Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T12:02:51.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - LGBTQ+ Individuals and Precarious Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2024

By
Oscar Holmes ,
Erhan Aydin ,
Richard Greggory Johnson  and
Emir Ozeren
Edited by
Elina Meliou ,
Joana Vassilopoulou  and
Mustafa F. Ozbilgin
Elina Meliou
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Joana Vassilopoulou
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Mustafa F. Ozbilgin
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Get access

Summary

Precarious work characterised by low pay, inadequate and variable hours, and short-term/temporary contracts refers to the employment conditions that include the situations of uncertainty’, ‘instability’, and ‘insecurity’. Precarious work arrangements skyrocketed in the 1970s as a result of the worldwide recession and the weakened power and forced reduction of organised labour. As a result, considerable power shifted back to employers who steadily repeal employment protections whenever possible. This chapter seeks to shed light on the missing link between diversity and precarious work from the viewpoint of sexual and gender identity minorities whose voices have been silenced and marginalised in mainstream discussions. Due to the long history of legalised discrimination and the stigmatisation they experience, LGBTQ+ employees are overrepresented in precarious work arrangements. Since LGBTQ+ employees are already a vulnerable population, the adverse effects of precarious work arrangements are exacerbated. We adopt an institutional approach to explore the challenges LGBTQ+ individuals face in precarious work concerning macro-institutional factors (e.g., social, organisational, political, legal, and economic) and micro-level factors (e.g., interpersonal discrimination, exclusion, incivility within organisations). Through case studies from Turkey and the United States, we demonstrate the political and social mechanisms that legitimise and proliferate precarious work arrangements for LGBTQ+ individuals. We conclude the chapter by highlighting research questions that scholars should pursue further to uncover the unique challenges LGBTQ+ individuals endure in precarious work arrangements.

Keywords

LGBTQ+diversityprecarious workbiasinsecurity
Type
Chapter
Information
Diversity and Precarious Work During Socio-Economic Upheaval
Exploring the Missing Link
 , pp. 36 - 57
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albelda, R., Bell-Pasht, A., & Konstantinidis, C. (2020). Gender and precarious work in the United States: Evidence from the contingent work supplement 1995–2017. Review of Radical Political Economics, 52(3), 542–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613419891175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anteby, M., & Anderson, C. (2014). The shifting landscape of LGBT organizational research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.08.001Google Scholar
Aydin, E. (2017). ‘Problems and suggestions’: Non-governmental organisations of sexual orientation minorities in the context of Turkey and United Kingdom. In Potocan, V., Ünğan, M. C., Nedelko, Z. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Managerial Solutions in Non-Profit Organizations (pp. 232–252). IGI Global.Google Scholar
Aydın, E., & Ozbilgin, M. F. (2019). Exploring the interplay between the aims and the context of LGBTI+ organising: The case of LGBTI+ organisations in Turkey and the UK. LGBT+ Studies Turkey, Transnational Press, London, 1, 9–32.Google Scholar
Badgett, M. V. L., Lau, H., Sears, B., & Ho, D. (2007). Bias in the Workplace: Consistent Evidence of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination. In The Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation Law and Public Policy. The Williams Institute. https://escholarship.org/content/qt5h3731xr/qt5h3731xr.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992). The Risk Society: Toward A New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bidwell, M., Briscoe, F., Fernandez-Mateo, I., & Sterling, A. (2013). The employment relationship and inequality: How and why changes in employment practices are reshaping rewards in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 61–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.761403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Burns, C., & Krehely, J. (2011). Gay and transgender people face high rates of workplace discrimination and harassment. Center for American Progress, 1(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2015). Foreward. In Lorey, I. (Ed.), State of Insecurity: Government of the Precarious (pp. vii–xi). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Campbell, I., & Price, R. (2016). Precarious work and precarious workers: Towards an improved conceptualisation. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 27(3), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304616652074Google Scholar
Catalyst. (2020). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender workplace issues: Quick take. www.catalyst.org/research/lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender-workplace-issues/Google Scholar
Curtin, M., & Sanson, K. (2016). Precarious creativity: Global media, local labor. , In Curti, (Ed.), Precarious Creativity: Global Media, Local Labor. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Duman, E. (2017). Ayrımcılık Yasağı ve Türkiye I˙nsan Hakları ve Eşitlik Kurumu Raporu. Pembe Hayat and Kaos GL.Google Scholar
EEOC (2021) Knowing your rights. EEOC website: www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/what-you-should-know-eeoc-and-protections-lgbt-workers.Google Scholar
Eckes, S. E. (2007). The legal ‘rights’ of LGBT educators in public and private schools. Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 23(1), 29–54.Google Scholar
Emre, O., Polat, V., & Duman, Y. S. (2017). Precarious work in Turkey: A comparison with EU member countries. Journal of Business Research Turk, 9(4), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2017.340Google Scholar
Friedman, M. S., Marshal, M. P., Guadamuz, T. E., Wei, C., Wong, C. F., Saewyc, E. M., & Stall, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of disparities in childhood sexual abuse, parental physical abuse, and peer victimization among sexual minority and sexual nonminority individuals. American Journal of Public Health, 101(8), 1481–1494. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.190009Google Scholar
Gedro, J. (2010). The lavender ceiling atop the global closet: Human resource development and lesbian expatriates. Human Resource Development Review, 9(4), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310380242Google Scholar
Gee and Waldrop (2021). Policies to improve health insurance coverage as America recovers from COVID-19. Center for American Progress.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. (2006). Gender stereotyping and the workplace: Price Waterhouse v.Google Scholar
Griffin, R. W., & Lopez, Y. P. (2005). ‘Bad Behavior’ in Organizations: A Review and Typology for Future Research. Journal of Management, 31(6), 988–1005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279942Google Scholar
Guittar, N. A., & Rayburn, R. L. (2016). Coming out: The career management of one’s sexuality. Sexuality and Culture, 20(2), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9325-yGoogle Scholar
Halkitis, P.N. (2013). The AIDS Generation: Stories and Survival of Resilience. The AIDS Generation: Stories and Survival of Resilience.Google Scholar
Hayat, P. (2019). 2019 yılında Translara Yönelik Gerçekleşen Hak I˙hlalleri Raporu. Pembe Hayat LGBTI Derneği.Google Scholar
Hernik, J. (2008) Polish Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) as workplace resources: from the point of view of provinces with the highest unemployment. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 1(3), 298–305.Google Scholar
Hill, R. J. (2009). Incorporating queers: Blowback, backlash, and other forms of resistance to workplace diversity initiatives that support sexual minorities. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308328128Google Scholar
Holmes IV, O. (2019). The antecedents and outcomes of heteronormativity in organizations. In Oxford Encyclopedia of Business and Management (pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.57Google Scholar
Holmes IV, O. (2020). Sexuality blindness: A new frontier of diversity resistance. In , K. M. Thomas, (ed.), Diversity Resistance in Organizations (2nd ed., pp. 34–57). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Holmes IV, O., Lopiano, G., & Hall, E. V. (2019). A review of compensatory strategies to mitigate bias. Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 5(2), 23–34.Google Scholar
Holmes IV, O., Whitman, M. V., Campbell, K. S., & Johnson, D. E. (2016). Exploring the social identity threat response. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 35(3), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-08-2015-0068Google Scholar
Hooks, B. (2009). Belonging: A Culture of Place. New York: Taylor and Francis Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, , 1989. The Constitutional and Legal Rights of Women, 3rd ed. Los Angeles:Roxbury, 2006. 167–175.Google Scholar
Human Dignity Trust. (2021). Maps of Countries that Criminalise LGBT People. www.humandignitytrust.org/lgbt-the-law/map-of-criminalisation/Google Scholar
Hwahng, S. J., & Lin, A. J. (2009). The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning people. In , C. Trinh-Shevrin, , , N. Islam, , & , M. Rey, (Eds.), Asian American Communities and Health: Context, Research, Policy, and Action. (Vol. 7, pp. 226–282). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373580-5.50043-0Google Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L., & Hewison, K. (2013). Precarious work and the challenge for Asia. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212466238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L., & Vallas, S. P. (2017). Probing precarious work: Theory, research, and politics. Research in the Sociology of Work, 31, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320170000031017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaos GL Association. (2014). Human Rights Violations of LGBT Individuals in Turkey. https://ilga.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Shadow-report-16.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kaos GL Association. (2020). Homophobia and transphobia based hate crimes in Turkey. https://kaosgldernegi.org/images/library/2020nefret-suclari-raporu-2019-eng.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kaos, GL, LGBT News, and IGLHRC. (2015). Türkiye’deki LGBT Yurttaşlara Yönelik I˙nsan Hakları I˙hlalleri. Ayrıntı Basımevi.Google Scholar
Kara, Y., Kır, H., Özgün, Y. & Okumuş, E. (2020). Pandemi Sürecinde LGBTI˙+’Ların Sosyal Hizmetlere Erişimi Araştırma Raporu. Sosyal Politika, Cinsiyet Kimliği ve Cinsel Yönelim Çalışmaları Derneği, I˙stanbul.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C., Mickelson, K. D., & Williams, D. R. (1999). The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40(3), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676349Google Scholar
Kim, J. (2011). Political institutions and public R&D expenditures in democratic countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(13), 843–857.Google Scholar
Kollen, T. (2016). Sexual Orientation and Transgender Issues in Organizations: Global Perspectives on LGBT Workforce Diversity. (, T. Kollen, (ed.)). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29623-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, C. (2011). A Company of One: Insecurity, Independence and the New World of White Collar Unemployment. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Lindsey, A., King, E., Gilmer, D., Sabat, I., & Ahmad, A. (2020). The benefits of identity integration across life domains. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(8), 1164–1172.Google Scholar
McKee-Ryan, F. M., & Harvey, J. (2011). ‘I have a job, but …’: A review of underemployment. Journal of Management, 37(4), 962–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311398134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039906Google Scholar
Mirowsky, J. and Ross, C. E. (2003). Social Causes of Psychological Distress. Hawthorne, NY: Transaction Publishers, Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mor Barak, M. E. (2019). Erecting walls versus tearing them down: Inclusion and the (false) paradox of diversity in times of economic upheaval. European Management Review, 16(4), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12302Google Scholar
Movement Advancement Project. (2013). ‘2013 National LGBT Movement Report: A Financial Overview of Leading Advocacy Organizations in the LGBT Movement.’ www.lgbtmap.org/file/2013-national-lgbt-movement-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., Holmes, IV, O., & Avery, D. R. (2014). The subjective well-being political paradox: Happy welfare states and unhappy liberals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1300–1308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037654CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Out Leadership. (2019). LGBT+ Business Climate Score. CEO Brief. https://outleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/OL-CEO-Brief_Turkey.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ozduzen, O., & Korkut, U. (2020). Enmeshing the mundane and the political: Twitter, LGBTI+ outing and macro-political polarisation in Turkey. Contemporary Politics, 26(5), 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozeren, E., & Aydin, E. (2016). What does being LGBT mean in the workplace? A comparison of LGBT equality in Turkey and the UK. In Research Handbook of International and Comparative Perspectives on Diversity Management. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Ozturk, M. B., & Tatli, A. (2016). Gender identity inclusion in the workplace: Broadening diversity management research and practice through the case of transgender employees in the UK. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(8), 781–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1042902Google Scholar
Pichler, S. (2007). Heterosexism in the workplace. Sloan Work and Family Research Network, Work-Family Encyclopedia. Chestnut Hill, MA: Sloan Work and Family Research Network. www.researchgate.net/profile/Shaun-Pichler/publication/323384558_Heterosexism_in_the_Workplace/links/5a91b0f745851535bcd79ec9/Heterosexism-in-the-Workplace.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pichler, S., & Holmes, IV, O. (2017). An investigation of fit perceptions and promotability in sexual minority candidates. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36(7), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-02-2017-0037Google Scholar
Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2013). Two sides of the same coin: Gender harassment and heterosexist harassment in LGBTQ work lives. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 1–22.Google Scholar
Ragins, B. R. (2004). Sexual orientation in the workplace: The unique work and career experiences of gay, lesbian, and bisexual workers. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 23, 35–120.Google Scholar
Ragins, B. R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2001). Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1244–1261.Google Scholar
Ragins, B. R., Singh, R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2007). Making the invisible visible: Fear and disclosure of sexual orientation at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1103–1118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1103Google Scholar
Ronan, W. (2020). New FBI hate crime reports shows increase in anti-LGBTQ attacks. Human Rights Campaign Press Releases. www.hrc.org/press-releases/new-fbi-hate-crimes-report-shows-increases-in-anti-LGBTQ-attacksGoogle Scholar
Rosner, D., & Markowitz, G. (2020). A short history of occupational safety and health in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 110(5), 622–628.Google Scholar
Shafritz, J. M., Ott, J. S., and Yang, J. S. (2011). Classics of Organization Theory. Wadsworth Cengage Learning (7th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Tilcsik, A., Anteby, M., & Knight, C. R. (2015). Concealable stigma and occupational segregation: Toward a theory of gay and lesbian occupations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(3), 446–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839215576401Google Scholar
Uygur, S., and Aydin, E. (2020). Religious diversity in the workplace. In Syed, J. and Ozbilgin, M. (eds.) Managing Diversity and Inclusion: An International Perspective (pp. 261–282). Sage.Google Scholar
Vallas, S. (2015). Accounting for precarity. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 44(4), 463–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306115588484aGoogle Scholar
Vosko, L. (2010). Managing the Margins: Gender, Citizenship, and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walby, S. (2015). Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Wang, M., & Wanberg, C. R. (2017). 100 years of applied psychology research on individual careers: From career management to retirement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 546–563. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westergaard-Nielsen, N., ed. (2008). Low-Wage Work in Denmark. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. and Ebert, N. (2013). Precarious work: economic, sociological and political perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 24(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304613500434Google Scholar
Yılmaz, V. (2013). The new constitution of Turkey: a blessing or a curse for LGBT citizens? Turkish Policy Quarterly, 11(4), 131–140.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, V., & Göçmen, I˙. (2016). Denied citizens of Turkey: experiences of discrimination among LGBT individuals in employment, housing and health care. Gender, Work & Organization, 23(5), 470–488.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×