Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-x2lbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T07:46:44.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of cultural group selection in explaining human cooperation is a hard case to prove

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Ruth Mace
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1H 0BW, United Kingdom. r.mace@ucl.ac.uk antonio.silva.09@ucl.ac.uk http://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropology/people/academic_staff/r_mace http://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropology/people/graduate_students/a_silva
Antonio S. Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1H 0BW, United Kingdom. r.mace@ucl.ac.uk antonio.silva.09@ucl.ac.uk http://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropology/people/academic_staff/r_mace http://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropology/people/graduate_students/a_silva

Abstract

We believe cultural group selection is an elegant theoretical framework to study the evolution of complex human behaviours, including large-scale cooperation. However, the empirical evidence on key theoretical issues – such as levels of within- and between-group variation and effects of intergroup competition – is so far patchy, with no clear case where all the relevant assumptions and predictions of cultural group selection are met, to the exclusion of other explanations.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable