Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-22T12:32:15.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cognitive account of the puzzle of ideography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2023

Xerxes D. Arsiwalla Open the ORCID record for Xerxes D. Arsiwalla [Opens in a new window]
Xerxes D. Arsiwalla*
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain x.d.arsiwalla@gmail.com Wolfram Research, Champaign, IL, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We posit a cognitive account of the puzzle of ideography, which complements the standardization account of Morin. Efficient standardization of spoken language is phenomenologically attributed to a modality effect coupled with chunking of cognitive representations, further aided by multisensory integration and the serialized nature of attention. These mechanisms explain why languages dominate graphic codes for general-purpose communication.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e235
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baars, B. J. (1998). Metaphors of consciousness and attention in the brain. Trends in Neurosciences, 21(2), 58–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Groot, A. D. (1968). Thought and choice in chess. In Warson, P. C. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (Eds.), Thinking and reasoning (pp. 145–151). Penguin.Google Scholar
Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F., Lane, P. C., Croker, S., Cheng, P. C., Jones, G., Oliver, I., & Pine, J. M. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 236–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hershenson, M. (1962). Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, N. F. (1970). The role of chunking and organization in the process of recall. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 4, pp. 171–247). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Laird, J. E., Rosenbloom, P. S., & Newell, A. (1984). Towards chunking as a general learning mechanism. In AAAI'84: Proceedings of the Fourth Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, Texas, USA, August 1984, pp. 188–192.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murdock, B. B. Jr (1968). Modality effects in short-term memory: Storage or retrieval?. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(1), 79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pashler, H., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory and Cognition, 17(4), 398–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Fürstenberg, A., Scheiter, K., & Zindler, A. (2011). The perceptual basis of the modality effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(2), 159.Google ScholarPubMed
Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 592.Google Scholar
Stein, B. E., Meredith, M. A., Huneycutt, W. S., & McDade, L. (1989). Behavioral indices of multisensory integration: Orientation to visual cues is affected by auditory stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 12–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabbers, H. K., Martens, R. L., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. (2001). The modality effect in multimedia instructions. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2001, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, Vol. 23, pp. 1024–1029.Google Scholar