To explore factors shaping social prescribing (SP) link workers (LWs) experiences of their job, and how they influence decisions about whether or not to leave it.

LWs support healthcare delivery by listening to patients’ non-medical concerns and social or relational difficulties, connecting them to ‘community assets’ (groups, organizations, charities) when relevant to help. LWs try to assist people with often complex emotional and/or social issues. This can affect how they feel in their job.

As part of a mixed methods project on LW retention, a qualitative study was conducted. It involved 20 LWs, purposively selected from respondents to a questionnaire; variation in the sample was sought in terms of self-efficacy in the role, length of time in it, intention to leave or not, employing organization, where they worked in the UK and gender. Semi-structured interviews, conducted via Microsoft Teams, were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Prior to interviews, we asked participants to take photographs of: a typical part of their working day; something that gave them confidence in their role; an unexpected part of their role. These photographs were discussed at the start of the interview. Thematic analysis was used to interpret data (the computer programme NVIVO supported this); this involved coding and clustering codes to develop analytical themes.

We produced four themes from the data; 1) Disconnection through place and space: straddling different organizational spheres; 2) Delivery ambiguity: vagueness around the link worker role; 3) Job misalignment and realignment: navigating identity and boundaries; 4) Clouded by instability: uncertainty around career advancement and sustainability. This led to the development of an overarching theme of LWs inhabiting a liminal space as they entered and undertook the role. Findings highlight the importance of training, supervision and other support to ensure LWs do not experience a prolonged liminal state.

To successfully recruit and retain faculty members from underrepresented backgrounds (URBs), we need to understand the factors that attract them to research careers in the first place. However, scholarship in this area has focused largely on students who are contemplating research careers rather than faculty members who are currently in such careers.

This study explores the career motivations of early-career health researchers (faculty members and postdoctoral fellows) from URBs. It was conducted as part of a cluster randomized trial across 25 academic institutions investigating a support intervention. We conducted 1-hour semi-structured qualitative interviews with scholars from URBs in both the intervention and control arms of the trial. To our knowledge, this is the largest qualitative study of early-career faculty members from URBs to date.

Seventy-eight individuals were interviewed. Our analysis revealed six key themes pertinent to participants’ motivations to pursue research careers: (1) love of science; (2) making a larger impact; (3) happenstance and economic considerations; (4) family, community, and a path out of poverty; (5) the role of mentors and role models; and (6) support programs for scholars from URBs.

Our results align with prior studies while offering new insights into the motivations of URB faculty members in research careers. These insights can and should inform the design of programs to both recruit and retain URM faculty members in research careers.

Extended reality may offer a convenient and effective method of increasing well-being within the wider healthcare workforce and particularly for those working in the mental health sector who are subject to high levels of stress because of increased workload, high levels of staff turnover and limited resources.

This scoping review aims to identify and assimilate relevant literature pertaining to the use of extended reality to improve healthcare practitioners’ well-being.

Databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane and PubMed) and grey literature were searched for relevant articles using established methodology and reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews.

A total of 280 articles were yielded by the search strategy, with 13 relevant articles selected by two independent reviewers in a blinded process. Studies demonstrated a heterogenous pool of outcome measurement modalities, intervention modalities and duration and frequency of the interventions. Of all the studies, 85% note a positive impact on healthcare practitioner well-being but studies have limited comparability because of heterogeneity. Interventions were engaging but the practicality of implementing such technologies into a finance- and time-limited healthcare environment will be a challenge.

Whilst extended reality is a promising well-being intervention, there is a paucity of literature relating to its effect on mental health practitioners’ well-being, and further studies in this area are required.

Rates of youth anxiety, depression, and self-harm have increased substantially in recent years. Expansion of clinical service capacity is constrained by workforce shortages and system fragmentation, and even substantial investment may not achieve the scale of growth required to address unmet need. Preventive strategies – such as strengthening social cohesion – are therefore essential to alleviate mounting pressures on the mental health system, yet their potential to compensate for these constraints remains unquantified.

This study employed a system dynamics model to explore the interplay between service capacity and social cohesion on youth mental health outcomes. The model was developed for a population catchment characterized by a mix of urban, suburban, and rural communities. Primary outcomes were prevalence of psychological distress and mental disorders, and incidence of mental health-related emergency department (ED) presentations among young people aged 15–24 years, projected over a 10-year time horizon. Two-way sensitivity analyses of services capacity and social cohesion were conducted.

Changes to specialized mental health services capacity growth had the greatest projected impact on youth mental health outcomes. Heatmaps revealed thresholds where improvements in social cohesion could offset negative impacts of constrained service capacity. For example, if services capacity growth was sustained at only 80% of baseline, improving social cohesion could still reduce years lived with symptomatic disorder by 6.3%. To achieve a similar scale of improvement without improvements in social cohesion, the current growth rate in services capacity would need to be more than double. Combining a doubling of service capacity growth with reversing the decline in social cohesion could reduce ED presentations by 25.6% and years with symptomatic mental disorder by 19.2%. A doubling of specialized, headspace, and GP services capacity growth could prevent 24,060 years lived with symptomatic mental disorder among youth aged 15–24.

This study provides a quantitative framework for understanding how social cohesion improvements can help mitigate workforce constraints in mental health systems, demonstrating the value of integrating service expansion with social cohesion enhancement strategies.

The roles and responsibilities of the public health emergency preparedness (PHEP) and response workforce have changed since the last iteration of competencies developed in 2010. This project aims to identify current competencies (i.e., knowledge, skills, and abilities) for the PHEP workforce, as well as all public health staff who may contribute to a response.

Five focus groups with members of the PHEP workforce across the US focused on their experiences with workforce needs in preparedness and response activities. Focus group transcripts were thematically analyzed using qualitative methods to identify key competencies needed in the workforce.

The focus groups revealed 7 domains: attitudes and motivations; collaboration; communications; data collection and analysis; preparedness and response; leadership and management; and public health foundations. Equity and social justice was identified as a cross-cutting theme across all domains.

Broad validation of competencies through ongoing engagement with the PHEP practice and academic communities is necessary. Competencies can be used to inform the design of PHEP educational programs and PHEP program development. Implementation of an up-to-date, validated competency model can help the workforce better prepare for and respond to disasters and emergencies.

The purpose of this research was to understand perceptions and experiences of inclusion among underrepresented early-career biomedical researchers (postdoctoral fellows and early-career faculty) enrolled in the Building Up study. Because inclusion is vital to job satisfaction and engagement, our goal was to shed light on aspects of and barriers to inclusion within the academic workforce.

We used qualitative interviews to assess workplace experiences of 25 underrepresented postdoctoral fellows and early-career faculty including: their daily work experiences; sense of the workplace culture within the institutions; experiences with microaggressions, racism, and discrimination; and whether the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies and practices at their institution enhanced their experiences. Using qualitative methods, we identified themes that highlighted high-level characteristics of inclusion.

Four distinct themes were identified: (1) participants appreciated the flexibility, versatility, and sense of fulfillment of their positions which enhanced feelings of inclusion; (2) greater psychological safety led to a greater sense of belonging to a research community; (3) participants had varied experiences of inclusion in the presence of microaggressions, racism, and discrimination; and (4) access to opportunities and resources increased feelings of value within the workplace.

Our findings provide new insight into how inclusion is experienced within the institution among underrepresented early-career biomedical researchers. This research points to specific approaches that could be used to enhance experiences of inclusion and to address barriers. More research is needed to understand how to accomplish a balance between the two, so that perceptions of inclusion outweigh negative experiences.