Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-pn7tm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-12T17:06:52.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assumptions in studies of heritability and genotype–phenotype association

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2012

Michael B. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455. mbmiller@umn.edu http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=EV_phq4AAAAJ&hl=en cdeyoung@umn.edu http://www.tc.umn.edu/~cdeyoung/
Colin G. DeYoung
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455. mbmiller@umn.edu http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=EV_phq4AAAAJ&hl=en cdeyoung@umn.edu http://www.tc.umn.edu/~cdeyoung/
Matt McGue
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455. mbmiller@umn.edu http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=EV_phq4AAAAJ&hl=en cdeyoung@umn.edu http://www.tc.umn.edu/~cdeyoung/ Department of Epidemiology, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark. mcgue001@umn.edu http://www.psych.umn.edu/people/faculty/mcgue.htm

Abstract

Charney's dismissal of well-established methods in behavioral genetic research is misguided. He claims that studies of heritability and genetic association depend for their validity on six assumptions, but he cites no sources to support this claim. We explain why none of the six assumptions is strictly necessary for the utility of either method of genetic analysis.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable