Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bp2c4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T19:12:04.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Let's be skeptical about reconsolidation and emotional arousal in therapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Lawrence Patihis*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-7085. lpatihis@uci.edu

Abstract

Lane et al. imply hypotheses that are questionable: that emotional arousal is a cause of positive change and reconsolidation research can be applied to therapy to alter memory. Given the history of problematic attempts to incorporate memory distortion or high emotional arousal into therapeutic techniques, both of which heralded premature optimism and hubris, I urge open-minded skepticism.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable