Skip to main content
×
×
Home
The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy
    • Online ISBN: 9781139055451
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy offers a uniquely comprehensive and authoritative overview of early-modern philosophy written by an international team of specialists. As with previous Cambridge Histories of Philosophy the subject is treated by topic and theme, and since history does not come packaged in neat bundles, the subject is also treated with great temporal flexibility, incorporating frequent reference to medieval and Renaissance ideas. The basic structure of the volumes corresponds to the way an educated seventeenth-century European might have organised the domain of philosophy. Thus, the history of science, religious doctrine, and politics feature very prominently.

Reviews

‘The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy is an outstanding collection that will be a standard reference work for some time to come and which will be an important point of call for anyone wanting to chart their way through the philosophy of one of the most exciting and significant centuries of all.’

Source: Metascience

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Page 1 of 2


  • 1 - The institutional setting
    pp 7-32
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.003
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Seventeenth-century philosophers were required to prolong an irresponsible or child-like existence, and not settle down in the powerful and ancient institutions within which most adults lived, both at home and at work. Regarding the study of philosophy was concerned, the institutional form into which was put a new, younger study of the advanced works of Aristotle varied from country to country and university to university, as did the success which the new arts courses enjoyed. By the seventeenth century, all the professors of philosophy and the humanities in Paris were in colleges teaching Latin and Greek grammar and literature, and philosophy, and the old faculty structure existed merely to give the degree of MA to applicants from the colleges. Most of the institutions in the seventeenth century taught the works of Aristotle; Aristotle was studied in a humanist guise.
  • 2 - The intellectual setting
    pp 33-86
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.004
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter indicates the broad range of intellectual traditions in terms of which the various seventeenth-century figures defined their attempts to establish a new philosophy. It suggests a partial explanation for the actual successes of the science which emerged, by indicating the conditions which led to an explosion of many new varieties of philosophy, any of which might have brought the promised wisdom. By the late fourteenth century, many regarded the whole structure of the church, the teaching orders included, as radically corrupt. Aristotelian philosophy was not responsible for these corruptions; but it had done little to stop them, and it was largely by-passed by the reforming movement. The chapter indicates the forms which anti-Aristotelianism took in the Renaissance, in so far as they helped to shape the expectation of a new philosophy. Three main regions may be distinguished on the intellectual map of Renaissance philosophy: scholasticism; philosophies emerging from humanism; and revival of dogmatic Platonism.
  • 3 - European philosophical responses to non-European culture: China
    pp 87-100
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.005
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Most seventeenth-century European thinkers who showed a strong interest in non-European philosophy believed in the universal basis of knowledge. No nation challenged the Jesuits as much as China. No philosophy dominated the Chinese imperial court and the scholar-officials more than Confucianism. Europeans of the seventeenth century tended to associate Chinese philosophy with Confucianism. The first important work to introduce Confucianism to Europeans, De Christiana expeditione apud Sinas, appeared in 1615. In the seventeenth-century biblical view of human history, all mankind, except for Noah's descendants, had been destroyed at the time of the Flood. No endeavour more fully reflects the philosophical outlook of seventeenth-century Europe than its search for a universal language. Many Europeans believed that God had given Adam a pure, exact, and utterly simple language which was called the lingua Adamica, lingua humana, or the Primitive Language; and that originally all humans spoke this Primitive Language.
  • 4 - Logic in the seventeenth century preliminary remarks and the constituents of the proposition
    pp 101-117
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.006
  • View abstract
    Summary
    There is a marked discontinuity between the principal features of the varieties of logic that were predominant in roughly the first half of the century and the way of viewing logic that came to the fore in the second half. The first half of the seventeenth century may be characterised by a general tendency to continue teaching logic in one of the versions that had been handed down from the remote or near past. As a rule, seventeenth-century textbooks of logic have three main parts: one dealing with concepts or terms as elements of propositions; another discussing various types of mental, spoken, and written declarative sentences or propositions; and a third part in which reasonings as peculiar combinations of propositions were treated. The first part of a textbook of logic was commonly devoted to the smallest relevant units that constitute a proposition. A categorical proposition contains a subject-term and a predicate-term.
  • 5 - Proposition and judgement
    pp 118-131
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.007
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Seventeenth-century logicians commonly adhered to the usual distinction between two operations of the mind: on the one hand, simple conceptions, through which things are apprehended that, as categorematic terms, are capable of becoming the subject and the predicate of a categorical proposition; on the other, acts of predication, by which the contents of simple apprehensions are combined into a prepositional complex that is a suitable potential object of assent or dissent. The diverse kinds of both categorical and compound proposition may either be merely entertained, in the sense of being present to the mind without any commitment to their truth or falsity, or become the object of an act or attitude of assent or dissent. An author who was most keenly aware of the need to uphold this distinction was John of St. Thomas, who maintained that there are two forms of truth and falsity, one of the judgeable content as such, and another of the actually judged proposition.
  • 6 - Deductive reasoning
    pp 132-146
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.008
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Most seventeenth-century textbooks of logic follow the usual pattern according to which a discussion of the constituents of propositions and of propositions themselves leads up to a part dealing with those combinations of propositions which exhibit a valid form of deductive argument. This chapter first builds up arguments against and in favour of syllogism. In spite of the manifold attempts to discredit the syllogism, several seventeenth-century writers succeeded in presenting the Aristotelian and scholastic treatment of that form of reasoning in more or less original guises. Of the many patterns of reasoning that are not syllogisms in a strict sense, such immediate inferences as the laws of the so-called square of opposition and the laws of conversion were usually assumed in the process of proving the validity of syllogisms. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz was exceptional in reversing that order by using syllogisms in his derivation of the laws of subalternation and conversion. The chapter also discusses Leibniz's conception of abstract calculus.
  • 7 - Method and the study of nature
    pp 147-177
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.009
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Historical discussion of method in the seventeenth century has long focused on the supposed development of modern scientific method, attempting thereby to explain the Scientific Revolution. This chapter, however, concerns method as a logical and philosophical category; it does not purport to examine or reconstruct the procedures used by philosophers in producing new knowledge, except to the extent that these involved explicit appeal to method. Seventeenth-century philosophers inherited two more or less distinct conceptions of method, one of which had been elaborated by humanist pedagogues intent on providing guidelines to students for the proper presentation of entire disciplines. Jacopo Zabarella referred to the two principal stages as the resolutive and compositive methods, following terminology derived from a commentary tradition drawing on Galen's use of those terms. Francis Bacon associated the word methodus with the pedagogical method, and made use of the handy Ciceronian translation of its Greek prototype: via et ratio.
  • 8 - Universals, essences, and abstract entities
    pp 178-211
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.010
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Theories of universals and essences were strongly affected by the seventeenth-century mechanist movement, in large part because it replaced the scholastic-Aristotelian analysis of substance with the view that matter (and perhaps immaterial mind) is substance in its own right. By mid-century, the mediaeval problem of universals, concerned with the metaphysical composition of individual substances, disappeared from philosophical discourse. For Francis Suárez, an abstracted form remains particular. To have a general concept, intellect must compare a number of particular concepts and abstract from singulars. The movement away from Aristotelian science replaced various species of material things as paradigmatic subjects of necessary truths; mathematics and, perhaps, the laws of physics became the prime examples. To ground necessary truths, one could no longer appeal to essences that exist as ingredients in actual things. Many philosophers took the view that essences (qua archetypes) are eternal and directly dependent on some aspect or other of God.
  • 9 - Individuation
    pp 212-262
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.011
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Seventeenth-century philosophers discussed several related questions under the heading individuation, although they did not always distinguish clearly between them. This chapter examines four of these questions. The main scholastic theories concerning individuation were drawn together and discussed in detail towards the end of the sixteenth century in the fifth of Francisco Suárez's fifty-four Disputationes metaphysicae. Descartes assumes that there is a plurality of individual human souls. Each individual human self, he states, has an immediate awareness of its own thinking and thus its own existence. Locke argued on the basis of his atomism that the complex of accidents relevant to individuation would have to be reduced to those of spatio-temporal location. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's philosophy as a whole is often characterised as individualism. The individual substance, or monad, as he called it in his later writings, was certainly a main focus of his philosophical thinking.
  • 10 - The idea of God
    pp 263-304
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.012
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The seventeenth century marks a significant moment in thought concerning the definition of God. Seventeenth-century debates over the idea of God were played out within the space of certain questions which are, strictly speaking, theological. In the Disputationes metaphysicae, Francis Suárez filled the analogical gap between the finite and the infinite by a univocal concept of being (conceptus univocus entis), sufficient to represent to the human mind any being whatsoever in a confused and indeterminate way. Seventeenth-century scientists persistently privileged one argument: humans can interpret the physical world in mathematical language because God first conceived the world that was to be created in accordance with mathematical rationality. However, not all seventeenth-century thinkers shared this tendency towards univocity with respect to the question of God. Counterbalancing the trend towards univocity is an exactly contrary orientation, strange but powerful, the insistence upon the radically unknowable transcendence of the divine essence.
  • 11 - Proofs of the existence of God
    pp 305-330
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.013
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The question of the existence of God is central for the seventeenth century at a time when atheism is no longer just an individual standpoint but a philosophical school and a genuine system of thought. Standing behind the new atheism of the seventeenth century was a new approach to the question of the nature of God. Scholastic thought about the existence of God was shaped in large part by Francis Suarez. Suarez begins by asking whether the existence of God falls within the domain of demonstrations in physics (the a posteriori ways of the scholastic tradition), or whether it is primarily a metaphysical question. Rene Descartes's search for an appropriate proof of God's existence goes back at least to 1630, as per a letter written by him to Mersenne. Spinoza's arguments for the existence of God are written in a Cartesian vocabulary, but they are in constant debate with Descartes's thought.
  • 12 - The Cartesian dialectic of creation
    pp 331-362
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.014
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter focuses on the status of eternal truths in the seventeenth-century history of Cartesianism. The chapter begins with Rene Descartes's views on divine causation, which adumbrated the later clash between divine wisdom and omnipotence. An important text with respect to the competing tendencies of wisdom and omnipotence is Descartes's first attempt, in Meditatio III, to prove the existence of God. This is followed by a discussion of his doctrine of the creation of the eternal truths, a systematic focus of that clash. Next, emphasis will be placed on divine wisdom that results in Spinoza's necessitarianism and apparent denial of creation, as well as notable attempts by Leibniz and Malebranche to avoid Spinoza's excesses while continuing to emphasise God's wisdom. Then the issue of the creation of the eternal truths is taken up, and with it the emphasis on divine omnipotence as found in some later figures.
  • 13 - The relation between theology and philosophy
    pp 363-392
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.015
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The theological controversies of the age created new problems which called for philosophical solutions. It is easy to suppose that almost all that is vital in seventeenth-century philosophy can be attributed to the scientific revolution, but several of the most interesting developments can be traced to the demands of theology. There had been more than one conception of the relationship between philosophy and theology within the Christian tradition. There is a powerful tendency among some seventeenth-century philosophers to make a sharp distinction between philosophy and theology. However, Nicolas Malebranche and others were very far from seeking to sever the connexions between philosophy and theology. They sought to revive the legacy of Augustine, and to that extent they were engaged in resurrecting Platonism in a Christian form. The history of theological conflicts in the seventeenth century is marked by both continuity and innovation. The classic issues of the Reformation continued to be at the centre of theological controversy.
  • 14 - The religious background of seventeenth-century philosophy
    pp 393-422
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.016
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The philosophy of the seventeenth century has often been seen as connected with a gradual march from religious orthodoxy and oppression towards pre-Enlightenment deism, agnosticism, atheism, and toleration. This chapter begins by looking at some aspects of the religious background that appear to parallel or support similar developments in the philosophy of the period. These include certain sceptical and probabilistic strains in seventeenth-century religious thought, the millenarian movement, and some strains of mystical thought. The interpretation of prophecy was most important in seventeenth-century interpretations of what was going on in the natural and human world. Then, the chapter deals with some very different features of seventeenth-century religious thought, features that led more and more to the rejection of orthodoxy. These include the increasing interest in Judaism and in other non-Christian religions, as well as direct challenges to the authority of the Bible, developments that made possible the growth of the secular philosophy of the Enlightenment.
  • 15 - The scholastic background
    pp 423-453
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.017
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The disciplinary demarcations of the early modern period were such that investigations and speculations on body and the physical world were legitimate concerns not just of those one would now describe as scientists, but of most of the philosophical community. The Peripatetic tradition was the intellectual framework within which most seventeenth-century philosophers were educated and within which many of them pursued their philosophical careers. The doctrine of hylemorphism (hyle, matter, morphe, form or shape) was central to Peripatetic philosophy. In Physica I, Aristotle taught that there are three principles of natural things: prime matter, form, and privation. Natural body is the concern of natural philosophy. Peripatetic writers like Abra de Raconis and Johannes Magirus considered the object of physics to be natural/mobile body. All proponents of the mechanical philosophy shared the Peripatetics' view that physical body requires impenetrability as the necessary concomitant of its mere extendedness in three dimensions.
  • 16 - The occultist tradition and its critics
    pp 454-512
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.018
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Practical interest in astrology, alchemy, and other departments of the occultist tradition ran strong throughout the early modern period among serious thinkers in many disciplines. Franco Burgersdijck, Tommaso Campanella, and Robert Fludd showed their century three ways to befriend occultism. Like Burgersdijck and other school philosophers, one could propagate the traditional Aristotelianism that sustained belief in magic. One could replace the Peripatetic basis of magic with a new system intended to be intelligible as philosophy, which was Campanella's aim. Like Fludd, one could detach occultism both from philosophy's Aristotelian past and from its Cartesian future. Marin Mersenne launched his crusade against occultism sometime before 1620, when he began to assemble his huge Genesis commentary of 1623. Mersenne aimed his book at atheists and deists, and among the subverters of religion he counted Fludd and many others who argued for magic.
  • 17 - Doctrines of explanation in late scholasticism and in the mechanical philosophy
    pp 513-552
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.019
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The notion that explanation provides knowledge of the cause of a phenomenon is a common feature of Aristotelian systems and the mechanical philosophies of the seventeenth century. For Aristotle, Saint Thomas, later scholastics, and the proponents of the new science, the relationship between explanans and explanandum, whatever else it may be must above all be causal. Before turning to the doctrine of explanation operative among seventeenth-century scholastics, this chapter examines the more orthodox Aristotelian account from which it derives. The discussion is more a generalised and highly distilled synopsis. Some elements in it are explicitly found in Aristotle; others come directly from Saint Thomas; still other features are more common within the Peripatetic tradition, both before and after Thomas. Although several distinct mediaeval philosophical traditions were influential in the revival of scholasticism in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, the overwhelming tendency was towards Aristotelianism,.
  • 18 - New doctrines of body and its powers, place, and space
    pp 553-623
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.020
  • View abstract
    Summary
    In the late years of the sixteenth century and the first years of the seventeenth there was a new interest in atomism and mechanist views of the world. These years witnessed new natural philosophies, new conceptions of body and the contents of the physical world. The new philosophers disagreed what the physical world was to contain, what the nature of body was, whether bodies were active or passive, the nature of the place or space in which they are found. This chapter first examines the views of the new philosophers by first viewing the physical world in the early part of the century. Next, it looks at the physical world held by three of the important mechanist system-builders in mid-century, Pierre Gassendi, Rene Descartes, and Thomas Hobbes. Finally, the chapter discusses the views on body and the physical world, including reactions to earlier mechanist conceptions of body, and attempts to escape the bounds of the new mechanist orthodoxy.
  • 19 - Knowledge of the existence of body
    pp 624-648
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.021
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Rene Descartes set out what he took to be a proof that bodies exist, and proposed to adopt the sceptic's own method: to doubt everything, unless something was found that could not be doubted. One of the first attempts to refute Descartes's proof of a material world was made by Henricus Regius, who rejected some of the metaphysical theses that Descartes believed were the indispensable foundation of his physics. Heterodox Cartesians retreated from Descartes's confidence that the existence of a material world can be proven with certainty. Attacks on Cartesianism poured from the pens of sceptical writers like Simon Foucher, Pierre-Daniel Huet, and Jean Du Hamel. Among other things, they attacked Descartes's purported proof of a material world. Spinoza's reason for asserting the necessary existence of extension is that God necessarily exists and extension is necessarily an attribute of God.
  • 20 - New doctrines of motion
    pp 649-679
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.022
  • View abstract
    Summary
    An enhanced status of motion within new conceptual frameworks had far-reaching effects in early modern natural philosophy. Since local motion was the only category of motion that had genuine explanatory work to do in the new scheme of things, its treatment differed in notable respects from what had been typical of the Peripatetic tradition. Opposition between realist and nominalist doctrines of motion is reflected in the innovative analyses of motion of the seventeenth century. Not only did Aristotle nominate local motion as the primary motion, he nominated circular or rotational motion as the primary kind of local motion. This discrimination between circular and rectilinear motion became a standard element in Peripatetic teaching and was a staple item in the scholastic physics manuals. A relativity principle is often attributed to Descartes. Such an attribution is misleading, if it implies a principle that mirrored the Galilean or inspired the Huygenian relativity principle.
  • 21 - Laws of nature
    pp 680-701
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.023
  • View abstract
    Summary
    By the beginning of the seventeenth century the idea of a moral law of nature already had a long and complex history. Its ultimate origins go back to the Greek Stoics, for whom the good life was one lived in accordance with nature. In Francis Bacon's writings several conceptions of the law or laws of nature may be distinguished. In some places he referred to one single summary or positive law of nature, whereas in others he referred to 'laws' in the plural. It was in the Principia Philosophiae that Rene Descartes first made public the physical theory of Le Monde, in which he mentioned the three laws of nature. One of the first Descartes's critics was Christiaan Huygens, who in 1652, had come to the conclusion that most of Descartes's collision rules were false. Issac Newton paid relatively little attention to the theory of collisions because he was preoccupied with bodies moving with continuously changing velocities along curvilinear paths.
  • 22 - The mathematical realm of nature
    pp 702-756
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.024
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Isaac Newton insist repeatedly that the first two books of the work treated motion in purely mathematical terms, without physical, metaphysical, or ontological commitment. Only in the third book did he expressly draw the links between the mathematical and physical realms. Nature was mathematised in the seventeenth century by means of its extensive mechanisation, which by the end of the century extended, at least programmatically, to the living world of plants and animals. The mathematical models were abstract machines, which in turn were models of the physical world and its components. Examples of mechanical thinking in seventeenth-century mathematics can be found in balances, levers, centres of gravity, velocities, moments, and forces. Francois Viete sought to capture the heuristic power of analysis in a general form common to arithmetic, geometry, and the other branches of mathematics. The practical art of algebra, applied traditionally to numbers, provided the basis.
  • 23 - Soul and mind: life and thought in the seventeenth century
    pp 757-795
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.025
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter emphasises the seventeenth-century contribution about the problems of mind and soul, in particular, the way in which the new mechanical philosophy suggested both new problems and new solutions to old problems connected with life and thought. It discusses various views concerning the soul and the existence, and nature of the incorporeal substance that most seventeenth-century thinkers posited. The chapter provides a brief discussion of some of the reactions to the mainstream accounts of mind and soul. Rene Descartes's conception of the soul was a significant departure from the Aristotelian tradition in which he was educated. Descartes's soul has no connexion whatsoever with the vital functions that are so central to the Aristotelian conception of the soul. In order to bring out the distinctive features of the Cartesian position, the chapter examines the views of two of Descartes's contemporaries who also argued for the existence of an incorporeal human soul: Kenelm Digby and Pierre Gassendi.

Page 1 of 2


Bibliographical appendix
Bibliography
[Rodis-]Lewis, Geneviève (1950a). Le problème de l'inconscient et le cartésianisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
[Rodis-]Lewis, Geneviève (1950b). L'individualité selon Descartes. Paris: Vrin.
Aaron, Richard I.. (1971). John Locke. 3d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Abel, Günter (1978). Stoizismus und Frühe Neuzeit. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Abercrombie, Nigel (1936). The Origins of Jansenism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Abra de Raconis, Charles Frančois d' (1633) (1646) (1651). Totius philosophiae, hoc est logicae, moralis, physicae, et metaphysicae. 2 vols. Paris.
Abraham, W. E. (1975). ‘Predication’, Studia Leibnitiana. 7:.
Ackroyd, P. R., and Evans, C. F. (eds.) (1970). The Cambridge History of the Bible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Adams, Marilyn McCord (1987). William Ockham (2 vols.). Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Adams, Robert Merrihew (1982). ‘Leibniz's Theories of Contingency’, in Hooker, Michael (ed.), Leibniz: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Adams, Robert Merrihew (1983). ‘Phenomenalism and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz’, in French, Peter A., Uehling, Theodore E. Jr., and Wettstein, Howard K. (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on the History of Philosophy (Midwest Studies in Philosophy). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Adams, Robert Merrihew (1994). Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aegidius Romanus, Giles of Rome] (1944). Errores philosophorum, ed. Koch, Josef, trans. Riedl, John. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Agrippa, Henry Cornelius (1533). DeOcculta Philosophia. Cologne. (Repr. Graz: Akademische Druckund Verlanganstalt, 1967.)
Agrippa, Henry Cornelius (1974). Of the Vanitie and Uncertaintie of Artes and Sciences, ed. Dunn, Catherine. Northridge: California State University.
Aidius, Andreas (1614). Clavis philosophiae moralis sive In Aristotelis Nicomacheia commentarius. Oppenheim.
Aiton, E. J. (1972). The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motions. New York: American Elsevier.
Aiton, E. J. (1985). Leibniz: A Biography. Bristol: Hilger.
Åkerman, Susanna (1990). ‘Queen Christina and Messianic Thought’, in Katz, D. S. and Israel, J. (eds.), Sceptics, Millenarians and Jews. Leiden: Brill.
Åkerman, Susanna (1991). Queen Christina of Sweden and her Circle (Brill Studies in Intellectual History). Leiden: Brill.
al-Ghazālī, (1953). ‘Deliverance from Error’, in Watt, W. M., ed. and trans., The Faith and Practice of al-Ghazali. London: Allen and Unwin.
Alberti, V. (1678). Compendium juris naturae, orthodoxae theologiae conformatum. Leipzig.
Alberti, V. (1687). Eros Lipsicus. Leipzig.
Aldrich, Henricus (1704). Artis logicae compendium. Oxford. (Ist ed. 1691.)
Alexander, Peter (1981). ‘The Case of the Lonely Corpuscle: Reductive Explanation and Primitive Expressions’, in Healey, Richard (ed.), Reduction, Time and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alexander, Peter (1985). Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles: Locke and Boyle on the External World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alhazen, Ibn al-Haytham) (1572). Opticae thesaurus. Alhazeni Arabis libri septem, nuncprimum editi. Eiusdem liber De crepusculis et nubium ascensionibus. Item ViteHonis Tliuringopoloni libri X. Basel. (Repr. New York: Johnson Reprint, 1972.)
Alhazen, Ibn al-Haytham) (1989). Optics, Books I-III: On Direct Vision, trans. Sabra, A. I. (2 vols.). London: Warburg Institute.
Allard, Albéric (1868). Histoire de la justice criminelle au seizieme siècle. Ghent/Paris/Leipzig. (Repr. Darmstadt: Scientia, 1970.)
Allen, Diogenes (1983). Mechanical Explanations and the Ultimate Origin of the Universe according to Leibniz (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 11). Wiesbaden: Steiner.
Allen, Don Cameron (1964). Doubt's Boundless Sea: Skepticism and Faith in the Renaissance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Allen, Michael J. B. (1984). The Platonism of Marsilio Ficino: A Study of His Phaedrus Commentary, Its Sources and Genesis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Allen, Michael J. B. (1989). lcastes: Marsilio Ficino's Interpretation of Plato's Sophist. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Allison, Henry E. (1987). Benedict de Spinoza: An Introduction. Rev. ed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Alquié, Ferdinand (1950). La découverte metaphysique de l'homme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Alquié, Ferdinand (1974). Le cartésianisme de Malebranche. Paris: Vrin.
Alquié, Ferdinand (1981). Le rationalisme de Spinoza. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1610a). Theatrum scholasticum, in quo consiliarius phihsophicusproponit et exponit. Herborn.
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1610b). Panacea phihsophica; id est,facilis, nova et accurattt methodus docendi and discendi universam encyclopaediam. Herborn.
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1612). Phihsophia digne restituta. Herborn.
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1613). Compendium logicae harmonicae. Herborn.
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1614). Logicae systema harmonicum. Herborn.
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1620). Cursus Philosophici Encyclopaedia libris XXVII. Herborn.
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1623). Theologia naturalis exhibens augustissimam naturae scholam; in qua creaturae Dei communi sermone ad omnes pariter docendos utuntur: adversus Atheos, Epicureos, et Sophistas huius temporis, duobus libris pertractata. … Hannover.
Alsted, Johann Heinrich. (1626). Compendium lexici philosophici. …Herborn. (The pagination of the copy consulted – Paris, Bibliotheque Nationale, cote R. 10478 – begins at p..)
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1628). Summa casuum conscientiae, nova methodo elaborata. Frankfurt.
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1630). Encyclopaedia, septem tomis distincta … (7 vols.). Herborn. (Repr. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann, 1989.)
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1649). Encyclopaedia … (4 vols.). Lyon.
Alston, William P., and Jonathan, Bennett (1988). ‘Locke on People and Substances’, Philosophical Review. 97:.
Alvarez, Diego (1610). De auxiliis divinae gratiae et humani arbitrii viribus, et libertate, ac legitiina eius cum effitada eorundem auxiliorum concordia. Rome.
Amerio, Romano (1972). Il sistema teologico di Tommaso Campanella. Milan: Ricciardi.
Ames, William (1639). Conscience with the Power and Cases Thereof. London. (Repr. Norwood, N.J.: Johnson and Amsterdam: Theatrum Orbis, 1975.)
Ames, William (1643). Conscience with the Power and Cases Thereof. London.
Ames, William (1648). Medulla theologica. Amsterdam.
Ammann, Peter J. (1967). ‘The Musical Theory and Philosophy of Robert Fludd’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 30:.
Andersen, K. (1985). ‘Cavalieri's method of indivisibles’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 31:.
Andrés Martin, Melquiades (1976–7). La teohgia espanola en el siglo XVI (2 vols.). Madrid: La Editorial Católica.
Andrews, F. E. (1983). ‘Leibniz' Logic within his Philosophical System’, Dionysius (Halifax). 7:.
Angelelli, I. A. (1975). ‘On Saccheri's Use of the “Consequentia Mirabilis”’, in Akten des II. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses Hannover, 17–22 Juli 1972 (4 vols.) (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa). Stuttgart: Steiner.
Angelelli, I. A. (1980). ‘On Individual Relations’, in Theoria cum Praxi. Akten des III. International Leibniz-Kongresses, Hannover, 12–17.11.1977, bd. III (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa 21). Stuttgart: Steiner.
Annas, Julia (1990). ‘Stoic Epistemology’, in Everson 1990.
Annas, Julia, and Barnes, Jonathan (1985). The Modes of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Annual Abstract of Statistics (1992). London: H.M.S.O.
Anon, . (1688). La morale de Confucius, philosophe de la Chine. Amsterdam.
Anon, . (1691). The Morals of Confucius a Chinese Philosopher. London.
Antematérielle, (L'ouvrage anonyme) (1969). Ed Niderst, Alain (Publicarions de l'Université de Rouen, 6. Serie littéraire). Paris: Nizet.
Appleton, William W. (1951). A Cycle of Cathay: The China Vogue in England during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. New York: Columbia University Press.
Arbuthnot, John (1710). ‘An Argument for Divine Providence, Taken from the Constant Regularity Observ'd in the Births of Both Sexes’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 27:.
Arckenholtz, J. (1751–60). Mémoires comernant Christine, reine de Suède pour servir d'éclaircissement à I'histoire de son regne et principalntent de sa vie privée, et aux evenements de son terns civile et literaire (4 vols.). Leipzig and Amsterdam.
Aricò, Denise (1987). II Tesauro in Europa. Studi sulk traduzioni della ‘Filosofia morale’. Bologna: Editrice CLUEB.
Ariew, Roger (1987). ‘The Infinite in Descartes' Conversation with Burman’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophic. 69:.
Ariew, Roger (1990). ‘Christopher Clavius and the Classification of Sciences’, Synthese. 83:.
Ariew, Roger (1992). ‘Descartes and Scholasticism: The Intellectual Background to Descartes' Thought’, in Cottingham, J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ariew, Roger, and Grene, Marjorie (1995). ‘Ideas, in and before Descartes’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 56:.
Aristode, (1936). Metaphysics, ed. and trans. Tredennick, H. (2 vols.) (Loeb Classical Library). London: William Heinemann.
Aristotle, (1619). Opera, ed. Du Val, Guillaume (2 vols.). Paris.
Aristotle, (1660). Ethicorum ad Nicomachum libri decem, ed. Rachelius, SamuelHelmstedt.
Aristotle, (1908–52). The Works, ed. and tr. Ross, W. D. et al. (12 vols.). Oxford.
Aristotle, (1975). Posterior Analytics, ed. and trans. Barnes, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle, (1980). Aristode, , Minor works, trans. Hett, W. S.. (Loeb Classical Library). London: William Heinemann.
Aristotle, (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle [trans.], ed. Barnes, Jonathan (2 vols). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Armogathe, J.-R., and Carraud, V. (1992). Bibliographia cartesiana II. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Armogathe, Jean-Robert (1970). Une secte fantôme au XVIIIème siècle:ju les égoi'stes. Unpublished memoire de maîtrise. Paris: Libraries of the Sorbonne and the Ecole Normale Supérieure.
Armogathe, Jean-Robert (1977). Theologia Cartesiana. L'explication physique de I'Eucharistie chez Descartes et Dom Desgabets. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Armstrong, A. H. (ed.). (1967). The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arnauld, Antoine (1643). De la fréquente communion. Paris.
Arnauld, Antoine (1683). Des vraies et des fausses idées. Cologne.
Arnauld, Antoine (1684). Défense de M. Arnauld contre la réponse au livre des vraies et des fausses idées. Cologne.
Arnauld, Antoine (1685). Réflexions philosophiques et théologiques sur le nouveau systéme de la nature et de la grâce. Cologne.
Arnauld, Antoine (1775–83). Oeuvres de Messire Antoine Arnauld, docteur de la maison et société de Sorbonne (43 vols.). Paris. (Repr. Brussels: Culture et Civilisation, 1965–7.)
Arnauld, Antoine (1843). Oeuvres philosophiques, ed. Jourdain, C.. Paris.
Arnauld, Antoine (1986). Des vrayes et des fausses idées, ed. Frémont, C.. Paris: Fayard.
Arnauld, Antoine (1990). On True and False Ideas, trans. Gaukroger, Stephen. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Arnauld, Antoine, and Lancelot, Claude (1660). Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Paris.
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1662). La Logique, ou l'art de penser. Paris.
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1668). La logique, ou L'art de penser: Contenant, outre les regles communes, plusieurs observations nouvelles propres à former le jugement (3d ed.). Paris.
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1964). The Art of Thinking: Port-Royal Logic, trans. Dickoff, James and James, Patricia. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1965). La logique; ou L'art de penser, ed. Girbal, Pierre Clair François. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1965–7). L'art de penser: La logique de Port-Royal, ed. Löringhoff, Bruno Baron Freytag and Brekle, Herbert (3 vols.). Stuttgart: Frommann.
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1970). La logique; ou, L'art de penser, ed. Marin, Louis. Paris: Flammarion.
Arndt, Hans Werner (1971). Methodo scientifica pertractatum. Mos geometricus und Kalkülbegriff in der philosophischen Theorienbildung des 17 und 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Arnold, Paul (1960). ‘Descartes et les Rose-Croix’, Mercure de France. 340:.
Arnold, Paul (1970). La Rose-Croix et ses rapports avec la franc-maçonnerie: Essai de synthèse historique. Paris: G.-P. Maisonneuve et Larose.
Arrais, Duarte Madeira (1650). Novae philosophiae et medicinae de qualilalibus occultis a nemine unquam excultae pars prima philosophis, et medicis, pernecessaria, theologis vero apprime utilis (2 vols.). Lisbon.
Arriaga, Rodericus (1632). Cursus philosophicus. Antwerp.
Arthur, R. T. W. (1988). ‘Continuous Creation, Continuous Time: A Refutation of the Alleged Discontinuity of Cartesian Time’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 26:.
Ashcraft, R. (1969). ‘Faith and Knowledge in Locke's Philosophy’, in Yolton, J. W. (ed.), John Locke: Problems and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ashcraft, R., Kroll, R., and Zagorin, P. (eds.), Philosophy, Science, and Religion, 1640–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1967). ‘Joachim Jungius (1587–1657) and the Logic of Relations’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 49.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1968Propositional Logic in the Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth CenturiesNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 9:.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1969). ‘The Doctrine of Supposition in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 51:.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1974). Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1978). The Tradition of Medieval Logic and Speculative Grammar. From Anselm to the End of the Seventeenth Century. A Bibliography from 1836 Onwards (Subsidia Mediaevalia). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1985). ‘Introduction’, in Sanderson, Robert, Logicae artis compendium (Instrumenta rationis, Sources for the History of Modern Logic). Bologna: Editrice CLUEB.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1988). ‘Traditional Logic’, in Schmitt, Skinner, and Kessler, 1988.
Aspelin, Gunnar (1943). ‘Ralph Cudworth's Interpretation of Greek Philosophy’, Götebergs Högskolas Årsskrift. 49:.
Assenmacher, Johannes (1926). Die Geschichte des Individuationsprinzips in der Scholastik. Leipzig: Meiner.
Atherton, Margaret (1983). ‘Locke's Theory of Personal Identity’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy. 8:.
Atherton, Margaret (1990). Berkeley's Revolution in Vision. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Atherton, Margaret (1993). ‘Cartesian Reason and Gendered Reason’, in Antony, Louise M. and Witt, Charlotte (eds.), A Mind of One's Own. ;Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
Attfield, Robin (1977). ‘Clarke, Collins and Compounds’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 15:.
Attfield, Robin (1978). God and the Secular: A Philosophical Assessment of Secular Reasoning from Bacon to Kant. Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press.
Aubenque, Pierre (1978). ‘Les origines de la doctrine de l'analogie de l'être. Sur l'histoire d'un contresens’, Les études philosophiques. 1/1978:.
Aubenque, Pierre (1987). ‘Zur Enstehung der pseudo-aristotelischen Lehre von der Analogie des Seins’, in Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidment (2 vols.). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Aubert de, Versé, Noel (1684). L'impie convaincu, ou dissertation centre Spinosa. Amsterdam.
AubignacFrançois Hédelin, abbé d' François Hédelin, abbé d' (1664). Macarise, ou la reine des isles fortunées. Histoire allegorique contenant la philosophie morale des Stoïques sous le voile de plusieurs aventures agreables en forme de roman (2 vols.). Paris.
Aubrey, John (1972). Brief Lives, ed. Dick, Oliver Lawson. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Auger, Léon (1962). Gilles Personne de Roberval (1602–1675). Paris: Blanchard.
Augustine, (1972). The City of God. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Averroes, Ibn Rushd) (1562–74). Aristotelis opera cum Averrois commentariis (12 vols.), Venice.
Averroes, Ibn Rushd) (1954). Tahāfut al-Tahāfut (The incoherence of the incoherence), trans. Van den Bergh, Simon. London: Luzac.
Averroes, Ibn Rushd) (1984). Ibn Rushd's Metaphysics, trans. Genequand, C.. Leiden: Brill.
Ayer, A. J. (1967). ‘“I think, therefore I am”’, in Doney, Willis (ed.), Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday.
Ayers, Michael R. (1981a). ‘Locke versus Aristotle on Natural Kinds’, Journal of Philosophy. 78:.
Ayers, Michael R. (1981b). ‘Mechanism, Superaddition, and the Proof of God's Existence in Locke's Essay’, Philosophical Review. 90:.
Ayers, Michael R. (1984). ‘Berkeley and Hume: A Question of Influence’, in Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B., and Skinner, Q. (eds.), Philosophy in History: Essay on the Historiography of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ayers, Michael [R.] (1985). ‘“The End of Metaphysics” and the Historiography of Philosophy’, in Holland, A. J. (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Ayers, Michael [R.] (1986). ‘Are Locke's Ideas Images, Intentional Objects or Natural Signs?Locke Newsletter. 17:.
Ayers, Michael R. (1987). ‘Divine Ideas and Berkeley's Proof of God's Existence’, in Sosa 1987.
Ayers, Michael R. (1991). Locke (2 vols.). London: Roudedge.
Ayers, Michael R. (1994). ‘The Foundations of Knowledge and the Logic of Substance: The Structure of Locke's General Philosophy’, in Rogers, G. A. J. (ed.), Locke's Philosophy: Content and Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ayers, Michael R. (1996). ‘Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?’, in Winkler, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Azevedo, J. Luciod' (1947). A evolufao do Sebastinismo. 2d. ed. Lisbon: Teizeira.
Bachelard, Gaston (1967). La Formation de I'esprit scientifique: Contribution à line psychanalyse de la connaissance objective. 5th ed. Paris: Vrin.
Bacon, Francis (1605). The Advancement of Learning. London.
Bacon, Francis (1609). De sapientia vetemm. London.
Bacon, Francis (1620). Instauratio tnagna multi pertransibunl & augebitur scientia [incl. Novum organum]. London.
Bacon, Francis (1623). De dignitate et augmentis scientarum. London.
Bacon, Francis (1627a). New Atlantis. London.
Bacon, Francis (1626b). Sylva sylvamm. London.
Bacon, Francis (1857–74). The Works of Francis Bacon. ed. Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., Heath, D. D. (14 vols.). London: Longmans. (Vols. 8–14 have the title page: The Letters and the Life of Francis Bacon. …). (Repr. London: Longmans, 1887–92; repr. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1989.)
Bacon, Francis (1860–4). The Works of Francis Bacon. ed. and trans. Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., Heath, D. D. (15 vols.). ed. and trans. Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., Heath, D. D. (15 vols.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. (This edition includes only the material in vols. 1–7 of Bacon 1857–74.)
Bacon, Francis (1878). Novum Organum ed. Fowler, Th.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bacon, Francis (1960). The New Organon and Related Writings. ed. Anderson, F. H.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Bacon, Francis (1974). The Advancement of Learning and New Atlantis. ed. Johnston, Arthur. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bacon, Francis (1984). Francis Bacon's Natural Philosophy: A New Source. A Transcription of Manuscript Hardwick J2A. trans, and commentary by Rees, Graham, assisted by Upton, Christopher (The British Society for the History of Science Monographs, 5). Chalfont Saint Giles, Bucks.: British Society for the History of Science.
Bacon, Francis (1985). Sir Francis Bacon: The Essays or Counsels, Civill and Morall. ed. Kirnan, M., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bacon, Roger (1900). The Opus Majus of Roger Bacon. ed. Bridges, J. H. (3 vols.). London: Williams and Norgate.
Bacon, Roger (1983). Roger Bacon's Philosophy of Nature: A Critical Edition, English Translation, Introduction, and Notes, of “De multiplicatione spederum” and “De speculis comburentibus”. ed. and trans. Lindberg, David C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Badaloni, Nicola (1965). Tommaso Campanula. Milan: Feltrinelli. Baillet, Adrien (1695). La Vie de M. Descartes (2 vols.). Paris.
Baillet, Adrien (1946). Vie de Monsieur Descartes. [abr. vers. of 1693]. Paris: Table Ronde.
Baillie, James (1993). ‘Recent Work on Personal Identity’, Philosophical Books. 34:.
Balfour, Robert (1620). Commentarium in libros Aristotelis de philosophia. Bordeaux.
Ballard, George (1752). Memoirs of Several Ladies of Great Britain, Who Have Been Celebrated for Their Writings or Skill, in the Learned Languages, Arts and Sciences. Oxford.
Balz, Albert G. A. (1951). Cartesian Studies. New York: Columbia University Press.
Báñez, Domingo (1942–8). Tractatus de vera et legitima concordia liberi arbitrii creati cum auxiliis gratiae Dei efficaciter moventis humanam voluntatem, in Comentarios ineditos a la prima secundae de santo Tomas, ed. Heredia, Vicente Beltrán (3 vols.). Salamanca: Instituto ‘Francesco Suárez’, vol. 3.
Barad, Judith (1986). ‘Aquinas on Faith and the Consent/Assent Distinction’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 24 :.
Barbay, Pierre (1676). Commentarius in Aristotelis physicam… (2d ed.). Paris.
Barbay, Pierre (1680). Commentarius in Aristotelis moralem… (3d ed.). Paris.
Barber, Kenneth, and Gracia, Jorge J. E. (eds.) (1994). Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy. Albany, N. Y.: SUNY Press.
Barbeyrac, Jean (1749). ‘Historical and Critical Account of the Science of Morality’, in Pufendorf, Samuel, The Law of Nature and Nations, ed. Barbeyrac, J., trans. Kennet, B.. London.
Barbour, Julian B. (1989). Absolute or Relative Motion? A Study from a Machian Point of View of the Discovery and the Structure of Dynamical Theories (2 vols. in progress): vol. 1, The Discovery of Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barker, Peter (1985). ‘Jean Pena (1528–58) and Stoic Physics in the Sixteenth Century’, Southern Journal of Philosophy. 23(supp.):.
Barker, Peter (1991). ‘Stoic Contributions to Early Modern Science’, in Osler, M. J. (ed.), Atoms, Pneuma and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barker, Peter, and Goldstein, Bernard R. (1984). ‘Is Seventeenth-century Physics Indebted to the Stoics?Centaurus. 27:.
Barnard, F. M. (1966). ‘Christian Thomasius: Enlightenment and Bureaucracy’, American Political Science Review. 59:.
Barnard, F. M. (1971). ‘The “Practical Philosophy” of Christian Thomasius’, Journal of the History of Ideals. 32:.
Barnoum, Jeffrey (1980). ‘Hobbes's Causal Account of Sensation’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 18:.
Barrow, Isaac (1669). Lectiones opticae. London.
Barrow, Isaac (1670). Lectiones geometricae: In quibus (praesertim) generalia curvarum linearum symptomata declarantur. London.
Barrow, Isaac (1683). Lectiones mathematicae XXIII. London.
Barrow, Isaac (1734). The Usefulness of Mathematical Learning Explained and Demonstrated… trans. John, Kirkby.London.
Barrow, Isaac (1859). The Theological Works of Isaac Barrow, ed. Napier, A. (9 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barrow, Isaac (1860). The Mathematical Works of Isaac Barrow, ed. William, Whewell.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bartas, Guillaume Saluste du (1611). Les oeuvres de G. du Saluste S' du Bartas… (2 vols.). Paris.
Barth, Else M. (1974). The Logic of the Articles in Traditional Philosophy. A Contribution to the Study of Conceptual Structures. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bartha, Paul (1993). ‘Substantial Form and the Nature of Individual Substance’, Studia Leibnitiana. 25:.
Bartholinus, Caspar (1665). Enchiridion ethicum seu Epitome philosophiae moralis. Oxford.
Barzilay, I. (1974). Yoseph Schlomo Delmedigo, Yashar of Candia: His Life, Works, and Times. Leiden: Brill.
Basnage, Jacques (1716). Histoire des Juifs. The Hague.
Basso, Sebastian (1621). Philosophia naturalis adversus Aristotelem libri XII, in quibus abstrusa veterum physiologia restauratur … Aristotelis errores solidis rationibus refelluntur. Geneva.
Basso, Sebastian (1649). Philosophia naturalis adversus Aristotelem libri XII, in quibus abstrusa veterum physiologia restauratur … Aristotelis errores solidis rationibus refelluntur. Amsterdam.
Battaglia, Felice (1982). Cristiano Thomasio. Filosofo e giurista. Bologna: CLUEB. (1st ed. 1936.)
Battail, Jean-François (1973). L'avocat philosophe Géraud de Cordemoy. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Bauer, Barbara (1987). ‘Apathie des stoischen Weisen oder Ekstase der christlichen Braut? Jesuitische Stoakritik und Jacob Baldes Jephtias’, in Neumeister, S. and Wiedemann, C. (eds.), Res Publica Litteraria: Die Institutionen der Gelehrsamkeit in der frühen Neuzeit (2 vols.). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Baumgold, D. (1988). Hobbes's Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bausola, A. (1969). ‘Il perfezionamento dell'argomento ontologico nel carteggio Leibniz-Eckhard’, in Bausola, , Indagini di storia della filosofia. Milan: Vita e pensiero.
Baxter, Richard (1673). A Christian Directory or a Summ of Practical Theology and Cases of Conscience Directing Christians How to Use Their Knowledge and Faith. London.
Baxter, Richard (1682a). Of the Immortality of Man's Soule, and the Nature of It and Other Spirits. London.
Baxter, Richard (1682b). Of the Nature of Spirits; Especially Mans Soul. In a Placid Collation with the Learned Dr. Henry More, In a Reply to his Answer to a Private Letter, Printed in His Second Edition of Mr. Glanviles Sadducismus Triumphatus, in Of the Immortality of Man's Soule, and the Nature of It and Other Spirits. London.
Bayes, Thomas (1763). ‘An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 53:.
Bayle, Pierre (1682). Lettre sur la comète. Rotterdam.
Bayle, Pierre (1683). Pensées diverses sur la comète. Rotterdam.
Bayle, Pierre (ed.) (1684). Recueil de quelques pièces curieuses concernant la philosophie de M. Descartes. Amsterdam.
Bayle, Pierre (1686). Commentaire philosophique sur les paroles de Jésus-Crist …Canterbury.
Bayle, Pierre (1692). Projet et fragmens d'un Dictionnaire critique. Rotterdam.
Bayle, Pierre (1697). Dictionnaire historique et critique. Rotterdam.
Bayle, Pierre (1702). Dictionnaire historique et critique. 2d ed. Rotterdam.
Bayle, Pierre (1713). Commentaire philosophique sur les paroles de Jésus-Christ … ou traité de la tolérance universelle. Rotterdam.
Bayle, Pierre (1720). Dictionnaire historique et critique. 4th ed. Rotterdam.
Bayle, Pierre (1727). Oeuvres diverses (4 vols.). The Hague. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1964–8.)
Bayle, Pierre (1730). Dictionnaire historique et critique (4th ed. Prosper Marchand) (4 vols.). Amsterdam and Leiden.
Bayle, Pierre (1734–8). Historical and Critical Dictionary. 2d. ed. London (1st ed., 1710). (Repr. New York: Garland, 1984.)
Bayle, Pierre (1740). Dictionnaire historique et critique. 5th ed. (4 vols.). Amsterdam, Leiden, The Hague, and Utrecht. (This is represented as the 5th ed. by the editors, but it is actually the 8th.)
Bayle, Pierre (1911). Pensées diverses sur la comète, ed. Prat, A. (2 vols.). Paris: Société Nouvelle de Librarie et d'Edition.
Bayle, Pierre (1965). Historical and Critical Dictionary, trans. Popkin, R.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Bayle, Pierre (1984). Pensées diverses sur la comète, eds. Prat, A. and Rétat, P. (2 vols.). Paris: Nizet.
Bazzoli, M. (1979). ‘Giambattista Almici e la diffusione di Pufendorf nel settecento Italiano’, Critica storica. 16:.
Beaude, J. (1979). ‘Cartésianisme et anticartésianisme de Desgabets’, Studia Cartesiana. 1:.
Becco, Anne (1978). ‘Leibniz et François-Mercure Van Helmont: Bagatelle pour des monades’, in Magia Naturalis 1978.
Becconsall, Thomas (1698). The Grounds and Foundation of Natural Religion. London.
Bechler, Zev (1974). ‘Newton's 1672 Optical Controversies: A Study in the Grammar of Scientific Dissent’, in Elkana, Yehuda (ed.), The Interaction between Science and Philosophy. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Beck, L. J. (1952). The Method of Descartes: A Study of the Regulae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beck, L. J. (1965). The Metaphysics of Descartes: A Study of the Meditations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beck, Lewis White (1969). Early German Philosophy: Kant and his Predecessors. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Bedini, Silvio A. (1991). The Pulse of Time: Galileo Galilei, The Determination of Longitude, and the Pendulum Clock. Florence: Leo S. Olschki.
Beeckman, Isaac (1644). D. Isaaci Beeckmanni medici et rectoris apud Dordracenos mathematico-physicarum meditationum, quaestionum, solutionum centuria. Utrecht.
Beeckman, Isaac (1939–53). Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604 à 1634, ed. Waard, Cornelis (4 vols.). The Hague: Nijhoff.
Belaval, Yvon (1960). Leibniz critique de Descartes. Paris: Gallimard.
Belaval, Yvon (1964). ‘Premières animadversions de Leibniz sur les Principes de Descartes’, in Mélanges Alexandre Koyré, intro. Braudel, Fernand (2 vols.) (Histoire de la Pensée, No. 13), vol. 2 (L'aventure de l'esprit). Paris: Herman.
Benedetti, Giovanni Battista (1585). Diversarum speculationum mathematicarum, et physicarum liber. Turin. (Also Venice, 1586 and 1599.)
Benesch, Otto (1969). Artistic and Intellectual Trends from Rubens to Daumier as Shown in Book Illustration. New York: Walker and Company and Cambridge, Mass.: Department of Printing and Graphic Arts, Harvard College Library.
Bénichou, Paul (1948). Morales du grand siècle. Paris: Gallimard.
Benitez, Miguel (1988). ‘Matériaux pour un inventaire des manuscrits philosophiques clandestins des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles’, Rivista di Storia della Filosofia. NS43:.
Benn, S. I. (1972). ‘Hobbes on Power’, in Cranston, M. and Peters, R. (eds.), Hobbes and Rousseau: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Bennett, J. A. (1975). ‘Hooke and Wren and the System of the World: Some Points towards an Historical Account’, British Journal for the History of Science. 8:.
Bennett, J. A. (1981). ‘Cosmology and the Magnetical Philosophy, 1640–1680’, Journal of the History of Astronomy. 12:.
Bennett, J. A. (1989). ‘Magnetical Philosophy and Astronomy from Wilkins to Hooke’, in Taton, René and Wilson, Curtis (eds.), The General History of Astronomy: vol. 2, Planetary Astronomy from the Renaissance to the Rise of Astrophysics. Part A: Tycho Brahe to Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, Jonathan (1968). ‘Berkeley and God’, in Martin, C. B. and Armstrong, D. M. (eds.), Locke and Berkeley: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Bennett, Jonathan (1971). Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, Jonathan (1984). A Study of Spinoza's Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, Jonathan (1994). ‘Locke's Philosophy of Mind’, in Chappell 1994a.
Bennett, Jonathan, and Peter, Remnant (1978). ‘How Matter Might First Be Made’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Sup. IV:.
Bentley, Richard (1692). The Folly and Unreasonableness of Atheism…. In Eight Sermons preached at the Lecture founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle…. London.
Bentley, Richard (1693). The Folly and Unreasonableness of Atheism …. In Eight Sermons preached at the Lecture founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle …. London. (Each sermon has a separate title page, some of which date 1692.)
Bentley, Richard (1699). The Folly and Unreasonableness of Atheism.… 4th ed. London.
Berckelius, Henricus (1623). Theses ethicae de summo hominis bono civili … praeside … Francone Burgersdicio…. Leiden.
Berkel, Klaas (1983a). ‘Beeckman, Descartes, et la philosophie physico-mathématique’, Archives de Philosophie. 46:.
Berkel, Klaas (1983b). Isaac Beeckman (1588–1637) en de Mechanisering van het Wereldbeeld (with a summary in English). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Berkeley, George (1709). An Essay towards a New Theory of Vision. Dublin.
Berkeley, George (1710). A Treatise concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Dublin. (Rev. ed. London, 1734.)
Berkeley, George (1713). Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. London. (Rev. ed. London, 1734.)
Berkeley, George (1721). De Motu. London.
Berkeley, George (1732). Altiphron: Or the Minute Philosopher. London.
Berkeley, George (1733). The Theory of Vision, or Visual Language Vindicated and Explained. London.
Berkeley, George (1734). The Analyst. London.
Berkeley, George (1945). Philosophical Commentaries, Generally Called the Commonplace Book, ed. Luce, A. A., London: T. Nelson.
Berkeley, George (1948–57). The Works of George Berkeley, ed. Luce, A. A. and Jessop, T. E. (9 vols.). Edinburgh, London: T. Nelson.
Berkeley, George (1975). Philosophical Works, ed. Ayers, M. R.. London: J. M. Dent.
Berman, David (1988). The History of Atheism in England: From Hobbes to Russell. London: Crown Helm.
Bernier, François (1678). Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi (7 vols.). Lyon.
Bernier, François (1682). Doutes de M. Bernier sur quelques uns des principaux chapitres de son Abrégé de Gassendi. Paris.
Bernier, François (1684). Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi. 2d ed. (7 vols.). Lyon.
Bernier, François (1992). Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi (3 vols.). Paris: Fayard.
Bernoulli, Jakob (1713). Ars conjectandi. Basel.
Bernoulli, Jakob (1966). Translations from Jakob Bernoulli, trans. Sung, Bing. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Department of Statistics Technical Report no. 2 (12 February 1966).
Bernoulli, Jakob (1969–89). Die Werke von Jakob Bernoulli (3 vols.). Basel: Birkhäuser.
Bernoulli, Nicholas (1709). De usu artis conjectandi injure. Basel. (Repr. inj. Bernoulli 1969–89, vol. 3.)
Bernstein, Howard (1984). ‘Leibniz and Huygens on the “Relativity” of Motion’, in Heinekamp, Albert (ed.), Leibniz' Dynamica (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft). Stuttgart: Steiner.
Berr, Henri (1960). Du Scepticisme de Gassendi, trans. Rochot, B.. Paris: Albin Michel.
Berr, Sylvia; Françoise, Charles-Daubert; and Richard, Popkin (eds.) (1996). Heterodoxy, Spinozism, and Free Thought in Early-Eighteenth-Century Europe: Studies on theTraité des trois imposteurs. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Berriot, Francois (1984). Atheismes et athéistes au XVIe siècle en France (2 vols.) (Series: Theses-Cerf). Paris: Cerf.
Bertelli, S. (ed.) (1980). H libertinismo in Europa. Milan: Riccardi.
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico (1988). ‘Leibniz on the Censorship of the Copernican System’, Studia Leibnitiana. 20:.
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico (1993). Equivalence and Priority: Newton versus Leibniz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berts, C. J. (1984). The Early Deism in France. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Bérulle, Pierre (1846). Oeuvres complètes, ed. Migne, J. P.. Paris.
Beyssade, Jean-Marie (1979). La Philosophie première de Descartes. Paris: Flammarion.
Beyssade, Jean-Marie (1981). ‘Création des vérités éternelles et doute métaphysique’. Studia Cartesiana. 2:.
Beyssade, Jean-Marie (1983). ‘La classification cartésienne des passions’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 146:.
Beyssade, Jean-Marie (1988). ‘Descartes on the Freedom of the Will’, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal. 13:.
Beyssade, Jean-Marie (1992). ‘Descartes on Material Falsity’, in Cummins and Zoeller 1992.
Bianchi, Massimo Luigi (1982). ‘Occulto e manifesto nella medicina del Rinascimento: Jean Fernel e Pietro Severino’, Atti e memorie dell'Accademia toscana de scienze e lettere, la Colombaria. 47. n.s. 33:.
Bianchi, Massimo Luigi (1983). ‘Sapiente e Popolo nel Theophrastus Redivivus’. Studi storici 24:.
Bianchi, Massimo Luigi (1987). Signatura Rerum: Segni, magia e conoscenza da Paracelso a Leibniz (Lessico Intellettuale Europeo, 43). Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateneo.
Biermann, Kurt-Reinhard (1955). ‘Eine Untersuchung von G. W. Leibniz über die jährliche Sterblichkeitsrate’, Forschungen and Fortschritte. 29:.
Biermann, Kurt-Reinhard (1967). ‘Uberblick über die Studien von G. W. Leibniz zur Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung’, Sudhoffs Archiv. 51:.
Biermann, Kurt-Reinhard, and Faak, Margot (1957). ‘G. W. Leibniz “De incerti aestimatione”’, Forschungen und Fortschritte. 31:.
Birch, Andrea Croce (1991). ‘The Problem of Method in Newton's Natural Philosophy’, in Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (ed.), Nature and Scientific Method (Studies in the History of Philosophy, vol. 22). Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.
Blackwell, Richard J. (1966). ‘Descartes' Laws of Motion’. Isis. 57:.
Blanché, R. (1970). La logique et son histoire, d'Aristote à Russell. Paris: Armand Colin.
Blanchet, Léon (1920a). Les Antécédents historiques du ‘Je pense, donc je suis’. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Blanchet, Léon (1920b). Campanella. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Blau, Joseph Leon (1944). The Christian Interpretation of the Cabala in the Renaissance. New York: Columbia University Press.
Blay, Michel (1992). La naissance de la mécanique analytique: La science du mouvement au tournant des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Bloch, E. (1968). Christian Thomasius, ein deutscher Gelehrter ohne Misere. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Bloch, Marc (1989). The Royal Touch, trans. Anderson, J. E.. New York: Dorset Press.
Bloch, Olivier René (1971). La philosophie de Gassendi: Nominalisme, matérialisme et métaphysique (International Archives of the History of Ideas). The Hague: Nijhoff.
Bloch, Olivier René (1978). ‘Sur les premières apparitions du mot matérialiste’, Raison Présente. 47:.
Bloch, Olivier René (1985). Le matérialisme (Que sais-je?). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Blom, H. W. (1993). ‘Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. Burgersdijk's Moral and Political Thought’, in Bos, E. P. and Krop, H. A. (eds.), Franco Burgersdijk (1590–1635): Neo-Aristotelianism in Leiden. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Blount, Charles (1693). Oracles of Reason. London.
Blount, Charles (1695). Miscellaneous Works. London.
Blüher, K. A. (1969). Seneca in Spanien: Untersuchung zur Geschichte der Seneca-Rezeption in Spanien vom 13. bis 17. Jahrhundert. Munich: Francke.
Blumenfeld, David (1973). ‘Leibniz's Theory of the Striving Possibles’, Studia Leibnitiana. 5:.
Blumenfeld, David (1984–5). ‘Leibniz on Contingency and Infinite Analysis’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 45:.
Blumenfeld, David (1988–9). ‘Freedom, Contingency, and Things Possible in Themselves’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 49:.
Boas Hall, Marie (1965). Robert Boyle on Natural Philosophy: An Essay with Selections front His Writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Boas Hall, Marie (1975). ‘Newton's Voyage in the Strange Seas of Alchemy’, in Bonelli, M. L. Rhigini and Shea, William R. (eds.), Reason, Experiment and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution. New York: Science History Publications.
Boas Hall, Marie (1978). ‘Matter in Seventeenth Century Science’, in McMullin, Ernan (ed.), The Concept of Matter in Modern Philosophy. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Boas Hall, Marie (1981). The Mechanical Philosophy. New York: Arno Press.
Boas, Marie (1952). ‘The Establishment of the Mechanical Philosophy’, Osiris. 10:.
Boas, Marie (1958). Robert Boyle and Seventeenth-Century Chemistry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bobbio, N. (1993). Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bobik, Joseph (1965). ‘Matter and Individuation’, in McMullin 1965.
Bochenski, I. M. (1961). History of Formal Logic. Notre Dame, Inc.: Notre Dame University Press.
Bodin, Jean (1590?). Colloquium heptaplomeres. Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenbüttel, Handschrift Extrav. 89.1 and 220.2. (Manuscript).
Bodin, Jean (1857). Colloquium heptaplomeres, ed. Noack, L.. Paris and London.
Bodin, Jean (1975). Colloquium of the Seven about Secrets of the Sublime, trans. Kuntz, Marion. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Boehm, Alfred (1962). Le “Vinculum substantiale” chez Leibniz. Ses origines historiques. Paris: Vrin.
Boehm, Alfred (1965). ‘L'Aristotélisme d'Honoré Fabri (1607–1688)’, Revue des sciences religieuses. 39:.
Boethius, (1973). The Theological Tractates, ed. and trans. Stewart, H. F., Rand, E. K., and Tester, S. J.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Bohatec, J. (1912). Die Cartesianische Scholostik in der Philosophie und Thieologie der reformierten Dogmatik des 17. Jahrhunderts. Leipzig: Deichert. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.)
Bold, Samuel (1705). A Discourse concerning the Resurrection of the Same Body. London.
Bolton, Martha Brandt (1987). ‘Berkeley's Objection to Abstract Ideas and Unconceived Objects’, in Sosa, Ernest (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bolton, Martha Brandt (1992). ‘The Idea-Theoretic Basis of Locke's Antiessentialist Doctrine of Nominal Essence’, in Cummins, Phillip and Zoeller, Guenter (eds.), Minds, Ideas and Objects. Atascedero, Calif: Ridgeview.
Bolton, Martha Brandt (1994). ‘The Real Molyneux Question and the Basis of Locke's Answer’, in Rogers, G. A. J. (ed.), Locke's Philosophy: Content and Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bonansea, Bernardino M. (1969). Tommaso Campanella: Renaissance Pioneer of Modern Thought. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.
Bonansea, Bernardino M. (1983). Man and His Approach to God in John Duns Scotus. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.
Bondi, E. (1966). ‘Predication: A Study Based in the Ars logica of John of St. Thomas’, Thomist. 30:.
Bonno, Gabriel D. (1955). Les relations intellectuelles de Locke avec la France. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bordo, Susan (1987). The Flight to Objectivity. Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Borkowski, S. von Dunin (1904). ‘Zur Textgeschichte und Textkritik der altesten Lebensbeschreibung Benedikt Despinosas’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 18:.
Borst, Clive (1992). ‘Leibniz and the Compatibilist Account of Free Will’, Studia Leibnitiana. 24:.
Bos, H. J. M. (1972). ‘Huygens’, in Gillispie 1970–80, vol. 6.
Bos, H. J. M. (1974). ‘Differentials, Higher-Order Differentials and the Derivative in the Leibnizian Calculus’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 14:.
Bos, H. J. M. (1988). ‘Tractional Motion and the Legitimation of Transcendental Curves’, Centaurus. 31:.
