No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 April 2025
Moffett's article asserts that human societies are distinct from other social groups because they must maintain control over specific territories. In our commentary, we challenge this argument, aiming to enrich it by highlighting the pivotal role of history and collective memories and their underestimated significance in shaping societies across time and beyond territorial ownership and resource control.
All authors contributed equally to the commentary and share first author status.
Target article
What is a society? Building an interdisciplinary perspective and why that's important
Related commentaries (16)
A nation by any other name: A failure to focus on function
Definitions and cultural dynamics in understanding “societies”
Do boundaries matter so much for societies?
How an interdisciplinary study of societies can develop a comprehensive understanding of the function of deceptive behavior
Identity groups, perceived group continuity, and schism
Identity is probably too complicated to serve as a useful criterion for defining society
Psychological mechanisms for individual recognition- and anonymous-societies in humans and other animals
Societies have functions for individuals and collectives
Societies of the open ocean without territories
Societies, identities, and macrodemes
Society: An anthropological perspective
The family as the primary social group
Understanding the jaggedness in social complexity is more important
Vocalizations are ideal identity signals
What is a society in the case of multilevel societies?
Why societies are important and grow so large: Tribes, nations, and teams