Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T06:02:32.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The costs of curiosity and creativity: Minimizing the downsides while maximizing the upsides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2024

Todd B. Kashdan Open the ORCID record for Todd B. Kashdan [Opens in a new window] ,
James C. Kaufman  and
Patrick E. McKnight
Todd B. Kashdan*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA todd@toddkashdan.com; pem725@gmail.com
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA james.kaufman@uconn.edu
Patrick E. McKnight
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA todd@toddkashdan.com; pem725@gmail.com
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The unbridled positivity toward curiosity and creativity may be excessive. Both aid species survival through exploration and advancement. These beneficial effects are well documented. What remains is to understand their optimal levels and contexts for maximal achievement, health, and well-being. Every beneficial element to individuals and groups carries the potential for harm – curiosity and creativity included.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e105
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acar, S., Tadik, H., Myers, D., Van der Sman, C., & Uysal, R. (2021). Creativity and well-being: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55, 738–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T. B., & Minhas, G. (2011). A dynamic approach to psychological strength development and intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 106–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, S. H. (2014). Cognitive disinhibition, creativity, and psychopathology. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 198–221). Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daker, R. J., Cortes, R. A., Lyons, I. M., & Green, A. E. (2020). Creativity anxiety: Evidence for anxiety that is specific to creative thinking, from STEM to the arts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Florida, R. (2014). The rise of the creative class–revisited: Revised and expanded. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., & Schwartz, B. (2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruber, M. J., & Ranganath, C. (2019). How curiosity enhances hippocampus-dependent memory: The prediction, appraisal, curiosity, and exploration (PACE) framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 1014–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kapoor, H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2022). The evil within: The AMORAL model of dark creativity. Theory & Psychology, 32, 467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashdan, T. B., Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., & McKnight, P. E. (2020). The five-dimensional curiosity scale revised (5DCR): Briefer subscales while separating overt and covert social curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashdan, T. B., Sherman, R. A., Yarbro, J., & Funder, D. C. (2013). How are curious people viewed and how do they behave in social situations? From the perspectives of self, friends, parents, and unacquainted observers. Journal of Personality, 81, 142–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, J. C. (2023). The creativity advantage. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litman, J. (2005). Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 793–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 730–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. S., Goncalo, J. A., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Recognizing creative leadership: Can creative idea expression negatively relate to perceptions of leadership potential? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 494–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. S., & Yin, Y. (2021). Unraveling the bias against novelty: Guiding the study of our tendency to desire but reject the new. In Zhou, J. & Rouse, E. D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity and innovation (pp. 267–289). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, V. M., Gerpott, F. H., Rivkin, W., & Stollberger, J. (2023). (Don't) mind the gap? Information gaps compound curiosity yet also feed frustration at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 178, 104276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). Is it possible to become happier?(And if so, how?). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Interesting things and curious people: Exploration and engagement as transient states and enduring strengths. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 785–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd. Free Press.Google Scholar
Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar