Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-xh428 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T11:33:40.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is attention a theory?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2025

Rachel N. Denison Open the ORCID record for Rachel N. Denison [Opens in a new window]
Rachel N. Denison*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA rdenison@bu.edu
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rosenholtz describes “attention theory” as a scientific paradigm in crisis, in the Kuhnian sense. But is attention a theory? Here, I question this premise. Although there can be theories of attentional phenomena, attention is not a theory. Rather, like memory and emotion, attention is a psychological concept that captures a broad class of phenomena, requiring multiple mechanistic explanations.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e136
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anton-Erxleben, K., & Carrasco, M. (2013). Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: Linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(3), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3443 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00327 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briggs, F. (2020). Role of feedback connections in central visual processing. Annual Review of Vision Science, 6, 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-121219-081716 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51(13), 1484–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 43(4), 859–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749108400960 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denison, R. N. (2024). Visual temporal attention from perception to computation. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3, 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00294-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, R. N., Carrasco, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2021). A dynamic normalization model of temporal attention. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 1674–1685. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01129-1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denison, R. N., Heeger, D. J., & Carrasco, M. (2017). Attention flexibly trades off across points in time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(2), 1142–1151. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1216-1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dugué, L., Merriam, E. P., Heeger, D. J., & Carrasco, M. (2020). Differential impact of endogenous and exogenous attention on activity in human visual cortex. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 21274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78172-x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrmann, K., Heeger, D. J., & Carrasco, M. (2012). Feature-based attention enhances performance by increasing response gain. Vision Research, 74, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.04.016 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrmann, K., Montaser-Kouhsari, L., Carrasco, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2010). When size matters: Attention affects performance by contrast or response gain. Nature Neuroscience, 13(12), 1554–1559. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2669 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Jing, C., Jin, H., Li, W., Wu, Z., Chen, Y., & Huang, D. (2022). Temporal attention affects contrast response function by response gain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 1020260. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.1020260 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, K. N., Weiner, K. S., & Grill-Spector, K. (2015). Attention reduces spatial uncertainty in human ventral temporal cortex. Current Biology, 25(5), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.050 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, H., & Anderson, B. A. (2019). Dissociable components of experience-driven attention. Current Biology, 29(5), 841–845 e842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.030 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Li, H. H., Hanning, N. M., & Carrasco, M. (2021). To look or not to look: Dissociating presaccadic and covert spatial attention. Trends in Neurosciences, 44(8), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2021.05.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, T. (2019). Feature-based attention: Effects and control. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.013 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maunsell, J. H. R. (2015). Neuronal mechanisms of visual attention. Annual Review of Vision Science, 1, 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035431 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAlonan, K., Cavanaugh, J., & Wurtz, R. H. (2008). Guarding the gateway to cortex with attention in visual thalamus. Nature, 456(7220), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07382 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montagna, B., Pestilli, F., & Carrasco, M. (2009). Attention trades off spatial acuity. Vision Research, 49(7), 735–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motter, B. C. (1993). Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70(3), 909–919. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1993.70.3.909 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.315 Google ScholarPubMed
Ni, A. M., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2019). Neuronal effects of spatial and feature attention differ due to normalization. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(28), 5493–5505. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2106-18.2019 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nobre, A. C., & van Ede, F. (2023). Attention in flux. Neuron, 111(7), 971–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2023.02.032 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pestilli, F., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations. Vision Research, 45(14), 1867–1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.019 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeves, A. (2020). Attention as a unitary concept. Vision, 4, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision4040048 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, J. H., & Heeger, D. J. (2009). The normalization model of attention. Neuron, 61(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenholtz, R. (2025). Visual attention in crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X24000323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, A. (2006). How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition, 14(4–8), 411–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500195250 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, A. L., Rolfs, M., & Carrasco, M. (2015). Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention. Journal of Vision, 15(14), 7, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.14.7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed