We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Cambridge Handbook of School-University Partnerships offers a panoramic view of research on school-university partnerships (SUPs), laying the groundwork for further development in the field. Through different theoretical and methodological perspectives, it amplifies the voices of scholars and practitioners across various institutions. This inclusive approach provides a comprehensive resource for researchers, scholars, students, practitioners, and policymakers, that honors diversity while fostering unity and expansion within the field of SUPs. Covering topics from historical foundations to international perspectives, the handbook delves into areas such as teaching, equity, leadership, community engagement, innovation, funding, and policy. By embracing the collaborative essence of SUPs, it promotes mutual benefit and encourages continued exploration in these dynamic settings.
Translational science and implementation science are two disciplines that integrate scientific findings into practice within healthcare. One method to assess the integration of these fields is to review the academic crossover between the disciplines with respect to shared citations in the peer-reviewed literature.
Methods:
This paper used direct citation network analysis to identify potential conceptual gaps and connections between the literature in implementation science and translational science. Bibliographic references were downloaded from Web of Science to create directed citation network maps in VosViewer. Heat maps visualized the top cited literature in each field.
Results:
A literature search yielded 6,111 publications in translational science and 7,003 publications in implementation science. When all publications were combined in a directed citation network map, two separate groups of publications emerged, representing the two fields of implementation science and translational science. When the top 50 cited translational science publications were combined with implementation science publications, 14% had a 100%+ increase in citation links, 44% had a mean increase of 2.4%, and 42% shared no links. When the top 50 cited implementation science publications were combined with translational science publications, 2% had a 100%+ increase in citation links, 92% had a 3.3% mean increase, and 6% had no shared links.
Conclusions:
Results suggest moderate academic overlap in the way published authors cite each other between translational science and implementation science. We hope the implications of this paper may promote continued collaborations between these fields to disseminate lessons learned and bridge research into practice more efficiently.
The investigation of Islamic archaeology in Ethiopia has until recently been neglected. Excavations at Harlaa, a large urban centre in eastern Ethiopia, are now beginning to redress this lack of research attention. By establishing occupation and material sequences, and by assessing the chronology and material markers of Islamisation, recent work provides important new insight on the presence and role of Muslims and Islamic practice at Harlaa, and in the Horn of Africa more generally. The results challenge previous assumptions of cultural homogeneity, instead indicating the development of cosmopolitanism. They also suggest a possible historical identity for Harlaa: as Hubät/Hobat, the capital of the Hārlā sultanate.
As the number of people affected by dementia continues to rise, this is the first in-depth examination of related services dedicated to the unique demands of remote and rural settings. Contributors from the UK, Australia, North America and Europe explore the experiences and requirements of those living with dementia and those caring for them in personal and professional capacities in challenging geographical locations. For practitioners, researchers, academics and policy makers, this book is an essential review of evidence and strategies to date, and a guide to future research needs and opportunities for improvements in rural dementia practice.
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Even though the intention is to offer the whole population services of comparable quality regardless of where they live, there are some challenges with living in rural areas…. (Kirkevold and Kristiansen, from Chapter 4 in this book)
Drawing across the material in this book, in this chapter we raise and discuss the emergent themes as highlighted by the contributions of leading experts and commentators from around the world. In terms of policy we consider systems issues and between-countries similarities and differences; for practice, we examine the relevance of culture and the importance of heeding the central human experience of dementia within the current healthcare system; and in respect of key emergent research topics, we feature the relevance of place-based planning and the role of technology. We end with a collated research agenda, drawing from topics suggested by authors across the chapters.
Policy and systems
Dementia is a costly issue for governments as people with dementia can live for a long time following their diagnosis, variably requiring different health and social care inputs (Prince et al, 2015). The World Health Organization (WHO) has taken a lead in establishing the need for coordinated national policy and planning approaches (2018), and has provided a toolkit for planning, education and community engagement (WHO, 2017), an online training programme for dementia carers (iSupport for Dementia) (WHO, 2020), and a knowledge exchange platform with access to key dementia data and indicators so that progress in meeting global dementia targets can be evaluated (Global Dementia Observatory) (WHO, 2019). The mhGAP toolkit can be adopted by individual countries and adapted to local systems and contexts.
The chapters in this book highlight the relevance of countries’ health systems and the contexts in which services are provided, as well as the characteristics of such services. By one interpretation, chapters depict health systems with features across a wide spectrum, from those with atomised services provided by a mixture of public, private and nongovernmental organisations (in Australia), through those that have become depleted (in Ireland), to apparently more coordinated and adaptive social welfarist models (such as those in Austria and Norway).
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
This book is the first edited collection to focus on dementia in remote and rural areas. Drawing on examples of research studies and innovative practice from remote and rural locations globally, it highlights the implications of living with dementia in remote and rural areas for dementia policy, practice and future research. The chapters represent countries with considerable experience and expertise in developing support and services for their rural and remote populations, such as Canada, Australia, the UK, Ireland and Austria. However, many other countries have rural geographies and ageing populations, and are likely to face similar challenges of meeting the needs of people living with dementia in remote and rural areas. To promote knowledge translation, the book's contributors share ideas from their countries to help practitioners working in challenging geographical landscapes anywhere as they strive to provide the highest standards of support for those living with dementia. The book draws on research conducted in different countries with longstanding histories of conducting remote and rural dementia research, and as such it is a resource for academics who teach or research rurality and dementia. The edited structure allows international examples of innovative research/practice in the remote and rural dementia field to be showcased with the implications of such national examples to be considered in relation to research, policy and practice globally. In this way, we hope that you, the reader, will find this edited collection to be a resource, whether you are a student, practitioner, policy influencer or academic, to assist you in enhancing the experience of living with dementia in remote and rural areas in the future.
Dementia has been defined by the World Health Organization as:
… an umbrella term for several diseases that are mostly progressive, affecting memory, other cognitive abilities and behaviour, and that interfere significantly with a person's ability to maintain the activities of daily living. (WHO, 2017c: 5)
Although the symptoms of dementia may be similar, how these are experienced and the impact on individuals’ lives can vary significantly. The experience of dementia is one that is fraught with challenges for the person diagnosed with dementia, and for families, friends and communities. It may require coming to terms with new identity and functionality and may require significant adaptation and resilience at individual, family and community levels (Innes et al, 2011).
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
Edited by
Anthea Innes, University of Salford,Debra Morgan, University of Saskatchewan, Canada,Jane Farmer, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria
This section of the book focuses on research evidence from Canada, Austria and Ireland. However, the chapters in section 3 of this book are also informed by research evidence in relation to practice innovations. Research can throw light on areas that require policy support and practice developments to improve the lives of those with dementia. Research also often focuses on neglected areas of policy and practice concern, and rural dementia care has characteristically been a relatively neglected area for both rurality researchers and dementia researchers. As such this section provides a showcase for the models of care that have been developed in one area of Canada and one area of Austria that provide an evidence base to shape and inform practice developments and also to influence policy. The contribution from our Irish authors in this section demonstrates the need to collate evidence that illuminates policy and practice differences within a country and how this may lead to social exclusion and as such impacts on the lived experience of dementia. Research is a vital component of a change agenda, and the chapters in this section clearly demonstrate this.
The emergence and spread of extensively multidrug-resistant organisms is a public health crisis, and long-term care settings have been identified as a reservoir for the cultivation of these organisms. Long-term care settings are now taking on increasingly ill residents with complicated medical problems, indwelling devices, and significant healthcare exposure, all of which are considered risk factors selecting for resistant organisms. Despite this, guidelines addressing infection prevention procedures in long-term care remain vague, and implementation of these guidelines is challenging, largely due to staff turnover, limited resources, knowledge gaps, and lack of organizational support. Human factors engineering approaches have emerged as an important innovation to address patient safety issues and develop interventions in the healthcare work system (ie, tools and technologies, tasks, organization, physical environment) that support human performance, which, in turn, lead to improvements in processes (eg, compliance with infection prevention guidelines) and outcomes (eg, reduced infection rates). We propose the concept of using the methods and approaches from the scientific field of human factors engineering to address the unique challenges of implementing infection prevention in the long-term care setting.
In recent years, several initiatives have sought to encourage redemption of food assistance benefits at direct-to-consumer (DTC) market venues such as community supported agriculture programs and farmers’ markets in the USA, with the dual goal of increasing access to healthy foods for low-income families and sales of locally-grown foods for farmers. Proponents of these interventions assert that these programs have a positive impact on local economies yet there is limited evidence to validate this argument. This research project used a customized input-output model to simulate potential economic impacts of programs and policies that enable Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to shift purchases from traditional food retailers to DTC venues in four states. Two different scenarios were explored: (1) increased outreach to low-income consumers and (2) financial support for using SNAP benefits at DTC market channels. We found a positive, though modest, economic impact at the state level under both scenarios when accounting for (a) business losses in the food retail and wholesale sectors, (b) a shift in acreage from commodity to specialty crops and (c) the cost to taxpayers. Since most of the increased economic activity would be in the produce farming sector, we discuss the opportunities and challenges for this sector along with potential policy implications.
To examine perspectives on food access among low-income families participating in a cost-offset community-supported agriculture (CO-CSA) programme.
Design
Farm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids (F3HK) is a multicentre randomized intervention trial assessing the effect of CO-CSA on dietary intake and quality among children from low-income families. Focus groups were conducted at the end of the first CO-CSA season. Participants were interviewed about programme experiences, framed by five dimensions of food access: availability, accessibility, affordability, acceptability and accommodation. Transcribed data were coded on these dimensions plus emergent themes.
Setting
Nine communities in the US states of New York, North Carolina, Washington and Vermont.
Subjects
Fifty-three F3HK adults with children.
Results
CSA models were structured by partner farms. Produce quantity was abundant; however, availability was enhanced for participants who were able to select their own produce items. Flexible CSA pick-up times and locations made produce pick-up more accessible. Despite being affordable to most, payment timing was a barrier for some. Unfamiliar foods and quick spoilage hindered acceptability through challenging meal planning, despite accommodations that included preparation advice.
Conclusions
Although CO-CSA may facilitate increased access to fruits and vegetables for low-income families, perceptions of positive diet change may be limited by the ability to incorporate share pick-up into regular travel patterns and meal planning. Food waste concerns may be particularly acute for families with constrained resources. Future research should examine whether CO-CSA with flexible logistics and produce self-selection are sustainable for low-income families and CSA farms.