Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T22:04:35.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Outcomes, Controversies, and Future Trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

By
Julia Metzner  and
Karen B. Domino
Edited by
Richard D. Urman  and
Alan David Kaye
Richard D. Urman
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Alan David Kaye
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice , pp. 175 - 184
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Havidich, JE, Cravero, JP. The current status of procedural sedation for pediatric patients in out-of-operating room locations.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012; 25: 453–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cravero, JP, Blike, GT, Beach, M, et al. Incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room: report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 1087–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhananker, SM, Posner, KL, Cheney, FW, et al. Injury and liability associated with monitored anesthesia care: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 228–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzner, J, Posner, KL, Domino, KB. The risk and safety of anesthesia in remote locations: the US closed claims analysis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22: 502–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metzner, J, Domino, KB. Risks of anesthesia or sedation outside the operating room: the role of the anesthesia care provider. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010; 23: 523–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Standards for Basic Anesthetic Monitoring. Park Ridge, IL: ASA, 2010. www.asahq.org/For-Healthcare-Professionals/Standards-Guidelines-and-Statements.aspx (accessed November 2016).Google Scholar
Pino, RM. The nature of anesthesia and procedural sedation outside of the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2007; 20: 347–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soto RG, Fu ES, Vila, H, Miguel, RV. Capnography accurately detects apnea during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 379–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Krauss, B, Hess, DR. Capnography for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 50: 172–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, JL, Junkins, E, Pribble, C, Guenther, E. Capnography and depth of sedation during propofol sedation in children. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 49: 9–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deitch, K, Miner, J, Chudnofsky, CR, et al. Does end tidal CO2 monitoring during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol decrease the incidence of hypoxic events? A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 55: 258–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qadeer, M, Vargo, JJ, Dumot, JA, et al. Capnographic monitoring of respiratory activity improves safety of sedation for endoscopic cholangiopancreatography and ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 1568–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qadeer, MA, Vargo, JJ, Patel, S, et al. Bispectral index monitoring of conscious sedation with the combination of meperidine and midazolam during endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 102–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agrawal, D, Feldman, HA, Krauss, B, Waltzman, ML. Bispectral index monitoring quantifies depth of sedation during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Ann Emerg Med 2004; 43: 247–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dominguez, TE, Helfaer, MA. Review of bispectral index monitoring in the emergency department and pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Emerg Care 2006; 22: 815–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilling, D, Rosenbaum, A, Schweizer, S, et al. Sedation with propofol for interventional endoscopy by trained nurses in high-risk octogenarians: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 295–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McQuaid, KR, Laine, L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 910–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cote, GA, Hovis, RM, Ansstas, MA, et al. Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 137–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fatima, H, DeWitt, J, LeBlanc, J, et al. Nurse-administered propofol sedation for upper endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 1649–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rex, DK, Deenadayalu, VP, Eid, E, et al. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology 2009; 137: 1229–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, H, Poluha, W, Cheung, M, et al. Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4): CD006268.Google ScholarPubMed
Rex, DK, Heuss, LT, Walker, JA, Qi, R. Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1384–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheriyan, DG, Byrne, MF. Propofol use in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 5171–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dere, K, Sucullu, I, Budak, ET, et al. A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 648–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arain, SR, Ebert, TJ. The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 461–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newton, A, Fitton, L. Intravenous ketamine for adult procedural sedation in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study. Emerg Med J 2008; 25: 498–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David, H, Shipp, J. A randomized controlled trial of ketamine/propofol versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 57: 435–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miner, JR, Moore, JC, Austad, EJ, et al. Randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial of propofol, 1:1 propofol/ketamine, and 4:1 propofol/ketamine for deep procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 65: 479–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahrami Gorji, F, Amri, P, Shokri, J, et al. Sedative and analgesic effects of propofol-fentanyl versus propofol-ketamine during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med 2016; 22: e39835.Google Scholar
Prescilla, R, Mason, KP. Recent advances and contributions to procedural sedation with consideration for the future. Minerva Anestesiol 2014; 80: 844–55. Review.Google ScholarPubMed
Mandel, JE, Tanner, JW, Lichtenstein, GR, et al. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus midazolam/fentanyl for colonoscopy. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 434–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigo, MR, Irwin, MG, Tong, CK, Yan, SY. A randomised crossover comparison of patient-controlled sedation and patient-maintained sedation using propofol. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 333–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pambianco, DJ, Whitten, CJ, Moerman, A, et al. An assessment of computer-assisted personalized sedation: a sedation delivery system to administer propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 542–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×