Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Open Access
  4. Research Open

Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

73381 results in Open Access

Page 101 of 3670

  • Narrowly person-affecting axiology: a reconsideration

  • Matthew D. Adler
  • Journal:
    Economics & Philosophy / Volume 41 / Issue 1 / March 2025
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 September 2024, pp. 119-160
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • A narrowly person-affecting (NPA) axiology is an account of the moral ranking of outcomes such that the comparison of any two outcomes depends on the magnitude and weight of individuals’ well-being gains and losses between the two. This article systematically explores NPA axiology. It argues that NPA axiology yields an outcome ranking that satisfies three fundamental axioms: Pareto, Anonymity and, plausibly, Pigou-Dalton. The axiology is neutral to non-well-being considerations (desert); and (assuming well-being measurability) leads to the Repugnant Conclusion (RC). In short, NPA axiology provides a grounding for Paretian, equity-regarding welfarism, albeit one that includes the RC.

  • Legislating for the future: situated health and embodied justice

  • Michael Thomson, Beth Goldblatt
  • Journal:
    International Journal of Law in Context / Volume 21 / Issue 1 / March 2025
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 September 2024, pp. 22-40
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • In response to the short-term political cycles that govern law-making, there is growing international attention to the obligations owed to future generations. Within the diverse approaches there is often a single, temporally defined inequality; that is, between now and a depleted future. While inequality is imagined between generations, these generations are often constructed as homogenous. This elides not just contemporary inequalities, but that these injustices are caused by historically rooted inequalities that current planetary threats are likely to deepen. In response, we centre health inequalities which illustrate the complex temporalities and structural causes of inequalities. We argue for a focus on eco-social and embodied generations to better understand – and respond to – inequalities past, present and future. We apply this focus to the Capabilities Approach as an example of the work needed to better articulate what is owed to present and future generations to secure justice and inform future-oriented law-making.

  • Non-Archimedean population axiologies – CORRIGENDUM

  • Calvin Baker
  • Journal:
    Economics & Philosophy / Volume 40 / Issue 3 / November 2024
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 September 2024, p. 731
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • The league of nations as an imperial assemblage: coloniality, indirect rule and the actualization of ‘International Law’

  • Ahmed Raza Memon
  • Journal:
    International Journal of Law in Context / Volume 21 / Issue 1 / March 2025
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    09 September 2024, pp. 1-21
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • In this article, I reconceptualise the League of Nations as an Imperial Assemblage that embeds and is embedded by coloniality. Relying on the return to the League’s historisisation by Third World Approaches to International Law, I argue that we can understand the League as a governance body that works across scales of international, transnational and local actors, processes and structures to reiterate coloniality within the mandated territories. I utilise Deleuzian notions of assemblage alongside the concept of ‘coloniality’ within the literature of decolonial theory within International Relations and Sociology to show how the work of the League’s various actors, processes and structures across different scales made, actualised and evolved the laws on Forced Labour and Slavery from 1925 to 1932 in the inter-war era with a particular focus on Mandate Territories B and C.

Page 101 of 3670