Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bkrcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T00:41:39.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The benefits of an evolutionary framework for the investigation of teaching behaviour: Emphasis should be taken off humans as a benchmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Amanda R. Ridley
Affiliation:
Centre of Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. Amanda.ridley@uwa.edu.au Benjamin.ashton@research.uwa.edu.au www.babbler-research.com http://www.ceb.uwa.edu.au/research/profiles?profile/1/id/4130 Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, WC 7701, South Africa.
Benjamin J. Ashton
Affiliation:
Centre of Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. Amanda.ridley@uwa.edu.au Benjamin.ashton@research.uwa.edu.au www.babbler-research.com http://www.ceb.uwa.edu.au/research/profiles?profile/1/id/4130

Abstract

We agree with Kline that a lack of unification is preventing progress in understanding the occurrence of teaching behaviour and the selective pressures influencing its presence. However, we feel that the proposed framework, which incorporates mentalistic and cultural approaches, continues to overlook cases of teaching in nonhuman animals. We advocate the comparative functionalist framework to identify the proximate causes of teaching behaviour in both humans and other animals.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable