Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T11:28:21.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - The restructuring of the international system after the Cold War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2010

Melvyn P. Leffler
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Odd Arne Westad
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

The Cold War ended suddenly and surprisingly. A great geopolitical and ideological struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union ceased. One historical era closed and another opened. But it was an historical turning point unlike others in the past, ones with dates such as 1648, 1713, 1815, 1919, and 1945. In this case, the old bipolar order collapsed peacefully without war between the great powers. Moreover, unlike past postwar moments, the global system – or at least the dominant core of that system led by the United States – was not overturned. Quite the contrary. The world that the United States and its allies created after World War II remained intact. The end of the Cold War simply consolidated and expanded that order. The Soviet bloc – estranged from the West for half a century – collapsed and began a slow process of integration into that order. As such, the end of the Cold War was not the beginning of a new world order, but the last gasp in the completion of an old one.

But if the end of the Cold War began as a consolidation of the US-led postwar order, deeper and more profound shifts – not immediately apparent – were also set in motion. The globalization of the world economy and the growing market orientation of the developing world were forces for change. The nature of the “security problem” in the global system also changed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergsten, Fred, “America’s Two Front Economic Conflict,” Foreign Affairs, 80 (March/April 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobbitt, Phillip, The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History (New York: Knopf, 2002).Google Scholar
Borgwardt, Elizabeth, A New Deal for the World: America’s Vision for Human Rights (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkley, Douglas, “Democratic Enlargement: The Clinton Doctrine,” Foreign Policy, 106 (Spring 1997).Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C., “Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War,” International Security, 25 (Winter 2000/2001).Google Scholar
Chollet, Derek and Goldgeier, James, America between the Wars: From 11/9 to 9/11 – the Misunderstood Decade between the End of the Cold War and the Start of the War on Terror (New York: Public Affairs, 2008).Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce, “The End of the Seventy-Years’ Crisis: Trilateralism and the New World Order,” in Woo-Cumings, Meredith and Loriaux, Michael (eds.), Past as Prelude: History in the Making of a New World Order (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1993);Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel and Ikenberry, G. John, “The International Sources of Soviet Change,” International Security, 16 (Winter 1991/1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel and Ikenberry, G. John, “The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order,” Review of International Studies, 25 (April 1999) –96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron L., “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Era,” International Security, 18 (Winter 1993/1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellman, Barton, “Keeping the US First: Pentagon Would Preclude a Rival Superpower,” Washington Post, March 11, 1992
Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann, A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration (New York: Random House, 2002).Google Scholar
Heginbotham, Eric and Samuels, Richard J., “Mercantile Realism and Japanese Foreign Policy,” International Security, 22 (Spring 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawn, , Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991 (London: Michael Joseph, 1994).Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J., Peace and War: Armed Con.icts and International Orders, 1648–1989 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, White, A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement (Washington, DC: White House, July 1994).Google Scholar
Hutchings, Robert, American Diplomacy and the End of the Cold War: An Insider’s Account of US Policy in Europe, 1989–1992 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Baker, James A., The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War, and Peace, 1989–1992 (New York: Putnam, 1995) –06.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, “Global Security Trap,” Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, 1, 2 (September 2006).Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, “The Remaking of a Unipolar World,” Washington Quarterly, 29, 2 (2006);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert, “Theories of War in an Era of Leading-Power Peace,” American Political Science Review, 96 (March 2002).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul, “The Eagle Has Landed,” Financial Times, February 2, 2002.
Lake, Anthony, “From Containment to Enlargement,” Vital Speeches of the Day, 60, 1 (October 15, 1993).Google Scholar
Layne, Christopher, “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Arise,” International Security, 17 (Spring 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Charles, “The Two Postwar Eras and the Conditions for Stability in Twentieth-Century Western Europe,” in Maier, , (ed.), In Search of Stability: Explorations in Historical Political Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987) –84;Google Scholar
Mann, James, The Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush’s War Cabinet (New York: Viking, 2004).Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael, “A Realist View: Three Images of the Coming International Order,” in Paul, T. V. and Hall, John A. (eds.), International Order and the Future of World Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael, “Models, Markets, and Power: Political Economy and the Asia-Pacific, 1989–1999,” Review of International Studies, 26 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matlock, Jack F. Jr., Reagan and Gorbachev: How the Cold War Ended (New York: Random House, 2004).Google Scholar
May, Ernest (ed.), American Cold War Strategy: Interpreting NSC-68 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, , “Back to the Future: Instability of Europe after the Cold War,” International Security, 15 (Summer 1990);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, , “Why We Will Soon Miss the Cold War,” Atlantic Monthly, 266 (August 1990).Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John, “Disorder Restored,” in Allison, Graham and Treverton, Gregory (eds.), Rethinking America’s Security (New York: Norton, 1992).Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas, The States System of Europe, 1640–1990: Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability (London: Oxford University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard, “American Exceptionalism, Exemptionalism, and Global Governance,” in Ignatie, Michael. (ed.), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005) –38.Google Scholar
Santoro, Carlo Maria, Diffidence and Ambition: The Intellectual Sources of US Foreign Policy (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1992), ch. 5 and 6.Google Scholar
,Secretary of Defense Richard Cheney, Defense Strategy for the 1990s: The Regional Defense Strategy (Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 1993),
Starr, Paul, Freedom’s Power: The True Force of Liberalism (New York: Basic Books, 2007), ch. 5;Google Scholar
Thurow, Lester, Head to Head: The Coming Economic Battle among Japan, Europe, and America (New York: Murrow, 1992);Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth, Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth, “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security, 18 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlforth, William, “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International Security, 24 (Summer 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Robert, “Clinton’s One Big Idea,” New York Times, January 16, 2001.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×