Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T13:12:08.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - Relationship Satisfaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2026

By
Janina Larissa Bühler  and
Louisa Scheling
Edited by
Anita L. Vangelisti ,
Daniel Perlman  and
Susan Sprecher
Anita L. Vangelisti
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Daniel Perlman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Susan Sprecher
Affiliation:
Illinois State University
Get access

Summary

Relationship satisfaction has major implications on individuals’ health and subjective well-being, and prominent theories in relationship research have assigned relationship satisfaction an important role. In this Handbook chapter, we first introduce conceptual perspectives on relationship satisfaction, showing that relationship satisfaction is a characteristic of both the individual and the relationship. We then provide an overview of the measurement of relationship satisfaction and discuss common affordances in its assessment. Next, we report empirical evidence on how relationship satisfaction evolves over time, showing that relationship satisfaction changes both normatively and depending on the eventual outcome of the relationship. We then report how relationship satisfaction is associated with different relationship-specific facets, such as perceptions, emotion regulations strategies, and communication styles. To conclude, we discuss a series of unresolved issues in the area of relationship satisfaction research and propose an agenda for future research, such as the usage of modern technologies.

Keywords

relationship satisfactionrelationship qualitycommunicationadjustment measuresglobal satisfaction measures

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships , pp. 616 - 633
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anusic, I., & Schimmack, U. (2016). Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 766–781. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000066CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bühler, J. L., & Dunlop, W. L. (2019). The narrative identity approach and romantic relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(4), Article e12447. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, J. L., Krauss, S., & Orth, U. (2021). Development of relationship satisfaction across the life span: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(10), 1012–1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000342CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bühler, J. L., & Nikitin, J. (2020). Sociohistorical context and adult social development: New directions for 21st century research. American Psychologist, 75(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000611CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bühler, J. L., & Orth, U. (2022). Rank-order stability of relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(5), 1138–1165. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000430CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bühler, J. L., & Orth, U. (2024). How relationship satisfaction changes within and across romantic relationships: Evidence from a large longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(5), 930–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Candel, O.-S., & Turliuc, M. N. (2019, 147). Insecure attachment and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis of actor and partner associations. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, A., Eldridge, K., Catta-Preta, A. B., Lim, V. R., & Santagata, R. (2006). Cross-cultural consistency of the demand/withdraw interaction pattern in couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00311.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, W. A., Welsh, D. P., & Furman, W. (2009). Adolescent romantic relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coutinho, J., Pereira, A., Oliveira-Silva, P., Meier, D., Lourenço, V., & Tschacher, W. (2021). When our hearts beat together: Cardiac synchrony as an entry point to understand dyadic co-regulation in couples. Psychophysiology, 58(3), e13739. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Bühler, J. L., Maghsoodi, A., Harake, N., Wilkinson, D., & McAdams, D. P. (2020). The stories couples live by. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(2), 690–710. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520969900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Hanley, G. E., McCoy, T. P., & Harake, N. (2017). Sticking to the (romantic) script: An examination of love life scripts, stories, and self-reports of normality. Memory, 25(10), 1444–1454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1316509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddy, J. M., Heyman, R. E., & Weiss, R. L. (1991). An empirical evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Exploring the differences between marital “satisfaction” and “adjustment.” Behavioral Assessment, 13(3), 199–220.Google Scholar
Erol, R. Y., & Orth, U. (2016). Self-esteem and the quality of romantic relationships. European Psychologist, 21(4), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, F. D., & Linfield, K. J. (1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 11(4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.11.4.489-502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D., & Rogge, R. (2010). Understanding relationship quality: Theoretical challenges and new tools for assessment. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(4), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00059.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D., Rogge, R., & Beach, S. R. H. (2018). Relationship satisfaction. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 2nd ed., 422–436). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867.033Google Scholar
Finn, C., Johnson, M. D., & Neyer, F. J. (2020). Happily (n)ever after? Codevelopment of romantic partners in continuing and dissolving unions. Developmental Psychology, 56(5), 1022–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000897CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraley, R. C., & Roberts, B. W. (2005). Patterns of continuity: A dynamic model for conceptualizing the stability of individual differences in psychological constructs across the life course. Psychological Review, 112(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fülöp, F., Bőthe, B., Gál, É., Cachia, J. Y. A., Demetrovics, Z., & Orosz, G. (2022). A two-study validation of a single-item measure of relationship satisfaction: RAS-1. Current Psychology, 41, 2109–2121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00727-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilford, R., & Bengtson, V. (1979). Measuring marital satisfaction in three generations: Positive and negative dimensions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(2), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.2307/351705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (1990). How marriages change. In Patterson, G. R. (Ed.), Depression and aggression in family interaction (pp. 75–102). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Han, S. C., Baucom, B., Timmons, A. C., & Margolin, G. (2021). A systematic review of respiratory sinus arrhythmia in romantic relationships. Family Process, 60(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12644CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (2008). Satisfaction, love, and respect in the initiation of romantic relationships. In Sprecher, S., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Relationship Initiation (Vol. 1, pp. 337–371). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020513Google Scholar
Heyman, R. E., Sayers, S. L., & Bellack, A. S. (1994). Global marital satisfaction versus marital adjustment: An empirical comparison of three measures. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(4), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.8.4.432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Impett, E. A., Gordon, A. M., Kogan, A., Oveis, C., Gable, S. L., & Keltner, D. (2010). Moving toward more perfect unions: Daily and long-term consequences of approach and avoidance goals in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 948–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jardine, B. B., Vannier, S., & Voyer, D. (2022). Emotional intelligence and romantic relationship satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 196, 111713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joel, S., Eastwick, P. W., Allison, C. J., Arriaga, X. B., Baker, Z. G., Bar-Kalifa, E., … Wolf, S. (2020). Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(32), 19061–19071. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917036117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. D., Horne, R. M., Hardy, N. R., & Anderson, J. R. (2018). Temporality of couple conflict and relationship perceptions. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(4), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000398CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. D., Lavner, J. A., Mund, M., Zemp, M., Stanley, S. M., Neyer, F. J., Impett, E. A., Rhoades, G. K., Bodenmann, G., Weidmann, R., Bühler, J. L., Burriss, R. P., Wünsche, J., & Grob, A. (2022). Within-couple associations between communication and relationship satisfaction over time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(4), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211016920CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. D., & Neyer, F. J. (2019). (Eventual) stability and change across partnerships. Journal of Family Psychology, 33(6), 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanter, J. B., Lavner, J. A., Lannin, D. G., Hilgard, J., & Monk, J. K. (2022). Does couple communication predict later relationship quality and dissolution? A meta‐analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(2), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karney, B., & Bradbury, T. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3Google ScholarPubMed
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley.Google Scholar
Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Patterns of change in marital satisfaction over the newlywed years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1171–1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00757.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavner, J. A., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2016). Does couples’ communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication? Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemay, E. P. (2016). The forecast model of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959, Vol. 21). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage & Family Living, 21(3), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/348022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The Five-Factor Model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, R. E., Rogge, R. D., Johnson, M. D., Davidson, E. K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). The positive and negative semantic dimensions of relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 20(2), 328–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01412.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The Five-Factor Theory of personality. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159–181). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., Meltzer, A. L., Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. (2021). How both partners’ individual differences, stress, and behavior predict change in relationship satisfaction: Extending the VSA model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(27), e2101402118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101402118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNulty, J. K., O’Mara, E. M., & Karney, B. R. (2008). Benevolent cognitions as a strategy of relationship maintenance: “Don’t sweat the small stuff”… But it is not all small stuff. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitnick, D. M., Heyman, R. E., & Smith Slep, A. M. (2009). Changes in relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(6), 848–852. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, S. L. (1999). The quest for conviction: Motivated cognition in romantic relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 10(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1001_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niehuis, S., Davis, K., Reifman, A., Callaway, K., Luempert, A., Rebecca Oldham, C., Head, J., & Willis-Grossmann, E. (2022). Psychometric evaluation of single-item relationship satisfaction, love, conflict, and commitment measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(3), 387–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221133693CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(1), 1–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/351302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, T., Gerstorf, D., Ashe, M. C., Madden, K. M., & Hoppmann, C. A. (2021). You’re under my skin: Long-term relationship and health correlates of cortisol synchrony in older couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000809CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, H. T., Aron, A., Clark, M. S., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Ellen Berscheid, Elaine Hatfield, and the emergence of relationship science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 558–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613497966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2002). It’s not just who you’re with, it’s who you are: Personality and relationship experiences across multiple relationships. Journal of Personality, 70(6), 925–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.05028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In Harvey, J. H. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scheling, L., Wrzus, C., Weidmann, R., Burriss, R. P., Wünsche, J., Grob, A., & Bühler, J. L. (2025). Within-person variability and couple synchrony in state relationship satisfaction: Testing predictors and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 129(2), 407–437. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, L. (2023). “What is a Happy Relationship?” – A Study on the Subjective Definition of Relationship Satisfaction (Master’s thesis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz).Google Scholar
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmons, A. C., Han, S. C., Chaspari, T., Kim, Y., Narayanan, S., Duong, J. B., Simo Fiallo, N., & Margolin, G. (2023). Relationship satisfaction, feelings of closeness and annoyance, and linkage in electrodermal activity. Emotion, 23(7), 1815–1828. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Totenhagen, C. J., Butler, E. A., Curran, M. A., & Serido, J. (2016). The calm after the storm: Relationship length as associated with couples’ daily variability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(6), 768–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515597562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, C. M., Neff, L. A., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2017). The role of emotional capital during the early years of marriage: Why everyday moments matter. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(4), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whisman, M. A., & Li, A. (2015). Assessment of positive and negative relationship adjustment in marriage. Personal Relationships, 22(4), 679–691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, T., de Zwaan, M., & Heinrichs, N. (2019). The German version of the Quality of Marriage Index: Psychometric properties in a representative sample and population-based norms. PLoS ONE, 14(2), e0212758. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212758CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×