To improve early intervention and personalise treatment for individuals early on the psychosis continuum, a greater understanding of symptom dynamics is required. We address this by identifying and evaluating the movement between empirically derived attenuated psychotic symptomatic substates—clusters of symptoms that occur within individuals over time.

Data came from a 90-day daily diary study evaluating attenuated psychotic and affective symptoms. The sample included 96 individuals aged 18–35 on the psychosis continuum, divided into four subgroups of increasing severity based on their psychometric risk of psychosis, with the fourth meeting ultra-high risk (UHR) criteria. A multilevel hidden Markov modelling (HMM) approach was used to characterise and determine the probability of switching between symptomatic substates. Individual substate trajectories and time spent in each substate were subsequently assessed.

Four substates of increasing psychopathological severity were identified: (1) low-grade affective symptoms with negligible psychotic symptoms; (2) low levels of nonbizarre ideas with moderate affective symptoms; (3) low levels of nonbizarre ideas and unusual thought content, with moderate affective symptoms; and (4) moderate levels of nonbizarre ideas, unusual thought content, and affective symptoms. Perceptual disturbances predominantly occurred within the third and fourth substates. UHR individuals had a reduced probability of switching out of the two most severe substates.

Findings suggest that individuals reporting unusual thought content, rather than nonbizarre ideas in isolation, may exhibit symptom dynamics with greater psychopathological severity. Individuals at a higher risk of psychosis exhibited persistently severe symptom dynamics, indicating a potential reduction in psychological flexibility.

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) reduce relapses in schizophrenia; however, most healthcare professionals (HCPs) reserve LAIs for nonadherence to oral antipsychotics (OAs) or severe disease.

US HCPs were surveyed regarding attitudes and perceptions toward LAIs for schizophrenia and LAI selection preferences. Respondents were grouped by LAI use (high [≥31% of patients using LAIs], low [≤14% using LAIs]; mid not analyzed) and archetype based on response to, “Which of the following best fits the current way you view your use of [LAIs] for your patients with schizophrenia?” (see responses below).

Respondents (106 high, 130 low LAI use) were distributed across early LAI use (n=123), severity-reserved (n=88), adherence-reserved (n=113), and LAI-hesitant (n=56) archetypes.

Across all groups, HCPs estimated OA nonadherence in their practice (21%– 32%) to be lower than for patients nationwide (50%– 56%). Overall, 27% were dissatisfied with their LAI:OA use ratio, most thinking their OA use was too high. In all groups, side effects/tolerability was ranked as most important when choosing an LAI and “preference for the molecule” was ranked least important. Overall, 71%– 77% of HCPs were somewhat/much more likely to use a particular LAI based on multiple injection site options, small/on par needle, and price, and 63%– 82% of HCPs were somewhat/much more likely to select an LAI dosed once monthly or less often compared with an LAI dosed once every 2 weeks (8%). HCPs with high LAI use or early LAI use archetype were more likely to disagree that managing patients with schizophrenia increased their stress (64% and 63% vs 27%-45%, P<.05 each) and/or left them feeling “burned out” (77% and 79% vs 50%– 64%, P<.05 each).

Compared with other groups, greater proportions with high LAI use or early LAI use archetype consistently read new LAI publications (18% and 19% vs 0%– 5%, P<.01) and were confident in key aspects of LAI treatment (ie, dosing, managing side effects, access; 67%– 74% and 59%– 70% vs 11%– 57%, P<.05 each).

HCPs with low LAI use estimated the proportion of patients who initially refuse LAIs to be higher (mean, 55%) than those with low LAI use (44%, P<.01); there were no differences among archetypes (49%– 54%). HCPs with high LAI use or early LAI use archetype were more likely to “use any means necessary to ensure that a patient is on an LAI” vs other groups (44% and 51% vs 5%– 22%, P<.01 each) or had used guardianship to assist with treatment (70% and 69% vs 32%– 56%, P<.05 each); greater proportions with high LAI use or early LAI use archetype strongly agreed it was “worth [their] time to resolve issues with the insurance company” (42% and 45% vs 16%– 30%, P<.05 each) and were confident they would be able to do so (23% and 20% vs 2%– 11%, P<.05 each). Greater proportions of HCPs with early LAI use archetype vs the severity-reserved archetype strongly agreed that they attempt to determine the patient’s/caregiver’s preferred role before involving them (43% vs 27%, P<.05) and encourage them to participate (72% vs 57%, P<.05) in shared decision-making.

