We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
There is rising concern over the potential cumulative and long-lasting effects of prior concussions in active and retired athletes. Previous studies suggest that there is an inverse relationship between concussion (or mild traumatic brain injury) and sleep, with increasing evidence of individuals reporting chronically disrupted sleep following remote concussion. The extent to which these effects are cumulative across repeat concussions is unknown. This project aimed to investigate the association between the number of prior concussions and subjective sleep quality in otherwise healthy collegiate-aged athletes. Furthermore, we investigated which aspects of sleep are most associated with prior concussion.
Participants and Methods:
A total of 176 collegiate-aged athletes (Mage = 21.19, SD = 1.63; 65.9% men) completed off-season clinical visits, at least 6 months since their most recent concussion. Semi-structured interviews captured detailed sport and head injury history across the lifespan. The number of prior concussions for each participant was retrospectively assessed based on American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine criteria. Subjective sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). A general linear model tested the relationship between number of prior concussions and global PSQI score (i.e., overall sleep quality). Logistic regression models were fit to investigate the association of the number of prior concussions with individual subcomponents of the PSQI (i.e., quality, latency, duration, efficiency, disturbances, use of sleep medications, and daily dysfunction), which were binarized based on their distribution. Sex and total number of years of exposure to contact sports were included as covariates for all models.
Results:
The number of prior concussions was significantly associated with worse overall sleep quality as assessed by the global PSQI score, F(3,172)=6.92, p= <0.001, unstandardized beta[B](standard error[SE])=0.54(0.14). Investigation of sub-components showed that the number of prior concussions was significantly associated with multiple PSQI subcomponents, including: poorer sleep quality, odds ratio [OR]=1.35, 95% CI [1.05, 1.74], p=0.02; longer sleep latency, OR=1.35, 95% CI [1.08, 1.68], p=0.008; more sleep disturbances, OR=1.56, 95% CI [1.15, 2.12], p=0.004; and more sleep-related daily dysfunction, OR=1.46, 95% CI [1.16, 1.83], p=0.001. The number of prior concussions was not significantly associated with sleep duration, sleep efficiency, or the use of sleep medication (ps>0.05). There were no years of exposure effects (ps>0.05). Select sex-related effects on sleep quality were observed. Specifically, women reported significantly worse global sleep scores, F(3,172)=6.92, p=0.048, B(SE)=-0.99(0.50), and women reported significantly more sleep disturbances, B(SE)=1.47(0.70), p=0.04, OR=4.34 (95% CI [1.11, 16.98].
Conclusions:
These results suggest a potential dose-effect of concussion history on poorer sleep quality ratings in otherwise healthy athletes. Specific facets of sleep that were adversely associated with prior concussion included sleep quality, latency, disturbances, and daily dysfunction, highlighting potential areas for sleep-related clinical interventions. Given the adverse effects of chronic sleep disturbance on mental health, future studies are needed to determine the role of concussion-related sleep problems in the adverse psychological outcomes observed in some athletes with multiple prior concussions.
Previous studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of social and emotional problems in young adults with a history of childhood epilepsy, with social skill impairment hypothesized to play a significant role in these outcomes. Few studies have examined social skills within children with epilepsy and very few have examined this within the context of other neuropsychological and neurological variables. This study aims to examine the association between social problems and other relevant neuropsychological variables (IQ, adaptive functioning, social skills) within the pediatric epilepsy population.
Participants and Methods:
Participants were 86 epilepsy patients between the ages 5 and 18 years of age who were referred for neuropsychological assessment as a part of their surgical candidacy work-up. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to examine the correlations between performance on objective measures of full-scale IQ, and parent ratings on questionnaires assessing parent perception of the patients’ overall adaptive functioning, social skills, and social problems.
Results:
As expected, earlier age of onset was associated with lower IQ, which itself was associated with weaker overall daily living skills and social skills. Later age of seizure onset was associated greater social problems. Social skills were not correlated with social problems.
Conclusions:
The results of this study suggest that children with later age of onset of seizures, are at increased risk of social problems and that these problems may not related to social skill impairment. Implications for clinical practice and future directions are discussed.
Chronic alcohol consumption has been associated with widespread cognitive deficits, including psychomotor speed. Researchers have found impairments in reaction speed, information processing, and fine-finger movement in alcoholics (Oscar-Berman et al., 2015). There have also been mixed findings on the impact of duration of alcohol use on neurocognitive functioning (Beatty et al., 2000; Oscar-Berman et al., 2004). This meta-analytical study examines: (a) the performance of abstinent alcohol-dependent individuals on psychomotor speed using the Trail Making TestA (TMT-A), and (b) the effect of duration of alcohol use on TMT-A.
Participants and Methods:
As part of a larger study, two researchers independently searched eight databases, extracted required data, and calculated effect sizes on neuropsychological data in alcohol dependent (AD) individuals. Inclusion criteria for articles were: (a) comparison of abstinent alcohol-dependent patients to healthy controls, (b) matched control group on age, education, or IQ, and (c) standardized neuropsychological testing. Exclusion criteria included: (a) diagnosis of Axis I disorders (other than alcohol dependence), (b) comorbidity with other disorders that impact neuropsychological functioning, or (c) not published or translated into English. Twenty-seven articles (AD n= 840 and HC n = 881) were analyzed in this study.
Results:
The TMT-A evidenced a statistically significant and medium effect size estimate (g = 0.624, p < 0.001). The heterogeneity of TMT-A was statistically significant (Q=61.935, df=26, p=0.000) and moderate (I2=58.021%). The meta-regression analysis between duration of alcohol use in days and TMT-A was not statistically significant (Q=0.012, df=1, p=0.913).
Conclusions:
TMT-A detects psychomotor speed deficits associated with alcohol dependence. Duration of alcohol use did not affect TMT-A performance, suggesting that other factors may have moderated this relationship. Further research should analyze other factors that affect psychomotor performance in alcohol dependent individuals.
Children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) have difficulty hearing in noisy environments and localizing sounds, impacting learning and social opportunities across contexts. Using a visible device like a cochlear implant (CI) may improve functioning but can also create psychological risk. Audiological measures alone are insufficient for predicting social, emotional, educational, adaptive, and quality-of-life post-operative outcomes, which are highly variable in this population and can also be impacted by a secondary diagnosis. Extending beyond audition to consider the “whole child” through neuropsychological evaluation may produce a sharper picture of potential outcomes, with or without surgical/audiological intervention. Given recent FDA approval for CI in children with UHL, more are receiving this elective surgery despite difficulties predicting who will experience significant benefit. Here we describe neuropsychological profiles of children with UHL who underwent CI candidacy evaluation at a tertiary pediatric hospital.
Participants and Methods:
During pre-operative clinical care, CI candidates completed targeted neuropsychological evaluation to identify patient- and family-level factors that could impact CI use and outcomes from surgery. Cognitive, language, attention/executive, visuoperceptual/visuomotor, academic, adaptive, and emotional/behavioral functioning were assessed. Evaluations integrated history, observations, caregiver report forms, and performance-based test data.
Results:
18 individuals were evaluated (age 7-months to 16-years). Most had left-sided UHL (67%) and were male (61%). Known hearing loss etiologies were congenital cytomegalovirus (n=5), enlarged vestibular aqueduct (n=1), traumatic brain injury (n=1), meningitis (n=1), cholesteatoma (n=1), neurofibromatosis type 1 (n=1), and Waardenburg syndrome (n=1). Indices of general cognitive ability were generally low average to average. Patterns of cognitive impairment were not restricted to language-based tasks (e.g., Beery VMI-6 range 56-109, M=89.42, SD=16.27). Standardized parent ratings of everyday executive functioning, social/emotional/behavioral functioning, and adaptive skills were collected. Eight (44%) had a behavioral health diagnosis: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (n=2), Global Developmental Delay (n=2), Unspecified Neurodevelopmental Disorder (n=2), Autism Spectrum Disorder (n=1), and Depression (n=1). Thirteen (72%) received or will receive a CI, of whom 38% had a behavioral health diagnosis. Average Area Deprivation Index (a marker of socio-economic status) was lower for individuals who ultimately received CIs (M=18%tile) compared to those who did not (M=25%tile).
Conclusions:
There may be increased rates of neurodevelopmental/psychological conditions among children with UHL, especially when the etiology involves the central nervous system. Albeit preliminary, results align with findings from bilateral hearing loss samples. Findings highlight the importance of routine neuropsychological screening in children with UHL and close interdisciplinary collaboration for optimal outcomes. Socio-economic disparities among those who do and do not receive CI need further exploration as those who did not receive CIs tended to be from less resourced neighborhoods. Additional research is warranted to understand the full range of risk and protective factors for children with UHL and how these relate to outcomes for those who opt for cochlear implantation.
Socioeconomic factors, spanning from childhood to mid-adulthood, were examined in an older adult Black cohort to better understand their influence on the ability to complete instrumental activities of daily living. Previous research with socioeconomic factors has primarily focused on cognitive changes rather than everyday functioning. Additionally, research that has been conducted examining functioning has been with predominantly White samples.
Participants and Methods:
Data on Black participants were obtained from Rush University’s Memory and Aging Project (MAP), Minority Aging Research Study (MARS), and the Latino CORE study (CORE). Participants (n = 1,273) were predominately female (79.9%) and ranged in age from 54 - 97 years (M = 73 years old). Participants were stratified into two groups based on their consensus diagnosis: no cognitive impairment (NCI; 76.1%) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Linear regression analyses were utilized on each group to examine predictors of decreased functioning in instrumental activities of daily living. Predictors included income levels during childhood, at age 40, and current income level. Additionally, sex, education level, and parental education levels were included in the models.
Results:
Impairment of functioning in instrumental activities of daily living was predicted by the age of the participants at the time of their visit in both NCI and MCI groups (p < 0.001). Current income levels for the NCI participants significantly predicted functioning in IADLs (p < 0.001). This relationship was not present for the MCI group, rather, total family income at age 40 better predicted functioning (p = 0.043).
Conclusions:
Previous research has found that early and mid-life socioeconomic circumstances have cascading and complex effects on late life cognition. These same associations may be applicable to functioning with instrumental activities of daily living as they are with cognition. In the present study, current income levels were influential on the functioning of participants without cognitive impairment. Although, when examining those with mild cognitive impairment, mid-life economic circumstances were more impactful on everyday functioning. While the economic status of both groups were predictors of functioning, these findings highlight the importance of better understanding socioeconomic factors across the lifespan and all levels of cognition.
To investigate differences in performance on a widely used cognitive screener between community-dwelling older adults from two disparate socioeconomic groups.
Participants and Methods:
Participants were part of a larger study of cognitive screening in healthy older adults. The total sample (N=79, 69.6% female, 19% White/Caucasian, 12.7% Asian, 43% Latino/a, 25.3% Black/African-American) consisted of community-dwelling adults (Mage=73.1 years [SD=7.2] and Meducation=14.3 years [SD=2.6]) who were initially recruited via social media, flyers, and general community announcements. A lack of ethnic minority participants resulted in a two-year commitment to reach communities of color via visits and provision of health literacy to local religious and community programs. Continuous contact with leaders/gatekeepers helped establish research study credibility and forge a stronger sense of trust among ethnically diverse participants in the greater Houston, TX, area. Testing was initially conducted at the clinical study site. Due to low participation rates among people of color, greater effort was placed on tailored strategies to overcome economic and time constraints (i.e., schedule/time conflicts, lack of transportation, inability to pay for parking). To fit the priorities and needs of the participants, testing was also conducted at their homes (25.3%) and nearby religious and community centers (22.8%). Participants identifying as Latino/a or Black were predominantly recruited and tested at their local community center (as requested by gatekeepers/participants) to increase access to the study, in contrast to Caucasian participants. Median income estimates were used to stratify participants by socioeconomic status (SES) based on zip codes into low SES (L-SES) or high SES (H-SES) groups.
Results:
Participants from the L-SES group had significantly lower total scores on the MoCA than their H-SES counterparts, t(77J=2.837, p=0.003, g=0.696. The average MoCA total score for participants from the L-SES group was 2.64 points lower. The observed differences in MoCA total score when stratifying by ethnicity may be attributable to differences in education level and SES, which are known risk factors for cognitive impairment and will be further examined upon recruitment completion.
Conclusions:
Studies have found that ethnically diverse older adults not only encounter more barriers to accessing quality health care but also experience disparities in brain health research. Communities of color comprise a sizeable portion of our older adults but have been traditionally underrepresented in clinical research, limiting the generalizability of research findings to clinical treatment. Socioeconomic deprivation has been identified as one of several barriers to research engagement for people of color, placing ethnic communities at increased risk for under- or misdiagnosis and limited access to medical intervention. Preliminary findings have implications for the recruitment of ethnically diverse groups in clinical research. Given the growing racial and ethnic diversity among the United States population, we must do our due diligence to increase understanding of participation and recruitment barriers for racial/ethnic individuals. Tailored community outreach and engagement strategies may be effective in improving the inclusion of ethnically diverse populations and facilitating recruitment and retention in clinical research studies.
A critical need in the neuropsychology field is development and validation of efficient, scalable assessments of cognition. The Mobile Toolbox (MTB), a novel suite of mobile device-compatible, app-based cognitive assessments, was developed to address this need. The goals of this study were (1) To collect longitudinal normative data for the MTB assessments in a large, ethnoculturally and educationally diverse cohort; (2) To assess the feasibility and usability of remote assessment using MTB.
Participants and Methods:
Participants were recruited from the UCSF Brain Health Registry (BHR), an online cohort (N>100,000) that collects longitudinal cognitive, functional, behavioral, and health data using online neuropsychological tests and self- and study-partner report surveys. BHR participants who opted to learning about additional research opportunities were sent automated email invitations to enroll in the MTB study. Those who indicated study interest were provided instructions within the BHR online portal for downloading the MTB app. All participants had the opportunity to complete a single baseline administration of MTB (Word Meaning, Sequences, Spelling, Arranging Pictures, Arrow Matching, Faces and Names, Shape-Color Sorting, Number Match). Those who completed the baseline assessment within three days were invited to continue into the longitudinal study, where they complete MTB assessments at a single, short-term timepoint (day 7, 14, or 21; study arms sequentially assigned), and then at 6-month intervals. Enrollment across demographic groups was monitored, and study invitations were sent to specific demographic groups, with the goal of enrolling a sample of 800 participants in the longitudinal study: equal distribution across eight, 10-year age bands (ages 18-80+); 60% with <16 years of education; 10% non-Latinx Black, 15% Latinx, and 5% non-White other ethnocultural identity.
Results:
Between January-June 2022, 48,110 BHR participants were invited to the MTB study. Of those, 8294 (17%) expressed interest, 3401 (7%) completed the baseline assessment, 850 (1.8%) were assigned to the longitudinal study, and 782 (1.6%) completed a short-term longitudinal assessment. Study staff received 797 help tickets submitted by participants asking for email support to complete MTB. The baseline cohort had and average age of 64 years and an average of 16.6 years of education, 76.2% female, 2.1% non-Latinx Black, 7.1% Latinx, 86.8% non-Latinx White, and 4% from other ethnocultural groups. The longitudinal cohort had an average age of 62.3 years and an average of 16.1 years of education, 80% female, 2.8% non-Latinx Black, 8.5% Latinx, 83.5% non-Latinx White; and 5% other ethnocultural group. Compared to those invited to the study, those who enrolled in the longitudinal study were older, had higher educational attainment, and were more likely to be female and self-identify as non-Latinx White (p<0.05 for all).
Conclusions:
Efficient enrollment and task completion of a large cohort in a novel, app-based mobile cognitive assessment is feasible in a completely remote setting. Most participants were able to complete MTB without individual support, indicating good usability. This approach can be scaled up to efficiently assess cognition in many research and healthcare settings. A remaining challenge is achieving robust ethnocultural and educational diversity.
The Texas Functional Living Scale (TFLS) is a measure of adaptive functioning commonly utilized across the geriatric population. Current research suggests that those with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias perform poorly on the TFLS, compared to those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and normal cognition (Cullum et al., 2001). Additional research is needed to examine the influence anxiety and depressive symptoms have on activities of daily living (ADLS) in individuals being evaluated for memory disorders. This study will examine the effects of anxiety and depression on adaptive functioning across all patients, and within samples of those with dementia and MCI. It is hypothesized that higher reported anxiety and depressive symptoms will predict lower scores of ADLS.
Participants and Methods:
Patients at a memory disorder clinic (N = 756; 58.2% female) were screened for cognitive impairment using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). A brief neuropsychological evaluation (BNE) was then conducted in which the TFLS, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) were administered, among other measures.
Results:
A stepwise hierarchical regression was conducted on the entire sample to examine the effects of anxiety and depressive symptoms on TFLS performance, controlling for cognitive impairment using the MoCA. Lower MoCA scores explained a significant amount of variance in TFLS performance (R2 = 0.456, F(1, 754) = 632.78, p < .001). MoCA scores (b = 1.27, p < .001), the GAI (b = 0.14, p = .019), and the GDS (b = 0.10, p = 0.039) were significant predictors of poor TFLS performance across the entire sample. Although the MoCA, GDS, and GAI were each significant predictors of the TFLS, the increased variance explained by the GDS and GAI individually was incremental (AR2 = 0.003, F(1, 752) = 3.90, p = .049). Stepwise hierarchical regressions were also conducted on subsamples diagnosed with MCI (N = 171) and dementia (N = 394). For those with MCI, MoCA scores explained a significant amount of variance in TFLS performance (R2 = 0.044, F(1, 169) = 7.80, p = .006). Neither the GAI nor GDS explained significant additional variance. Only MoCA scores (b = .30, p =.006) predicted TFLS performance. For those with dementia, MoCA scores explained significant variance in TFLS scores (R2 = 0.338, F(1, 392) = 200.47, p < .001). The GAI explained additional significant variance when added (AR2 = 0.009, F(1, 391) = 5.26, p = .022). The GDS did not explain any additional variance. Both the MoCA (b = 1.29, p < .001) and the GAI (b = -0.15, p = .002) significantly predicted TFLS performance.
Conclusions:
While results suggest that anxiety and depressive symptoms alone do not explain a significant degree of variance within scores of adaptive functioning across the entire sample, elevated ratings of anxiety and depressive symptoms were significant predictors of lower scores of ADLS, suggesting some support for our hypothesis. Additionally, anxiety symptoms significantly explained increased variance in TFLS scores for those diagnosed with dementia, suggesting a potential relationship between anxiety levels and poor adaptive functioning for dementia patients.
An effective support system for families with children with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) consists of multiple methods of educational and therapeutic delivery. Such methods are adapted to meet a family’s needs and needs of the time, like the COVID-19 pandemic. Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) are established by schools to support success in academics for children with ASD. IEPs can vary depending on the district and accessibility, thus, the effective implementation and communication between this support system is important for its success. The current case study examines academic and therapeutic outcomes of an IEP implementation during hybrid learning of a child with ASD and their family.
Participants and Methods:
Purposeful sampling identified a participant from a previous IRB approved study through the UNLV Educational Psychology program that interviewed parents on their remote learning experience. A qualitative case study was applied to further investigate student outcomes. Parent interview and the child’s progress report were coded and analyzed systematically. The identified family included correspondence from the mother (Lisa, 37) and her son (Noah, 9). Noah attended third grade at a Charter School and was diagnosed with ASD in 2019. His IEP included 80% in General Education (online) with Special Education assistance (in person; reading, writing, and mathematics) and Occupational (OT), Speech/Language (SLP), and Physical Therapy (PT) (hybrid).
Results:
Noah began hybrid learning in October 2020, with in-person learning two days a week and remote learning everyday for two to three hours each day. Progress report and interview were collected in April 2021 at the halfway point of his IEP implementation which described Noah’s current special education and therapy services goals/outcomes in March 2021. This included 11 goals that were observed and assessed in OT (2), PT(2), Reading (2), Writing (1), Math (2), and SLP (2). Noah progressed in 9 of 11 goals, with 1 being met and 8 classified as satisfactory by displaying some improvement in respective skills mid year. The remaining OT (2) goals showed no definitive conclusion. Lisa mentioned that lack of direct observation of particular skills and too many online classes to attend led to inconclusive outcomes. Lisa and Noah came across difficulties while engaging in OT online sessions encountering emotional stress when adjusting to the mode of delivery. Lisa expressed positive emotions when referring to the support system and described it as collaborative with adequate attention to multiple aspects of his development. She voiced understanding of her’s and other professionals’ role and the extent of their abilities in the context of the pandemic.
Conclusions:
Of the 11 IEP goals, there was adequate progress for the child amid hybrid learning. The parent preferred that OT be delivered in person as certain procedures require direct contact and affected outcomes. Hybrid learning has allowed for parents to directly access their children’s endeavors and heighten communication with professionals. This suggests that maintenance of IEP standards can be satisfactory in a hybrid learning model with adequate monitoring from parents and treatment teams for children with ASD.
To assess the impact of injury severity on disease specific quality of life after Traumatic Brain Injury
Participants and Methods:
The study was carried out in Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India after obtaining ethical clearance from Institute Ethics Committee. Sixty consecutive patients aged 18 and above with moderate to severe TBI (GCS score of 3-12 at admission) attending the Outpatient Department of Neurosurgery Specialty were screened. Out of 60 participants, 40 had moderate TBI (GCS 9-12) and 20 patients had severe TBI (GCS 3-8). The participants having any pre-existing major psychiatric disorders, intellectual disability, current or past history of substance abuse, degenerative and/or progressive condition, terminal illness and past history of TBI were excluded. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Socio-demographic details and information about clinical status at the time of admission and discharge were obtained from participant and hospital records. Disease specific quality of life was measured by QOLIBRI (Quality of life after brain injury). It is a self-reported measure comprising of 37 items. The first part assesses the subjects’ satisfaction with his HRQL in 4 domains (cognition, self, daily life and autonomy, and social relationships). The second part measures how much the subject is bothered after TBI in 2 domains (emotions and physical problems). The other tools administered were Glasgow Outcome Scale and Barthel’s Index of Activities of Daily Living (functional status); Mini Mental State Examination (cognitive status): Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety and depression).
Results:
The data was analyzed using statistical package for social sciences software version 21 (SPSS). There were no significant differences between both groups with regard to age, gender, education status, marital status, family type and place of residence. Both groups were similar with regard to mode of injury and duration of injury. With regard to treatment during admission both group had significant differences. Among severe TBI group 90% underwent surgical intervention whereas among moderate TBI group only 45% underwent surgical intervention. Significant difference was present in GCS score at discharge between both the groups. After 6 months of injury both group had no significant difference with regard to functional status, global cognitive functioning, anxiety and depression. With regard to quality of life significant difference emerged between the groups on QOLIBRI total score. On various subscales of QOLIBRI - significant differences were noted only in the domains of social relationship and emotions. There were no differences between them on domains of cognition, self, daily life and physical problems.
Conclusions:
After 6 months of TBI, the participants in both groups (Moderate TBI and severe TBI) had similar functioning with regard to daily activities and psychological functioning. With regard to quality of life both groups emerged to be significantly different on overall quality of life and domains of social relationship and emotions.
