To examine neurocognitive correlates of oculomotor performance among U.S. military personnel with history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

A series of studies (total n=356) were conducted to examine saccadic eye movements and manual button presses collected in response to attention stimuli, and to compare these findings to the results of standardized neuropsychological tests. Study 1 included n=27 with remote mTBI and n=54 controls who completed the Bethesda Eye and Attention Measure (BEAM), an eye tracking task that was designed to measure visual attention and executive function. In Study 2, n=51 with chronic mTBI and n=33 controls completed the Fusion n-Back task, an eye tracking task that was designed to assess the impact of working memory load on visual attention performance. Study 3 examined psychometric characteristics of BEAM among n=191 military personnel with remote mTBI. In all studies, participants completed eye tracking tasks, a structured TBI diagnostic interview, and a brief battery of standardized neuropsychological tests.

In Study 1, BEAM saccadic and manual metrics demonstrated strong reliability and high sensitivity to multiple cognitive cues designed to elicit spatial orienting, temporal alerting, executive interference, perceptual release (gap) and inhibition (n2p=.76, p<.001). However, corresponding saccadic and manual measurements were weakly related to each other, and only manual (not saccadic) measurements were related to estimated verbal intelligence or years of education. Standardized neuropsychological measures did not differ between groups, but mTBI participants were more likely to be impaired on saccadic metrics than controls.

In Study 2, Standardized cognitive measures and estimated premorbid intelligence were positively associated with all manual metrics from the Fusion n-Back test, but were not associated with mTBI history or with saccadic metrics. Fusion n-Back saccadic and manual metrics had strong reliability and complementary sensitivity to chronic mTBI, with combined predictive power of PPV=.78, NPV=.72, r2=.44 for classification of remote mild TBI vs. controls on the more cognitively-challenging 1-back task condition.

In Study 3, BEAM metrics including manual RT latency and consistency, saccadic RT consistency, and saccadic inhibition errors showed consistent correlations with standardized measures of visual attention, processing speed, task switching, working memory, and executive functions. Hierarchical regressions showed that BEAM saccadic and manual metrics were independently predictive of cognitive test performance, above and beyond effects of demographic factors and clinical characteristics.

Results demonstrated some surprising findings related to neurocognitive influences on oculomotor performance. While both saccadic and manual performance were strongly and similarly influenced by attention cues, these two modalities were only weakly correlated to one another. Additionally, manual metrics were more strongly and consistently related to standardized cognitive test performance and premorbid intelligence than saccadic metrics. However, saccadic metrics demonstrated superior sensitivity to remote/chronic mTBI relative to manual metrics and standardized neuropsychological measures. Overall, these results suggest that saccadic eye tracking measures may provide unique value in assessment of mTBI and neurocognitive functions that is complementary with more common forms of assessment relying upon somatomotor response modalities.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many neuropsychological services shifted from an in-person assessment to a tele-neuropsychological assessment format. Prior research studies support the use of telemedicine assessments but have also noted some limitations (i.e., tasks involving direct manipulation of physical stimuli and visuospatial tasks). We sought to examine the relationship between the same neuropsychological tasks administered via a telemedicine versus inperson format in a treatment seeking clinical sample of Veterans with history of TBI.

Veterans with history of mild to severe TBI (predominantly mild TBI) referred to the TBI Cognitive Rehabilitation Clinic within the San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center completed a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment to help inform diagnosis and treatment recommendations. 515 Veterans completed traditional in-person assessment (pre-pandemic) and 45 Veterans completed neuropsychological assessment via a telemedicine platform during the pandemic (Veteran was in their home and examiner was in their home or facility office). The total sample consisted of 93% male and 7% female, average age of 33, 13 years of education, 63% White, 13% Other/Non-reported, 12% Black, 6% Asian, 6% Pacific Islander, 2% Alaskan Native, and 1% Multi-Racial, 73% Non-Hispanic, and 27% Hispanic. For the purposes of this study, we used age-corrected subtest scores from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS): Color Word Interference (CWI) and Verbal Fluency (VF), WASI-II Matrix Reasoning, California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II), Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-IV): Logical Memory, and WRAT-IV Reading. We also examined symptoms of anxiety (BAI), sleep quality (PSQI), neurological symptoms (NSI), and symptoms of PTSD (PCL-5). ANOVAs were used to analyze the relationship between tele-neuropsychological versus in-person administration. Additionally, we controlled for performance validity failure.

Tele-neuropsychological task results were comparable to in-person assessment across all tasks, except for D-KEFS CWI color naming subtest where individuals completing the task via telemedicine performed approximately 2 scaled scores below the in-person assessment group, F (1, 278)=6.44, p=.012. Individuals who completed the tele-neuropsychological assessment during the COVID-pandemic did not differ on scores of self-reported symptoms of PTSD or neuropsychological symptoms when compared to in-person assessment of pre-pandemic individuals within our clinic. However, the telemedicine group reported better sleep quality (F (1, 377)=11.94, p=.001) but a trend towards more symptoms of anxiety (F (1, 552)=2.90, p=.089.

These results suggest that many of the verbal memory, language, premorbid functioning, and verbal/visual tasks of executive function can be adequately administered via telemedicine. Substantial variability may exist on measures of processing speed administered via telemedicine, however. Additionally, changes in lifestyle and daily demands during the COVID-19 pandemic may have created unique circumstances that benefited sleep quality for some individuals but also increased symptoms of anxiety/uncertainty.

To determine the association between blood markers of white matter injury (e.g., serum neurofilament light and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy) and a novel neuroimaging technique measuring microstructural white matter changes (e.g., diffusion kurtosis imaging) in regions (e.g., anterior thalamic radiation and uncinate fasciculus) known to be impacted in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and associated with symptoms common in those with chronic TBI (e.g., sleep disruption, cognitive and emotional disinhibition) in a heterogeneous sample of Veterans and non-Veterans with a history of remote TBI (i.e., >6 months).

Participants with complete imaging and blood data (N=24) were sampled from a larger multisite study of chronic mild-moderate TBI. Participants ranged in age from young to middle-aged (mean age = 34.17, SD age = 10.96, range = 19-58) and primarily male (66.7%). The number of distinct TBIs ranged from 1-5 and the time since most recent TBI ranged from 0-30 years. Scores on a cognitive screener (MoCA) ranged from 22-30 (mean = 26.75). We performed bivariate correlations with mean kurtosis (MK) in the anterior thalamic radiation (ATR; left, right) uncinate fasciculus (UF; left, right), and serum neurofilament light (NFL), and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy (pNFH). Both were log transformed for non-normality. Significance threshold was set at p<0.05.

pNFH was significantly and negatively correlated to MK in the right (r=-0.446) and left (r=-0.599) UF and right (r=-0.531) and left (r=-0.469) ATR. NFL showed moderate associations with MK in the right (r=-0.345) and left (r=-0.361) UF and little to small association in the right (r=-0.063) and left (r=-0.215) ATR. In post-hoc analyses, MK in both the left (r=0.434) and right (r=0.514) UF was positively associated with performance on a frontally-mediated list-learning task (California Verbal Learning Test, 2nd Edition; Trials 1-5 total).

Results suggest that serum pNFH may be a more sensitive blood marker of microstructural complexity in white matter regions frequently impacted by TBI in a chronic mild-moderate TBI sample. Further, it suggests that even years after a mild-moderate TBI, levels of pNFH may be informative regarding white matter integrity in regions related to executive functioning and emotional disinhibition, both of which are common presenting problems when these patients are seen in a clinical setting.

Although remote neuropsychological assessments have become increasingly common, current research on the reliability and validity of scores obtained from remote at-home assessments are sparse. No studies have examined remote at-home administration of the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set (UDS) even though this battery is being used to track over 45,000 participants over time. This study aimed to determine whether remote UDS scores can be combined with in-person data by assessing whether rates of score changes over time (i.e., reliability) differed by modality and whether remote and in-person scores converge (i.e., validity).

Data for UDS visits conducted from 09/2005 to 12/2021 from 43 Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers were examined. We identified 311 participants (254 cognitively unimpaired, 7 impaired - not mild cognitive impairment, 25 mild cognitive impairment, 25 dementia) who completed 2 remote UDS visits 0.868 years apart (SD = 0.200 years). First, initial remote scores were correlated with most recent in-person scores. Second, we examined whether rates of change differed between remote and in-person assessments. Repeated-measure one-way ANOVA were used to compare rates calculated from the same individual from remote versus inperson assessments. We additionally identified a demographically- and visit-number-matched group of 311 participants with in-person UDS visits given that all remote visits occurred after in-person visits; one-way ANOVAs were used to compare remote rates to rates from in-person assessments from the matched in-person group. Finally, accuracy of remote scores were assessed by quantifying the difference between the actual remote scores and predicted scores based on repeated in-person assessments. These residual values were then divided by the maximum score to form error rates.

Remote UDS score on MoCA-blind, Craft story immediate and delayed recall, digits forward, digits backward, phonemic fluency (F, L, F + L), and semantic fluency (animals, vegetables, animals + vegetables) were all highly correlated (all ps < 0.001) with scores obtained from preceding in-person assessments. At the group level, within-subject comparisons between remote and in-person rates of change were not significantly different for 7/11 tests; between-subject comparisons were not significantly different for 10/11 tests. Vegetable fluency had slightly reduced rates of change with remote assessment compared to inperson assessments. Critically, remote scores were consistent with predicted scores based on the trajectory of each subject’s in-person assessments with group mean error rates ranging from 0.7% (Craft Delayed Recall) to 3.9% (Phonemic fluency - F).

Our results demonstrate adequate reliability and convergent validity for remotely administered verbally based tests from the NACC UDS battery. Importantly, our findings provide some support for combining remote and in-person scores for studies that transitioned to remote testing due to COVID-19. However, future research is needed for tests with visual stimuli that assess visual memory, visuospatial function, and aspects of executive function.

Verbal fluency consists of semantic and phonemic fluency and is often used to detect verbal ability and executive control (Shao et al., 2014). While research has found general verbal fluency impairments in chronic alcohol use, few studies have examined semantic and phonemic fluency separately (Stavro et al., 2012; Stephan et al., 2017). This meta-analytical study examines the performance of abstinent alcohol-dependent individuals on semantic fluency (categories) and phonemic fluency (letters).

As part of a larger study, two researchers independently searched eight databases, extracted required data, and calculated effect sizes on neuropsychological data in alcohol dependent (AD) individuals. Inclusion criteria for articles were: (a) comparison of abstinent alcohol-dependent patients to healthy controls, (b) matched control group on age, education, or IQ, and (c) standardized neuropsychological testing. Exclusion criteria included: (a) diagnosis of Axis I disorders (other than alcohol dependence), (b) comorbidity with other disorders that impact neuropsychological functioning, or (c) not published or translated into English. A total of 31 articles (AD n=1,080 and HC n=1,090) was analyzed in this study.

Semantic fluency evidenced a statistically significant and medium effect size estimate (g = 0.632, p < 0.001). The heterogeneity for semantic fluency was statistically significant (Q=152.468, df=20, p=0.000). Phonemic fluency evidenced a statistically significant and medium effect size estimate (g = 0.572, p < 0.001). The heterogeneity for phonemic fluency was also statistically significant (Q=236.697, df=24, p=0.000).

Deficits in semantic and phonemic fluency are both associated with alcohol dependence. Although some previous research has reported more frontal lobe impact of alcohol, which would be expected to impact phonemic more readily than semantic fluency, this is not evident in the current data. There are many possible reasons for this failure to observe this dissociation meta-analytically. Some potential reasons include the possibility that alcohol affects multiple regions of the brain, that both these measures are affected by alcohol but miss the subtlety associated with frontal damage, or the likelihood that when studies are aggregated in meta-analysis the heterogeneity results in a regression to the mean effect size. These and other reasons are not mutually exclusive and future research should attempt to examine these and other hypotheses.

Emotion regulation is generally thought of as the process of overriding one's initial emotional response to personally relevant events. One frequently investigated type of emotion regulation is cognitive reappraisal, which describes one's ability to cognitively alter the meaning of an event. Cognitive reappraisal is associated with better cognitive, social, and health outcomes compared to other emotion regulation strategies. The cognitive building blocks of cognitive reappraisal are related to executive cognitive control processes, which broadly describe one's ability to engage in non-automatic and goal-oriented behaviors. Crucially, executive control processes are also relevant in demanding cognitive tasks such as prospective memory since, similarly to cognitive reappraisal, they involve effortful and purpose driven efforts. However, cognitive reappraisal has thus far not been investigated regarding prospective memory performance despite findings that suggest that emotionally evocative stimuli improve prospective memory performance. The present study investigated whether cognitive reappraisal state and trait measures as well as other types of emotion regulation strategies are associated with prospective memory accuracy of negatively valenced prospective memory targets.

A total of 45 participants (69% women; M = 22.62 years, SD = 5.69 years) took part in this cross-sectional study. Cognitive reappraisal and prospective memory tasks were administered on the computer. A total of 106 pictures were shown in the prospective memory task, including 12 prospective memory hits. A 2-back paradigm was used as the effortful ongoing task. Dependent measures included accuracy of and reaction times to negative prospective memory hits. A total of 45 pictures were shown in the cognitive reappraisal task. Participants were asked to decrease their negative emotions when looking at previously normed negatively valenced pictures versus merely looking at them (Lang et al., 2001). Dependent measures in the cognitive reappraisal task included success of downregulating negative emotion after the DECREASE versus LOOK instruction. A mood manipulation check and a questionnaire asking about participants' reappraisal strategies was conducted. Trait based measures of emotion regulation included the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and the Dysfunction of Emotion Regulation Scale.

Participants endorsed significantly higher negative mood after looking at negative versus neutral pictures, t(48) = 22.77, p , .05). Ratings further indicated that participants were able to significantly decrease how negative they felt when reappraising versus looking at negative pictures, t(44) = 12.82, p , .05. Regarding the relationship between prospective memory accuracy of negatively valanced prospective memory targets and cognitive reappraisal ability, no significant bivariate correlation was found (p > .05). However, a significant bivariate correlation was found between reaction times to negatively valenced prospective memory targets and cognitive reappraisal ability (rs = -.32, p = .03). No significant relationship was observed between prospective memory accuracy of or reaction times to negatively valenced prospective memory targets and trait based measures of emotion regulation (all ps > .05).

Hypotheses were partly supported. Higher state-based cognitive reappraisal abilities may be associated with lower cognitive costs when asked to remember negatively evocative pictures and/or higher overall cognitive capacity. The importance of assessing emotion regulation when utilizing emotionally evocative stimuli and their clinical significant is discussed.

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and dementia present major and escalating public health concerns for the U.S., especially among ethnoculturally diverse (e.g., Latinx, non-Latinx Black [NLB]) populations who represent an increasing percentage of the older adult population in the US and bear greater AD burden compared to non-Latinx Whites (NLWs). Notably, neurocognition and functional status are highly correlated in those with AD. However, little has been done to understand these associations and validate functional measures across geographically diverse, multiethnic samples. The aims of this study were to characterize the neurocognition and functional status of a large, multiethnic sample and subsequently examine any associations between neurocognition and functional status among Latinx, NLB, and NLW older adults.

This cross-sectional, retrospective study utilized archival data drawn from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). ADNI is a national, longitudinal, multi-site, observational study aiming to measure the progression of AD (see https://adni-info.org). Study measures included the: 1) Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog; 13-items), a global neurocognitive battery evaluating neurocognition in people with AD; 2) Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ; 10-item questionnaire) to assess functional status; 3) Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS; 15-item questionnaire) for depression; and 4) American National Adult Reading Test (ANART; 50-word test) for reading level. The sample included 1537 older adults who completed baseline visits for the ADNI study, 1333 of whom were NLW, 123 NLB, and 81 Latinx. The average age of the sample was 73 years, average 16 years of education, and 53% male. Compared to the NLW group, the NLB and Latinx groups were significantly younger and had a higher percentage of female participants. Compared to NLW and Latinx groups, the NLB group also had significantly fewer years of education and lower reading scores. Potential confounds (i.e., demographic variables, depression) were identified a priori based on the literature and subsequently analyzed for inclusion as covariates in the primary analyses. Analyses revealed variables were non-normally distributed, therefore Independent Samples Kruskal-Wallis tests and Spearman’s Correlations were computed to examine differences and correlations between ethnocultural groups.

