Baldwin, J. N. 1990. ‘Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape: their impact on motivation’, The American Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borry, E. 2016. ‘A new measure of red tape: introducing the three-item red tape (TIRT) scale’, International Public Management Journal. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1143421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bozeman, B. 1993. ‘A theory of government “red tape”’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273–304.Google Scholar

Bozeman, B. 2000. Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Bozeman, B. 2012. ‘Multidimensional red tape: a theory coda’, International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 245–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bozeman, B. and Feeney, M. K. 2011. Rules and Red Tape: A Prism for Public Administration Theory and Research. ME Sharpe.Google Scholar

Bozeman, B. and Scott, P. 1996. ‘Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: untangling conceptual knots’, The American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bretschneider, S. 1990. ‘Management information systems in public and private organizations: an empirical test’, Public Administration Review, 50(5), 536–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, G. A. and Walker, R. M. 2010. ‘Red tape: the bane of public organizations?’ In Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A., and Brewer, G. A. (eds.), Public Management and Performance: Research Directions. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–26.Google Scholar

Buchanan, B. 1975. ‘Red-tape and the service ethic: some unexpected differences between public and private managers’, Administration & Society, 6(4), 423–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coursey, D. H. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘Content domain, measurement, and validity of the red tape concept: a second-order confirmatory factor analysis’, The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 342–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Jong, G. and Van Witteloostuijn, A. 2015. ‘Regulatory red tape and private firm performance’, Public Administration, 93(1), 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeHart-Davis, L. 2017. Creating effective Rules in Public Sector Organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

DeHart-Davis, L., Chen, J., and Little, T. D. 2013. ‘Written versus unwritten rules: the role of rule formalization in green tape’, International Public Management Journal, 16(3), 331–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeHart-Davis, L. and Pandey, S. K. 2005. ‘Red tape and public employees: does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers?’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickson, E. S. 2011. ‘Economics vs. psychology experiments: stylization, incentives, and deception’. In Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. 2011. ‘Experimentation in political science’. In Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, M. K. 2012. ‘Organizational red tape: a measurement experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 427–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, M. K. and Rainey, H. G., 2010. ‘Personnel flexibility and red tape in public and nonprofit organizations: distinctions due to institutional and political accountability’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 801–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., and Anderfuhren-Biget, S. 2012. ‘Resigned but satisfied: the negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction’, Public Administration, 90(1), 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodsell, C. T. 1983. The Case for Bureaucracy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Pandey, S. K., and Deat, F. 2015. ‘Defending inflexible rules: an experiment on the effect of counter attitudinal behavior on work-related perceptions of public managers’, Paper presented at the 2015 Public Management Research Association Conference, Minneapolis, MN, June 11–13, 2015.Google Scholar

Hall, R. H. 1996. Organizations: structures, processes, and outcomes, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Heintze, T. and Bretschneider, S. 2000. ‘Information technology and restructuring in public organizations: does adoption of information technology affect organizational structures, communications, and decision making?’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 801–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hood, C. 1991. ‘A public management for all seasons’, Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, H. 1977. Red Tape: Its Origins, Uses, and Abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, W. and Feeney, M. K. 2012. ‘Objective formalization, perceived formalization and perceived red tape: sorting out concepts’, Public Management Review, 14(8), 1195–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, W. and Feeney, M. K. 2014. ‘Beyond the rules: the effect of outcome favourability on red tape perceptions’, Public Administration, 92(1), 178–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, W. and Tummers, L. 2014. ‘More than words: experimental evidence on the negative effects of red tape on quality and procedural justice’, Paper presented at the IRSPM Conference, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar

Kelman, Steven. 2008. ‘The “Kennedy school” of research on innovation in government’, In Borins, S. (ed.), Innovations in Government: Research, Recognition, and Replication. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 28–52.Google Scholar

Lambert, E. G., Paoline, E. A. III, and Hogan, N. L. 2006. ‘The impact of centralization and formalization on correctional staff job satisfaction and organizational commitment: an exploratory study’, Criminal Justice Studies, 19(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. A., Sadoff, S., and Wagner, M. 2011. ‘So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design’, Experimental Economics, 14(4), 439–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luton, L. S. 2007. ‘Deconstructing public administration empiricism’, Administration and Society, 39(4), 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merton, R. K. 1995. ‘The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect’, Social Forces, 74(2): 379–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. and Herd, P. 2010. ‘Red tape and democracy: how rules affect citizenship rights’, The American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 654–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. 2006. ‘Creating desirable organizational characteristics: how organizations create a focus on results and managerial authority’, Public Management Review, 8(1), 119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation’, Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming Government. Reading, MA: Adison Wesley.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. K. 1995. ‘Managerial perceptions of red tape’, Unpublished PhD dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. 2012. ‘E-government and small business activity’. In Shareef, M. A. et al. (eds.), Transformational Government through Egov Practice: Socio-economic, Cultural, and Technological Issues. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 369–86.Google Scholar

Pande, S. and Bretschneider, S. 1997. ‘The impact of red tape’s administrative delay on public organizations’ interest in new information technology’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 113–30.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H., and Moynihan, D. P. 2007. ‘Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: a multimethod study’, Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 398–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pandey, S. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., and Kumar, V. 2014. ‘Introduction: markets and public administration’. In Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., Pandey, S. K., and Kumar, V. (eds.), Public Administration Reformation: Market Demand from Public Organizations. Routledge/Taylor and Francis, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. K. and Kingsley, G. A. 2000. ‘Examining red tape in public and private organizations: alternative explanations from a social psychological model’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 779–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pandey, S. K. and Marlowe, J. 2015. ‘Assessing survey-based measurement of personnel red tape with anchoring vignettes’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(3), 215–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pandey, S. K. and Moynihan, D. P. 2006. ‘Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: testing the moderating role of culture and political support’. In Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. Jr., and Walker, R. M. (eds.), Public Services Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. K., Pandey, S., Breslin, R., and Broadus, E. 2017. Public Service Motivation Research Program: Key Challenges and Future Prospects. In Raadschelders, J. and Stillman, R. (eds.), Foundations of Public Administration. Irvine, CA: Melvin and Leigh, Chapter 19, pp. 314–332.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. K. and Scott, P. G. 2002. ‘Red tape: a review and assessment of concepts and measures’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pandey, S. K. and Welch, E. W. 2005. ‘Beyond stereotypes a multistage model of managerial perceptions of red tape’, Administration & Society, 37(5), 542–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Quratulain, S. and Khan, A. K. 2013. ‘Red tape, resigned satisfaction, public service motivation, and negative employee attitudes and behaviors: testing a model of moderated mediation’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 0734371X13511646.Google Scholar

Rainey, H. G., 1979. ‘Perceptions of incentives in business and government: implications for civil service reform’, Public Administration Review, 39(5), pp. 440–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rainey, H. G. and Bozeman, B. 2000. ‘Comparing public and private organizations: empirical research and the power of the a priori’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S., and Bozeman, B. 1995. ‘Research note: public and private managers’ perceptions of red tape’, Public Administration Review 55(6): 567–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, P. G. and Pandey, S. K. 2000. ‘The influence of red tape on bureaucratic behavior: an experimental simulation’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4), 615–33.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, R. S. 1999. ‘Contested memory: notes on Robert K. Merton’s “the Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect”’, The American Sociologist, 30(2), 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stazyk, E. C., Pandey, S. K., and Wright, B. E. 2011. ‘Understanding affective organizational commitment: the importance of institutional context’, The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 603–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, W. I. and Thomas, D. S. 1928. The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. Knopf.Google Scholar

Thompson, F. J. and Riccucci, N. M. 1998. ‘Reinventing government’, Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 231–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torenvlied, R. and Akkerman, A. 2012. ‘Effects of managers’ work motivation and networking activity on their reported levels of external red tape’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3): 445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tummers, L., Weske, W., Bouwman, R., and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. 2016. ‘The impact of red tape on citizen satisfaction: an experimental study’, International Public Management Journal, 19(3), 320–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van den Bekerom, P., Torenvlied, R., and Akkerman, A. 2015. ‘Managing all quarters of the compass? How internally oriented managerial networking moderates the impact of environmental turbulence on organizational performance’, The American Review of Public Administration, 46(6), 639–59.Google Scholar

Walker, R. M. and Brewer, G. A. 2008. ‘An organizational echelon analysis of the determinants of red tape in public organizations’, Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1112–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Welch, E. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘E-government and bureaucracy: toward a better understanding of intranet implementation and its effect on red tape’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar