Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T09:35:44.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The motivation to sacrifice for a cause reflects a basic cognitive bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Christopher Y. Olivola
Christopher Y. Olivola*
Affiliation:
Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. olivola@cmu.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/chrisolivola/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many extreme forms of self-sacrifice occur without identity fusion or out-group threats. For example, people willingly participate in extreme charity fundraisers – exerting effort, enduring pain, and risking bodily injury – to advance desired causes. Therefore, it seems plausible that the motivation to engage in extreme self-sacrifice reflects a basic cognitive bias, rather than an evolutionary-cultural adaption specifically designed for intergroup conflict.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e212
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arkes, H. R. & Blumer, C. (1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35(1):124–40.Google Scholar
Inzlicht, M., Shenhav, A. & Olivola, C. Y. (2018) The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22(4):337–49.Google Scholar
Lee, C. T., Williams, P. & Hadden, W. A. (1999) Parachuting for charity: Is it worth the money? A 5-year audit of parachute injuries in Tayside and the cost to the NHS. Injury 30(4):283–87.Google Scholar
Olivola, C. Y. (2011) When noble means hinder noble ends: The benefits and costs of a human preference for martyrdom in altruism. In: The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity, ed. Oppenheimer, D. M. & Olivola, , pp. 49–64. Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Olivola, C. Y. (2018) The interpersonal sunk-cost effect. Psychological Science 29(7):1072–83.Google Scholar
Olivola, C. Y. & Shafir, E. (2013) The martyrdom effect: When pain and effort increase prosocial contributions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 26(1):91–105. doi: 10.1002/bdm.767.Google Scholar
Olivola, C. Y. & Shafir, E. (2018) Blood, sweat, and cheers: The martyrdom effect increases willingness to sponsor others' painful and effortful prosocial acts. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3101447.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1(1):39–60.Google Scholar