After controlling for age and education, Latinx and NLB groups had significantly higher ADAS-cog and FAQ scores than the NLW group (Hs = 9.50-21.53, ps < .05). Spearman’s partial correlations controlling for age, education, gender, and depression revealed that higher ADAS-cog scores were associated with higher FAQ scores within Latinx (p=.49, p<.001), NLB (p=.66, p<.001), and NLW (p=.60, p<.001) groups.

Findings indicate that neurocognition is positively associated with functional status and support the ecological and external validity of the ADAS-cog and FAQ for use with NLB and Latinx older adults, in addition to previously established work with more homogenous samples. Study strengths include the overall sample size, geographic diversity, and standardization of research approaches. Study limitations include high education level and low comorbidity rates present in the sample, limiting the generalizability of the results, in addition to the unbalanced ethnocultural groups, further emphasizing the need for increased inclusion efforts of ethnoculturally diverse older adults into brain health research studies.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the continuity of cognitive rehabilitation (CR) worldwide. However, the use of teleneuropsychology (TNP) to provide CR has contributed significantly to the continuity of treatment. The objective of this study was to measure the effects of CR via the TNP on cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and memory strategies in a cohort of patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

A sample of 60 patients (60% female; age: 72.4±6.96) with MCI according to Petersen criteria was randomly divided into two groups: 30 cases (treatment group) and 30 controls (waiting list group). Subjects were matched for age, sex, and MMSE or MoCA.

The treatment group received ten weekly CR sessions of 45 minutes weekly. Pre-treatment (week 0) and post-treatment (week 10) measures were assessed for both groups. Different Linear Mixed Models were estimated to test treatment effect (CR vs. Controls) on each outcome of interest over Time (Pre/Post), controlling for Diagnosis, Age, Sex, and MMSE/MoCA performance.

A significant Group (Control/Treatment) x Time (pre/post) interaction revealed that the treatment group at 10 weeks had better scores in cognitive variables: memory (RAVLT learning trials p=0.030; RAVLT delayed recall p=0.029), phonological fluency(p=0.001), activities of daily living (FAQ p=0.001), satisfaction with memory performance (MMQ Satisfaction p=0.004) and use of memory strategies (MMQ Strategy p=0.00), and a significant reduction of affective symptomatology: depression (GDS p=0.00), neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPIQ p=0.045), Forgetfulness (EDO-10 p=0.00), Stress (DAS Stress p=0.00).

This is the first study to test CR using teleNP in South America. Our results suggest that CR through teleNP is an effective intervention to improve performance on cognitive variables and reduce neuropsychiatric symptomatology compared to patients with MCI. These results have great significance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in South America, where teleNP is proving to be a valuable tool.

As the older adult population increases in the coming decades, the number of persons that develop dementia of the Alzheimer’s type (DAT) will increase accordingly. Though curative treatment for Alzheimer’s disease remains elusive, early detection of cognitive decline allows for initiation of pharmacological treatment to slow disease progression and non-pharmacological approaches to support quality of life and well-being of affected individuals and their care partners. Streamlined approaches that bridge the gap between brief screenings and comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation are needed. The NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) is a brief, easily administered, computerized cognitive battery that assesses various aspects of both fluid and crystallized cognitive abilities. ARMADA (Advancing Reliable Measurement in Alzheimer’s Disease and Cognitive Aging) is a multi-site study that aims to validate the NIHTB across the spectrum from normal aging to DAT. The current study utilized longitudinal data from ARMADA to determine whether performance on the NIHTB-CB detects cognitive decline in persons with normal cognition (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and mild DAT over the span of two years. We predicted that scores would decline for the MCI and DAT groups, but not for the NC group.

Participants were 191 participants drawn from the larger ARMADA cohort aged 65-84 (nNC = 118, nMCI = 47, nDAT = 26) that completed the NIHTB-CB at baseline and 12 months. The clinical groups were significantly older than the NC group at baseline (MNC = 72.72, MMCI = 76.63, MDAT = 75.42; p < .001) and the NC and MCI groups had significantly more years of education than the DAT group (MNC = 17.03, MMCI = 16.83, MDAT = 15.54; p = .008).

Mixed model ANOVAs determined differences in uncorrected NIHTB-CB scores between clinical groups at baseline and 12 months, controlling for age and education. There were significant interactions between time and clinical group for Flanker (p < .001), Pattern Comparison (p < .001), and Picture Vocabulary (p = .001), such that the DAT group demonstrated a more negative slope of change than the NC and MCI groups. For Oral Reading, the MCI group demonstrated a more negative slope of change than the NC and DAT groups (p = .01).

Differential score trajectories were found for the Flanker task, with a more negative pattern of change in scores in the DAT group compared to the NC and MCI groups. Contrary to expectation, scores decreased for the two crystallized subtests across groups, which may reflect regression to the mean given high baseline scores, especially for Picture Vocabulary; however, these results were also moderated by group with less decline in scores in the NC group, which may indicate involvement of non-crystallized abilities in executing a single word comprehension task. Group differences were subtle, which may in part reflect the relatively short period of follow up. The Flanker task appears to be most sensitive to decline in mild DAT compared to MCI and NC. Results provide preliminary support for the utility of NIHTB-CB in detecting cognitive decline along the cognitive aging to DAT spectrum.

US forces used Agent Orange (AO) during the Vietnam War and continued to store/test it at other locations after the war. AO is a powerful herbicide including dioxin, a highly toxic ingredient classified as a human carcinogen. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine periodically review the literature on the health effects of AO exposure (AOE) and concluded in 2018 that there is sufficient evidence linking AO with a wide range of adverse health outcomes, including neurologic disorders (e.g., Parkinson’s disease). The VA has a list of medical disorders considered presumptive conditions related to AOE. More recently, AOE has been linked to a nearly double risk compared to those without AOE for receiving a dementia diagnosis. To our knowledge, no one has investigated the association of AOE to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a condition thought to precede dementia.

We examined men in three waves of the Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging (VETSA). In wave 3, participants self-reported yes/no to the question of whether they ever had prolonged or serious AOE. MCI was diagnosed by the Jak-Bondi approach. Impairment was defined as 2+ tests within a cognitive domain that were more than 1.5 standard deviations below normative means after adjusting for premorbid cognitive ability. In mixed effects models, we tested the effect of AOE on MCI status. Models were adjusted for age, ethnicity, and non-independence within twin pairs.

In wave 3, 12.6% (230) of 1167 participants reported AOE. Those with AOE data had mean ages of 51.1 (wave 1), 56.0 (wave 2), and 61.4 (wave 3). Those with data on both AOE and MCI numbered 861 (wave 1), 900 (wave 2), 1121 (wave 3), and 766 had AOE and MCI at all waves. AOE was significantly related to wave 2 MCI (p < .001), but not to waves 1 and 3 MCI. AOE was significantly associated with the number of time points at which someone met criteria for MCI (p = .011). Analyses were conducted on six cognitive domains used to diagnose MCI, using available participants per wave. At all 3 waves, AOE was significantly associated with lower scores in processing speed (p = .003, p = .004, p = .005, respectively), working memory (p < .001, p = .002, p = .008) and nearly significant at all waves for executive dysfunction (p < .001, p < .001, p = .050). There were two other significant associations [wave 2 memory (p = .038), wave 3 fluency (p = .024)]. The semantic fluency cognitive domain was unrelated to AOE in all waves.

AOE was consistently associated with lower processing speed, working memory, and executive dysfunction in males ages 51-61. It was also associated with the number of time points at which one met criteria for MCI in that age range, and with MCI in the mid-fifties. Findings support the idea of a risk for greater cognitive decline in those exposed to AO earlier in their lives, and with a risk for developing MCI.

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) allows for tracking participant responses across multiple timepoints within the context of typical daily experiences. This study used EMA delivered via smartwatches to investigate dynamic associations between older adults’ fluctuations in cognitive performance as measured by an n-back test and self-reports of current internal (i.e., mental sharpness, fatigue, stress) and external (i.e., environmental distractions, time of day) contextual states over seven days. We hypothesized that 1) cognitive test fluctuations throughout the week would be meaningful beyond average cognitive test scores and 2) cognitive test scores would fluctuate in response to internal and external contexts.

Participants were 28 community-dwelling older adults recruited for a larger clinical trial assessing the influence of lifestyle factors and compensatory strategy use on cognitive health. During week one of the trial, participants received a smartwatch which sent prompts four times a day for seven consecutive days. The prompts included a 45-second one-back shape test, along with Likert-style questions about their current experience. Questions assessing participants’ internal contexts asked about participants’ experience “right now” of mental sharpness, physical fatigue, and stress. External context was assessed via the EMA prompt, “Right now my environment is distracting,” and time of day of the response.

Data was screened such that all data points outside the 7-day prompt window were removed, one participant who did not respond to any prompts was removed, and participants who responded to less than 60% of the shape test prompts were removed (n = 10). The sample used for this preliminary analysis included 17 participants (Age, M = 71.94 years; Education, M = 14 years; 88% Female; 88% White) with an average compliance of 75% (Range = 17 - 26 shape test responses) and an average shape test accuracy of > 92%. Hypothesis 1 was supported by the large fluctuations of the average cognitive test scores across timepoints (M = 24.35, Min = 16, Max = 27, SD = 2.54) and by repeated-measures ANOVA of average cognitive test scores by day (F(1,7) = 5.24, p < 0.01). Hypothesis 2: Cross-correlation lags 0 to 4 were assessed. For internal contexts, cross-correlation showed a medium correlation between mental sharpness and cognition for lags 0 (r = 0.46) and 1 (r = 0.4); a small to medium correlation between physical fatigue and cognition for lags 0 (r = -0.51) and 1 (r = -0.31); and no correlation between stress and cognition (r < 0.2). For external contexts, cross-correlation revealed no correlation between environmental distraction and cognition (r < 0.3), and repeated measures ANOVA revealed no effect of time of day on cognition scores (p > 0.05).

Older adults’ cognitive performance on an n-back shape test varied over time with internal contextual states. Cognitive performance was positively associated with feelings of mental sharpness and negatively associated with physical fatigue. Current external environmental distractions and time of day were less influential on cognitive performance. As more data is collected, influences of individual fluctuations in cognitive performance will be investigated.

The Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) Recognition Discrimination (RD) index has emerged as an embedded performance validity test (PVT). However, there do not appear to be any studies that have examined its utility in Spanish-speaking samples. This pilot study examined the classification accuracy of the BVMT-R RD for detecting performance invalidity in a Spanish-speaking forensic sample.

This cross-sectional study utilized a sample of 89 Spanish speakers that were administered the BVMT-R during an outpatient neuropsychological evaluation. Out of the 89 Spanish speakers, 43 were subjects in litigation, 32 were neurological patients evaluated for clinical purposes, and 14 were healthy controls. The sample was 67% male/33% female, 53% South American, 33% Caribbean (Dominican, Puerto Rican, Cuban), 10% Central American, 3% North American (Mexican), and 1% Spanish, with a mean age of 44.2 years (SD = 14.2; range = 20-78) and mean education of 11 years (SD = 3.7; range = 0-20). Test administration for each patient was completed in Spanish by a fluent, Spanish-speaking examiner. In total, 64/89 (72%) were classified as valid and 25/89 (28%) as invalid based on performance across the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), at least one additional PVT (Rey-15 item memory test; Rey Dot Counting Test; Reliable Digit Span; WHO-AVLT recognition trial) and objective diagnostic criteria identifying invalid performance. Analyses included three univariate analyses of variance (ANOVA), with the groups (healthy vs neurological vs litigation) as independent variables and performance on BVMT-RD as the dependent variable.

Statistically significant differences among the groups were found F(2,86)=8.32, p < .001). Post-hoc analysis (Scheffe test) showed the mean of the litigation group to be significantly lower than the means of the other two groups (healthy and neurological), which showed no difference between them. An ANOVA with validity groups as the fixed factor and BVMT-R RD index as the dependent variable was significant F(1,85)= 21.02, p <.001). Results of a ROC curve analysis yielded statistically significant AUC (.794). The optimal cut-score was BVMT-R RD < 5 (48% sensitivity/88% specificity).

Results of the BVMT-R RD index in this Spanish-speaking population differed by subgroup, with worse performance seen in individuals involved in litigation, compared to those who were not (healthy and neurological). Notably, the BVMT-R RD index significantly differentiated validity groups, maintaining adequate sensitivity and good specificity. Overall, results demonstrate promise for BVMT-RD as a PVT for Spanish-speaking populations.

Following a traumatic brain injury (TBI), the majority of patients report difficulties with prospective memory (PM). However, there is not always a significant relationship between subjective and objective PM measures. Several variables may influence the degree of severity of perceived difficulties, including the severity of the injury and psychoemotional status. The aim of this study was to determine whether the severity of the TBI and anxiety and depressive symptoms were related to objective and subjective difficulties of PM.

50 patients (mean age = 31,3 years old) with a TBI (20 mild and 30 moderate/severe) in the post-acute phase of recovery and 15 matched healthy control participants (mean age = 32,3 years old) were recruited. They completed inventories assessing the presence of anxiety (BAI) and depressive (BDI) symptoms and performed the Ecological test of prospective memory (TEMP), an objective measure of PM. The Comprehensive Assessment of PM (CAPM), a subjective measure of PM, was also filled out by participants and their relatives.

In patients with moderate/severe TBI, significant correlations were found between the CAPM and the BDI (r =.601, p<.001) and the BAI (r =.507, p=.004). A negative correlation was also observed between the relatives’ CAPM scores and the performance of the patients on the TEMP (r= -.374, p=.042). In patients with mild TBI, there was only a strong significant correlation between the CAPM and the BAI scores (r =.574, p=.008). However, no other correlation was significant between this group of patients and their relatives. Additionally, results on the TEMP were not significantly correlated with the CAMP completed by healthy control participants or their relatives. A linear regression conducted in the group of participants with TBI showed that BAI and BDI scores are the only significant predictors of the results on the CAPM (31% of the variance), while TBI severity is the only significant predictor of the results on the TEMP (37% of the variance).

The perception of PM difficulties in patients with a TBI does not seem to be related to their objective performance. Anxiety and depressive symptoms appear to influence their perception more than their objective performance. As suggested by their relatives, a decrease in self-awareness could explain the lack of relationship between subjective PM difficulties of patients with moderate/severe TBI and their objective performance. On the other hand, TBI severity is more strongly related to objective performance on PM tests. These results highlight the importance of using different measures to accurately assess PM and the various factors influencing this construct.

Performance validity tests (PVTs) provide a methodological approach to detecting credible neurocognitive performances. This proves invaluable to the diagnostic process, as it allows neuropsychologists to objectively determine if an evaluation reflects a patient’s true neurocognitive abilities or if external factors are impacting the results. However, their addition to a testing battery can increase an already lengthy evaluation. As such, there is a need for sensitive but less time intensive PVTs. The purpose of this study is to validate the Coin-in-Hand (CIH) procedure as a quick and effective PVT within a veteran population.

68 English-speaking patients were identified from an outpatient neuropsychological assessment dataset. Performances were correlated to the well- validated Reliable Digit Span (RDS), and several other soft indicators of task engagement including expanded COWAT, BVMT-False Alarms (FA), WCST Failure to Maintain Set (FTM), TOMM, and the RBANS Effort Index (EI). All participants attempted CIH and RDS, testing was discontinued if 2 or more PVTs were invalid. An AUC analysis was conducted to determine how well the CIH discriminated between valid and invalid performance and determine the tests optimal cut-off score (sensitivity > 0.90 while maintaining the highest possible specificity). Logistic Regression was conducted to determine how well the CIH predicted performance validity.

Subject mean(SD) age and education were 55.25 (16.06) and 13.41 (2.55) years, respectively. 17% female, 60% Caucasian, and 32% Black. Descriptive statistics for each of the other performance validity tests were gathered. The CIH demonstrated low diagnostic accuracy (AUC = .66; p >.05; CI = .51 -.81); a cut score of <8 resulted in a sensitivity of .96 and a specificty of .64. Logistic Regression showed that CIH performance significantly predicted performance validity (X2 = -0.93; df = 1; N = 68; p < .05), accounting for 18-28% of the variance in performance classification (Cox & Snell R2 = .18; Nagelkerke R2 = .28). It correctly classified 96% of valid performers, but only correctly classified 35% of invalid performers, with an overall correct prediction rate of 83%. A predicted chase in log odds (B= -.93) and odd ratio [Exp (B) =.40] indicated that every unit increase in CIH score was associated with a decrease probability of performance invalidity. Logistic regression was also used to calculate the probability of performance invalidity at each possible CIH score (Table 1).