Comparing HCPs with high LAI use or early LAI use archetype vs other groups, multiple factors (eg, attitudes, preferences, training, knowledge base) combine to influence LAI use. These results highlight considerations for developing educational materials to increase LAI use in this population.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) face unique challenges when managing patients with schizophrenia. Educational initiatives targeting common clinical dilemmas encountered by clinicians, including partial or nonadherence, may alleviate knowledge gaps and clarify the role of long-acting injectable antipsychotic agents (LAIs) in treating this population.

4 experts in schizophrenia management used empirical evidence to identify 11 key clinical dilemmas where LAIs may be useful. These experts then developed a heuristic, educational tool (S.C.O.P.E.™: Schizophrenia Clinical Outcome Scenarios and Patient-Provider Engagement) based on empirical evidence and expert opinion for clinicians to use when encountering similar scenarios to optimize schizophrenia care.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is a freely-available resource comprising an interactive digital platform providing educational materials for HCPs involved in continued care for patients with schizophrenia. S.C.O.P.E.™ provides HCPs with considerations in common clinical scenarios met in inpatient and outpatient settings, as well as questions to consider when patients present to the emergency department. The potential usefulness of LAIs is explored in each scenario. Clinical education videos prepare nurse practitioners, social workers, and case managers to address patient concerns and communicate the benefits of LAI treatment. S.C.O.P.E.™ will not replace clinical judgment, guidelines, or continuing medical education, and is not a platform for recording patient-level data, nor intended for payer negotiations or access-related questions by HCPs.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is an educational tool for HCPs to use alongside standard psychiatric evaluations to improve understanding of how to manage common clinical dilemmas when treating patients with schizophrenia and the role of LAIs in schizophrenia management.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) face unique challenges when managing patients with schizophrenia. Educational initiatives targeting common clinical dilemmas encountered by clinicians, such as unfamiliarity with prescribing information for long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs), may assist clinicians when treating patients with schizophrenia.

Four experts in schizophrenia management used empirical evidence to identify 11 key clinical dilemmas where LAIs may be useful. These experts then developed a heuristic, educational tool (S.C.O.P.E.™: Schizophrenia Clinical Outcome Scenarios and Patient-Provider Engagement) based on empirical evidence and expert opinion for clinicians to use when encountering similar scenarios to optimize schizophrenia care. S.C.O.P.E.™ also includes supportive elements such as an LAI selector.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is a freely available resource comprising an interactive digital platform providing educational materials for HCPs involved in continued care for patients with schizophrenia. To acquaint HCPs with characteristics of common LAIs used in schizophrenia treatment, S.C.O.P.E.™ offers a selector that filters LAIs by approved indication(s), initiation regimen, reconstitution, dosing strengths and frequency, injection volumes and routes, and supply and storage information based on approved product labels. The LAI selector does not provide LAI safety and efficacy data, so HCPs should visit individual product websites for this information. Therefore, S.C.O.P.E.™ will not replace clinical judgment, guidelines, or continuing medical education, and is not a platform for recording patient-level data, nor intended for payer negotiations or access-related questions by HCPs.

S.C.O.P.E.™ is an educational tool for HCPs to use alongside standard psychiatric evaluations to improve understanding of how to manage common clinical dilemmas when treating patients with schizophrenia, the role of LAIs in schizophrenia management, and the product characteristics of available LAIs.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Valbenazine is a highly selective vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor indicated for tardive dyskinesia (TD), a persistent and potentially debilitating movement disorder associated with prolonged antipsychotic exposure. Given the paucity of data regarding the course of TD in patients no longer taking antipsychotics, a meta-analysis of 3 long-term valbenazine studies was conducted in subgroups with and without concomitant antipsychotic use at baseline.

