Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T23:36:25.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward true integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2017

Joana Rosselló ,
Otávio Mattos  and
Wolfram Hinzen
Joana Rosselló
Affiliation:
Department of Catalan Philology and General Linguistics, Universitat de Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain. joana.rossello@ub.edu
Otávio Mattos
Affiliation:
Cognitive Development Center, Central European University, 1051 Budapest, Hungary. mattos_otavio@phd.ceu.edu
Wolfram Hinzen
Affiliation:
ICREA (Catalan Institute for Advanced Studies and Research), 08010 Barcelona, Spain. Department of Translation and Language Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08018 Barcelona, Spain. wolfram.hinzen@upf.edu https://sites.google.com/site/wolframhinzen/ FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalaries Research Foundation, 08830 Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. Philosophy Department, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3HN, England, United Kingdom.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whether in sign or speech, language is more integrative than the target article suggests. A more integrative view embraces not only sign/speech and co-sign/speech gesture, but also indicative gestures irrespective of modality, and locations along with movements in the signed modality, as suggested by both linguistic acquisition and pathologies. An extended integrative view also proves advantageous in terms of conceptual coherence.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e70
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alibali, M. W. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993) Gesture–speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child's state of mind. Cognitive Psychology 25:468–523.Google Scholar
Cartmill, E. A., Hunsicker, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014) Pointing and naming are not redundant: Children use gesture to modify nouns before they modify nouns in speech. Developmental Psychology 50(6):1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatzidamianos, G. (2013) Language in profoundly deaf people with schizophrenia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. & Reilly, J. S. (2013) Language, gesture, and space. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. & Morford, M. (1985) Gesture in early child language: Studies of deaf and hearing children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-):145–76.Google Scholar
Klima, E. & Bellugi, U. (1979) The signs of language. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mattos, O. & Hinzen, W. (2015) The linguistic roots of natural pedagogy. Frontiers in Psychology 6.Google Scholar
Mizuno, A., Liu, Y., Williams, D. L., Keller, T. a, Minshew, N. J. & Just, M. A. (2011) The neural basis of deictic shifting in linguistic perspective-taking in high-functioning autism. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 134(Pt 8):2422–35. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr151.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009) When gesture-speech combinations do and do not index linguistic change. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(2):190–217.Google Scholar