Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-2r2wp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T21:41:11.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanistic disunity as attention in crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2025

Wayne Wu Open the ORCID record for Wayne Wu [Opens in a new window]
Wayne Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA waynewu@pitt.edu
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While I agree with Rosenholtz that attention as mechanism should often be “banned”—this conception is confused and often explanatorily useless—I suggest that the real crisis is the proliferation of different, too often underspecified, mechanisms as attention. Attention is not an explainer. It is what we are trying to explain. Confusion on this point leads to unnecessary theoretical disunity.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e160
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, B. (2011). There is no such thing as attention. Frontiers in Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 2, 246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00246 Google Scholar
Anderson, B. A., Kim, H., Kim, A. J., Liao, M.-R., Mrkonja, L., Clement, A., & Grégoire, L. (2021). The past, present, and future of selection history. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 130, 326–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisley, J. W., & Mirpour, K. (2019). The neural instantiation of a priority map. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hommel, B., Chapman, C. S., Cisek, P., Neyedli, H. F., Song, J.-H., & Welsh, T. N. (2019). No one knows what attention is. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 81(7), 2288–2303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krauzlis, R. J., Bollimunta, A., Arcizet, F., & Wang, L. (2014). Attention as an effect not a cause. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(9), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, W. (2023). Movements of the Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, W. (2024). We know what attention is!. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(4), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.11.007 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, W. (2025). Attention. (2nd ed.) Routledge.Google ScholarPubMed