Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8v9h9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-22T16:54:41.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral demands truly are externally imposed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2018

Jan-Willem van Prooijen
Jan-Willem van Prooijen*
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit (VU) Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and The Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), 1008 BH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.w.van.prooijen@vu.nl http://www.janwillemvanprooijen.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most moral demands indeed are externally imposed, as violations are subject to social condemnation. While in modern society objectified moral demands may serve as a cue for desirable interaction partners, human morality evolved in small tribes that offered little choice regarding with whom to cooperate. Instead, it was adaptive to objectify moral demands to avoid the costs of social exclusion.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e115
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H. & Strongman, J. A. (1999) Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:525–37.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. (2012) Moral origins: The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. Basic Books.Google Scholar
DeScioli, P. & Kurzban, R. (2009) Mysteries of morality. Cognition 112:281–99.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J. & Nosek, B. A. (2009) Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96:1029–46.Google Scholar
Haley, K. J. & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005) Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior 26(3):245–56. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.01.002.Google Scholar