Results suggests that poor performance on CIH does not necessarily equate to invalid performances, but instead, should act as a screener to cue neuropsychologists working with Veterans that additional PVTs should be considered. Overall, it was determined that CIH was able to correctly predict 35% of invalid performers and 96% of valid performers, with an overall correct prediction rate of 83%, suggesting the procedure may be too simple to be an effective standalone PVT for clinical use. These results also highlight that every correct response on the CIH was associated with a decreased probability of performance invalidity. Additionally, an AUC analysis determined the tests optimal cut off score to be <8, suggesting that shortening the procedure may be as effective as giving the full 10 trials.

Higher cardiovascular burden and peripheral inflammation are associated with small vessel vascular disease, a predominantly dysexecutive cognitive profile, and a higher likelihood of conversion to vascular dementia. The digital clock drawing test, a digitized version of a standard neuropsychological tool, is useful in identifying cognitive dysfunction related to vascular etiology. However, little is known about the specific cognitive implications of vascular risk, peripheral inflammation, and varying levels of overall brain integrity. The current study aimed to examine the role of cardiovascular burden, peripheral inflammation, and brain integrity on digitally acquired clock drawing latency and graphomotor metrics in non-demented older adults.

The final prospectively recruited IRB-consented participant sample included 184 non-demented older adults (age: 69±6 years, education: 16±3 years, 46% female, 94% white) who completed digital clock drawing, vascular assessment, blood draw, and brain MRI. Digital clock drawing variables of interest included: total completion time (TCT), pre-first hand latency (PFHL), digit misplacement, hour hand distance from center, and clock face area (CFA). Cardiovascular burden was calculated using the revised version of the Framingham Stroke Risk Profile (FSRP-10). Peripheral inflammation was operationalized using interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a), and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). The brain integrity composite was comprised of bilateral entorhinal cortex volume, bilateral ventricular volume, and whole brain leukoaraiosis.

Over and above age and cognitive reserve, hierarchical regressions showed FSRP-10, inflammatory markers, and brain integrity explained an additional 13.3% of the variance in command TCT (p< 0.001), with FSRP-10 (p=0.001), IL-10 (p= 0.019), and hsCRP (p= 0.019) as the main predictors in the model. FSRP-10, inflammatory markers, and brain integrity explained an additional 11.7% of the variance in command digit misplacement (p= 0.009), with findings largely driven by FSRP-10 (p< 0.001).

Overall, in non-demented older adults, subtle behavioral nuances seen in digital clock drawing metrics (i.e., total completion time and digit misplacement) are partly explained by cardiovascular burden, peripheral inflammation, and brain integrity over and above age and cognitive reserve. These nuanced behaviors on digitally acquired clock drawing may associate with an emergent disease process or overall vulnerability.

Funding sources: Barber Fellowship; K07AG066813; R01 AG055337; R01 NR014810; American Psychological Foundation Dissertation Award; APA Dissertation Research Award

Accumulating evidence from case-control and population studies suggests attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) confers a 2- to 5-fold risk of all-cause dementia later in life. Here, we investigate vascular burden as a potential mediator of this relationship, because vascular integrity is well known to be compromised in ADHD (due to chronic obesity, diabetes, and hypertension) and is also a robust risk factor for neurodegeneration (due to reduced cerebral blood flow). We use brain white matter hyperintensities (WMH) as a measure of vascular burden.

Thirty-nine adults aged 48-81 years with clinical ADHD, and 37 matched controls, completed neuropsychological testing and 1.5 T structural neuroimaging. None had stroke. Cognitive tests were demographically-adjusted to Z scores using regression-based norms generated from the control group, and averaged across tests within domains of short- and long-term verbal memory (forward digit span, California Verbal Learning Test, Logical Memory), visual memory (Visual Recognition, Rey Complex Figure), processing speed (coding, trails A, Stroop word-reading and color-naming), language (Boston Naming Test, semantic fluency), visuoconstruction (clock drawing, Rey Complex Figure copy), and executive function (backward digit span, trails B, phonemic fluency, Stroop inhibition, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test). Total WMH volumes (i.e., combined periventricular and deep) within subcortical, temporal, frontal, parietal, and occipital regions were individually divided by regional volumes to produce a proportion of each region representing WMH, then log-transformed to correct for skew. Age-corrected linear regression quantified total effects of ADHD on cognition; when these were significant, mediation models quantified the direct effects of ADHD on WMH volumes and the direct effect of WMH volumes on cognition. Sobel’s test estimated indirect effects of ADHD on cognition via WMH.

Group had a significant total effect on Processing Speed (ß=-1.154, p<.001) and on Executive Functioning (ß=-0.587, p=.004), where ADHD participants had lower composite scores (M=-1.10, SD=1.76 and M=-0.54, SD=1.14 respectively) than controls (M=0.02, SD=0.74; M=0.00, SD=0.49). Only frontal-lobe WMH had direct effects on Processing Speed (ß=-0.315, p=.012) and Executive Functioning (ß=-0.273, p<.001). The direct effect of ADHD on frontal WMH was significant (ß=-0.734, p=.016), and Sobel’s tests supported an indirect effect of ADHD on Executive Functioning (z=2.079, p=.038) but not Processing Speed (z=1.785, p=.074) via WMH. Because the effect of ADHD on WMH was negative (i.e., fewer WMH in ADHD) despite worse cognition than controls, we tested the a posteriori hypothesis that WMH burden may be relatively more deleterious for ADHD than controls. We found considerably stronger negative correlations between total WMH volumes and Processing Speed (r=-.423, p=.009) and Executive Functioning (r=-.528, p<.001) in the ADHD group than in controls (r=-.231, p=.175 and r=-.162, p=.346, respectively), even though total whole-brain proportion of WMH (M=0.15%, SD=0.27; Mann-Whitney l/=430.0, p=.002) and frontal-lobe proportion of WMH volumes (M=0.33%, SD=0.51; Mann-Whitney U=464.0, p=.007) were lower in ADHD than in controls (M=0.29%, SD=0.42 and M=0.66%, SD=0.88, respectively).

WMH burden contributes significantly to the relationship between ADHD and cognition, but ADHD remains an independent contributor to worse processing speed and executive functioning in older adults. Vascular burden may have relatively more deleterious effects on cognition in ADHD, potentially due to decades of accumulated allostatic load, whereas healthy controls can accumulate greater amounts of WMH before cognition is impacted.

Historically, numerous studies have supported a male advantage in math. While more recent literature has shown that the gender gap is either decreasing or non-significant, a gender difference remains for higher level math (high school and college) (Hyde et. al. 1990; Casey et. al. 1995). It is known that both cognitive and non-cognitive factors influence math performance. There is little evidence for gender differences in working memory (Miller & Bichsel, 2004), which is a key predictor for mathematics. There is, however, evidence for gender differences in the non-cognitive domain, including math anxiety, with females having higher levels (Miller & Bichsel, 2004; Goetz, et. al. 2013). This study evaluates gender differences in both standardized and everyday math performances, and the way that cognitive and non-cognitive factors impact math. The study is focused on a very understudied group with high levels of math difficulty, namely community college students. We expected to find gender differences in math, and expect these to be in part accounted for by gender differences in strong mathematical predictors, particularly non-cognitive factors.

Participants included 94 community college students enrolled in their first math class (60 female; 34 male). Participants were administered the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement - 3rd edition (KTEA3): Math Computation (MC) and Math Concepts Application (MCA) subtests, as well as an original Everyday Math (EM) measure which assessed their math ability in the context of common uses for math (e.g., financial and health numeracy). Additional measures included math anxiety, self-efficacy, and confidence. Finally, complex span working memory tasks were administered to assess verbal and spatial working memory. Analyses were performed using correlation and regression to examine relationships between the cognitive and non-cognitive variables and standardized and everyday math measures.

Correlations showed that all cognitive and non-cognitive variables are significantly correlated with all three math measures (all p < .05). There were no significant gender differences for any of the math measures, nor the working memory, or non-cognitive measures. Regression showed that across all three math outcomes, math anxiety and verbal working memory are significantly predictive of math performance. Overall R2 values were significant (range 27% to 37%, all p < .001). Working memory and math anxiety were unique predictors in all three regressions (all p < .05), but other non-cognitive variables such as self-efficacy did not show unique prediction (all p >.05).

There was no evidence for gender differences on any studied variable. This stands in contrast to prior studies, although few studies have included community college students. On the other hand, both cognitive and non-cognitive factors were complimentary in the prediction of math outcomes, which is consistent with prior work. Among non-cognitive predictors, math anxiety was particularly prominent. This study clarifies prior conflicting work regarding gender differences, and highlights the role of both math anxiety and working memory as relevant for multiple math outcomes.

Executive function is known to decline in later life, largely attributed to structural and functional changes in the prefrontal cortex. However, other regions of the brain are integral to executive functioning, including the hippocampus. The hippocampus plays a large role in memory but its intricate connections to limbic regions including the prefrontal cortex likely underlies associations between the hippocampus and executive functions. Due to the hippocampus’ complex structure, hippocampal subregions may be differentially associated with executive function, but this possibility remains largely unexplored. Therefore, we examined the association between volume of the hippocampus and its subregions with executive function to understand these relationships across the adult lifespan.

The study included 32 healthy, community-dwelling participants (age range = 18-81, mean age = 51.06 ± 20.98, 91% white, 72% female) who received a 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and completed a cognitive battery. We calculated an executive composite based on Trail Making Test Part B and the interference score from the Stroop Color and Word Test. Freesurfer (version 5.3) as used to quantify total hippocampal volume and subfield volumes for CA1, CA2-3, CA4-dentate gyrus, subiculum, and presubiculum. We conducted mixed-effects regression analyses with total hippocampal and subfield volume, age group (young, middle-aged, and older), and their interaction predicting the executive function composite, controlling for total intracranial volume.

Larger hippocampal subregion volumes in CA1 (p = 0.03), the subiculum (p = 0.01), and the CA4-dentate gyrus (p = 0.04) predicted better executive function. Total hippocampal volume and the presubiculum were not significantly associated with the executive function composite. The age group interaction was not significant for any of the models. Follow-up analyses by hemisphere showed that the effects were right lateralized in CA1and CA4-dentate gyrus, and bilateral in the subiculum.

These data support the literature demonstrating the involvement of the hippocampus in executive function and demonstrates variation across hippocampal subfields. The lack of significant age interactions suggests these relationships may not differ across the lifespan, although this finding would need to be replicated in larger samples. These findings support previous literature showing CA4-dentate gyrus’ association with neurogenesis may facilitate better executive function by increasing connection strength among CA1, CA2-3, and the frontal cortex. This study contributes to our understanding of how specific hippocampal subregions relate to executive function, which has both clinical and research implications.