Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-hqrjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-23T06:44:01.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Humans, fruit flies, and automatons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2012

Evan Charney*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Policy and Political Science, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 90239. http://fds.duke.edu/db/Sanford/faculty/echar

Abstract

My response is divided into four sections: (1) is devoted to a potpourri of commentaries that are essentially in agreement with the substance of my target article (with one exception); in (2) I address, in response to one of the commentaries, several issues relating to the use of candidate gene association studies in behavior genetics (in particular those proposing a specific G×E interaction); in (3) I provide a detailed response to several defenses of the twin study methodology; and in (4) I conclude with several reflections on that methodology and the conception of human nature it has fostered.

Information

Type
Author's Response
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable