Aoki, M. 1994. The contingent governance of teams: Analysis of institutional complementarity. International Economic Review 35: 657–676.Google Scholar

Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., and Trippl, M.. 2016. Regional Innovation Systems: Past – presence – future, in Handbook of the Geographies of Innovation, Doloreux, D., Shearmur, R., and Carrincazeux, C. (eds.), 46–62. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Asheim, B. T. 2000. Industrial districts: The contributions of Marshall and beyond, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., and Gertler, M. S. (eds.), 413–431. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Asheim, B. T., Moodysson, J., and Tödtling, F.. 2011. Constructing regional advantage: Towards state-of-the-art regional innovation system policies in Europe? European Planning Studies 19: 1133–1139.Google Scholar

Battilana, J., Leca, B., and Boxenbaum, E.. 2009. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals 3: 65–107.Google Scholar

Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39: 61–75.Google Scholar

Boschma, R. 2015. Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies 49: 733–751.Google Scholar

Boschma, R. and Frenken, K.. 2011. Technological relatedness and regional branching, in Beyond Territory. Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion, and innovation, Bathelt, H., Feldman, M., and Kogler, D. (eds.), 64–81. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W.-C., Dicken, P., and Henderson, J.. 2004. ‘Globalizing’ regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29: 468–484.Google Scholar

Coenen, L., Asheim, B., Bugge, M. M., and Herstad, S. J.. 2017. Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 35: 600–620.Google Scholar

Dawley, S. 2014. Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography 90: 91–112.Google Scholar

Dopfer, K.; Foster, J.; and Potts, J.. 2004. Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14: 263–279.Google Scholar

Essletzbichler, J. 2015. Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas. Regional Studies 49: 752–766.Google Scholar

Fitjar, R. D. and Rodríguez-Pose, A.. 2011. When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment and Planning. A 43: 1248–1267.Google Scholar

Foray, D. 2015. Smart Specialization: Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policies. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Frenken, K. and Boschma, R. A.. 2007. A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography 7: 635–649.Google Scholar

Garud, R., Hardy, C., and Maguire, S.. 2007. Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies 28: 957–969.Google Scholar

Geels, F. W. 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33: 897–920.Google Scholar

Gertler, M. S. 2003. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography 3: 75–99.Google Scholar

Grabher, G. 1993. The weakness of strong ties; the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area, in The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks, Grabher, G. (ed.), 255–277. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Grabher, G. 2001. Locating economic action: Projects, networks, localities, institutions. Environment and Planning A 33: 1329–1331.Google Scholar

Grillitsch, M. 2015. Institutional layers, connectedness and change: Implications for economic evolution in regions. European Planning Studies 23: 2099–2124.Google Scholar

Grillitsch, M. 2016. Institutions, smart specialisation dynamics and policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34: 22–37.Google Scholar

Grillitsch, M. and Asheim, B.. 2015. Cluster Policy: Renewal through the integration of institutional variety. Papers in Innovation Studies.Google Scholar

Grillitsch, M., Martin, R., and Srholec, M.. 2017. Knowledge base combinations and innovation performance in Swedish regions. Economic Geography 93: 458–479.Google Scholar

Grillitsch, M. and Nilsson, M.. 2017. Firm performance in the periphery: On the relation between firm-internal knowledge and local knowledge spillovers. Regional Studies 51: 1219–1231.Google Scholar

Grillitsch, M. and Rekers, J. V.. 2016. How does multi-scalar institutional change affect localized learning processes? A case study of the med-tech sector in Southern Sweden. Environment and Planning A 48: 154–171.Google Scholar

Grillitsch, M. and Trippl, M.. 2014. Combining knowledge from different sources, channels and geographical scales. European Planning Studies 22: 2305–2325.Google Scholar

Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., and Trippl, M.. 2017. Unrelated knowledge combinations: Unexplored potential for new regional industrial path development. Papers in Innovation Studies.Google Scholar

Hall, P. A. and Gingerich, D. W.. 2009. Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science 39: 449–482.Google Scholar

Hassink, R. 2005. How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies 13: 521–535.Google Scholar

Hassink, R. 2010. Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas, in The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, Boschma, R. and Martin, R. (eds.), 450–468. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., and Yeung, H. W.-C.. 2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy 9: 436–464.Google Scholar

Iammarino, S. 2005. An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives. European Planning Studies 13: 497–519.Google Scholar

Isaksen, A. 2001. Building regional innovation systems: Is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy? Canadian Journal of Regional Science 14: 101–120.Google Scholar

Isaksen, A. and Trippl, M.. 2017. Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography 93: 436–457.Google Scholar

Isaksen, A. and Trippl, M.. 2016. Path development in different regional innovation systems, in Innovation Drivers and Regional Innovation Strategies, Parrilli, M., Fitjar, R., and Rodríguez-Pose, A. (eds.), 66–84. New York, NY and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Isaksen, A., Tödtling, F., and Trippl, M.. 2016. Innovation policies for regional structural change: Combining actor-based and system-based strategies. In 56th ERSA Congress August 23–26. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar

Kirzner, I. M. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 60–85.Google Scholar

Klepper, S. 2007. Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Science 53: 616–631.Google Scholar

Lam, A. 2000. Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization Studies 21: 487–513.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, D. 2012. Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography 12: 227–245.Google Scholar

Malecki, E. J. 2011. Regional social capital: Why it matters. Regional Studies 46: 1023–1039.Google Scholar

Martin, R. 2010. Roepke lecture in economic geography – Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography 86: 1–27.Google Scholar

Martin, R. and Sunley, P.. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6: 395–437.Google Scholar

Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A.. 1999. Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23: 167–185.Google Scholar

Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A.. 2007. Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 7: 603–618.Google Scholar

Morgan, K. 2007. The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies 41: S147–S159.Google Scholar

Morgan, K. 2013. Path dependence and the state. In Re-Framing Regional Development, Cooke, P. (ed.), 318–340. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Morgan, K. 2017. Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 35: 569–583.Google Scholar

Murmann, J. P. 2003. Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. 1994. The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change 3: 47–63.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal Knowledge : Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Pyke, F., Becattini, G., and Sengenberger, W.. 1990. Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-Operation in Italy. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar

Schamp, E. W. 2010. On the notion of co-evolution in economic geography, in The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, Boschma, R. and Martin, R. (eds.), 432–449. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar

Simmie, J. 2003. Innovation and urban regions as national and international nodes for the transfer and sharing of knowledge. Regional Studies 37: 607–620.Google Scholar

Simmie, J. 2012. Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies 20: 753–772.Google Scholar

Sotarauta, M. and Mustikkamäki, N.. 2015. Institutional entrepreneurship, power, and knowledge in innovation systems: Institutionalization of regenerative medicine in Tampere, Finland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33: 342–357.Google Scholar

Steen, M. and Karlsen, A.. 2014. Path creation in a single-industry town: The case of Verdal and Windcluster Mid-Norway. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography 68: 133–143.Google Scholar

Storper, M. 1995. The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies 2: 191–221.Google Scholar

Strambach, S. 2010. Path dependence and path plasticity: the co-evolution of institutions and innovation – the German customized business software industry, in The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, Boschma, R. and Martin, R. (eds.), 406–429. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Strambach, S. and Klement, B.. 2012. Cumulative and combinatorial micro-dynamics of knowledge: The role of space and place in knowledge integration. European Planning Studies 20: 1843–1866.Google Scholar

Tanner, A. N. 2014. Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography 90: 403–427.Google Scholar

Ter Wal, A. L. J. and Boschma, R.. 2011. Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies 45: 919–933.Google Scholar

Tödtling, F. and Grillitsch, M.. 2015. Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms? European Planning Studies 23: 1741–1758.Google Scholar

Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M.. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34: 1203–1219.Google Scholar

Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M.. 2013. Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies to new development paths. In Reframing Regional Development, Cooke, P. (ed.), 297–317. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., and Isaksen, A.. 2017. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography. DOI:10.1177/0309132517700982.Google Scholar

Trippl, M. and Otto, A.. 2009. How to turn the fate of old industrial areas: A comparison of cluster-based renewal processes in Styria and the Saarland. Environment and Planning. A 41: 1217–1233.Google Scholar

Weber, K. M. and Rohracher, H.. 2012. Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy 41: 1037–1047.Google Scholar

Westlund, H. and Kobayashi, K.. 2013. Social capital and sustainable urban-rural relationships in the global knowledge society, in Social Capital and Rural Development in the Knowledge Society, Westlund, H. and Kobayashi, K. (eds.), 1–17. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Vitols, S. 2001. Varieties of corporate governance: Comparing Germany and the UK, in Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (eds.), 337–360. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M., and Gilsing, V.. 2005. A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation 25: 609–619.Google Scholar

Zelizer, V. A. 1978. Human values and the market: The case of life insurance and death in 19th-century America. American Journal of Sociology 84: 591–610.Google Scholar

Zukauskaite, E. and Moodysson, J.. 2016. Multiple paths of development: Knowledge bases and institutional characteristics of the Swedish food sector. European Planning Studies 24: 589–606.Google Scholar

Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R., Franco, A., and Sarkar, M. 2004. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spinout generation, development, and survival. Academy of Management Journal 47: 501–522.Google Scholar

Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., Galasso, A., and Oettl, A. 2014. Why are some regions more innovative than others? The role of small firms in the presence of large labs. Journal of Urban Economics 81: 149–165.Google Scholar

Appold, S. 1995. Agglomeration, interorganizational networks, and competitive performance in the U.S. metalworking sector. Economic Geography 71: 27–54.Google Scholar

Arthur, W. B. 1990. Positive feedbacks in the economy. Scientific American 262: 92–99.Google Scholar

Arthur, W. B. 2009. The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86: 253–273.Google Scholar

Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. 2004. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4, Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J. F. (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Bassett, R. To the Digital Age. 2002. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Boschma, R. and Frenken, K. 2006. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 6: 273–302.Google Scholar

Boschma, R. and Wenting, R. 2007. The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: Does location matter? Industrial and Corporate Change 16: 213–238.Google Scholar

Bottazzi, G. and Secchi, A. 2006. Explaining the distribution of firm growth rates. The RAND Journal of Economics 37: 235–256.Google Scholar

Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F. 2009. Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography 9: 439–468.Google Scholar

Buendia, F. 2013. Increasing returns economics and generalized polya processes. Complexity 19: 21–37.Google Scholar

Buenstorf, G. and Guenther, C. 2011. No place like home? Relocation, capabilities, and firm survival in the German machine tool industry after World War II. Industrial and Corporate Change 20: 1–28.Google Scholar

Buenstorf, G. and Klepper, S. 2009. Heritage and agglomeration: The Akron tire cluster revisited. Economic Journal 119: 705–733.Google Scholar

Buenstorf, G. and Klepper, S. 2010. Why does entry cluster geographically? Evidence from the U.S. tire industry. Journal of Urban Economics 68: 103–114.Google Scholar

Carias, C. and Klepper, S. 2010. Entrepreneurship, the initial labor force, and the location of new firms. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Cheyre, C., Klepper, S., and Veloso, F. 2015. Spinoffs and the mobility of US merchant semiconductor inventors. Management Science 61: 487–506.Google Scholar

Christensen, C. 1993. The rigid disk drive industry: A history of commercial and technological turbulence. Business History Review 67: 531–588.Google Scholar

Danneels, E. 2002. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal 23: 1095–1121.Google Scholar

Dumais, G., Ellison, G., and Glaeser, E. 2002. Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. Review of Economics and Statistics 84: 193–204.Google Scholar

Duranton, G. and Puga, D. 2004. Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4, Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J. F. (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Duranton, G. and Overman, H. 2005. Testing for localization using micro-geographic data. Review of Economic Studies 72: 1077–1116.Google Scholar

Ellison, G. and Glaeser, E. 1997. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy 105: 889–927.Google Scholar

