Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T22:01:43.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why would the discovery of gestures produced by signers jeopardize the experimental finding of gesture-speech mismatch?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2017

Timothy Koschmann
Timothy Koschmann*
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Department of Medical Education, Springfield, IL 62794-9681. tkoschmann@siumed.edu http://siumed.academia.edu/tdk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mismatch occurs when there is a discrepancy between produced gestures and co-occurring speech. In this commentary, I explore why research on mismatch might be called into question by changing views of what constitutes a gesture. I argue that the experimental procedure for producing mismatch, through its coding methods, is blind to the tight temporal coordination of gesture and affiliated talk.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e60
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alibali, M. W. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993) Gesture–speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child's state of mind. Cognitive Psychology 25:468–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calbris, G. (2011) Elements of meaning in gesture, trans. Copple, M. M.. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. (2005) Gesture in signing: A case study from Taiwan sign language. Language and Linguistics 6(2):279–318.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Shield, A., Lenzen, D., Herzog, M. & Padden, C. (2012) The gestures ASL signers use tell us when they are ready to learn math. Cognition 123(3):448–53. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027712000327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hindmarsh, J. & Heath, C. (2000) Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32:1855–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koschmann, T. (2002) Dewey's critique of Thorndike's behaviorism. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., Zemel, A. & Dunnington, G. (2007) Formulating the triangle of doom. Gesture 7:97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K. & Metzger, M. (1998) Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30:657–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1968) Ontological relativity. Journal of Philosophy 65:185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2009) Gesturecraft: The manufacture of meaning. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar