Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) commonly experience comorbid anxiety and somatization, which can complicate treatment. Adjunctive therapy with atypical antipsychotics can be an effective treatment option for patients with MDD who had inadequate responses to antidepressant therapy (ADT) alone. Cariprazine is a dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist that is approved as an adjunctive treatment for MDD. This post hoc analysis examined the effect of adjunctive cariprazine therapy on anxiety and somatization symptoms in patients with MDD.

A post hoc analysis was conducted using data from a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose study of patients with MDD who had inadequate responses to ADT alone. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive ADT plus cariprazine 1.5 mg/d, 3 mg/d, or placebo for 6 weeks. The least squares (LS) mean change from baseline to week 6 in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Anxiety/Somatization subscale was measured. The Anxiety/Somatization subscale includes six HAM-D items: anxiety-psychic, anxiety-somatic, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, general somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight. The modified intent to treat population included 751 patients (placebo=249; cariprazine 1.5 mg/d=250; cariprazine 3 mg/d=252).

The LS mean change from baseline in HAM-D Anxiety/Somatization subscale at week 6 was significantly greater than placebo + ADT for both cariprazine + ADT dose groups (placebo: -3.22; cariprazine 1.5 mg/d: -4.00, P<.001; 3 mg/d: -3.75, P<.05). LS mean change from baseline in the cariprazine 1.5 mg/d + ADT group was also significantly greater than placebo + ADT on the anxiety-psychic (placebo: -0.88; cariprazine 1.5 mg/d: -1.08, P<.01) and anxiety-somatic (placebo: -0.78; cariprazine 1.5 mg/d: -0.96, P<.05) items. In patients treated with cariprazine 3 mg/d + ADT, LS mean changes from baseline on anxiety-psychic and anxiety-somatic items were numerically larger than placebo + ADT but not statistically significant. Both cariprazine + ADT dose groups had significantly larger LS mean changes compared with placebo + ADT on the gastrointestinal somatic symptoms item (placebo: -0.51; cariprazine 1.5 mg/d: -0.66, P<.01; cariprazine 3 mg/d: -0.68, P<.01). General somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight items showed no significant difference between placebo + ADT and cariprazine + ADT groups.

Patients treated with adjunctive cariprazine demonstrated greater improvements than patients treated with adjunctive placebo on HAM-D Anxiety/Somatization subscale scores, as shown by reduced scores on anxiety-psychic, anxiety-somatic, and gastrointestinal items. These findings suggest adjunctive cariprazine therapy may be effective in reducing anxiety and somatization symptoms in patients with MDD.

AbbVie

Study Registration Number: NCT03738215

Akathisia is a common adverse effect associated with use of dopamine receptor blocking agents.1,2 Symptoms of akathisia, in severe cases, may lead to discontinuation of treatment. Cariprazine is a dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 receptor partial agonist and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist approved to treat schizophrenia and acute manic, mixed, and depressive episodes of bipolar 1 disorder. Cariprazine is well tolerated in patients across its indications, but is associated with a higher incidence of akathisia compared with placebo.3,4 This pooled post hoc analysis of data from phase 3 clinical trials of adjunctive cariprazine aimed to characterize the incidence, severity, and management of akathisia and other extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in adult patients with MDD.

Patients with MDD and inadequate response to ongoing antidepressant therapy (ADT) were randomized to cariprazine 1.5 mg/d + ADT, cariprazine 3 mg/d + ADT, or placebo + ADT for 6 weeks of double-blind treatment. Post hoc analysis evaluated incidence, severity, and time to resolution of akathisia, restlessness, and other EPS; use of rescue medications; and the rate of discontinuation due to these treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

A total of 1508 patients (cariprazine + ADT: 1.5 mg/d, n=502, 3 mg/d, n=503; placebo + ADT, n=503) were included in these 2 studies. The incidence of akathisia was greater with cariprazine 3 mg/d + ADT (9.7%) than with cariprazine 1.5 mg/d + ADT (6.4%) and placebo + ADT (2.0%). Most patients treated with cariprazine + ADT (94%) experienced only mild or moderate akathisia. The incidence of restlessness was 3.8% for patients treated with cariprazine 3 mg/d + ADT, 3.6% for cariprazine 1.5 mg/d + ADT, and 1.8% for placebo + ADT. The incidence of EPS excluding akathisia and restlessness was 4.4% for patients treated with cariprazine 3 mg/d + ADT, 4.6% for cariprazine 1.5 mg/d + ADT, and 3.2% for placebo + ADT. For patients treated with cariprazine + ADT and placebo + ADT, respectively, EPS-related study discontinuations were 1.4% and 0.4% due to akathisia, 0.2% and 0.0% due to restlessness, and 0.1% and 0.4% due to EPS excluding akathisia and restlessness. Rescue medications were used to treat EPS-related TEAEs during the double-blind treatment period in 3% of cariprazine-treated patients and 0.4% of placebo-treated patients. The mean time to resolution of akathisia during treatment was slightly shorter in cariprazine-treated patients (15.6 days) versus placebo-treated patients (19.5 days).

Incidence of akathisia was higher for cariprazine than placebo, with a lower incidence observed for patients treated with cariprazine 1.5 + ADT than with cariprazine 3 mg/d + ADT, suggestive of a dose related effect. Most patients experienced mild or moderate akathisia. Rates of study discontinuation and rescue medication use due to akathisia were low, suggesting that akathisia was tolerated by most patients.

This data was previously presented at the CINP World Congress; Montreal, Canada; May 7-10, 2023.

AbbVie

Anhedonia, a multidimensional domain including the reduced ability to experience pleasure, is a core diagnostic symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD) and a common residual symptom. In patients with MDD, anhedonia has been associated with poor treatment outcomes, suicide and reduced functioning and quality of life. This post-hoc analysis of data from a phase 3 trial (NCT03738215) evaluated the efficacy of adjunctive cariprazine (CAR) treatment on anhedonia symptoms in patients with MDD.

Patients with MDD and inadequate response to ongoing antidepressant therapy (ADT) were randomized to CAR 1.5 mg/d + ADT, CAR 3 mg/d + ADT, or placebo + ADT for 6 weeks of double-blind treatment. Post hoc analyses evaluated the change from baseline to Week 6 in Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score, MADRS anhedonia subscale score (items: 1 [apparent sadness], 2 [reported sadness], 6 [concentration difficulties], 7 [lassitude], and 8 [inability to feel]), and MADRS anhedonia item 8 in the overall modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population and in subgroups of patients with baseline MADRS anhedonia item 8 score of ≥4 or baseline anhedonia subscale score of ≥18. Least square (LS) mean change from baseline to Week 6 was analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures.

There were 751 patients in the mITT population (CAR + ADT: 1.5 mg/d=250, 3 mg/d=252; placebo + ADT=249). At baseline, 508 (67.6%) patients had MADRS anhedonia item 8 scores ≥4, and 584 (77.8%) had MADRS anhedonia subscale scores ≥18. In the overall mITT population, LS mean change from baseline to Week 6 in anhedonia subscale score was significantly greater for CAR 1.5 mg/d + ADT (-8.4) and CAR 3 mg/d + ADT (-7.9) than for placebo + ADT (-6.8; both P<.05). The LS mean change from baseline in MADRS individual item 8 was also significantly greater for CAR 1.5 mg/d + ADT (-1.7) vs placebo + ADT (-1.3; P=.0085). In both subgroups of patients with baseline anhedonia, CAR 1.5 mg/d + ADT was associated with significantly greater reduction in MADRS total score, MADRS anhedonia subscale score, and MADRS item 8 score compared with placebo + ADT (all P<.05). In the CAR 3 mg/d + ADT group, significantly greater reductions vs placebo + ADT were observed for MADRS total score and MADRS anhedonia subscale score in the subgroup of patients with baseline anhedonia subscale scores ≥18 (both P<.05).

Adjunctive treatment with CAR was associated with a reduction in symptoms of anhedonia relative to adjunctive placebo in patients with MDD and inadequate response to ADT alone. In subgroups of patients with moderate-to-severe anhedonia at baseline, CAR + ADT demonstrated greater improvements than placebo + ADT in overall depressive symptoms and symptoms of anhedonia. These results suggest that adjunctive CAR treatment may be effective for improving symptoms of anhedonia in patients with MDD who have symptoms of anhedonia.

AbbVie

Women have a greater lifetime risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia than men, a sex/gender disparity that cannot be explained by female longevity alone. There is substantial evidence for sex differences in the effects of APOE £4 on risk for AD. While APOE e4 increases AD risk in both sexes, women who carry APOE e4 are disproportionately vulnerable to cognitive impairment and AD compared to their counterpart men. In contrast to APOE e4, APOE £2 is associated with slower cognitive decline and a lower risk of AD. Although a less robust literature, APOE e2 may also have sex-specific effects. Because APOE e2 is the rarest major APOE allele, well-powered studies are needed to examine sex-specific effects. The objective of the present study was to examine sex-specific associations of APOE e2 carriage with longitudinal cognitive decline in a large cohort of clinically unimpaired adults.

We used observational data from two sources: the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) and the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center (ROS/MAP/MARS) studies. We included data from clinically unimpaired adults who were >50 years old at baseline who self-identified as non-Hispanic White (NHW) or non-Hispanic Black (NHB). Participants were categorized as APOE £2, £4, or £3/e3 carriers. APOE e2/e4 carriers were excluded. The same battery of neuropsychological tests was used to assess global cognition in participants from both data sources. Linear mixed models examined interactive associations of genotype (£2 or £4 vs. £3/£3), sex, and time on longitudinal cognition in NHW and NHB participants separately. Analyses were first performed in a pooled sample of NACC and ROS/MAP/MARS participants and if significant they were repeated separately in each data source.

Across both data sources, 9,766 NHW (mean (SD) age=73.0(9.00) years, mean (SD) education=16.3(2.83) years, n(%) women=6,344(65.0)) and 2,010 NHB participants (mean(SD) age=71.3(7.59) years, mean(SD) education=14.9(3.10) years, n(%) women=1,583(78.8)) met inclusion criteria. Sex modified the association between APOE £2 and cognitive decline in NHW (ß=0.097, 95% CI: 0.023-0.172, pint=.01) but not NHB participants (ß=-0.011, 95% CI: -0.153-0.131, pint=.9). In sex-stratified analyses of NHW participants, APOE £2 (vs. £3/£3) carriage was associated with attenuated cognitive decline in men (ß=0.096, 95% CI: 0.037-0.155, p=.001), but not women (ß=-0.001, 95% CI: -0.044-0.043, p=.97). In analyses comparing men and women APOE £2 carriers, men exhibited slower cognitive decline than women (ß=0.120, 95% CI: 0.051-0.190, p=.001). Analyses performed separately in NACC and ROS/MAP revealed the same pattern of male-specific APOE £2 protection in NHW participants in both data sources.

In light of the longstanding view that APOE £2 protects against AD and dementia, our results provide evidence that APOE £2 is associated with attenuated cognitive decline in men but not women among NHW adults. This male-specific protection may contribute to sex differences in AD-related cognitive decline. Our findings have important implications for understanding the biological drivers of sex differences in AD risk, which is crucial for developing sex-specific strategies to prevent and treat AD dementia.

Warfarin remains the preferred anticoagulant for many patients with CHD. The complexity of management led our centre to shift from a nurse-physician-managed model with many providers to a pharmacist-managed model with a centralized anticoagulation team. We aim to describe the patient cohort managed by our Anticoagulation Program and evaluate the impact of implementation of this consistent, pharmacist-managed model on time in therapeutic range, an evidence-based marker for clinical outcomes.

A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the impact of the transition to a pharmacist-managed model to improve anticoagulation management at a tertiary pediatric heart centre. The percent time in therapeutic range for a cohort managed by both models was compared using a paired t-test. Patient characteristics and time in therapeutic range of the program were also described.

After implementing the pharmacist-managed model, the time in therapeutic range for a cohort of 58 patients increased from 65.7 to 80.2% (p < .001), and our Anticoagulation Program consistently maintained this improvement from 2013 to 2022. The cohort of patients managed by the Anticoagulation Program in 2022 included 119 patients with a median age of 24 years (range 19 months–69 years) with the most common indication for warfarin being mechanical valve replacement (n = 81, 68%).

Through a practice change incorporating a collaborative, centralized, pharmacist-managed model, this cohort of CHD patients on warfarin had a fifteen percent increase in time in therapeutic range, which was sustained for nine years.

Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) often do not respond to antidepressant (ADT) monotherapy alone and may require adjunctive treatment to provide adequate symptom relief. Cariprazine (CAR) is a dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist approved to treat adults with schizophrenia and manic, mixed, or depressive episodes of bipolar I disorder. Post hoc analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial evaluated clinically relevant improvements in depressive symptom severity with adjunctive cariprazine in patients with MDD and inadequate response to ADT monotherapy.

