Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-h8lrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T05:05:21.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

It's the biology, stupid! Proxy failures in economic decision making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2024

Pier Luigi Sacco Open the ORCID record for Pier Luigi Sacco [Opens in a new window]
Pier Luigi Sacco*
Affiliation:
Biobehavioral Arts & Culture for Health, Sustainability & Social Cohesion (BACH) Center, University of Chieti-Pescara Viale Pindaro, Pescara, Italy metaLAB (at) Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USAhttps://www.unich.it/ugov/person/1902 pierluigi_sacco@fas.harvard.edu; https://pierluigisacco.eu
*
Corresponding author: Pier Luigi Sacco; Email: pierluigi.sacco@unich.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Utilitarian characterizations of economic decision making fail to capture the complex, conditional, and heterogeneous motivations underlying human behavior as shaped by the predictive, multicriterial drivers of biological regulation. Unless economic models start to acknowledge that humans have bodies and a biology with its own adaptive logic and tradeoffs, economic policies will be systematically exposed to, and systematic generators of, proxy failures.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e82
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abler, B., Walter, H., Erk, S., Kammerer, H., & Spitzer, M. (2006). Prediction error as a linear function of reward probability is coded in human nucleus accumbens. NeuroImage, 31(2), 790–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2015). Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron, 86(3), 646–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glimcher, P. W. (2011). Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: The dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(S3), 15647–15654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., & Figueira, J. R. (Eds.) (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquereau, B., & Turner, R. S. (2013). Limited encoding of effort by dopamine neurons in a cost-benefit trade-off task. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(19), 8288–8300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulkin, J., & Sterling, P. (2019). Allostasis: A brain-centered, predictive mode of physiological regulation. Trends in Neurosciences, 42(10), 740–752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sennesh, E., Theriault, J., Brooks, D., van de Meent, J. W., Feldman Barrett, L., & Quigley, K. S. (2022). Interoception as modeling, allostasis as control. Biological Psychology, 167, 108242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sigot, N. (2002). Jevons's debt to Bentham: Mathematical economy, morals and psychology. The Manchester School, 70(2), 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, P. (2012). Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation. Physiology & Behavior, 106(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, P. (2020). What is health? Allostasis and the evolution of human design. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar