Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-f6s65 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T23:00:00.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heritability estimates in behavior genetics: Wasn't that station passed long ago?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2012

Wim E. Crusio
Wim E. Crusio*
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience, University of Bordeaux and CNRS, F-33400 Talence, France. wim_crusio@yahoo.com http://www.incia.u-bordeaux1.fr/spip.php?article168
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Charney describes several mechanisms that will bias estimates of heritability in unpredictable directions. In addition, the mechanisms described by Charney explain the puzzling fact that research in human-behavior genetics routinely reports higher heritabilities than animal studies do. However, I argue that the concept of heritability has no real place in human research anyway.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 361 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Crusio, W. E. (1990) Estimating heritabilities in quantitative behavior genetics: A station passed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13(1):127–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crusio, W. E. (2006) Inheritance of behavioral and neuroanatomical phenotypical variance: Hybrid mice are not always more stable than inbreds. Behavior Genetics 36(5):723–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (1973) Genetic homeostasis and behavior: Analysis, data, and theory. Behavior Genetics 3(3):233–45.Google Scholar
Wahlsten, D. (1990) Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13(1):109–20.Google Scholar