. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 251–269). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pagel, M., Beaumont, M., Meade, A., Verkerk, A., & Calude, A. (2019). Dominant words rise to the top by positive frequency-dependent selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(15), 7397–7402. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816994116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1939). Studies in iconology: Humanistic themes in the art of the renaissance. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pastoureau, M. (2007). Traité d'héraldique (5e edn.). Editions A & J Picard.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. N. (2013). Universal reading processes are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning and Development, 9(4), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2013.813828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petitto, L. A., Langdon, C., Stone, A., Andriola, D., Kartheiser, G., & Cochran, C. (2016). Visual sign phonology: Insights into human reading and language from a natural soundless phonology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 7(6), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1404CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2021). Understanding dialogue: Language use and social interaction. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, M. (1999). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Quay, S. (2015). Monastic sign language from medieval to modern times. In Bakken Jepsen, J., Lutalo-Kingii, S., De Clerck, G., & McGregor, W. (Eds.), Sign languages of the world a comparative handbook (pp. 871–900). De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramus, F. (2004). The neural basis of reading acquisition. In Gazzania, S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 815–824). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Regier, T., Kemp, C., & Kay, P. (2015). Word meanings across languages support efficient communication. In MacWhinney, B., & O'Grady, W. (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 237–263). John Wiley. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346136.ch11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggsby, A. (2019). Mosaics of knowledge: Representing information in the Roman world. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, P. (2000). Logic and the art of memory: The quest for a universal language. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic Introduction. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (2017). The linguistics delusion. Equinox.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. (2009). What comes first in language emergence? In Enfield, N. J. (Ed.), Dependencies in language (pp. 63–84). Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Georgetown University Press. Retrieved from https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/555474/GURT_1981.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, P. (2018). What is super semantics? Philosophical Perspectives, 32(1), 365–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D. (2007). When writing met art: From symbol to story (1st edn.). University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, T., Reilhac, C., & McCloskey, M. (2018). Knowledge about writing influences reading: Dynamic visual information about letter production facilitates letter identification. Cortex, 103, 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott-Phillips, T. (2014). Speaking our minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevcik, R., Romski, M. A., & Wilkinson, K. (1991). Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for persons with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619112331275873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevcik, R. A., Barton-Hulsey, A., Romski, M., & Hyatt Fonseca, A. (2018). Visual-graphic symbol acquisition in school age children with developmental and language delays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(4), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1522547CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Severi, C. (2012). The arts of memory: Comparative perspectives on a mental artifact. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2(2), 451–485. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.2.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severi, C. (2019). Their way of memorizing: Mesoamerican writings and native American picture-writings. Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 71–72, 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1086/706117Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (2010). Signals: Evolution, learning, and information. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. (2008). Cantonese as written standard? Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 18(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.18.2.05snoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10587–10592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamariz, M., & Kirby, S. (2015). Culture: Copying, compression, and conventionality. Cognitive Science, 39(1), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, I., Taylor, M. M., & Taylor, M. M. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, T. J. (2000). Language constructing language: The implications of reflexivity for linguistic theory. Language Sciences, 22(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00016-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tigwell, G. W., & Flatla, D. R. (2016). Oh that's what you meant! MobileHCI ’16 Proceedings of the 18th international conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services adjunct, MobileHCI 2016, pp. 859–866. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2961844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turoman, N., & Styles, S. J. (2017). Glyph guessing for “oo” and “ee”: Spatial frequency information in sound symbolic matching for ancient and unfamiliar scripts. Royal Society Open Science, 4(9), 170882. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170882CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unger, J. M. (2003). Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of disembodied meaning. University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Unger, J. M., & DeFrancis, J. (1995). Logographic and semasiographic writing systems: A critique of Sampson's classification. In Taylor, I. & Olson, D. R. (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (pp. 45–58). Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1162-1_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valério, M., & Ferrara, S. (2019). Rebus and acrophony in invented writing. Writing Systems Research, 11(1), 66–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2020.1724239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergriff, I. (2013). Emotive communication online: A contextual analysis of computer-mediated communication (CMC) cues. Journal of Pragmatics, 51, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. (2022). Universals in learning to read across languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1938575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Zirps, F. A., Edwards, A. A., Wood, S. G., Joyner, R. E., Becker, B. J., … Beal, B. (2020). The prevalence of dyslexia: A new approach to its estimation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420920377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, H. (2014). Writing and the ancient state: Early China in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wengrow, D. (2008). Prehistories of commodity branding. Current Anthropology, 49(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/523676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and non-verbal communication (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, J. (2011). The ubiquity of the gloss. Scripta, 3, 95–121.Google Scholar
Winters, J., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2018). Contextual predictability shapes signal autonomy. Cognition, 176, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winters, J., & Morin, O. (2019). From context to code: Information transfer constrains the emergence of graphic codes. Cognitive Science, 43(3), e12722. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12722CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Chinese characters are read using not only visual but also writing motor information. Psychophysiology, 58(1), e13696. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagala, S. (2004). Vanuatu sand drawing. Museum International, 56(1–2), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00455.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalta, E. N. (2022). Gottlob Frege. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2022). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/frege/Google Scholar
Zhang, H., & Mace, R. (2021). Cultural extinction in evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 3, E30. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed