3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) has shown promising safety and efficacy in phase 3 studies of post-traumatic stress disorder, but has not been investigated for a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD).

We aimed to explore the proof of principle and safety as a first study with MDMA-AT for MDD, and to provide preliminary efficacy data.

Twelve participants (7 women, 5 men) with moderate to severe MDD received MDMA in 2 open-label sessions 1 month apart, along with psychotherapy before, during and after the MDMA sessions, between January 2023 and May 2024. The primary outcome measure was mean change in Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the secondary outcome measure was mean change in functional impairment as measured with the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), both from baseline to 8 weeks following the second MDMA session. We used descriptive statistics and the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare baseline and outcome scores. Repeated measures were analysed by a mixed-effects model.

Baseline MADRS was 29.6 (s.d. 4.9). Feasibility was demonstrated with sufficient recruitment and retention. MADRS scores were significantly reduced post treatment compared with baseline (mean difference –19.3, s.e. 2.4, CI –14.8 to –23.8, P < 0.001). SDS scores significantly decreased from baseline (mean difference –11.7, s.e. 2.2, CI –7.5 to –15.9, P = 0.001). There were no adverse events of special interest, and no unexpected or serious adverse events.

The study met the primary objectives of safety and feasibility, and provided indications of efficacy for MDMA-AT for MDD. Further studies with a randomised design are required to confirm these findings.

EudraCT no. 2021-000805-26.

Treatment guidelines recommend evidence-based psychological therapies for adults with intellectual disabilities with co-occurring anxiety or depression. No previous research has explored the effectiveness of these therapies in mainstream psychological therapy settings or outside specialist settings.

To evaluate the effectiveness of psychological therapies delivered in routine primary care settings for people with intellectual disability who are experiencing co-occurring depression or anxiety.

This study used linked electronic healthcare records of 2 048 542 adults who received a course of NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression in England between 2012 and 2019 to build a retrospective, observational cohort of individuals with intellectual disability, matched 1:2 with individuals without intellectual disability. Logistic regressions were used to compare metrics of symptom improvement and deterioration used in the national programme, on the basis of depression and anxiety measures collected before and at the last attended therapy session.

The study included 6870 adults with intellectual disability and 2 041 672 adults without intellectual disability. In unadjusted analyses, symptoms improved on average for people with intellectual disability after a course of therapy, but these individuals experienced poorer outcomes compared with those without intellectual disability (reliable improvement 60.2% for people with intellectual disability v. 69.2% for people without intellectual disability, odds ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.63–0.70; reliable deterioration 10.3% for people with intellectual disability v. 5.7% for those without intellectual disability, odds ratio 1.89, 95% CI 1.75–2.04). After propensity score matching, some differences were attenuated (reliable improvement, adjusted odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 1.91–1.04), but some outcomes remained poorer for people with intellectual disability (reliable deterioration, adjusted odds ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.16–1.42).

Evidence-based psychological therapies may be effective for adults with intellectual disability, but their outcomes may be similar to (for improvement and recovery) or poorer than (for deterioration) those for adults without intellectual disability. Future work should investigate the impact of adaptations of therapies for those with intellectual disability to make such interventions more effective and accessible for this population.

Ketamine exerts potent but transient antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Combinations of ketamine and psychotherapy have attracted interest, but no trial has investigated a psychedelic model of ketamine–psychotherapy for TRD to our knowledge.

This secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial (RCT) explores the therapeutic effects and experiential mechanisms of the Montreal Model of ketamine–psychotherapy for TRD, with or without music.

A two-centre, single-blinded, RCT conducted in Montreal, Canada, between January 2021 and August 2022 (NCT04701866). Participants received ketamine–psychotherapy for TRD – six subanaesthetic infusions over 4 weeks and psychological support – with either music or matched non-music support during ketamine doses, as per random group assignments. The primary therapeutic outcome was the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, assessed by blinded raters. Psychedelic-like experiences, evaluated by the Mystical Experience Questionnaire and Emotional Breakthrough Inventory, and their session-by-session relationships with depression were explored with multilevel, time-lagged covariate models with autoregressive residuals.

Thirty-two participants with severe and highly comorbid TRD, including high rates of personality disorder and suicidality, received 181 ketamine infusions. Therapeutic outcomes and psychedelic experiences did not differ between music (n = 15) and non-music (n = 17) interventions. Both groups experienced significant reductions in clinician-rated and self-reported depression (d = 1.2 and d = 0.87, respectively; p < 0.001), anxiety (d = 0.8, p < 0.001) and suicidality (d = 0.4, p < 0.05) at 4 weeks, fully maintained at 8-week follow-up. Ketamine experiences were highly emotional and mystical. Converging analyses supported mystical-like ketamine experiences as mechanisms of its antidepressant effects.

This trial found large and notably sustained benefits of ketamine–psychotherapy for severe TRD, with or without music, and psychedelic experiences of comparable intensity to those observed with psilocybin. Mystical-like experiences may particularly contribute to ketamine’s immediate and persistent psychiatric benefits.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the first-line treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), but initial outcomes can be modest.

To compare SSRI dose optimisation with four alternative second-line strategies in MDD patients unresponsive to an SSRI.

Of 257 participants, 51 were randomised to SSRI dose optimisation (SSRI-Opt), 46 to lithium augmentation (SSRI+Li), 48 to nortriptyline combination (SSRI+NTP), 55 to switch to venlafaxine (VEN) and 57 to problem-solving therapy (SSRI+PST). Primary outcomes were week-6 response/remission rates, assessed by blinded evaluators using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). Changes in HDRS-17 scores, global improvement and safety outcomes were also explored. EudraCT No. 2007-002130-11.

Alternative second-line strategies led to higher response (28.2% v. 14.3%, odds ratio = 2.36 [95% CI 1.0–5.6], p = 0.05) and remission (16.9% v. 12.2%, odds ratio = 1.46, [95% CI 0.57–3.71], p = 0.27) rates, with greater HDRS-17 score reductions (−2.6 [95% CI −4.9 to −0.4], p = 0.021]) than SSRI-Opt. Significant/marginally significant effects were only observed in both response rates and HDRS-17 decreases for VEN (odds ratio = 2.53 [95% CI 0.94–6.80], p = 0.067; HDRS-17 difference: −2.7 [95% CI −5.5 to 0.0], p = 0.054) and for SSRI+PST (odds ratio = 2.46 [95% CI 0.92 to 6.62], p = 0.074; HDRS-17 difference: −3.1 [95% CI −5.8 to −0.3], p = 0.032). The SSRI+PST group reported the fewest adverse effects, while SSRI+NTP experienced the most (28.1% v. 75%; p < 0.01), largely mild.

Patients with MDD and insufficient response to SSRIs would benefit from any other second-line strategy aside from dose optimisation. With limited statistical power, switching to venlafaxine and adding psychotherapy yielded the most consistent results in the DEPRE'5 study.

Psychotherapy plays a crucial role in mental healthcare. Integrating evidence-based practices into treatment guidelines highlights the need for basic psychotherapy competence in psychiatry training. While programs set minimum requirements for psychotherapy training in line with the recommendations of the World Psychiatric Association or accreditation bodies like the European Union of Medical Specialists, implementation is often inconsistent, and resources are limited. This systematic review explores early career psychiatrists’ (ECPs) views, interests, and available opportunities for psychotherapy training worldwide.

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and PubPsych for survey-based studies on ECPs’ perspectives on psychotherapy training, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Of 31,281 studies screened, 48 articles were included. Quality assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment Checklist for Survey Studies on Psychology, and the findings were summarized through narrative synthesis.

Included studies were from Europe (24, 50%), United States (12, 25%), Western Pacific (6, 12.5%), South-East Asia (4, 8.3%), Eastern Mediterranean (1, 2%), and Africa (1, 2%), with a total of 7,196 participants. Thirty-one studies on ECPs’ interest in psychotherapy training found that 57–80% were interested in psychotherapy, 67–92% viewed being a psychotherapist as part of their psychiatrist identity, and 88–97.7% supported its inclusion in psychiatry training. Training opportunities varied by country and institution, with cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic psychotherapy being primary modalities.

Improving psychiatrists’ access to evidence-based, culturally adapted psychotherapy training is essential. Educational activities offered by training institutions and professional organizations can play a key role in supporting ongoing professional development.

Psychological and existential distress is prevalent among patients with life-threatening cancer, significantly impacting their quality of life. Psilocybin-assisted therapy has shown promise in alleviating these symptoms. This systematic review aims to synthesize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of psilocybin in reducing cancer-related distress.

We searched MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane database, Embase, and Scopus from inception to February 8, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), open-label trials, qualitative studies, and single case reports that evaluated psilocybin for cancer-related distress. Data were extracted on study characteristics, participant demographics, psilocybin and psychotherapy intervention, outcome measures, and results. Two authors independently screened, selected, and extracted data from the studies. Cochrane Risk of Bias for RCTs and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used to evaluate study quality. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024511692).

Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising three RCTs, five open-label trials, five qualitative studies, and one single case report. Psilocybin therapy consistently showed significant reductions in depression, anxiety, and existential distress, with improvements sustained over several months. Adverse effects were generally mild and transient.

This systematic review highlights the potential of psilocybin-assisted therapy as an effective treatment for reducing psychological and existential distress in cancer patients. Despite promising findings, further large-scale, well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm these results and address existing research gaps.