Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-72crv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T15:27:56.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing the incentive structure of social media may reduce online proxy failure and proliferation of negativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2024

Claire E. Robertson Open the ORCID record for Claire E. Robertson [Opens in a new window] ,
Kareena del Rosario ,
Steve Rathje  and
Jay J. Van Bavel
Claire E. Robertson*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA kareena.delrosario@nyu.edu; sr6276@nyu.edu; jay.vanbavel@nyu.edu
Kareena del Rosario
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA kareena.delrosario@nyu.edu; sr6276@nyu.edu; jay.vanbavel@nyu.edu
Steve Rathje
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA kareena.delrosario@nyu.edu; sr6276@nyu.edu; jay.vanbavel@nyu.edu
Jay J. Van Bavel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA kareena.delrosario@nyu.edu; sr6276@nyu.edu; jay.vanbavel@nyu.edu Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA Department of Strategy and Management, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway
*
Corresponding author: Claire E. Robertson; Email: cer493@nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social media takes advantage of people's predisposition to attend to threatening stimuli by promoting content in algorithms that capture attention. However, this content is often not what people expressly state they would like to see. We propose that social media companies should weigh users’ expressed preferences more heavily in algorithms. We propose modest changes to user interfaces that could reduce the abundance of threatening content in the online environment.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e81
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beknazar-Yuzbashev, G., Jiménez Durán, R., McCrosky, J., & Stalinski, M. (2022). Toxic content and user engagement on social media: Evidence from a field experiment. Available at SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4307346Google Scholar
Brady, W. J., Crockett, M. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). The MAD model of moral contagion: The role of motivation, attention, and design in the spread of moralized content online. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 978–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, W. J., Gantman, A. P., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). Attentional capture helps explain why moral and emotional content go viral. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(4), 746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, W. J., McLoughlin, K., Doan, T. N., & Crockett, M. J. (2021). How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks. Science Advances, 7(33), eabe5641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(28), 7313–7318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockett, M. J. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(11), 769–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2003). On wildebeests and humans: The preferential detection of negative stimuli. Psychological Science, 14(1), 14–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition & Emotion, 14(1), 61–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Globig, L. K., Holtz, N., & Sharot, T. (2023). Changing the incentive structure of social media platforms to halt the spread of misinformation. eLife, 12, e85767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J. W., Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2021). The distorting prism of social media: How self-selection and exposure to incivility fuel online comment toxicity. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 922–946. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milli, S., Carroll, M., Pandey, S., Wang, Y., & Dragan, A. D. (2023) Engagement, user satisfaction, and the amplification of divisive content on social media. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.16941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pretus, C., Servin-Barthet, C., Harris, E. A., Brady, W. J., Vilarroya, O., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2023). The role of political devotion in sharing partisan misinformation and resistance to fact-checking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(11), 3116–3134. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001436CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rathje, S., Robertson, C., Brady, W. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (in press). People think that social media platforms do (but should not) amplify divisive content. Perspectives on Psychological Science.Google Scholar
Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J., & Van Der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(26), e2024292118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, C. E., Pröllochs, N., Schwarzenegger, K., Pärnamets, P., Van Bavel, J. J., & Feuerriegel, S. (2023). Negativity drives online news consumption. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(5), 812–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roose, K., Isaac, M., & Frenkel, S. (2020). Facebook struggles to balance civility and growth. The New York Times, 24.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhay, E., Bello-Pardo, E., & Maurer, B. (2018). The polarizing effects of online partisan criticism: Evidence from two experiments. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740697CrossRefGoogle Scholar