The Tower of London is commonly used to assess planning ability. Deficient outcomes may however have different causes: A participant may not have the ability to think a sufficient number of steps into the future, or may become, for example, impatient to evaluate different possible paths. Outcomes are thus not pure measures of the "planning" construct of primary interest, which may have contributed to findings of low reliability and low validity of these outcomes in the literature. The advent of computerized testing combined with computational modeling potentially allows to go beyond traditional outcomes such as "total number of moves" and "total time taken" and disentangle different processes that are of primary interest. The goal of the current study is to establish whether a model that consists of "planning ability" and "response inhibition" parameters can be used to describe Tower of London data.
Participants and Methods:
We constructed an algorithm that produces Tower of London data, and a computational model that uses every single decision of a participant as input (e.g., whether a participant moves the red or the blue ball to the right peg in setting 15 when trying to get to setting 28). There are 210 unique decision situations that participants can encounter. Our algorithm and Bayesian hierarchical model uses two parameters for each participant as well as a guessing rule, that together determine the participant's decision at every step. The appropriateness of the model was evaluated in a simulation study, where the simulated distribution of data implied by this model is compared to the empirical distribution of total number of moves observed in real datasets. Data were simulated for 10 items with a sample size of 200 participants.
Results:
Our simulation study shows that with our model the empirical distribution of total number of moves is successfully replicated in the distribution of the simulated data.
Conclusions:
Computational modeling provides a new window into Tower of London performance by identifying different processes. Modeling thus allows us to go beyond aspecific descriptions of planning ability. Furthermore, using the high-resolution data of computerized testing allows us to estimate these parameters reliably without requiring "big data", keeping participant burden low. This study will be followed up in three ways. First, predictions will be preregistered and tested for these new cognitive outcomes in several large oncological patient samples. Second, the model will be extended to include reaction times, to include an additional metric of cognitive computation. Third, the new cognitive process outcomes will be analyzed in conjunction with cognitive process outcomes on other tests to establish process communalities.
Given the aging population, there are significant public health benefits to delaying the onset of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in individuals at risk. However, adherence to health behaviors (e.g., diet, exercise, sleep hygiene) is low in the general population. The Health Belief Model proposes that beliefs such as perceived threat of disease, perceived benefits and barriers to behavior change, and cues to action are mediators of behavior change. The aim of this study was to gain additional information on current health behaviors and beliefs for individuals at risk for developing AD. This information can then be used to inform behavioral interventions and individualized strategies to improve health behaviors that may reduce AD risk or delay symptom onset.
Participants and Methods:
Surveys were sent to the Rhode Island AD Prevention Registry, which is enriched for at-risk, cognitively normal adults (i.e., majority with a family history and/or an APOE e4 allele). A total of 177 individuals participated in this study. Participants were 68% female; 93% Caucasian and non-Hispanic; mean age of 69.2; 74% with family history of dementia; 40% with subjective memory decline. The survey included measures from the Science of Behavior Change (SoBC) Research Network to measure specific health belief factors, including individual AD risk, perceived future time remaining in one’s life, generalized self-efficacy, deferment of gratification, consideration of future consequences as well as dementia risk awareness and a total risk score for dementia calculated from a combination demographic, health and lifestyle behaviors.
Results:
Participants who were older had higher scores for dementia risk (r=0.78), lower future time perspective (r=-0.33), and lower generalized self-efficacy (r=-0.31) (all at p<0.001). Higher education correlated with higher consideration of future consequences (r=-.31, p<0.001) and lower overall dementia risk score (r=-0.23, p=0.006). Of all scales examined, only generalized self-efficacy had a significant linear relationship to both frequency (r2=0.06) and duration (r2=0.08) of weekly physical activity (p<0.001). Total dementia risk score also had significant linear relationships (r2=0.19) with future time perspective (p<0.001) and generalized self-efficacy (p=0.48).
Conclusions:
Overall, individuals who rated themselves higher in self-efficacy were more likely to exercise more frequently and for a longer duration. Individuals who had lower overall risk for dementia due to both demographic and behavioral factors were more likely to endorse higher self-efficacy and more perceived time remaining in their lives. Increasing self-efficacy and targeting perceived future time limitations may be key areas to increase motivation and participation in behavioral strategies to reduce AD risk. Developing individual profiles based on these scales may further allow for individually tailored intervention opportunities.
Given the results of the clinical trials for the disease-modifying therapy for Alzheimer's disease and its mechanism of action, it is necessary to start at the early stage as soon as possible. To this end, there is a need for a tool that allows easy periodic home assessment of memory change from the early stages of the disease. The purpose of this study is to establish a new method of memory evaluation showing well- correlated with Logical Memory (LM) II subtest score of the WMS-R and that, at the same time, can be done easily in a short time.
Participants and Methods:
The subjects were 85 subjects (including 12 MCI, 8 AD, and 65 age people with normal cognitive function). In the new method, 8-picture recall and 16-word recognition were assessed, respectively, and the index was calculated by adding up the ratio ofcorrect responses to both tests (max point is two). The correlation with the LM II score was examined.
Results:
Our statistical analysis showed that 8-picture recall (R=0.872, p<0.001) and the index (R=0.857, p<0.001) showed a significantcorrelation with the LMII score. On the other hand, the 16-word regression and LM II score was R = 0.691(p<0.001), relatively lower than the other two scores, because this task may have been higher than the true ability due to the false recognition of words that were not there.
Conclusions:
Our new method can easily predict the LM II score of WMS-R in about one third of the time required by conventional methods. We named this index as Self Assessment Memory Scale (SAMS), and are planning to develop a digital tool to enable easy andself-accessible evaluation of recall.
Despite knowledge concerning the prevalence and adverse consequences of pediatric stroke, there is limited awareness of the immediate and long-term effects on social-emotional functioning and psychological adjustment. Evidence from the broader childhood literature suggests that young individuals living with disabilities or neurological conditions are at considerably greater risk for emotional and behavioral concerns and lower quality of life. Qualitative research methodology can elucidate personal and subjective aspects of experience that cannot be entirely represented through quantitative measures. Although the parent experience of pediatric stroke has been qualitatively investigated, we endeavored to fill a gap in the pediatric stroke literature by focusing on the youth voice. The current project aimed to qualitatively explore emotional, behavioral, and social outcomes in pediatric stroke and identify personal and environmental factors that can influence psychological risk and resilience.
Participants and Methods:
Individual interviews were conducted with 14 children, aged 8 to 18 years, with a history of ischemic stroke. The semi-structured interview protocol aimed to capture the lived experience of survivors and encompassed open-ended questions about daily life, memories, perceptions, and psychosocial experiences. Interviews spanned 40-60 minutes in length, were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and qualitatively analyzed using reflexive Thematic Analysis methodology. Coding, theme generation, and data visualization were completed using NVivo12 software.
Results:
Participants discussed their views and understanding of their stroke, the perceived impact of stroke on their daily life, and the meaning-making process surrounding this experience. Children shared their perceptions regarding their abilities, challenges, life circumstances, aspirations, and relations to peers. Prominent themes encompassed shyness and social anxiety, cognitive and learning troubles, test anxiety, concealing feelings of sadness, the stigma of physical disability and its impact on social participation, bullying, and loneliness/isolation. Insight into adaptive coping mechanisms was present, as was emphasis on family closeness and the importance of supportive peers. Participants described feeling unique and were proud of their values and personal identity. Gratitude was expressed regarding stroke medical care and rehabilitative services, with an emergent theme surrounding the desire to give back to society.
Conclusions:
Taken together, our qualitative study findings illustrate the profound impact that pediatric stroke can have on children’s emotional experiences, personal identity, self-efficacy, learning, behavior, and psychosocial functioning. Despite these challenges, an enormous degree of resiliency was also demonstrated in youth’s insights into coping and adaptation to challenge. Our findings speak to the importance of psychological assessment and treatment planning surrounding internalizing symptoms in children with stroke. Given the potential for pervasive changes in various aspects of daily life, a comprehensive understanding of the personal psychological experiences and perceptions of pediatric stroke patients is essential, as it will facilitate opportunity for timely interventions that can improve coping and adaptive outcome. Implications will be discussed with regard to empowering pediatric stroke survivors, enhancing public education efforts about childhood acquired brain injury, and reducing stigma associated with disability and use of required supports.
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive scale (FACT-Cog) is one of the most frequently used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) and of CRCI-related impact on quality of life (QOL). Previous studies using the FACT-Cog found that >75% of women with breast cancer (BCa) experience CRCI. Distress tolerance (DT) is a complex construct that encompasses both the perceived capacity (i.e., cognitive appraisal) and the behavioral act of withstanding uncomfortable/aversive/negative emotional or physical experiences. Low DT is associated with psychopathology and executive dysfunction. We previously found that women with BCa with better DT skills reported less CRCI on the FACT-Cog. However, this relationship has not been tested using a performance-based cognitive measure. Therefore, the aims of this study were to: (1) assess the relationship between the FACT-Cog and the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), a performance-based cognitive measure; and (2) test whether the association between DT and CRCI (using the FACT-Cog) was replicated with the TICS.
Participants and Methods:
Participants completed the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS), the FACT-Cog, and the TICS after undergoing BCa surgery and prior to starting adjuvant therapy [101 women, age >50 years, M(SD)= 61.15(7.76), 43% White Non-Hispanic, 34.4% White Hispanic, 10.8% Black, with nonmetastatic BCa, 55.4% lumpectomy, 36.6% mastectomy; median 29 days post-surgery].
Results:
Although there was a significant correlation between the TICS total score and the FACT-CogQOL subscale (r = 0.347, p < 0.001), the TICS total score was not correlated with scores on the FACT-Cog perceived cognitive impairment (CogPCI), perceived cognitive abilities (CogPCA), or comments from others (CogOth) subscales. However, the TICS memory item, a 10-word list immediate recall task, had a weak statistically significant correlation with CogPCI (r = 0.237, p < 0.032), CogOth (r = 0.223, p < 0.044), and CogPCA (r = 0.233, p < 0.036). Next, the sample was divided based on the participant’s score on TICS memory item (i.e., < vs. > sample mean of 5.09). Results of independent samples t-tests demonstrated significant differences in mean scores for CogPCI, f(80) = -2.09, p = 0.04, Mdt = -7.65, Cohen’s d = 0.483, and CogQOL, f(80) = -2.57, p = 0.01, Mditt = -2.38, Cohen’s d = 0.593. A hierarchical linear regression found that DTS subscale and total scores did not significantly predict performance on the TICS. However, DTS continued to be a significant predictor of poorer FACT-Cog PCI scores while controlling for TICS scores.
Conclusions:
We found a weak relationship between self-reported cognitive impairment and objective cognitive performance (TICS). However, greater self-reported PCI and its impact on QOL was found in participants who scored below the sample mean on a recall task from the TICS. Although perceived ability to tolerate distress continued to predict self-reported PCI on the FACT-Cog, it did not predict overall performance on the TICS. Therefore, responses on the FACT-Cog may be more representative of an individual’s ability to tolerate distress related to perceived CRCI than actual overall cognitive ability or impairment.
Cognitive training has shown promise for improving cognition in older adults. Aging involves a variety of neuroanatomical changes that may affect response to cognitive training. White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are one common age-related brain change, as evidenced by T2-weighted and Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MRI. WMH are associated with older age, suggestive of cerebral small vessel disease, and reflect decreased white matter integrity. Higher WMH load associates with reduced threshold for clinical expression of cognitive impairment and dementia. The effects of WMH on response to cognitive training interventions are relatively unknown. The current study assessed (a) proximal cognitive training performance following a 3-month randomized control trial and (b) the contribution of baseline whole-brain WMH load, defined as total lesion volume (TLV), on pre-post proximal training change.
