Efficient triage in general practice is critical to optimize appointment allocation and minimize patient delays. Delays in receiving clinical information, such as photographs or symptom questionnaires, lead to unnecessary consultations and inefficiencies. This study evaluated the feasibility and impact of a structured pre-triage protocol requesting photos and questionnaires for common conditions (skin, eye, tonsillitis, and urinary tract infections).

A pre-post intervention quality improvement project was conducted in a UK general practice. Triage administrators were instructed to proactively request photographs for skin and eye complaints and symptom questionnaires for tonsillitis and UTIs at initial patient contact. Outcomes included process metrics (number of pre-triage requests, proportion of cases managed directly by the triage GP) and subjective measures of ease, speed, satisfaction, and confidence.

The protocol increased photo requests for skin (mean increase 4.0/session, Cohen’s d = 7.77) and eye (2.2/session, d = 4.09) conditions, while questionnaire requests remained unchanged. The proportion of skin cases managed directly by the triage GP increased significantly (from 0.2 to 2.2 cases/session, d = 1.65), and eye case management also improved. Questionnaire-based pathways showed minimal change in efficiency or direct management. Subjective feedback indicated a slight reduction in triage speed, but ease and satisfaction were maintained, while diagnostic confidence increased, particularly for photo-supported conditions.

A structured pre-triage protocol is feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective in enhancing triage efficiency, particularly for visually assessable conditions like skin and eye presentations. By enabling earlier access to essential information, such protocols may reduce unnecessary consultations, improve workflow, and support clinician confidence.

Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) in high-risk environments pose major challenges for coordinated emergency response. Training is often infrequent, resource-intensive, and lacks interagency consistency. This study explores the use of Virtual Reality (VR) simulation to train responders in the RAMP triage model across emergency services.

An observational qualitative design was used. Sixteen participants from various emergency services engaged in a VR-based MCI scenario involving 26 patients and hazardous conditions. The scenario required rapid RAMP triage based on essential cues (radial pulse and the ability to follow commands). Structured interviews followed, and data were analyzed thematically.

Three themes emerged: (1) Deficiencies in current training, including inconsistent MCI protocols, lack of guideline familiarity, and limited interagency practice; (2) VR as an effective, low-resource training method enabling repeatable and safe practice—RAMP triage was found intuitive and efficient, even for non-medical personnel; and (3) prerequisites for VR implementation, such as realistic design, technical infrastructure, and stakeholder involvement to support shared understanding.

VR-based MCI training is a feasible and effective supplement to traditional drills. It enables scalable and flexible skill-building, though it should complement and not replace live exercises.

This study explored the prevalence and attributes of triage errors made by emergency responders during virtual reality simulations of mass casualty incidents.

The study analyzed errors made by 99 emergency responders during their triage and treatment of a mass casualty incident in virtual reality. Responders received training on the Sort, Assess, Life-saving Intervention, Treatment, Transport (SALT) protocol, then responded to a virtual bombed subway station. Responder accuracy, efficiency, and application of treatments were tracked. Error analysis was performed through the lens of human factors. Accordingly, errors were categorized by their nature: either perception, proficiency, or procedure.

Responders correctly triaged 70% of virtual patients, and 78% demonstrated relative efficiency. Interaction times between responders and patients averaged 20 seconds. The time to assess and treat all patients for life-threatening bleeding injuries across the entire scene averaged six minutes. Most errors were related to proficiency (e.g., competence or experience). However, procedural errors (shortcomings of SALT) and perceptual errors (degraded sensory input from programmed environmental chaos, i.e., virtual smoke/debris and louder sound) were also observed. Most errors were related to patients with either respiratory issues or multiple injuries.

Virtual reality (VR) offered a controlled environment for studying errors made by emergency responders in a mass casualty incident, which will lead to improved training and protocols to better prepare them for these events.

Evaluate and improve the accuracy of disaster triage decisions for pediatric patients among clinicians of various training levels using the Sort, Assess, Life-Saving Intervention, Treatment/Transport (SALT) triage system.

We used an online pediatric disaster triage module to evaluate and improve accuracy of triage decisions. During a pre- and post-test activity, participants triaged 20 fictional patients. Between activities, participants completed a didactic covering concepts of disaster triage, SALT triage, and pediatric limitations of triage systems. We assessed accuracy and improvement with non-parametric tests.

There were 48 participants: 27 pediatric emergency medicine attendings (56%), 9 pediatric emergency medicine fellows (19%), 12 pediatric residents (25%). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) pre-test percent accuracy across all participants was 75 (IQR 65-85). Attendings scored higher than residents 80 (IQR 73-88) compared to 60 (IQR 55-65, P < 0.01) but not significantly higher than fellows 75 (IQR 70-85, P = 0.6). For the 44 participants who completed both the pre- and post-test, median score significantly improved from 75 (65-85) to 80 (75-90), P < 0.01.

The accuracy of triage decisions varies at different training levels. An online module can deliver just-in-time triage training and improve accuracy of triage decisions for pediatric patients, especially among pediatric residents.

Just as prospective differentiation between true emergencies and calls for subacute patients is critical to the delivery of prehospital care, retrospective differentiation is critical to research and quality improvement. Determining the acuity of patients based on the type of care they received could complement the vital-sign-based instruments currently popular, yet imperfect. The study aim was to create a consensus definition of time-dependent care and a list of time-dependent interventions in paramedicine.

The study was a Delphi approach consisting of four rounds of voting by a bi-provincial panel of 22 Canadian key informants representing medical first responders, paramedics, and physicians – first to agree on a definition of time-dependent care – then to categorize 29 clinical and 34 pharmacological interventions.

Based on the consensus definition of “A majority of patients who should receive the intervention, according to provincial protocols, would suffer a direct prejudice to their health or safety if the intervention, provided on its own, was not performed within eight minutes of the initial call,” the panel reached consensus on 52 of 63 interventions (82.5%), of which 17 (32.7%) were voted time-dependent (11 clinical [64.7%] and six pharmacological [35.3%]). Clinical interventions included airway suction or de-obstruction, cricothyrotomy, positive pressure ventilation, chest decompression, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, cardioversion, pacing, and hemorrhage control. Pharmacological interventions included medication classed as sympathomimetics, caloric agents, antiarrhythmic agents, anticonvulsants, or tranquilizers.

The panel reached a consensus on a definition of time-dependent care and used this to identify prehospital interventions that could serve as an instrument to improve care and system performance.

The Syrian Civil War (SCW) began in 2011 and has resulted in numerous cases of war-related civilian injuries. The modified Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (mREMS) is widely used as an effective tool for assessing clinical status and mortality risk, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs) and emergency departments (EDs). However, to date, no study has evaluated the ability of mREMS to predict mortality in patients injured during the SCW.

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of mREMS in predicting in-hospital mortality among adult trauma patients injured during the SCW. The secondary objective was to analyze the epidemiological characteristics of both adult and pediatric populations affected by the SCW.

This single-center, retrospective observational study included patients who were injured during the SCW and presented to the ED from January 2012 through January 2016. Data from 4,074 adult patients and 1,379 pediatric patients were analyzed. The diagnostic and prognostic performance of the mREMS was specifically assessed in the adult cohort. Additionally, an epidemiological evaluation of the demographic and clinical characteristics of both cohorts was conducted.

Among the 4,074 adult patients included in the study, a total of 3,657 (89.8%) were male and 417 (10.2%) were female. In-hospital mortality occurred in 484 patients (11.9%). Adult patients admitted to the ICU exhibited a mortality rate 7.6-times higher than those who were not admitted (odds ratio [OR] = 7.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2–9.3). The analysis of the mREMS revealed a median score of eight for survivors and fourteen for non-survivors, demonstrating a statistically significant difference (P < .001).

The present study demonstrated that the majority of civilians injured during the SCW were young males. Furthermore, this study’s findings indicated that the mREMS exhibits excellent performance in predicting in-hospital mortality among trauma patients injured during the SCW.

Targeted identification, effective triage, and rapid hemorrhage control are essential for optimal outcomes of mass-casualty incidents (MCIs). An important aspect of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) care is field triage, but this skill is difficult to teach, assess, and research.

This study assessed triage efficacy and hemorrhage control of emergency responders from different professions who used the Sort, Assess, Life-Saving Treatment (SALT) triage algorithm in a virtual reality (VR) simulation of a terrorist subway bombing.

After a brief just-in-time training session on the SALT triage algorithm, participants applied this learning in First VResponder, a high-fidelity VR simulator (Tactical Triage Technologies, LLC; Powell, Ohio USA). Participants encountered eleven virtual patients in a virtual scene of a subway station that had experienced an explosion. Patients represented individuals with injuries of varying severity. Metrics assessed included triage accuracy and treatment efficiency, including time to control life-threatening hemorrhage. Independent Mann-Whitney analyses were used to compare two professional groups on key performance variables.

The study assessed 282 participants from the ranks of EMS clinicians and medical trainees. Most (94%) participants correctly executed both global SALT sort commands. Participants triaged and treated the entire scene in a mean time of 7.8 decimal minutes, (95%CI, 7.6-8.1; SD = 1.9 decimal minutes) with a patient triage accuracy rate of 75.8% (95%CI, 74.0-77.6; SD = 15.0%). Approximately three-quarters (77%) of participants successfully controlled all life-threatening hemorrhage, within a mean time of 5.3 decimal minutes (95%CI, 5.1-5.5; SD = 1.7 decimal minutes). Mean time to hemorrhage control per patient was 0.349 decimal minutes (SD = 0.349 decimal minutes). Overall, EMS clinicians were more accurate with triage (P ≤ .001) and were faster at triage, total hemorrhage control (P < .01), and hemorrhage control per patient (P < .004) than medical trainees.

Through assessments using VR simulation, it was observed that more experienced individuals from the paramedic (PM) workforce out-performed less experienced medical trainees. The study also observed that the medical trainees performed acceptably, even though their only formal training in SALT triage was a 30-minute, just-in-time lecture. Both of these findings are important for establishing evidence that VR can serve as a valid platform for assessing the complex skills of triage and treatment of an MCI, including the assessment of rapid hemorrhage control.

This study aimed to examine emergency transport times considering closed roads to propose more efficient transport routes to improve the life-saving rate for seriously injured people in Sapporo during an earthquake disaster. Sapporo is the capital of Hokkaido and has a population of approximately 1.97 million as of 2020.

Transport routes were created using publicly available data and a geographic information system (GIS), and the emergency transport times in Sapporo were subsequently calculated. Closed roads were defined as roads in “areas with high liquefaction potential” and “areas with a total house destruction rate ≥20%.”

Closed roads were concentrated in the northeastern part of the city, as were extended emergency transport times, with delays of up to 101 min. Other areas did not experience significant delays.

The emergency transport time was prolonged in areas with closed roads. Triage posts and semi-closed roads were also suggested to affect emergency transport times. To minimize emergency transport times, it is necessary to consider having nurses and doctors ride in ambulances to triage patients, and to coordinate with disaster base hospitals outside of the city to transport seriously injured people.

To evaluate sex differences in the triage and assessment of chest pain in Dutch out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC).

Prior research illustrated differences between women and men with confirmed cardiac ischemia. However, information on sex differences among patients with undifferentiated chest pain is limited and current protocols used to assess chest pain in urgent primary care in the Netherlands do not account for potential sex differences.

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who contacted a large OOH-PC facility in the Netherlands in 2017 regarding chest pain. We performed descriptive analyses on sex differences in patient and symptom characteristics, triage assessment, and subsequent clinical outcomes, including acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

A total of 1,802 patients were included, the median age was 54 years, and 57.6% were female. Compared to men, women less often had a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (16.0% vs 25.8%, p < 0.001) or cardiovascular risk factors (49.3% vs 56.0%, p = 0.005). Symptom characteristics were comparable between sexes. While triage urgencies were more frequently altered in women, the resulting triage urgencies were comparable, including ambulance activation rates (31.1% and 33.5%, respectively, p = 0.33). Musculoskeletal causes were the most common in both sexes; but women were less likely to have an underlying cardiovascular condition (21.1% vs 29.6%, p < 0.001), including ACS (5.4% vs 8.5%, p = 0.019).