Bossu, R. le (1674). Parallèle des principes de la physique d'Aristote et de celle de Descartes. Paris. (Repr. Paris: Vrin, 1981.)
Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne (1879). Oeuvres complètes, ed. Guillaume, (10 vols.). Lyon.
Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne (1964). Platon et Aristote: Notes de lectures, ed. Goyet, T.. Paris: Klincksieck.
Bouillier, Francisque (1868). Histoire de la philosophie cartésienne. 3d. ed. (2 vols.). Paris. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1987.)
Bouju, Théophraste (1614). Corps de toute la philosophie. Paris.
Bourke, Vernon (1937). ‘An Illustration of the Attitude of the Early French Jesuits towards Cartesianism’, in Cartesio nel terzo centenario nel' Discorso del Metodo, in Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica. 20(supp):.
Bourne, H. R. Fox (1876). The Life of John Locke (2 vols.). London: H. S. King.
Boutroux, E. (1927). Des vérités éternelles chez Descartes, trans. [French] Canguilhem, G.. Paris: Alcan.
Bouvet, Joachim (1989). Eine Wissenschaftliche Akademie für China, ed. Collani, Claudia (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 18). Stuttgart: Steiner.
Boyce Gibson, A. (1929–30). ‘The Eternal Verities and the Will of God in the Philosophy of Descartes’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. N.s. 30:.
Boylan, Michael (1980). ‘Henry More's Space and the Spirit of Nature’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 18:.
Boyle, Robert (1660). New Experiments Physico-Mechanicall, Touching the Spring of the Air. Oxford. (2d ed. Oxford, 1662.)
Boyle, Robert (1661). The Sceptical Chymist. London.
Boyle, Robert (1666). The Origine of Formes and Qualities, (According to the Corpuscular Philosophy), Illustrated by Considerations and Experiments, (Written by way of Notes upon an Essay about Nitre). Oxford.
Boyle, Robert (1674). The Excellency of Theology, Compared with Natural Philosophy, (as both are objects of men's study). Discours'd of in a Letter to a Friend…To which are annex'd Some Occasional Thoughts about the Excellency and Grounds of the Mechanical Hypothesis… (2 parts paginated separately). London.
Boyle, Robert (1675). Some Considerations about the Reconcileableness of Reason and Religion. London.
Boyle, Robert (1685/6). A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Receiv'd Notion of Nature. London.
Boyle, Robert (1688). Disquisitions concerning the Final Causes of Natural Things. London.
Boyle, Robert (1690). The Christian Virtuoso. London.
Boyle, Robert (1744). The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, ed. Birch, Thomas (5 vols.). London.
Boyle, Robert (1772). The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, ed. Birch, Thomas (6 vols.). London. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1965.)
Boyle, Robert (1911). The Sceptical Chymist. London: Dent.
Boyle, Robert (1965). Robert Boyle on Natural Philosophy, ed. Hall, Marie Boas. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Boyle, Robert (1979). Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle, ed. Stewart, M. A.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Boyle, Robert (1991). The Early Essays and Ethics of Robert Boyle, ed. Harwood, J. T.. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Bracken, Harry (1974). Berkeley. London: Macmillan.
Bradley, R. I. (1966). ‘Blacklo and the Counter-Reformation: An Inquiry into the Strange Death of Catholic England’, in Carter, C. H. (ed.), From the Renaissance to the Counter-Reformation: Essays in Honour of Garrett Mattingly. London: Cape.
Bradwardine, Thomas (1505). Tractatus de proportionibus. Venice.
Brändli, Rodolfo (1964). Virgilio Malvezzi politico e moralista. Basel: Tipografia dell'USC.
Brandt, F. (1928). Thomas Hobbes' Mechanical Conception of Nature. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.
Brandt, Reinhard (1991). ‘Locke und Kant’, in Thompson, M. P. (ed), John Locke und Immanuel Kant. Historische Rezeption und Gegenwärtige Relevanz. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
Brann, Noel L. (1979–80). ‘The Conflict between Reason and Magic in Seventeenth-Century England: A Case Study of the Vaughan-More Debate’, Huntington Library Quarterly. 43:.
Brauen, Fred (1982). ‘Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680)’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 43:.
Breger, Herbert (1990). ‘Know-how in der Mathematik. Mit einer Nutzanwendung auf die unendlichkleinen Gröβen’, in Rechnen mit dem Unendlichen: Beiträge zur Entwicklung eines kontroversen Gegenstandes. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Bréhier, E. (1937). ‘La création des vérités éternelles dans le système de Descartes’, Revue Philosophique. 103:.
Bréhier, E. (1967). ‘The Creation of the Eternal Truths in Descartes's System’, in Doney, Willis (ed.), Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Bremond, Henri (1967). Histoire Littéraire du Sentiment Religieux en France. Paris: Armand Colin.
Brerewood, Edward (1640). Tractatus ethici sive Commentarii in aliquot Aristotelis libros ad Nicomachum demoribus. Oxford.
Brickman, Benjamin (1941). An Introduction to Francesco Patrizi's Nova de Universis Philosophia. New York: Columbia University Press.
Brizzi, Gian Paolo (1976). La formazione della classe dirigente nel Sei-Settecento. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Broad, C. D. (1975). Leibniz: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brockliss, L. W. B. (1981). ‘Aristotle, Descartes, and the New Science: Natural Philosophy at the University of Paris, 1600–1740’, Annals of Science. 38:.
Brockliss, L. W. B. (1987). French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Cultural History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Broughton, Janet, and Ruth, Mattern (1978). ‘Reinterpreting Descartes on the Notion of the Union of Mind and Body’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 16:.
Brown, Clifford (1990). Leibniz and Strawson: A New Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. Munich and Vienna: Philosophia.
Brown, Harcourt (1934). Scientific Organizations in Seventeenth-Century France (1620–1680). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
Brown, K. C. (1962). ‘Hobbes's Grounds for Belief in a Deity’, Philosophy. 37:.
Brown, K. C. (ed.) (1965). Hobbes Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brown, Stuart (1984). Leibniz (Philosophers in Context). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Browne, Thomas Sir (1977). Religio Medici (1643), in Sir Thomas Browne. The Major Works, ed. Patrides, C. A.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Broydé, Isaac (1905). ‘Spaeth, Johann Peter’, in Singer, Isidore et al. (eds.), The Jewish Encyclopedia (12 vols.). New York: Funk and Wagnalls.
Brucker, Johann Jakob (1742–4). Historia critica philosophiae (5 vols.). Leipzig.
Brundell, Barry (1987). Pierre Gassendi. From Aristotelianism to a New Natural Philosophy. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Brunet, Jean (1686). Journal de Medicine. Paris.
Brunet, Pierre (1931). L'introduction des théories de Newton en France au xviiie siècle. Paris: Blanchard.
Brunner, Fernand (1951). Etudes sur la signification historique de la philosophie de Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.
Bruno, Giordano (1584a). La cena de le ceneri. London.
Bruno, Giordano (1584b). De la causa, principio et uno. London.
Bruno, Giordano (1584c). De l'infinito universo e mondi. London.
Bruno, Giordano (1584d). Lo spaccio de la bestia trionfante. London.
Bruno, Giordano (1585). De gli eroici furori. London.
Bruno, Giordano (1879–91). Opere latine, ed. Fiorentino, F. et al. Naples and Florence: Morano. (Repr. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1969.)
Bruno, Giordano (1957). Dialoghi italiana, ed. Gentile, G. and Aquilecchia, G.. Florence: Sanson.
Bruno, Giordano (1964). The Expulsion of the Triumphant Beast, trans. Imerti, Arthur D.. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
Bruno, Giordano (1973). De la causa, principio et uno, ed. Aquilecchia, G.. Turin: Einaudi.
Bruno, Giordano (1976). Cause, Principle, and Unity, trans. Lindsay, J.. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Brunschvicg, L. (1945). Descartes et Pascal lecteurs de Montaigne. Neuchâtel: La Baconnière.
Brush, Craig (1966). Montaigne and Bayle. Variations on the Theme of Scepticism. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Bruyère, Nelly (1984). Méthode et dialectique dans l'oeuvre de La Ramée: Renaissance et âge classique. Paris: Vrin.
Brykman, Geneviève (1984). Berkeley. Philosophie et apologétique. Paris: Vrin.
Buchdahl, Gerd (1969). Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: The Classical Origins, Descartes to Kant. Oxford: Blackwell.
Buchdahl, Gerd (1970). ‘Gravity’ in Butts, Robert E. and Davis, John W. (eds.), The Methodological Heritage of Newton. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Buckle, S. (1991). Natural Law and the Theory of Property. Grotius to Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buckley, Michael (1987). At the Origin of Modern Atheism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Buickerood, J. G. (1985). ‘The Natural History of the Understanding: Locke and the Rise of Facultative Logic in the Eighteenth Century’, History and Philosophy of Logic. 6:.
Bullokar, John (1616). An English Expositor, Teaching the Interpretation of the Hardest Words Used in Our Language…. London.
Buonamici, Francesco (1591).