Participants and Methods:
Sixty-two healthy older adults ages 65-84 completed either adaptive cognitive training (CT; n=31) or educational training control (ET; n=31) interventions. Participants assigned to CT completed 20 hours of attention/processing speed training and 20 hours of working memory training delivered through commercially-available Posit Science BrainHQ. ET participants completed 40 hours of educational videos. All participants also underwent sham or active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an adjunctive intervention, although not a variable of interest in the current study. Multimodal MRI scans were acquired during the baseline visit. T1- and T2-weighted FLAIR images were processed using the Lesion Segmentation Tool (LST) for SPM12. The Lesion Prediction Algorithm of LST automatically segmented brain tissue and calculated lesion maps. A lesion threshold of 0.30 was applied to calculate TLV. A log transformation was applied to TLV to normalize the distribution of WMH. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance (RM-ANCOVA) assessed pre/post change in proximal composite (Total Training Composite) and sub-composite (Processing Speed Training Composite, Working Memory Training Composite) measures in the CT group compared to their ET counterparts, controlling for age, sex, years of education and tDCS group. Linear regression assessed the effect of TLV on post-intervention proximal composite and sub-composite, controlling for baseline performance, intervention assignment, age, sex, years of education, multisite scanner differences, estimated total intracranial volume, and binarized cardiovascular disease risk.
Results:
RM-ANCOVA revealed two-way group*time interactions such that those assigned cognitive training demonstrated greater improvement on proximal composite (Total Training Composite) and sub-composite (Processing Speed Training Composite, Working Memory Training Composite) measures compared to their ET counterparts. Multiple linear regression showed higher baseline TLV associated with lower pre-post change on Processing Speed Training sub-composite (ß = -0.19, p = 0.04) but not other composite measures.
Conclusions:
These findings demonstrate the utility of cognitive training for improving postintervention proximal performance in older adults. Additionally, pre-post proximal processing speed training change appear to be particularly sensitive to white matter hyperintensity load versus working memory training change. These data suggest that TLV may serve as an important factor for consideration when planning processing speed-based cognitive training interventions for remediation of cognitive decline in older adults.
Frequent and remote cognitive assessment may improve sensitivity to subtle cognitive decline associated with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of repeated remote memory assessment in late middle-aged and older adults.
Participants and Methods:
We recruited participants from a longitudinal aging cohort to complete three medial temporal lobe-based memory paradigms (Object-In-Room Recall [ORR], Mnemonic Discrimination for Objects and Scenes [MDT-OS], Complex Scene Recognition [CSR]) using the neotiv application at repeated intervals over one year. We conducted initial telephone calls to perform screening, consent, and download instructions. Participants were assigned 24 remote sessions on a smartphone or tablet and were alerted via push notification when an assignment was ready to complete. Participants were randomly assigned to: (1) complete memory tests every other week or (2) complete memory tests for multiple days within one week every other month. Each remote session lasts approximately 10 minutes and includes one memory paradigm and brief usability/acceptability questionnaires followed by a delayed retrieval session 90 minutes later. Feasibility metrics examined included participation, retention, compliance, and usability/acceptability.
Results:
Of 150 participants recruited, 113 consented and were enrolled into the study (participation rate = 75%). Current retention rate is 75%, with 85/113 currently active (n=73) or completed (n=12). Of the 85 active or completed participants, the mean age is 68.7 (range = 4882), 64% are women, 70% used a smartphone (30% tablet), 84 are cognitively unimpaired and 1 has mild cognitive impairment. The primary threat to retention was participants consenting into the study but never registering in the app or completing their first scheduled assignment. After enrollment, 130 telephone calls were made by study staff to facilitate registration into the app or to remind participants to complete tasks. 74-80% of participants completed delayed retrieval tasks within 30 minutes of push notification, but average retrieval time was 125137 minutes post-learning trials. Regarding acceptability/usability, 94% agreed the application was easy to use, 56% enjoyed completing the mobile memory tests (36% felt neutral), 40% prefer remote mobile memory tests to standard in-person paper and pencil tests, and 50% understood the test instructions. 87% felt the frequency of tests assigned was “just right” (13% “too often”) and 90% felt the test length was “just right” (7% too short, 3% too long). Participants who completed all 24 sessions to date (n=12) all endorsed being “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the platform and visit schedule, as well as recommended continued use of this type of cognitive testing.
Conclusions:
Remote memory assessment using smartphones and tablets is feasible and acceptable for cognitively unimpaired late middle-aged and older adults. Follow-up by study staff was needed to ensure adequate retention. Comprehension of instructions and compliance with completing delayed retrieval tasks within the expected timeframe was lower than expected. These feedback will be incorporated into an updated version of the app to improve compliance and retention. Longitudinal data collection is ongoing and results will be updated with a larger sample. Results will be compared across frequency schedule groups.
Memory impairment is a common comorbidity in individuals with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Further, in medication-resistant epilepsy the frontline option, neurosurgical epileptogenic zone destruction, places memory at significant risk. Research has highlighted that TLE causes whole-brain network efficiency disruption, but it is not established how this may explain pre- and post-surgical cognition. Here we examine whether white matter structural network organization predicts pre-operative memory function and/or risk for post-operative memory decline.
Participants and Methods:
Patients with drug-resistant TLE were recruited from two epilepsy centers in a prospective longitudinal study. The pre-operative sample included 51 individuals with left TLE (L-TLE), 52 with right TLE (R-TLE), and 57 healthy controls who underwent T1- and diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI), and neuropsychological tests of verbal and visual memory. Forty-four patients (n=21 L-TLE) subsequently underwent temporal lobe surgery (36 anterior temporal lobectomy; 7 stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampectomy; 1 amygdalohippocampectomy) and completed post-operative memory testing. Whole-brain connectomes were generated via diffusion tractography and analyzed using graph theory, focusing on network integration (path length) and specialization (transitivity). In the preoperative dataset, first we compared TLE versus controls with analysis of covariance (ANCOVAs) controlling for age. Next, linear regressions examined the association between memory scores and network efficiency between L-TLE, R-TLE and controls. In the post-operative sample, bivariate correlations examined the association between pre- to post-operative memory change and 1) global network efficiency and 2) asymmetry of mesial temporal efficiency (i.e., local efficiency of the hippocampal, parahippocampal, and entorhinal nodes). Finally, efficiency metrics were entered into stepwise regressions along with established predictors of memory decline.
Results:
Compared to controls, TLE showed longer path length (p < .05; ηp2 = .03) and lower transitivity (p = .01; ηp2 = .04). Pre-operatively, better verbal learning and memory were associated with both shorter path length (β = -0.23 to -0.32; psadjusted < .05) and increased transitivity (β = 0.20 to 0.31; psadjusted < .05). These associations were greater in L-TLE than R-TLE (i.e., a significant interaction; β = -0.29 to 0.25; psadjusted <.05). Post-operatively, global metrics predicted decline on list learning for LTLEs (rs = -.57 to .58; ps < .01), and were marginal on list recall (rs = -.42 to .40; ps < .10). Leftward asymmetry of mesial temporal local efficiency predicted greater decline across most verbal memory measures for L-TLE (rs -.47 to -59; psadjusted <.05), but not R-TLE. Asymmetry of mesial network efficiency uniquely explained at least 20 to 43% of the variance in list learning, recall, and story learning for L-TLE, outperforming hippocampal asymmetry and preoperative score (psadjusted <.05).
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that global white matter network abnormalities contribute to verbal memory impairment pre-operatively and vulnerability to decline post-operatively in L-TLE. Asymmetry of a predefined mesial temporal sub-network may help predict post-operative memory function following left temporal lobe surgery, such that greater efficiency in the to-beresected mesial temporal network may be an important risk factor for decline. Our findings extend the importance of network approaches in TLE to include the relationships between neurobiological networks and memory function.
Accurate early detection of subtle cognitive difficulties is critical for optimizing treatment of neurodegenerative disease. Those who speak English as a second language (ESL) in the US may be at a disadvantage on Englishwritten neuropsychological tests, increasing the potential for error, particularly when cognitive difficulties are mild and/or when informants are not available/unreliable. This study examined the utility of a standardized, performance-based test of everyday function for the assessment of cognition in ESL older adults.
Participants and Methods:
Five ESL participants (Mage=83 years; range 65-84 years old) were recruited along with 43 cognitively healthy, native English speakers (controls) as part of a larger study of functional assessment in community-dwelling older adults. Participants were required to identify a study partner to answer questions about their cognitive abilities and everyday functioning. ESL participants reported diverse native languages: Cantonese, Mandarin, Gujarati/Hindi, Farsi, and Azeri. One of the 5 ESL participants reported a diagnosis of MCI. Participants completed the Mini-Mental Status Exam, Trail Making Tests, Digit Span, Boston Naming Test, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, and Brief Visual Memory Test, resulting in 15 test scores. Participants also completed the Naturalistic Action Test (NAT), a performance-based tests that requires preparation of a breakfast and lunch using standardized objects presented on a table. Recordings of NAT performance were scored by two coders for time to completion, accomplishment of task steps, and errors (overt, micro-error, motor), resulting in 10 scores for the Breakfast and the Lunch tasks. Any discrepancies amongst the two coders were resolved by our lab. Informant-report questionnaires included the Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ), Everyday Cognition Questionnaire (ECog) and IADL-C. Total scores from the cognitive tests, NAT, and informant reports for each ESL participant were compared against the scores of Controls by computing T-scores using the Control M and SD. Low/impaired test scores were defined as <1.5 SD.
Results:
Informants reported intact everyday function (FAQ, IADL-C) for all ESL participants. Informant-reported ECog scores varied as expected; with mild decline reported for the participant with MCI. On traditional cognitive tests, ESL participants showed variable performance, such that low scores were obtained on up to 9 of the 15 scores. The ESL participant with MCI obtained low scores on 11/15 scores. On the NAT, all of the ESL participants without MCI showed scores on the Breakfast (accomplishment, errors) that were comparable to Controls. Completion time for both Breakfast and Lunch and Lunch scores (accomplishment, errors) were variable, with low across observed in ESL participants with healthy cognition.
Conclusions:
Older participants with ESL and healthy cognition showed highly variable scores on traditional, neuropsychological tests. However, on one item from a performance-based assessment of everyday function (NAT Breakfast), ESL participants with healthy cognition consistently performed well compared to healthy Controls. Performance was less consistent for completion time across both NAT tasks and on all measures from the Lunch task, for which the steps and objects may have been less familiar to ESL participants. Thus, performance-based testing holds promise for informing neuropsychological assessment of ESL older adults, but care should be taken in selecting test items that are highly familiar and outcome measures that are most meaningful across a range of cultures.
Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) can be observed in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Hallucinations are a core clinical symptom of Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB). In this study, we investigated NPS in healthy control and MCI groups who would later be diagnosed with DLB to determine which symptoms would present early.
Participants and Methods:
Participants included those originally diagnosed as healthy controls (n=55), MCI with DLB etiology (n=215), and DLB (n=1059). The control and MCI groups progressed to DLB at later visits in the study. NPS data were collected using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) that was obtained from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center.
Results:
To determine which NPS presented early in the DLB course, we ran ANCOVAs to assess the role of original diagnosis on each NPS, using age as a covariate and applying Bonferroni correction. The control and MCI groups, who were later diagnosed with DLB, had greater severity of delusions, hallucinations, agitation, and apathy than the DLB group. The MCI group that would later be diagnosed with DLB had greater severity of anxiety and motor symptoms than the DLB group. The control group had greater irritability severity than the DLB group, and the controls had greater nighttime behavior severity than the MCI group, who had greater severity than the DLB group.
Conclusions:
Overall, we found that NPS present early in those who will be diagnosed with DLB, even when they are diagnosed as healthy controls. These results suggest that examination of NPS is important even in healthy adults, and their presence may be the onset of the DLB process before an official diagnosis of the condition.