Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-7lfxl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-21T19:00:48.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tools as “petrified memes”: A duality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2020

Carsten Korth Open the ORCID record for Carsten Korth [Opens in a new window]
Carsten Korth*
Affiliation:
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40219Düsseldorf, Germany.ckorth@hhu.dehttps://www.uniklinik-duesseldorf.de/en/institute-of-neuropathology/research/ag-korth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tools are generated by defined steps, fulfill distinct uses, and elicit affordances or mental representations. When the latter are recombined, they are perceived as “technical reasoning,” resulting in novel tools when executed. They can be exchanged, varied, and selected between individuals in a cumulative social process. Tools are materialized, “petrified” memes forming a duality within the framework of active externalism.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e169
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. & Chalmers, D. (1998) The extended mind (active externalism). Analysis 58(1):7–19. doi: 10.1111/1467-8284.00096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creanza, N., Kolodny, O. & Feldman, M. W. (2017) Cultural evolutionary theory: How culture evolves and why it matters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114(30):7782–89. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620732114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, R. (1976/2016) The selfish gene. 40th anniversary edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1982) Replicators and vehicles. In: Current problems in sociobiology, ed. K. S. C. Sociobiology & Group, pp. 45–64. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1983) Universal Darwinism. In: Evolution from molecules to men, ed. Bendall, D. S., pp. 403–25. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greif, H. (2017) What is the extension of the extended mind? Synthese 194(11):4311–36. doi: 10.1007/s11229-015-0799-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, B. (2017) Survival of the friendliest: Homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality. Annual Review of Psychology 68:155–86. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, B., Plyusnina, I., Ignacio, N., Schepina, O., Stepika, A., Wrangham, R. & Trut, L. (2005) Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Current Biology 15(3):226–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J. (2009) The evolution of innovation-enhancing institutions. In: Innovation in cultural systems: Contributions from evolutionary anthropology, eds. Shennan, S. J. & O'Brian, M. J., pp. 99–120. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J. (2016) The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (2008) Five misunderstandings about cultural evolution. Human Nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) 19(2):119–37. doi: 10.1007/s12110-008-9037-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. (2012) What's social about social learning? Journal of Comparative Psychology 126(2):193–202. doi: 10.1037/a0025180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menary, R. (2010) The extended mind. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthukrishna, M., Shulman, B. W., Vasilescu, V. & Henrich, J. (2014) Sociality influences cultural complexity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1774):20132511. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed