Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-t6st2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T04:56:43.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multi-level selection, social signaling, and the evolution of human suffering gestures: The example of pain behaviors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Jacob M. Vigil  and
Eric Kruger
Jacob M. Vigil
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131–1161. vigilJ@unm.edu esk@unm.edu http://www.unm.edu/~psych/faculty/sm_vigil.html
Eric Kruger
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131–1161. vigilJ@unm.edu esk@unm.edu http://www.unm.edu/~psych/faculty/sm_vigil.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pain suffering has been naturally selected to be experienced and expressed within a wider social system. The communication of pain improves group coordination and decision-making about engaging in resource dependent and potentially risky endeavors. Recent findings warrant the development of a cohesive framework for understanding the reciprocal nature of pain expression and individual and group-level outcomes that can generate novel predictions on the heuristical expression of human suffering in naturalistic and clinical settings.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e56
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cikara, M., Bruneau, E., Van Bavel, J. J. & Saxe, R. (2014) Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55:110–25. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007.Google Scholar
Cikara, M., Bruneau, E. G. & Saxe, R. R. (2011) Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20(3):149–53. doi:10.1177/0963721411408713.Google Scholar
Eccleston, C. & Crombez, G. (1999) Pain demands attention: A cognitive-affective model on the interruptive function of pain. Psychological Bulletin 125:356–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberger, N. I. & Cole, S. W. (2012) Social neuroscience and health: Neurophysiological mechanisms linking social ties with physical health. Nature Neuroscience 15(5):669–74. doi:10.1038/nn.3086.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2010) Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences, 2nd edition. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C., Byrd-Craven, J., Hoard, M. K., Vigil, J. & Numtee, C. (2003) Evolution and development of boys' social behavior. Developmental Review 23:444–70.Google Scholar
Macdonald, G. & Leary, M. R. (2005) Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin 131(2):202–23. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panksepp, J. (1998) Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford university press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigil, J. M. (2009) A socio-relational framework of sex differences in the expression of emotion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5):375–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigil, J. M. & Alcock, J. (2014) Tough guys or cry babies? Disentangling the role of examiner gender on patient pain reports. Pain Research and Management 19:e9–e12.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M. & Coulombe, P. (2011) Biological sex and audience affects pain intensity and observational coding of other people's pain behaviors. Pain 152:2125–30.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M., Pendleton, P., Coulombe, P, Vowels, K., Alcock, J. & Smith, B. (2014a) Pain patients and who they live with: A correlational study of co-residence patterns and pain interference. Pain Research and Management 19:e109–e114.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M., Rowell, L. N., Alcock, J. & Maestes, R. (2014b) Laboratory personnel gender and cold pressor apparatus affect subjective pain reports. Pain Research and Management 19:e13–e18.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M., Rowell, N., Chouteau, S., Chavez, A., Jaramillo, E., Neal, M. & Waid, D. (2013) Sex differences in how social networks and relationship quality influence experimental pain sensitivity. PLoS ONE 8:e78663. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigil, J. M. & Strenth, C. (2014) No pain, no social gains: A social-signaling perspective of human pain behaviors. World Journal of Anesthesiology 3(1):18–30. Available at: http://www.wjgnet.com/2218--6182/abstract/v3/i1/18.htm.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M., Strenth, C, Trujillo, T. & Gangestad, S. W. (2014c) Fluctuating experimental pain sensitivities across the menstrual cycle are contingent on women's current romantic relationship status. PLoS ONE 9:e91993. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigil, J. M., Torres, D., Wolff, A. & Hughes, K. (2014d) Exposure to virtual social stimuli modulates subjective pain reports. Pain Research and Management 19:e103–e108.Google Scholar