Book contents
- Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice
- Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Guidelines and Standards
- 1 Introduction to Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 2 Pharmacology Principles in Sedation
- 3 Pain Assessment and Management Considerations
- 4 Patient Evaluation and Procedure Selection
- 5 Patient Monitoring, Equipment, and Intravenous Fluids
- 6 Credentialing, Competency, and Education
- 7 Quality, Legal, and Risk Management Considerations: Ensuring Program Excellence
- 8 Nursing Considerations for Sedation
- 9 Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners
- 10 High-risk Patients: Sedation Considerations in Coexisting Disease
- 11 Respiratory Compromise in Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 12 Management of Complications of Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 13 Recovery and Discharge after Procedural Sedation
- 14 Outcomes, Controversies, and Future Trends
- 15 Simulation Training for Sedation
- 16 Sedation in the Radiology Suite
- 17 Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite
- 18 Sedation in the Interventional Cardiology Suite
- 19 Sedation in the Emergency Department
- 20 Sedation in the Intensive Care Setting
- 21 Pediatric Sedation: Practical Considerations
- 22 Pediatric Sedation: Safety and Outcomes
- 23 Sedation in the Office and Other Outpatient Settings
- 24 Sedation in Dentistry
- 25 Sedation for Assisted Reproductive Technologies
- 26 Interventional Pain Management Procedures
- 27 Emergency Resuscitation Algorithms: Adults
- 28 Emergency Resuscitation Algorithms: Infants and Children
- Index
- References
17 - Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 November 2017
Book contents
- Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice
- Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Guidelines and Standards
- 1 Introduction to Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 2 Pharmacology Principles in Sedation
- 3 Pain Assessment and Management Considerations
- 4 Patient Evaluation and Procedure Selection
- 5 Patient Monitoring, Equipment, and Intravenous Fluids
- 6 Credentialing, Competency, and Education
- 7 Quality, Legal, and Risk Management Considerations: Ensuring Program Excellence
- 8 Nursing Considerations for Sedation
- 9 Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners
- 10 High-risk Patients: Sedation Considerations in Coexisting Disease
- 11 Respiratory Compromise in Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 12 Management of Complications of Moderate and Deep Sedation
- 13 Recovery and Discharge after Procedural Sedation
- 14 Outcomes, Controversies, and Future Trends
- 15 Simulation Training for Sedation
- 16 Sedation in the Radiology Suite
- 17 Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite
- 18 Sedation in the Interventional Cardiology Suite
- 19 Sedation in the Emergency Department
- 20 Sedation in the Intensive Care Setting
- 21 Pediatric Sedation: Practical Considerations
- 22 Pediatric Sedation: Safety and Outcomes
- 23 Sedation in the Office and Other Outpatient Settings
- 24 Sedation in Dentistry
- 25 Sedation for Assisted Reproductive Technologies
- 26 Interventional Pain Management Procedures
- 27 Emergency Resuscitation Algorithms: Adults
- 28 Emergency Resuscitation Algorithms: Infants and Children
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice , pp. 206 - 220Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Seeff, LC, Richards, TB, Shapiro, JA, et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 1670–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthes, K. Gastrointestinal endoscopy in the office-based setting. In Shapiro, F ed. Manual of Office-Based Anesthesia Procedures. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007: 120–32.Google Scholar
Ferreira, AO, Cravo, M. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: where are we at in 2014? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(2): 102–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, R, Erlson, M, Vargo, J. Modeling the costs and benefits of capnography monitoring during procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy International Open 2016; 04:E340–51.Google Scholar
Birk, J, Kaur Bath, R. Is the anesthesiologist necessary in the endoscopy suite? A review of patients, payers and safety, Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (2015); 9(7): 883–85.Google ScholarPubMed
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 1004–17.Google Scholar
Faigel, DO, Baron, TH, Goldstein, JL, et al. Guidelines for the use of deep sedation and anesthesia for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 613–17.Google ScholarPubMed
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Training guideline for use of propofol in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 167–72.Google Scholar
Waring, JP, Baron, TH, Hirota, WK, et al. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Standards of Practice Committee. Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 317–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, SB. Complications of conscious sedation. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1996; 6: 277–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, ML. Sedation and monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1994; 4: 475–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quine, MA, Bell, GD, McCloy, RF, et al. Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods. Gut 1995; 36: 462–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arrowsmith, JB, Gerstman, BB, Fleischer, DE, Benjamin, SB. Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 421–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, LB, Wecsler, JS, Gaetano, JN, et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 967–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crantock, L, Cowen, AE, Ward, M, Roberts, RK. Supplemental low flow oxygen prevents hypoxia during endoscopic cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 418–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reshef, R, Shiller, M, Kinberg, R, et al. A prospective study evaluating the usefulness of continuous supplemental oxygen in various endoscopic procedures. Isr J Med Sci 1996; 32: 736–40.Google Scholar
Nelson, DB, Freeman, ML, Silvis, SE, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 288–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, ES, Downs, JB, Schweiger, JW, Miguel, RV, Smith, RA. Supplemental oxygen impairs detection of hypoventilation by pulse oximetry. Chest 2004; 126: 1552–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soto, RG, Fu, ES, Vila, H, Miguel, RV. Capnography accurately detects apnea during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 379–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Vargo, JJ, Zuccaro, G, Dumot, JA, et al. Automated graphic assessment of respiratory activity is superior to pulse oximetry and visual assessment for the detection of early respiratory depression during therapeutic upper endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 826–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernik, DA, Gillings, D, Laine, H, et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1990; 10: 244–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Heuss, LT, Schnieper, P, Drewe, J, Pflimlin, E, Beglinger, C. Safety of propofol for conscious sedation during endoscopic procedures in high-risk patients: a prospective, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1751–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Heuss, LT, Schnieper, P, Drewe, J, Pflimlin, E, Beglinger, C. Conscious sedation with propofol in elderly patients: a prospective evaluation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17: 1493–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goff, JS. Effect of propofol on human sphincter of Oddi. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40: 2364–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, JA, McIntyre, RD, Schleinitz, PF, et al. Nurse-administered propofol sedation without anesthesia specialists in 9152 endoscopic cases in an ambulatory surgery center. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1744–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koshy, G, Nair, S, Norkus, EP, Hertan, HI, Pitchumoni, CS. Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1476–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, M, Hofmann, C, Kiesslich, R, Brackertz, A. Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 233–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rex, DK, Overley, C, Kinser, K, et al. Safety of propofol administered by registered nurses with gastroenterologist supervision in 2000 endoscopic cases. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1159–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seifert, H, Schmitt, TH, Gultekin, T, Caspary, WF, Wehrmann, T. Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14: 1207–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sipe, BW, Rex, DK, Latinovich, D, et al. Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 815–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargo, JJ, Zuccaro, G, Dumot, JA, et al. Gastroenterologist-administered propofol for therapeutic upper endoscopy with graphic assessment of respiratory activity: a case series. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 250–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargo, JJ, Zuccaro, G, Dumot, JA, et al. Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 8–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wehrmann, T, Kokabpick, S, Lembcke, B, Caspary, WF, Seifert, H. Efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: a prospective, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 677–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargo, JJ, Cohen, LB, Rex, DK, Kwo, PY. Position statement: nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1053–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Guidelines for Office-based Anesthesia. Park Ridge, IL: ASA, 1999 (last affirmed 2009). www.asahq.org/For-Healthcare-Professionals/Standards-Guidelines-and-Statements.aspx (accessed June 2011).Google Scholar
The Joint Commission. Using medication reconciliation to prevent errors. Sentinel Event Alert 2006; 35. www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event_alert_issue_35_using_medication_reconciliation_to_prevent_errors (accessed June 2011).Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by