KINECTTM-3 (NCT02274558), KINECTTM-4 (NCT02405091), and JKINECT (NCT03176771) data were analyzed in study completers taking antipsychotics at baseline (AP+) and those who were not (AP-). The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) total score was used to measure TD severity at baseline, Wk48 (end of valbenazine treatment), and Wk52 (4 weeks after valbenazine withdrawal). The meta-analysis implemented a random-effects model that weighted each study based on inverse variance, adjusted for between-study variance.

Of 576 enrolled patients, 336 (58.3%) were study completers and included for analysis: AP+ (n=269); AP- (n=67). Mean baseline AIMS scores ranged from 7.9–14.9 (AP+) and 10.9–14.5 (AP-). Mean changes from baseline in AIMS scores indicated substantial TD improvements with valbenazine at Wk48 (AP+, 6.1; AP-, -6.5) and return towards baseline severity at Wk52 (AP+, -2.1; AP-, -1.4).

Once-daily valbenazine treatment resulted in substantial and sustained TD improvement through Wk48, with no meaningful differences between AP+ and AP- subgroups. The return towards baseline severity after valbenazine withdrawal shows TD is chronic and often irreversible, even in patients no longer taking antipsychotics. Continuous treatment with valbenazine may be warranted irrespective of antipsychotic therapy.

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Given increased survival for adults with CHD, we aim to determine outcome differences of infective endocarditis compared to patients with structurally normal hearts in the general population.

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study identifying infective endocarditis hospitalisations in patients 18 years and older from the National Inpatient Sample database between 2001 and 2016 using International Classification of Disease diagnosis and procedure codes. Weighting was used to create national annual estimates indexed to the United States population, and multivariable logistic regression analysis determined variable associations. Outcome variables were mortality and surgery. The primary predictor variable was the presence or absence of CHD.

We identified 1,096,858 estimated infective endocarditis hospitalisations, of which 17,729 (1.6%) were adults with CHD. A 125% increase in infective endocarditis hospitalisations occurred for adult CHD patients during the studied time period (p < 0.001). Adults with CHD were significantly less likely to experience mortality (5.4% vs. 9.5%, OR 0.54, CI 0.47–0.63, p < 0.001) and more likely to undergo in-hospital surgery (31.6% vs. 6.7%, OR 6.49, CI 6.03–6.98, p < 0.001) compared to the general population. CHD severity was not associated with increased mortality (p = 0.53). Microbiologic aetiology of infective endocarditis varied between groups (p < 0.001) with Streptococcus identified more commonly in adults with CHD compared to patients with structurally normal hearts (36.2% vs. 14.4%).

Adults with CHD hospitalised for infective endocarditis are less likely to experience mortality and more likely to undergo surgery than the general population.

Cognitive reserve (CR) is typically operationalized as episodic memory residualized on brain health indices. The dimensionality of more generalized models of CR has rarely been examined.

In a sample of N = 113 dementia-free older adults (ages 62–86 years at MRI scan; 58.4% women), the domain-specific representation of general cognition (COG) before vs. after residualization on brain indices (brain volume loss, cerebral blood flow, white matter hyperintensities) was compared (i.e., COG vs. CR). COG and CR were assessed by 15 tasks spanning five domains: processing speed, verbal memory, visuospatial memory, fluid reasoning, and vocabulary. Measurement invariance and item-construct representation were tested in a series of structural factor analyses. COG and CR were then examined in relation to 22 risk and protective factors and dementia status at time of death.

Item-factor loadings differed such that CR more strongly emphasized fluid reasoning. More years of education, higher occupational class, more hobbies/interests, and fewer difficulties with personal mobility similarly predicted better COG and CR. Only the sub-domain of visuospatial memory (both before and after residualization) was associated with conversion to dementia by end-of-life (r = −.30; p = .01).

Results provide tentative support for the role of fluid reasoning (intelligence) as a potential compensatory factor for age- and/or neuropathology-related reductions in processing speed and memory. Intellectually stimulating work, efforts to preserve personal mobility, and a diversity of hobbies and interests may attenuate age- and/or pathology-related reductions in cognitive functioning prior to dementia onset.