Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-vpfzz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T09:36:14.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Ground-penetrating radar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

C. Hauck
Affiliation:
Université de Fribourg, Switzerland
C. Kneisel
Affiliation:
University of Würzburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a geophysical method for subsurface investigation that utilises electromagnetic signals transmitted into the ground as pulses from an antenna. A receiver antenna picks up energy that is partially reflected as the signal passes through a dielectric boundary in the ground. Compared to other geophysical methods, GPR supplies data with very high vertical resolution, a potential high recording speed and real-time display of the acquired data. Commercial GPR systems have only been available since the mid 1970s and the first digitally controlled GPR system was introduced by Sensors & Software Inc. in the mid 1980s. Of early scientific applications of GPR, radar measurements in cold glacier ice are probably the most noteworthy and the technique became even more important within glaciology in the mid 1970s when technical development facilitated GPR applications also on temperate ice (see also Chapter 13). GPR was also applied early within permafrost studies (Annan and Davis 1976, Davis et al. 1976). GPR is today one of the standard methods for subsurface investigations, and the fundamentals of the method are provided in textbooks such as Daniels (1996) and Reynolds (1997).

The range and number of GPR applications have in general risen sharply during the past 4–5 years. This rise is also noticeable within the fields of permafrost and periglacial research. However, despite the early promising results from GPR profiling in cold environments, the absolute number of applications is still rather limited.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annan, A. P. (1998). Ground Penetrating Radar Workshop Notes, Sensors and Software Inc. Mississauga, Ontario.
Annan, A. P. and Davis, J. L. (1976). Impulse radar sounding in permafrost. Radio Science, 11, 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annan, A. P. and Cosway, S. W. (1992). Ground penetrating radar survey design. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), Oakbrook, USA, 329–351.CrossRef
Berthling, I., Etzelmüller, B., Wåle, M. and Sollid, J. L. (2003). Use of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) soundings for investigating internal structures in rock glaciers. Examples from Prins Karls Forland, Svalbard. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, Supplement, 132, 103–121.Google Scholar
Daniels, D. J. (1996). Surface-penetrating radar. Electronics & Communication Egineering Journal, 8(4), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. L., Scott, W. J., Morey, R. M. and Annan, A. P. (1976). Impulse radar experiments on permafrost near Tuktoyaktuk, Northwest Territories. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 13, 1584–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowdeswell, J. A. and Evans, S. (2004). Investigations of the form and flow of ice sheets and glaciers using radio-echo sounding. Reports on Progress in Physics, 67, 1821–1861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamran, S.-E. and Aarholt, E. (1993). Glacier study using wavenumber domain synthetic aperture radar. Radio Science, 28(4), 559–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamran, S.-E., Erlingsson, B., Gjessing, Y. and Mo, P. (1998). Estimate of the subglacier dielectric constant of an ice shelf using a ground-penetrating step-frequency radar. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36, 518–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, F. N. and By, T. L. (1995). Performance of a GPR system which uses step frequency signals. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 33, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, F. and Green, A. G. (2000). Topographic migration of georadar data: implications for acquisition and processing. Geophysics, 65, 836–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, F., Vonder Mühll, D., van der Veen, M., Wild, P. and Green, A. (1998). True topographic 2-D migration of georadar data. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems (SAGEEP), Chicago, 107–114.CrossRef
McQuillin, R., Bacon, M. and Barclay, W. (1984). An Introduction to Seismic Interpretation. Graham & Trotman Ltd.
Moorman, B. J. (2001). Ground-penetrating radar applications in paleolimnology. In Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments: Physical and Chemical Techniques, ed. Last, J. P., Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 23–47.Google Scholar
Moorman, B. J. and Michel, F. A. (2000). Glacial hydrological system characterization using ground-penetrating radar. Hydrological Processes, 14(15), 2645–2667.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorman, B. J., Robinson, S. D. and Burgess, M. M. (2003). Imaging periglacial conditions with ground-penetrating radar. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 14(4), 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, A. (2004). Ground-penetrating radar and its use in sedimentology: principles, problems and progress. Earth-Science Reviews, 66(3–4), 261–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overgaard, T. and Jakobsen, P. R. (2001). Mapping of glaciotectonic deformation in an ice marginal environment with ground penetrating radar. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 47(3–4), 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plewes, L. A. and Hubbard, B. (2001). A review of the use of radio-echo sounding in glaciology. Progress in Physical Geography, 25(2), 203–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, J. M. (1997). An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Trabant, P. K. (1984). Applied High-resolution Geophysical Methods. International Human Resources Development Corp., Boston, 265pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruk, J. and Slob, E. C. (2004). Reduction of reflections from above surface objects in GPR data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 55, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×