Women more frequently sought urgent primary care for chest pain than men. Despite a lower overall risk for cardiovascular events in women, triage assessment and ambulance activation rates were similar to those in men, indicating a potentially less efficient and overly conservative triage approach for women.

During mass-casualty incidents (MCIs), prehospital triage is performed to identify which patients most urgently need medical care. Formal MCI triage tools exist, but their performance is variable. The Shock Index (SI; heart rate [HR] divided by systolic blood pressure [SBP]) has previously been shown to be an efficient screening tool for identifying critically ill patients in a variety of in-hospital contexts. The primary objective of this study was to assess the ability of the SI to identify trauma patients requiring urgent life-saving interventions in the prehospital setting.

Clinical data captured in the Alberta Trauma Registry (ATR) were used to determine the SI and the “true” triage category of each patient using previously published reference standard definitions. The ATR is a provincial trauma registry that captures clinical records of eligible patients in Alberta, Canada. The primary outcome was the sensitivity of SI to identify patients classified as “Priority 1 (Immediate),” meaning they received urgent life-saving interventions as defined by published consensus-based criteria. Specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated as secondary outcomes. These outcomes were compared to the performance of existing formal MCI triage tools referencing performance characteristics reported in a previously published study.

Of the 9,448 records that were extracted from the ATR, a total of 8,650 were included in the analysis. The SI threshold maximizing Youden’s index was 0.72. At this threshold, SI had a sensitivity of 0.53 for identifying “Priority 1” patients. At a threshold of 1.00, SI had a sensitivity of 0.19.

The SI has a relatively low sensitivity and did not out-perform existing MCI triage tools at identifying trauma patients who met the definition of “Priority 1” patients.

The catastrophic Beirut blast on August 4, 2020 at 6:07 pm resulted in extensive damage. Our study aims to categorize the injuries of patients who were transferred to the radiology department in the first 12 hours following the blast and to evaluate the disaster preparedness of the radiology department at Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital in order to implement corrective action process.

A total of 97 patients underwent imaging examinations, comprising 77 CT scans and 20 radiographs, which were retrospectively reviewed by 4 senior radiology residents. Patient injuries were classified according to blast injury categories. A full assessment of our disaster plan was done including staff shortage, examination time, patients triage and diagnostic performance of radiologists.

Tertiary injuries were the most prevalent (47.6%). Maxillofacial fractures and intracranial hemorrhage were the most common (54.3%). The radiology department encountered numerous challenges, including communication difficulties, staffing shortages and infrastructure damage. Nevertheless, the disaster management plan enabled the department to effectively navigate these obstacles despite many flaws and many lessons were learned.

This study underscores the importance of an efficient response of the radiology team during mass casualty incidents and can inform future disaster preparedness efforts in health care settings.

This study aimed to develop and validate the modified irritant gas syndrome agent (IGSA) criteria, utilizing readily available triage information and epidemiologic data to efficiently segregate patients based on the severity of hydrofluoric acid (HFA) exposure.

A retrospective analysis of 160 patients exposed to HFA was performed to develop the criteria and assess the criteria’s efficacy, focusing on age, respiratory rate, and compliance with IGSA standards. The criteria’s validity was assessed by comparing clinical outcomes between patients meeting the modified IGSA (mIGSA) criteria and those who did not as external and internal.

The mIGSA criteria (or AIR criteria) consisting of the 3 clusters of age greater than 49, IGSA criteria satisfied, and respiratory rate greater than 19 was developed. The area under curve of receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of the risk of confirmed HFA injury according to AIR criteria was 0.8415 at the external validation.

The mIGSA criteria offer a significant improvement in the triage of HFA exposure incidents, facilitating rapid identification and prioritization of patients with potentially severe outcomes. Future research should aim to further validate these criteria across diverse emergency scenarios, reinforcing their utility in global health emergency preparedness.

The SDMPH 10-year anniversary conference created an opportunity for a researcher to present at a professional association conference to advance their research by seeking consensus of statements using Delphi methodology.

Conference attendees and SDMPH members who did not attend the conference were identified as Delphi experts. Experts rated their agreement of each statement on a 7- point linear numeric scale. Consensus amongst experts was defined as a standard deviation < = 1. Presenters submitted statements relevant to advancing their research to the authors to edit to fit Delphi statement formatting.

Statements attaining consensus were included in the final report after the first round. Those not attaining consensus moved to the second round in which experts were shown the mean response of the expert panel and their own response for opportunity to reconsider their rating for that round. If reconsideration attained consensus, these statements were included in the final report. This process repeated in a third and final round.

37 Experts agreed to participate in the first round; 35 completed the second round, and 34 completed the third round; 35 statements attained consensus; 3 statements did not attain consensus.

A Delphi technique was used to establish expert consensus of statements submitted by the SDMPH conference presenters to guide their future education, research, and training.

Dysphagia can lead to morbidity including weight loss and aspiration pneumonia. Effective triage of patients and streamlining of pathways to expedite diagnosis and treatment is therefore imperative.

The goals of this research were to measure the referral to treatment time for dysphagia patients in a newly established pathway and compare with existing UK national and local referral to treatment times, and to evaluate patient feedback.

Speech and language therapy advanced clinical practitioners were trained in nasendoscopy and assessment of swallow. Referral to treatment times were measured and patient satisfaction questionnaires completed.

A decrease in triage to treatment time (from 24 to 6 weeks). Patients reported high understanding of the condition and minimal discomfort during assessments. Radiation exposure was reduced (2 per cent of patients undergoing soluble contrast swallows, previously 100 per cent).

The new pathway expedites treatment and achieves high patient satisfaction. It empowers speech and language therapy in efficiently managing low-complexity cases and supports multidisciplinary care for dysphagia patients.

Medical professionals can use mass-casualty triage systems to assist them in prioritizing patients from mass-casualty incidents (MCIs). Correct triaging of victims will increase their chances of survival. Determining the triage system that has the best performance has proven to be a difficult question to answer. The Advanced Prehospital Triage Model (Modelo Extrahospitalario de Triaje Avanzado; META) and Sort, Assess, Lifesaving Interventions, Treatment/Transport (SALT) algorithms are the most recent triage techniques to be published. The present study aimed to evaluate the META and SALT algorithms’ performance and statistical agreement with various standards. The secondary objective was to determine whether these two MCI triage systems predicted patient outcomes, such as mortality, length-of-stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

This retrospective study used patient data from the trauma registry of an American College of Surgeons Level 1 trauma center, from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. The sensitivity, specificity, and statistical agreement of the META and SALT triage systems to various standards (Revised Trauma Score [RTS]/Sort Triage, Injury Severity Score [ISS], and Lerner criteria) when applied using trauma patients. Statistical analysis was used to assess the relationship between each triage category and the secondary outcomes.

A total of 3,097 cases were included in the study. Using Sort triage as the standard, SALT and META showed much higher sensitivity and specificity in the Immediate category than for Delayed (Immediate sensitivity META 91.5%, SALT 94.9%; specificity 60.8%, 72.7% versus Delayed sensitivity 28.9%, 1.3%; specificity 42.4%, 28.9%). With the Lerner criteria, in the Immediate category, META had higher sensitivity (77.1%, SALT 68.6%) but lower specificity (61.1%) than SALT (71.8%). For the Delayed category, SALT showed higher sensitivity (META 61.4%, SALT 72.2%), but lower specificity (META 75.1%, SALT 67.2%). Both systems showed a positive, though modest, correlation with ISS. For SALT and META, triaged Immediate patients tended to have higher mortality and longer ICU and hospital lengths-of-stay.

Both META and SALT triage appear to be more accurate with Immediate category patients, as opposed to Delayed category patients. With both systems, patients triaged as Immediate have higher mortality and longer lengths-of-stay when compared to Delayed patients. Further research can help refine MCI triage systems and improve accuracy.