Post hoc analysis evaluated data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled MDD trial (NCT03738215) in patients treated with CAR (1.5 mg/d or 3 mg/d) + ADT or placebo + ADT; the primary outcome was change from baseline to week 6 in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Post hoc analysis evaluated category shifts from baseline to week 6 in MADRS severity (normal <6, mild 7–19, moderate 20–34, severe ≥35). MADRS severity shifts were reported as the percentage of patients with no change or worsened severity, 1 category improvement, ≥1 category improvement, and ≥2 category improvement. Examples of categorical shifts in depressive symptoms at week 6 include change from severe at baseline to moderate (1 category improvement) and change from severe at baseline to mild (2 category improvement).

Of the 751 patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (CAR: 1.5 mg/d=250, 3.0 mg/d=252; placebo=249), baseline MADRS severity was mild in 1.5%, moderate in 64%, and severe in 35%. Fewer CAR + ADT patients compared to placebo + ADT had no change or worsened MADRS severity at week 6 (CAR: 1.5 mg/d=32%, 3.0 mg/d=33%; placebo=42%). Approximately 68% of patients treated with CAR + ADT demonstrated a MADRS severity improvement of 1 category or greater by week 6 (CAR: 1.5 mg/d=68%, 3.0 mg/d=67%; placebo=58%). A greater percentage of patients in the CAR 1.5 mg/d group also had a 2 or greater category improvement versus CAR 3.0 mg/d or placebo 6 (CAR: 1.5 mg/d=28%, 3.0 mg/d=17%; placebo=19%).

In this post hoc analysis, CAR + ADT was associated with a greater proportion of patients with improvements in depressive symptom severity categories compared with placebo + ADT. These results may suggest that CAR + ADT is associated with clinically meaningful depressive symptom improvement in MDD patients.

AbbVie

Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) often do not respond to antidepressant (ADT) monotherapy; adjunctive treatment is often used to address this unmet need. Cariprazine (CAR), a dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist approved to treat adults with manic, mixed, or depressive episodes of bipolar I disorder, is under investigation as adjunctive therapy for patients with MDD.

This randomized, double-blind, phase 3 placebo (PBO)-controlled study assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of CAR 1.5 and 3 mg/d as an adjunct to ADT in adult patients with MDD (18–65 years) and inadequate response to ADT alone (NCT03738215). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 6 in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) were also assessed. Treatment response was defined as at least 50% decrease in MADRS total score at week 6.

Patients (n=751) in the modified intent-to-treat population were randomly assigned to CAR 1.5 mg/d+ADT (n=250), CAR 3 mg/d+ADT (n=252), or PBO+ADT (n=249). Mean age was 44.8 years and 73.4% were female; mean baseline total scores were: MADRS=32.5, HAMD-17=25.9, HAM-A= 21.4. Overall, 89.7% of patients completed the study; rates of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and lack of efficacy were 3.6% and 0.5%, respectively. The difference in MADRS total score change from baseline to week 6 was statistically significant after multiplicity adjustment for CAR 1.5 mg/d vs PBO (-14.1 vs -11.5; adjusted P=.0050), but not for CAR 3 mg/d (-13.1; P=.0727). Differences for CAR 1.5 mg/d vs PBO were observed by week 2 (nominal P=.0453) and maintained at weeks 4 (nominal P<.0001) and 6 (nominal P=.0025). At week 6, more CAR 1.5 mg/d patients (44%) than PBO patients (34.9%) responded to treatment (nominal P=.0446). Greater improvement in the CGI-I scores was observed for CAR 1.5 (nominal P=.0026) and 3 mg/d (nominal P=.0076) vs PBO. At week 6, improvement in HAMD-17 total score reached nominal significance for CAR 1.5 mg/d vs PBO (-13.1 vs -11.1; nominal P=.0017), but not for CAR 3 mg/day (-12.2; P=.0783). HAM-A improvement was greater for CAR 1.5 mg/d vs PBO (nominal P=.0370). There were no deaths; 2 serious AEs occurred in each group (CAR: kidney infection, social stay hospitalization; PBO: depression, multiple sclerosis). The most common CAR AEs (≥5% and twice PBO) were akathisia and nausea.

Cariprazine 1.5 mg/d was effective as adjunctive treatment in adults with MDD and inadequate response to ADT. Cariprazine was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile that was consistent with other indications. Together with results from a prior flex-dose study, these results suggest that adjunctive cariprazine may be an effective option for patients with inadequate response to ADT alone.

AbbVie

Studying phenotypic and genetic characteristics of age at onset (AAO) and polarity at onset (PAO) in bipolar disorder can provide new insights into disease pathology and facilitate the development of screening tools.

To examine the genetic architecture of AAO and PAO and their association with bipolar disorder disease characteristics.

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and polygenic score (PGS) analyses of AAO (n = 12 977) and PAO (n = 6773) were conducted in patients with bipolar disorder from 34 cohorts and a replication sample (n = 2237). The association of onset with disease characteristics was investigated in two of these cohorts.

Earlier AAO was associated with a higher probability of psychotic symptoms, suicidality, lower educational attainment, not living together and fewer episodes. Depressive onset correlated with suicidality and manic onset correlated with delusions and manic episodes. Systematic differences in AAO between cohorts and continents of origin were observed. This was also reflected in single-nucleotide variant-based heritability estimates, with higher heritabilities for stricter onset definitions. Increased PGS for autism spectrum disorder (β = −0.34 years, s.e. = 0.08), major depression (β = −0.34 years, s.e. = 0.08), schizophrenia (β = −0.39 years, s.e. = 0.08), and educational attainment (β = −0.31 years, s.e. = 0.08) were associated with an earlier AAO. The AAO GWAS identified one significant locus, but this finding did not replicate. Neither GWAS nor PGS analyses yielded significant associations with PAO.

AAO and PAO are associated with indicators of bipolar disorder severity. Individuals with an earlier onset show an increased polygenic liability for a broad spectrum of psychiatric traits. Systematic differences in AAO across cohorts, continents and phenotype definitions introduce significant heterogeneity, affecting analyses.

Older adults presenting with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have a higher risk of developing dementia and also demonstrate impairments in social cognition. This study sought to establish whether in people with MCI, poorer theory of mind (ToM) was associated with volumetric changes in the amygdala and hippocampus, as well as early changes in behaviour.

One hundred and fourteen people with MCI and fifty-two older adult controls completed the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), while close informants (e.g., spouse/family member/friend/carer) described any current behavioural changes using the Revised Cambridge Behavioural Inventory (CBI-R). A subsample of participants completed structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

The MCI group showed poorer performance on all neuropsychological tests administered, and moderate reductions on the RMET compared to the control group (d = .44), with greater reduction observed in those with amnestic compared to non-amnestic MCI (p = .03). While a robust correlation was identified between poorer RMET performance and smaller hippocampal volume in the control group (ρ = .53, p = .01), this relationship was not apparent in the MCI group (ρ = .21, p = .11). In the MCI group, poorer RMET performance was associated with poorer everyday skills (ρ = −.26, p = .01) assessed by the CBI-R.

Our findings cross-validate previous reports that social cognitive deficits in ToM are a feature of MCI and also suggest that disruptions to broader neural networks are likely to be implicated. Furthermore, ToM deficits in MCI are associated with a decline in everyday skills such as writing or paying bills.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission occurs in 0.2%-10% of people after accidental needlestick exposures. However, postexposure prophylaxis is not currently recommended. We sought to determine the safety, tolerability, and acceptance of postexposure prophylaxis with peginterferon alfa-2b in healthcare workers (HCWs) exposed to blood from HCV-infected patients.

Open-label pilot trial of peginterferon alfa-2b for HCV postexposure prophylaxis.

TWO academic tertiary-referral centers.

HCWs exposed to blood from HCV-infected patients were informed of the availability of postexposure prophylaxis. Persons who elected postexposure prophylaxis were given weekly doses of peginterferon alfa-2b for 4 weeks.

Among 2,702 HCWs identified with potential exposures to bloodborne pathogens, 213 (7.9%) were exposed to an HCV antibody-positive source. Of 51 HCWs who enrolled in the study, 44 (86%) elected to undergo postexposure prophylaxis (treated group). Seven subjects elected not to undergo postexposure prophylaxis (untreated group). No cases of HCV transmission were observed in either the treated or untreated group, and no cases occurred in the remaining 162 HCWs who did not enroll in this study. No serious adverse events related to a peginterferon alfa-2b regimen were recorded, but minor adverse events were frequent.

In this pilot study, there was a lower than expected frequency of HCV transmission after accidental occupational exposure. Although peginterferon alfa-2b was safe, because of the lack of HCV transmission in either the treated or untreated groups there is little evidence to support routine postexposure prophylaxis against HCV in HCWs.