Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-grvzd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T19:35:39.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human genomic data have different statistical properties than the data of randomised controlled trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2023

Mirjam J. Borger Open the ORCID record for Mirjam J. Borger [Opens in a new window] ,
Franz J. Weissing Open the ORCID record for Franz J. Weissing [Opens in a new window]  and
Eva Boon Open the ORCID record for Eva Boon [Opens in a new window]
Mirjam J. Borger
Affiliation:
Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands m.j.borger@rug.nl; f.j.weissing@rug.nl; e.boon@rug.nl https://www.marmgroup.eu/
Franz J. Weissing
Affiliation:
Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands m.j.borger@rug.nl; f.j.weissing@rug.nl; e.boon@rug.nl https://www.marmgroup.eu/
Eva Boon
Affiliation:
Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands m.j.borger@rug.nl; f.j.weissing@rug.nl; e.boon@rug.nl https://www.marmgroup.eu/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Madole & Harden argue that the Mendelian reshuffling of genes and genomes is analogous to randomised controlled trials. We are not convinced by their arguments. First, their recipe for meeting the demands on randomised experiments is inherently inconsistent. Second, disequilibrium across chromosomes conflicts with their assumption of statistical independence. Third, the genome-wide association study (GWAS) method has many pitfalls, including low repeatability.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e184
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chatterjee, S., & Ahituv, N. (2017). Gene regulatory elements, major drivers of human disease. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 18, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flint, J., & Mackay, T. F. C. (2009). Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in mice, flies, and humans. Genome Research, 19, 723–733. doi: 10.1101/gr.086660.108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedrick, P. W. (2005). Genetics of populations (3rd ed). Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar
Kuijper, B., Pen, I., & Weissing, F. J. (2012). A guide to sexual selection theory. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 43, 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, T. F. C. (2014). Epistasis and quantitative traits: Using model organisms to study gene–gene interactions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 15, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3627CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marjoram, P., Zubair, A., & Nuzhdin, S. V. (2014). Post-GWAS: Where next? More samples, more SNPs or more biology? Heredity, 112, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, M. C., & Mathieson, I. (2022). The challenge of detecting recent natural selection in human populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 119, e2203237119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Gestel, J., & Weissing, F. J. (2016) Regulatory mechanisms link phenotypic plasticity to evolvability. Scientific Reports, 6, 24524. doi: 10.1038/srep2452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Gestel, J., & Weissing, F. J. (2018). Is plasticity caused by single genes? Nature, 555, E20. doi: 10.1038/nature25495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, X. S., Pierre, C. L., Gonzales, N. M., Zou, J., Cheng, R., Chitre, A. S., … Palmer, A. A. (2020). Genome-wide association study in two cohorts from a multi-generational mouse advanced intercross line highlights the difficulty of replication due to study-specific heterogeneity. Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 10, 951–965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuk, O., Hechter, E., Sunyaev, S. R., & Lander, E. S. (2012). The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 1193–1198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed