Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-11T13:35:41.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Relationship Neuroscience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2026

By
Omri Gillath  and
Pascal Vrtička
Edited by
Anita L. Vangelisti ,
Daniel Perlman  and
Susan Sprecher
Anita L. Vangelisti
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Daniel Perlman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Susan Sprecher
Affiliation:
Illinois State University
Get access

Summary

In the current chapter, we review the research on close relationships done via the methodologies of neuroscience – in short relationship neuroscience (RN). Much of the research we review focuses on attachment (child–parent or romantic) and sexuality. Nevertheless, we aim to cover RN broadly defined. We start by framing our topic and providing a few working definitions. We then cover the various relational (attachment, interdependence) and neuroscience (social baseline theory, and the Functional Neuroanatomical Model of Human Attachment) theories, methodologies (MRI, ERPs, and genetics), and types of relationships (familial relations, romantic, friendships, sexual relations, etc.) used or covered in this subfield. We explore both positive and negative aspects of close relationships. Finally, we reflect on the bidirectional link and contributions between relationship science and neuroscience and suggest potential implications for mental and physical health and policymaking. We also outline some remaining issues and future directions for RN.

Keywords

relationship neuroscience (RN)close relationshipsattachment theorysocial baseline theoryneuroimaging

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships , pp. 307 - 330
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abraham, E., & Feldman, R. (2022). The neural basis of human fatherhood: A unique biocultural perspective on plasticity of brain and behavior. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 25(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00381-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq092CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(1), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00838.2004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atzil, S., Gao, W., Fradkin, I., & Barrett, L. F. (2018). Growing a social brain. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 624–636. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0384-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atzil, S., Hendler, T., & Feldman, R. (2011). Specifying the neurobiological basis of human attachment: Brain, hormones, and behavior in synchronous and intrusive mothers. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36(13), 2603–2615. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2011.172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Verhees, M. W. F. T., Lotz, A. M., Alyousefi-van Dijk, K., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2022). Is paternal oxytocin an oxymoron? Oxytocin, vasopressin, testosterone, oestradiol and cortisol in emerging fatherhood. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1858), 20210060. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. NeuroImage, 21(3), 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartz, J. A., Zaki, J., Ochsner, K. N., Bolger, N., Kolevzon, A., Ludwig, N., & Lydon, J. E. (2010). Effects of oxytocin on recollections of maternal care and closeness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(50), 21371–21375. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012669107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckes, L., & Coan, J. A. (2011). Social baseline theory: The role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(12), 976–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00400.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, B., & Steele, M. (2013). How does microanalysis of mother–infant communication inform maternal sensitivity and infant attachment? Attachment & Human Development, 15(5–6), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2013.841050CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berendzen, K. M., Sharma, R., Mandujano, M. A., Wei, Y., Rogers, F. D., Simmons, T. C., Seelke, A. M. H., Bond, J. M., Larios, R., Goodwin, N. L., Sherman, M., Parthasarthy, S., Espineda, I., Knoedler, J. R., Beery, A., Bales, K. L., Shah, N. M., & Manoli, D. S. (2023). Oxytocin receptor is not required for social attachment in prairie voles. Neuron, 111(6), 787–796.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.12.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, S. A., & Young, L. J. (2023). The neurobiology of love and pair bonding from human and animal perspectives. Biology, 12(6), 844. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12060844CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bode, A., & Kowal, M. (2023). Toward consistent reporting of sample characteristics in studies investigating the biological mechanisms of romantic love. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 983419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.983419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosmans, G., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Vervliet, B., Verhees, M. W. F. T., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2020). A learning theory of attachment: Unraveling the black box of attachment development. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 113, 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, R. A., & Hutanamon, T. (2018). Activating attachments enhances heart rate variability. PLoS ONE, 13(2), e0151747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151747CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burkett, J. P., & Young, L. J. (2012). The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction. Psychopharmacology, 224(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-012-2794-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Decety, J. (2010). Social neuroscience and its relationship to social psychology. Social Cognition, 28(6), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.6.675CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canterberry, M., & Gillath, O. (2013). Neural evidence for a multifaceted model of attachment security. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88(3), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2019). Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context, Applied Developmental Science, 23(4), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloutier, J., Heatherton, T. F., Whalen, P. J., & Kelley, W. M. (2008). Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(6), 941–951. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20062CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coan, J. A. (2010). Adult attachment and the brain. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509360900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coan, J. A., Schaefer, H. S., & Davidson, R. J. (2006). Lending a hand: Social regulation of the neural response to threat. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1032–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01832.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. C., Dunne, S., Furey, T., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2014). The role of the posterior temporal and medial prefrontal cortices in mediating learning from romantic interest and rejection. Cerebral Cortex, 24(9), 2502–2511. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2019). The role of parental relationships in children’s well-being: A modest set of proposals for improving the lives of children. Human Development, 62(4), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, P. A., Cowan, C. P., & Gillette, P. F. (2022). TRUE Dads: The impact of a couples-based fatherhood intervention on family relationships, child outcomes, and economic self-sufficiency. Family Process, 61(3), 1021–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12748CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, F., Tenuta, F., Rizzato, V., Costabile, A., Trabacca, A., & Montirosso, R. (2021). Attachment-related dimensions in the epigenetic era: A systematic review of the human research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 125, 654–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling Rasmussen, P., & Storebø, O. J. (2021). Attachment and epigenetics: A scoping review of recent research and current knowledge. Psychological Reports, 124(2), 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120901846CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., Pauwels, L., Vogt, B., & Fehr, E. (2020). A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(6), 646–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Felice, S., Chand, T., Croy, I., Engert, V., Goldstein, P., Holroyd, C. B., Kirsch, P., Krach, S., Ma, Y., Scheele, D., Schurz, M., Schweinberger, S. R., Hoehl, S., & Vrtička, P. (2024). Relational neuroscience: Insights from hyperscanning research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105979. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0878-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWall, C. N., Gillath, O., Pressman, S. D., Black, L. L., Bartz, J. A., Moskovitz, J., & Stetler, D. A. (2014). When the love hormone leads to violence: Oxytocin increases intimate partner violence inclinations among high trait aggressive people. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(6), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613516876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWall, C. N., Masten, C. L., Powell, C., Combs, D., Schurtz, D. R., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). Do neural responses to rejection depend on attachment style? An fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duque-Wilckens, N., Steinman, M. Q., Busnelli, M., Chini, B., Yokoyama, S., Pham, M., Laredo, S. A., Hao, R. Perkeybile, A. M., Minie, V. A., Tan, P. B., Bales, K. L., & Trainor, B. C. (2018). Oxytocin receptors in the anteromedial bed nucleus of the stria terminalis promote stress-induced social avoidance in female California mice. Biological Psychiatry, 83(3), 203–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ein-Dor, T., Coan, J. A., Reizer, A., Gross, E. B., Dahan, D., Wegener, M. A., Carel, R., Cloninger, C. R., & Zohar, A. H. (2015). Sugarcoated isolation: Evidence that social avoidance is linked to higher basal glucose levels and higher consumption of glucose. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 439–454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ein-Dor, T., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Mokry, M., & Vrtička, P. (2018). Epigenetic modification of the oxytocin and glucocorticoid receptor genes is linked to attachment avoidance in young adults. Attachment & Human Development, 20(4), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2018.1446451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberger, N. I., Master, S. L., Inagaki, T. K., Taylor, S. E., Shirinyan, D., Lieberman, M. D., & Naliboff, B. D. (2011). Attachment figures activate a safety signal-related neural region and reduce pain experience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(28), 11721–11726. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108239108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fearon, P., Shmueli-Goetz, Y., Viding, E., Fonagy, P., & Plomin, R. (2014). Genetic and environmental influences on adolescent attachment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(9), 1033–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. (2017). The neurobiology of human attachments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2006). Romantic love: A mammalian brain system for mate choice. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 361(1476), 2173–2186. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., & Strathearn, L. (2011). Borderline personality disorder, mentalization, and the neurobiology of attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 32(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.20283CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraley, R. C., & Roisman, G. I. (2019). The development of adult attachment styles: Four lessons. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galynker, I. I., Yaseen, Z. S., Katz, C., Zhang, X., Jennings-Donovan, G., Dashnaw, S., Hirsch, J., Mayberg, H., Cohen, L. J., & Winston, A. (2012). Distinct but overlapping neural networks subserve depression and insecure attachment. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(8), 896–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, J. R., MacKillop, J., Aller, E. L., Merriwether, A. M., Wilson, D. S., & Lum, J. K. (2010). Associations between dopamine D4 receptor gene variation with both infidelity and sexual promiscuity. PLoS ONE, 5(11), e14162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014162CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, C. J., Sander, A. M., Robins, N., Mazzei, D., & Struchen, M. A. (2011). Exploring experiences of intimacy from the viewpoint of individuals with traumatic brain injury and their partners. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 26(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182048ee9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillath, O., Bunge, S. A., Shaver, P. R., Wendelken, C., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment-style differences in the ability to suppress negative thoughts: Exploring the neural correlates. NeuroImage, 28(4), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillath, O., Shaver, P. R., Baek, J.-M., & Chun, D. S. (2008). Genetic correlates of adult attachment style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1396–1405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208321484CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glasper, E. R., & Gould, E. (2013). Sexual experience restores age‐related decline in adult neurogenesis and hippocampal function. Hippocampus, 23(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22090CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, A. F. de C. (2021). Hyperscanning: Beyond the hype. Neuron, 109(3), 404–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.11.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, S., Northoff, G., Vogeley, K., Wexler, B. E., Kitayama, S., & Varnum, M. E. W. (2013). A cultural neuroscience approach to the biosocial nature of the human brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071112-054629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Q., Turel, O., & Bechara, A. (2018). Association of excessive social media use with abnormal white matter integrity of the corpus callosum. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 278, 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.06.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, Q., Turel, O., Brevers, D., & Bechara, A. (2017). Excess social media use in normal populations is associated with amygdala-striatal but not with prefrontal morphology. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 269, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedman, A. M., van Haren, N. E., Schnack, H. G., Kahn, R. S., & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. (2012). Human brain changes across the life span: A review of 56 longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 33(8), 1987–2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21334CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hietanen, J. O., Peltola, M. J., & Hietanen, J. K. (2020). Psychophysiological responses to eye contact in a live interaction and in video call. Psychophysiology, 57(6), e13587. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, J. Q., Hu, M., Chen, T. X., & Hartanto, A. (2025). Potential and pitfalls of romantic Artificial Intelligence (AI) companions: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 19, 100715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoehl, S., Fairhurst, M., & Schirmer, A. (2021). Interactional Synchrony: Signals, mechanisms and benefits. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1–2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insel, T. R., & Young, L. J. (2001). The neurobiology of attachment. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 2(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/35053579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, S. M., Burgess Moser, M., Beckes, L., Smith, A., Dalgleish, T., Halchuk, R., Hasselmo, K., Greenman, P. S., Merali, Z., & Coan, J. A.. (2013). Soothing the threatened brain: Leveraging contact comfort with Emotionally Focused Therapy. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e79314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanai, R., & Rees, G. (2011). The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(4), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L., & Peterson, D. R. (Eds.). (1983). Close relationships. Freeman.Google Scholar
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Gouin, J. P., & Hantsoo, L. (2010). Close relationships, inflammation, and health. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.09.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krahé, C., Paloyelis, Y., Condon, H., Jenkinson, P. M., Williams, S. C., & Fotopoulou, A. (2015). Attachment style moderates partner presence effects on pain: A laser-evoked potentials study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(8), 1030–1037. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kungl, M., Vrtička, P., Heinisch, C., Beckmann, M. W., Fasching, P. A., Ziegler, C., & Spangler, G. (2023). Deactivating attachment strategies associate with early processing of facial emotion and familiarity in middle childhood: An ERP study. Attachment & Human Development, 25(1), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2022.2132050CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemche, E., Giampietro, V. P., Surguladze, S. A., Amaro, E. J., Andrew, C. M., Williams, S. C. R., Brammer, M. J., Lawrence, N., Maier, M. A., Russell, T. A., Simmons, A., Ecker, C., Joraschky, P., & Phillips, M. L. (2006). Human attachment security is mediated by the amygdala: Evidence from combined fMRI and psychophysiological measures. Human Brain Mapping, 27(8), 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–289. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, M., Puhlmann, L., & Vrtička, P. (2021). Hypothalamus volume in men: Investigating associations with paternal status, self-reported caregiving beliefs, and adult attachment style. Social Neuroscience, 16(6), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2021.1997799CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, M., Verbeke, W., Ein-Dor, T., & Vrtička, P. (2020). A functional neuro-anatomical model of human attachment (NAMA): Insights from first- and second-person social neuroscience. Cortex, 126, 281–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-García, M., Paternina-Die, M., Cardenas, S. I., Vilarroya, O., Desco, M., Carmona, S., & Saxbe, D. E. (2023). First-time fathers show longitudinal gray matter cortical volume reductions: Evidence from two international samples. Cerebral Cortex, 33(7), 4156–4163. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maza, M. T., Fox, K. A., Kwon, S.-J., Flannery, J. E., Lindquist, K. A., Prinstein, M. J., & Telzer, E. H. (2023). Association of habitual checking behaviors on social media with longitudinal functional brain development. JAMA Pediatrics, 177(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.4924CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, P. O., Sasaki, A., D’Alessio, A. C., Dymov, S., Labonté, B., Szyf, M., Turecki, G., & Meaney, M. J. (2009). Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nature Neuroscience, 12(3), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meaney, M. J. (2010). Epigenetics and the biological definition of gene x environment interactions. Child Development, 81(1), 41–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01381.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menon, V., & D’Esposito, M. (2022). The role of PFC networks in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01152-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monin, J. K., Goktas, S. O., Kershaw, T., & DeWan, A. (2019). Associations between spouses’ oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism, attachment security, and marital satisfaction. PLoS ONE, 14(2), e0213083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213083CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, T., Kungl, M. T., Hoehl, S., White, L. O., & Vrtička, P. (2024). Visualizing the invisible tie: Linking parent–child neural synchrony to parents’ and children’s attachment representations. Developmental Science, e13504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T., Schleihauf, H., Kayhan, E., Matthes, D., Vrtička, P., & Hoehl, S. (2020). The effects of interaction quality on neural synchrony during mother–child problem solving. Cortex, 124, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, T., Schleihauf, H., Kayhan, E., Matthes, D., Vrtička, P., & Hoehl, S. (2021a). Neural synchrony in mother–child conversation: Exploring the role of conversation patterns. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1–2), 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T., Schleihauf, H., Kungl, M., Kayhan, E., Hoehl, S., & Vrtička, P. (2021b). Interpersonal Neural Synchrony during father–child problem solving: An fNIRS hyperscanning study. Child Development, 92(4), e565–e580. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13510CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novembre, G., & Iannetti, G. D. (2021). Hyperscanning alone cannot prove causality. Multibrain stimulation can. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(2), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pan, Y., Cheng, X., Zhang, Z., Li, X., & Hu, Y. (2017). Cooperation in lovers: An fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Human Brain Mapping, 38(2), 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23421CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picardi, A., Giuliani, E., & Gigantesco, A. (2020). Genes and environment in attachment. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 112, 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Barrett, L. F. (2000). The internal working models concept: What do we really know about the self in relation to others? Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puhlmann, L. M., Derome, M., Morosan, L., Kilicel, D., Vrtička, P., & Debbané, M. (2023). Longitudinal associations between self-reported attachment dimensions and neurostructural development from adolescence to early adulthood. Attachment & Human Development, 25(1), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2021.1993628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintana, D. S., & Guastella, A. J. (2020). An allostatic theory of oxytocin. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(7), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.03.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintana, D. S., Rokicki, J., van der Meer, D., Alnæs, D., Kaufmann, T., Córdova-Palomera, A., Dieset, I., Andreassen, O. A., & Westlye, L. T. (2019). Oxytocin pathway gene networks in the human brain. Nature Communications, 10, 668. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08503-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quirin, M., Gillath, O., Pruessner, J. C., & Eggert, L. D. (2010). Adult attachment insecurity and hippocampal cell density. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp042CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redcay, E., Dodell-Feder, D., Pearrow, M. J., Mavros, P. L., Kleiner, M., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Saxe, R. (2010). Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: A new tool for social cognitive neuroscience. NeuroImage, 50(4), 1639–1647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reindl, V., Gerloff, C., Scharke, W., & Konrad, K. (2018). Brain-to-brain synchrony in parent–child dyads and the relationship with emotion regulation revealed by fNIRS-based hyperscanning. NeuroImage, 178, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sbarra, D. A., & Hazan, C. (2008). Coregulation, dysregulation, self-regulation: An integrative analysis and empirical agenda for understanding adult attachment, separation, loss, and recovery. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308315702CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schacht, A., & Vrtička, P. (2018). Spatiotemporal pattern of appraising social and emotional relevance: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(6), 1172–1187. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0629-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, L., Levy, J., Endevelt-Shapira, Y., Djalovski, A., Hayut, O., Dumas, G., & Feldman, R. (2022). Technologically-assisted communication attenuates inter-brain synchrony. NeuroImage, 264, 119677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119677CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seeley, W. W. (2019) The salience network: A neural system for perceiving and responding to homeostatic demands. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(50), 9878–9882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seltzer, L. J., Prososki, A. R., Ziegler, T. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2012). Instant messages vs. speech: Hormones and why we still need to hear each other. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(1), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.05.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shih, H.-C., Kuo, M.-E., Wu, C. W., Chao, Y.-P., Huang, H.-W., & Huang, C.-M. (2022). The neurobiological basis of love: A meta-analysis of human functional neuroimaging studies of maternal and passionate love. Brain Sciences, 12(7), 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, H., Zou, Z., Kou, J., Liu, Y., Yang, L., Zilverstand, A., … Zhang, X. (2015). Love-related changes in the brain: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 71. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, P. (2012). Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation. Physiology & behavior, 106(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathearn, L., Fonagy, P., Amico, J., & Montague, P. R. (2009). Adult attachment predicts maternal brain and oxytocin response to infant cues. Neuropsychopharmacology, 34(13), 2655–2666. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunahara, C. S., Wilson, S. J., Rosenfield, D., Alvi, T., Szeto, A., Mendez, A. J., & Tabak, B. A. (2022). Oxytocin reactivity to a lab-based stressor predicts support seeking after stress in daily life: Implications for the Tend-and-Befriend theory. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 145, 105897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, J., Kim, P., Spicer, J., Ho, S., Dayton, C., Elmadih, A., & Abel, K. (2014). Approaching the biology of human parental attachment: Brain imaging, oxytocin and coordinated assessments of mothers and fathers. Brain Research, 1580, 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.03.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, Q., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Liu, Y. (2017). Priming the Secure Attachment Schema Affects the Emotional Face Processing Bias in Attachment Anxiety: An fMRI Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 624. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S. H., Zhao, P., & Bazarova, N. N. (2022). Social media and close relationships: A puzzle of connection and disconnection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomprou, M., Kim, Y. J., Chikersal, P., Woolley, A. W., & Dabbish, L. A. (2021). Speaking out of turn: How video conferencing reduces vocal synchrony and collective intelligence. PLoS ONE, 16(3), e0247655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triki, Z., Daughters, K., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2022). Oxytocin has “tend-and-defend” functionality in group conflict across social vertebrates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1851), 20210137. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsapelas, I., Fisher, H. E., & Aron, A. (2011). Infidelity: When, where, why. In Cupach, W. R. & Spitzberg, B. H. (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships II (pp. 175–195). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Verhage, M. L., Schuengel, C., Madigan, S., Fearon, R. M. P., Oosterman, M., Cassibba, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2016). Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment. Psychological Bulletin, 142(4), 337–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrtička, P., Andersson, F., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2008). Individual attachment style modulates human amygdala and striatum activation during social appraisal. PloS ONE, 3(8), e2868. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002868CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrtička, P., Bondolfi, G., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2012). The neural substrates of social emotion perception and regulation are modulated by adult attachment style. Social Neuroscience, 7(5), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2011.647410CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrtička, P., & Vuilleumier, P. (2012). Neuroscience of human social interactions and adult attachment style. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walum, H., Westberg, L., Henningsson, S., Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Igl, W., Ganiban, J. M., Spotts, E. L., Pedersen, N. L., Eriksson, E., & Lichtenstein, P. (2008). Genetic variation in the vasopressin receptor 1a gene (AVPR1A) associates with pair-bonding behavior in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(37), 14153–14156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803081105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, S. L., Bost, K. K., Roisman, G. I., Silton, R. L., Spielberg, J. M., Engels, A. S., Choi, E., Sutton, B. P., Miller, G. A., & Heller, W. (2010). Effects of adult attachment and emotional distractors on brain mechanisms of cognitive control. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1818–1826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610388809CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, I. C. G., Cervoni, N., Champagne, F. A., D’Alessio, A. C., Sharma, S., Seckl, J. R., Dymov, S., Szyf, M., & Meaney, M. J. (2004). Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 7(8), 847–854. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1276CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisman, O., Zagoory-Sharon, O., & Feldman, R. (2012). Oxytocin administration to parent enhances infant physiological and behavioral readiness for social engagement. Biological Psychiatry, 72(12), 982–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.06.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, L., Kungl, M., & Vrtička, P. (2023). Charting the social neuroscience of human attachment (SoNeAt). Attachment & Human Development, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2023.2167777CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, L. O., Bornemann, B., Crowley, M. J., Sticca, F., Vrtička, P., Stadelmann, S., Otto, Y., Klein, A. M., & Klitzing, K. (2021). Exclusion expected? Cardiac slowing upon peer exclusion links preschool parent representations to school‐age peer relationships. Child Development, 92(4), 1274–1290. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13494CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, L. O., Schulz, C. C., Schoett, M. J. S., Kungl, M. T., Keil, J., Borelli, J. L., & Vrtička, P. (2020). Conceptual analysis: A social neuroscience approach to interpersonal interaction in the context of disruption and disorganization of attachment (NAMDA). Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 517372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.517372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witteman, J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Rilling, J. K., Bos, P. A., Schiller, N. O., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2019). Towards a neural model of infant cry perception. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 99, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, R. L., & Yurdakul, L. K. (1997). Change in relationship status following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 11(7), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/bij.11.7.491.501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woody, E. Z., & Szechtman, H. (2011). Adaptation to potential threat: The evolution, neurobiology, and psychopathology of the security motivation system. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(4), 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xia, M., Chen, Y., & Dunne, S. (2023). What makes people feel loved? An exploratory study on core elements of love across family, romantic, and friend relationships. Family Process, e12873. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X., Brown, L., Aron, A., Cao, G., Feng, T., Acevedo, B., & Weng, X. (2012). Regional brain activity during early-stage intense romantic love predicted relationship outcomes after 40 months: An fMRI assessment. Neuroscience Letters, 526(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.08.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeevi, L., klein Selle, N., Kellmann, E. L., Boiman, G., Hart, Y., & Atzil, S. (2022). Bio-behavioral synchrony is a potential mechanism for mate selection in humans. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 4786. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08582-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×