To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Liz McDonald, East London NHS Foundation Trust,Roch Cantwell, Perinatal Mental Health Service and West of Scotland Mother & Baby Unit,Ian Jones, Cardiff University
Autism research and clinical practice is a rapidly evolving branch of psychiatry. This chapter explores autism through the lenses of the neurodiversity paradigm, challenging the deficit-based model whilst remaining stark about significant healthcare inequalities and challenges that autistic people face. It considers the perinatal journey from an autistic perspective, highlighting some of the common challenges autistic mums (to be) can face, and makes suggestions for approaches to take when working with autistic patients.
This chapter examines the various definitions and models used to conceptualise and diagnose dyslexia. The authors critique traditional approaches such as the discrepancy model and response to intervention (RTI), arguing that these methods are inadequate – particularly for adolescents and adults. Instead, they advocate for the profile of strengths and weaknesses (PSW) model, which accounts for underlying cognitive inefficiencies, such as working-memory deficits, to explain functional impairments in skills such as reading and writing. The chapter also explores the biological and neurological foundations of dyslexia, including genetic influences and structural brain differences, and challenges simplistic or euphemistic views such as ’neurodiversity’ that may obscure understanding. Emphasising a scientific, empirical lens, the authors reject models based purely on social narratives or lived experiences, advocating instead for the biopsychosocial model that integrates biological, psychological, and environmental factors. Dyslexia is positioned not merely as a reading issue but as a complex cognitive disorder with broad implications across the lifespan. The chapter closes by asserting the need for clear, evidence-based conceptual models to foster self-understanding, improve assessment, and guide effective intervention.
This chapter characterises the beginning of the 1810s as a transitional moment for both early feminist thought and cultural conceptions of intellectual disability. Through a sustained reading of Lucy Aikin’s critically underexamined Epistles on Women (1810), the chapter argues that the long, combative poem articulates an intersectional appeal to feminine-coded weakness, idiocy, and disability. The opening question of the poem, ‘when was ever weakness in the right?’, pits a utopian matriarchal future against the overwhelming misogyny and brutality of the masculinist past. Aikin’s revisionist history begins in Eden with Eve’s assiduous care for the ‘moping idiot’ Adam and ends in the modern era with the new ideal of feminine friendship supplanting compulsory ideologies of heteropatriarchal marriage. Throughout, Aikin creatively develops a compelling feminist aesthetics and ethics grounded in the complex trope of idiocy and neurodiversity.
The Epilogue provides a reflective distillation of the book’s major claims and anticipatory warnings. It revisits the central idea that the human species is entering a new epoch of cognitive modulation — one that combines the ancient allure of psychoactive substances with the unprecedented reach of digital simulation. It affirms that while such tools offer extraordinary opportunities for creativity, healing, and connection, they also pose significant risks to autonomy, mental integrity, and collective meaning-making. The epilogue emphasises the urgency of ethical design, regulatory foresight, and public education to manage this dual-edged transformation. It concludes with a speculative yet grounded vision: that the next phase of human evolution may depend less on biology and more on how we symbolically navigate our internal and external realities. The final call is for conscious engagement — with our histories, technologies, and altered states — to ensure our adaptations remain humane and meaningful.
This integrative chapter highlights the interdisciplinary implications of the book’s core arguments. It synthesises the historical, neuroscientific, cultural, and ethical perspectives covered in earlier chapters, showing how they converge around a central theme: the human impulse to reshape consciousness through external means. The summary identifies key throughlines such as the neurochemical basis of thrill-seeking, the symbolic encoding of drug use, the commodification of altered states, and the rise of digital simulation as a new frontier of mind alteration. It stresses the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration in addressing emerging challenges — including addiction, mental health, identity fragmentation, and regulatory vacuums. The chapter proposes that future research and policy must account for the hybrid nature of cognitive environments, shaped by both chemical inputs and algorithmic systems. Ultimately, it reaffirms the need to develop new cultural literacies and ethical frameworks suited to the complexities of the digital-chemical age.
School refusal among neurodivergent students underscores systemic failures in traditional educational systems. This qualitative study, informed by the neurodiversity paradigm, examines how Flexible Learning Options (FLOs) in South Australia address drivers of disengagement, such as sensory overload, punitive discipline, and identity erasure, while fostering reengagement through autonomy, relational safety, and identity empowerment. Drawing on interviews conducted with a subsample of 18 students aged 13–19, reflexive thematic analysis resulted in the development of three themes: (1) autonomy and its limits, (2) relational safety as harm reduction, and (3) identity empowerment through neuroaffirmation. The findings reported in this paper advocate for educational models that transform flexibility from a temporary solution into a blueprint for equity, ensuring schools become spaces of support rather than harm for neurodivergent learners.
In his target article, ‘Autism, constructionism, and nativism’, Kissine (2021) argues that data from autism should be taken into consideration in the debate about L1 acquisition. This paper responds to Kissine's piece by pointing out several of its underlying assumptions and suggesting directions for future research on the topic. Traditional framings of autism as a deficit have recently been challenged in favor of an identity-based approach, the neurodiversity paradigm, which suggests that autistic speech should not be measured in terms of its resemblance to nonautistic speech and that literature on intercultural miscommunication may offer insights into autistic communication. There are some indications that distinct autistic discourse practices may be identifiable in communities of practice, and studies on autistic literacy could benefit from considering the theoretical perspectives found in literature on multimodality and translanguaging. Finally, research on language acquisition might be strengthened by the incorporation of holistic neurocognitive theories about autistic minds.
Autistic adolescents are at higher risk of self-harm, suicidal behaviours, and emotion dysregulation compared with their non-autistic peers. Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is an evidence-based treatment for self-harm and suicidal behaviour with emerging literature of the application of DBT for autistic populations. Despite this, no qualitative research has investigated the experiences of autistic adolescents of standard DBT. Therefore, this study aimed to explore autistic adolescents’ experiences of non-adapted DBT. Ten adolescents who had or were seeking an autism diagnosis, and were in a DBT programme, completed semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data from the interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Themes were generated for each objective. Objective 1 included themes about the lived experience of autistic adolescents accessing DBT, including: ‘The impact of invalidation’, ‘Fostering acceptance and understanding’, ‘What does autism mean to me?’, and ‘Autism and mental health difficulties’. The themes regarding Objective 2 were about the experiences of the various modes of DBT and were organised by each client-facing mode. Objective 3 included themes highlighting the experience of utilising DBT skills in daily life, which included: ‘Barriers to skills use’, ‘Supporting skills use’, and ‘Skills practice or masking?’. Finally, Objective 4 included themes regarding the recommendations participants had for optimising DBT for autistic people: ‘Improving written materials’ and ‘General accessibility advice’. These findings suggest for DBT therapists to embody cultural humility, curiosity, validation, and flexibility when building neuro-affirmative competencies for supporting autistic individuals. Results are discussed in relation to the application and acceptability of DBT for this group.
Key learning aims
(1) Recent publications (e.g. Keenan et al., 2023) have explored the experience of autistic adults accessing DBT and highlighted the need for clinicians to work collaboratively with clients and make reasonable adjustments to improve autistic adults’ understanding and adherence to DBT.
(2) To date, no qualitative studies have explored the experience of autistic adolescents accessing the Rathus and Miller (2015) Adolescent DBT model. The current study explores the views of autistic adolescents on how autism is discussed and considered by clinicians when supporting them to access different components of DBT when describing the strengths and barriers they experience.
(3) Adopting a bottom-up approach, we identify key themes from adolescents’ perspectives on how to support them to access and engage with different DBT components, ranging from making environmental adaptations to meet individual sensory needs to improve accessibility, to providing more opportunities for personalised learning using neuro-affirmative examples that can improve generalisability of skills in everyday life. We provide recommendations for clinicians to consider on ways of adapting the process and content of DBT to increase accessibility and engagement for autistic adolescents in treatment.
We humans are diverse. But how to understand human diversity in the case of cognitive diversity? This Element discusses how to properly investigate human behavioural and cognitive diversity, how to scientifically represent, and how to explain cognitive diversity. Since there are various methodological approaches and explanatory agendas across the cognitive and behavioural sciences, which can be more or less useful for understanding human diversity, a critical analysis is needed. And as the controversial study of sex and gender differences in cognition illustrates, the scientific representations and explanations put forward matter to society and impact public policy, including policies on mental health. But how to square the vision of human cognitive diversity with the assumption that we all share one human nature? Is cognitive diversity something to be positively valued? The author engages with these questions in connection with the issues of neurodiversity, cognitive disability, and essentialist construals of human nature.
This chapter focuses on the second bridge between economic and social values in contract law, examining the role played by regulation in bringing together these values. The discussion questions the effectiveness of regulatory responses to business to consumer (B2C) relations in English consumer contract law, in protecting people not just as economic actors, but also as citizens, and in safeguarding values such as autonomy and human dignity. The analysis focuses on the regulation of unfair contract terms, unfair commercial practices, implied terms in contracts for the provision of goods, services and digital content, and on information and cancellation rights in business to consumer (B2C) contracts. This chapter also examines the concept of consumer vulnerability in trader– consumer relations.
Mirroring the general population, the number of medical students, doctors and, indeed, psychiatrists disclosing being neurodivergent is rising. These individuals commonly have a variety of strengths that can enhance their work, but these strengths may go unrecognised. All too often such individuals have been labelled ‘doctors in difficulty’. We begin this article with a review of contemporary thinking regarding neurodiversity, before considering specific issues facing neurodivergent doctors, specifically psychiatrists. We explore neurodivergent strengths and the evidence regarding career outcomes and mental health. We discuss the stigma that many neurodivergent psychiatrists face in the medical sphere and how difficulties may be reframed as unmet needs. We highlight initiatives that aim to change workplace culture, before discussing the concept of reasonable adjustments, alongside a wide range of practical suggestions of adjustments to consider, using the Autistic SPACE framework and the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ reasonable adjustments guidance. Finally, we consider how those in senior leadership roles can contribute to this field and provide role modelling and signposting to further information and support for neurodivergent doctors and their supervisors and line managers.
This chapter focuses on the influence of nineteenth-century neurology on Beckett’s writing, especially the work of Jean-Martin Charcot and Georges Gilles de la Tourette, who both worked at the Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris. Charcot’s famous Tuesday lectures, at which he exhibited his patients to admiring crowds, became an intellectual and middle-class pastime in Paris, instigating a new performance style in the Parisian café-concert, in cabaret, and in music hall, while the performers at such venues, in turn, became the stars of early cinema, adapting their convulsive performance style to silent film. Beckett took a lifelong interest in these popular forms, and the chapter considers the impact of their convulsive aesthetic on his work. It also addresses Beckett’s representation of speech and his reading of Bergson’s 1900 essay on Laughter, which argued that humour arises from ‘something mechanical encrusted on the living’. Bergson’s extended essay was itself substantially influenced by medical discoveries, and especially the theatrical and often spectacular culture of the late-nineteenth-century science of neurology. While Beckett diverges from Bergson’s Cartesian stance, he nevertheless concurred on the limitations of free will and agency, on ‘the deep-seated recalcitrance of matter’, and on the human as always already determined by the mechanical.
Describe how children can take different paths in development and reach similar destinations; understand the developmental differences between children as a set of strengths and challenges that are highly sensitive to environmental context; explore how events in children’s lives can trigger a cascade of later consequences.
This chapter explores the unique relationship between music and individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). It highlights the remarkable musical abilities often found in people with autism, contrasting with their challenges in social interaction and communication. Research shows that music can serve as a bridge, facilitating social interaction and emotional expression for those on the spectrum. Brain imaging studies reveal how brain regions typically associated with language processing are activated in autistic individuals when they engage with music. This suggests that music may offer an alternative pathway for communication and emotional understanding. The chapter also discusses the therapeutic applications of music for individuals with autism, such as auditory-motor mapping training (AMMT), which has shown promise in improving verbal communication and social skills. Music therapy can also foster emotional expression, social connection, and a sense of belonging. The chapter concludes by emphasizing the importance of understanding and embracing the individual’s musical preferences and strengths in order to support their development and well-being.
In this chapter we discuss that, as well as being the main feature necessary for the diagnosis of Hoarding Disorder, hoarding can also occur as a symptom in many other physical and mental conditions. We will discuss clinical stories of people who have had difficulties with hoarding but will demonstrate how a different type of approach is needed to help them overcome their problems from that described from pure Hoarding disorder. There will then be a brief examination of the overlap between trauma and neurodiversity and hoarding as well as a brief description and discussion of the validity of the concept of Diogenes Syndrome in the elderly.
Shakespeare and Neurodiversity argues that the Shakespeare classroom should be a place where neurodivergent learners flourish. This Element addresses four key areas: questions of reasonable adjustments, the pace of learning, the issue of diagnosis, and Shakespearean neurodivergent futures in education. Throughout, the Element provides activities and theoretical explanations to enable students and educators to understand how these four areas of Shakespeare education have often been underpinned by ableism, but can now become sources of neurodivergent flourishing.
The neurodiversity movement takes a societal view of individual differences by suggesting that people should be respected and not necessarily medically treated based on personal attributes. This commentary article discusses how human differences in intellectual capacities should be considered as another form of diversity with the requirement for medical intervention needing to be considered in terms of overall social change. As a significant portion of the overall workforce could be considered as people with some form of neurological disability this article analyses how co-creation processes occur meaning neurodiverse individuals should be accepted in society regardless of their differences. This article contributes to societal discussions around managing diversity as in society the socio-demographic categories such as age and gender are well established, but newer categories such as neurodiversity are required.
EDAC (Eating Disorders and Autism Collaborative) is an innovative project aiming to increase research capacity by supporting collaboration in the fields of eating disorders and autism. EDAC comprises four integrated workstreams to co-produce interdisciplinary research, directed by Autistic individuals with lived experience of eating disorders. Workstream 1 will outline best collaborative practices, informing the research network. Workstream 2 will use arts-based methodologies to set research priorities, with emphasis on the perspectives of underrepresented groups. Workstream 3 will support interdisciplinary collaborations to develop innovative research. Finally, workstream 4 will maximise knowledge mobilisation with the aim of reducing barriers to rapid incorporation of research into policy and clinical practice. A core aim of EDAC is to embed a neurodiversity-affirming culture within eating disorder research and to support the development of a new generation of researchers conducting innovative and meaningful research with the potential to improve clinical outcomes.
This chapter discusses cognitive individual differences that affect learning processes and outcomes of second language. It answers broad questions such as Why do some learners seem to have such an easy time learning a second language? and Why do some learners sound like a first-language speaker but others don’t? The chapter examines how our cognitive abilities influence our learning, and how we might be able to improve our learning even if we have lower cognitive skills in some areas. Specific individual differences include general intelligence, working memory, and language learning aptitude (phonemic coding ability, grammatical sensitivity, rote memorization). The chapter then examines how cognitive individual differences mediate the impact of second language instruction, that is, aptitude–treatment interaction. The chapter includes less-investigated individual differences as well, such as neurodiversity, autism, ADHD, and dyslexia. The chapter concludes with learning strategies and pedagogical recommendations that help counter the negative impacts that cognitive individual differences have on second language learning.
There are increasing calls for neurodivergent peoples’ involvement in research into neurodevelopmental conditions. So far, however, this has tended to be achieved only through membership of external patient and public involvement (PPI) panels. The Regulating Emotions – Strengthening Adolescent Resilience (RE-STAR) programme is building a new participatory model of translational research that places young people with diagnoses of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism at the heart of the research team so that they can contribute to shaping and delivering its research plan.
Aims
To outline the principles on which the RE-STAR participatory model is based and describe its practical implementation and benefits, especially concerning the central role of members of the Youth Researcher Panel (Y-RPers).
Method
The model presented is a culmination of a 24-month process during which Y-RPers moved from advisors to co-researchers integrated within RE-STAR. It is shaped by the principles of co-intentionality. The account here was agreed following multiple iterative cycles of collaborative discussion between academic researchers, Y-RPers and other stakeholders.
Results
Based on our collective reflections we offer general guidance on how to effectively integrate young people with diagnoses of ADHD and/or autism into the core of the translational research process. We also describe the specific theoretical, methodological and analytical benefits of Y-RPer involvement in RE-STAR.
Conclusions
Although in its infancy, RE-STAR has demonstrated the model's potential to enrich translational science in a way that can change our understanding of the relationship between autism, ADHD and mental health. When appropriately adapted we believe the model can be applied to other types of neurodivergence and/or mental health conditions.