Ellison, G. and Glaeser, E. 1999. The geographic concentration of industry: Does natural advantage explain agglomeration? American Economic Review 89: 311–316.Google Scholar

Ellison, G., Glaeser, E., and Kerr, W. 2010. What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. American Economic Review 100: 1195–1213.Google Scholar

Feinstein, J. 2017. The creative development of fields: Learning, creativity, paths, implications. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 8: 23–62.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. 1994. The Geography of Innovation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. 2001. The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change 10: 861–891.Google Scholar

Feldman, M., Francis, J., and Bercovitz, J. 2005. Creating a cluster while building a firm: Entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Regional Studies 39: 129–141.Google Scholar

Figueiredo, O., Guimaraes, P., and Woodward, D. 2002. Home-field advantage: Location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs. Journal of Urban Economics 52: 341–361.Google Scholar

Franco, A. and Filson, D. 2006. Spin-outs: Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. RAND Journal of Economics 37: 841–860.Google Scholar

Frenken, K. and Boschma, R. 2007. A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography 7: 635–649.Google Scholar

Frenken, K., Cefis, E., and Stam, E. 2015. Industrial dynamics and clusters: A survey. Regional Studies 49: 10–27.Google Scholar

Fujita, M., Krugman, P., and Venables, A. 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar

Glaeser, E., Rosenthal, S., and Strange, W. 2010. Urban economics and entrepreneurship. Journal of Urban Economics 67: 1–14.Google Scholar

Greenstone, M., Hornbeck, R., and Moretti, E. 2010. Identifying agglomeration spillovers: Evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings. Journal of Political Economy 118: 536–598.Google Scholar

Heebels, B. and Boschma, R. 2011. Performing in Dutch book publishing 1880–2008. The importance of entrepreneurial experience and the Amsterdam Cluster. Journal of Economic Geography 11: 1007–1029.Google Scholar

Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577–598.Google Scholar

Kenney, M. and von Burg, U. 1999. Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: Industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Industrial and Corporate Change 8: 67–103.Google Scholar

Klepper, S. 2007. Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Science 53: 616–631.Google Scholar

Klepper, S. 2009a. Silicon Valley – A chip off the old Detroit bloc, in Entrepreneurship, Growth, and Public Policy, Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. and Strom, R. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klepper, S. 2009b. Spinoffs: A review and synthesis. European Management Review 6: 159–171.Google Scholar

Klepper, S. 2010. The origin and growth of industry clusters: The making of Silicon Valley and Detroit. Journal of Urban Economics 67: 15–32.Google Scholar

Klepper, S., Kowalski, J., and Veloso, F. 2011. Technological Spillovers and the Agglomeration of the Semiconductor Industry in Silicon Valley. Mimeo.Google Scholar

Klepper, S. and Sleeper, S. 2005. Entry by spinoffs. Management Science 51: 1291–1306.Google Scholar

Klepper, S. and Thompson, P. 2006. Submarkets and the evolution of market structure. The RAND Journal of Economics 37: 861–886.Google Scholar

Klette, T. J. and Kortum, S. 2004. Innovating firms and aggregate innovation. Journal of Political Economy 112: 986–1018.Google Scholar

Lécuyer, C. 2006. Making Silicon Valley. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar

Luttmer, E. 2007. Selection, growth, and the size distribution of firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122: 1103–1144.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

McKendrick, D., Doner, R., and Haggard, S. 2000. From Silicon Valley to Singapore. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, M. 2000. The scope and organization of production: Firm dynamics over the learning curve. RAND Journal of Economics 31: 180–205.Google Scholar

Mitton, D. 1990. Bring on the clones: A longitudinal study of the proliferation, development, and growth of the biotech industry in San Diego, in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship, Churchill, N., Bygrave, W., Hornday, J., Muzyka, D., Vesper, K., and Wetzel, W. Jr. (eds.). Babson Park, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar

Montgomery, C. 1994. Corporate diversification. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 163–178.Google Scholar

Moore, G. and Davis, K. 2004. Learning the Silicon Valley way, in Building High-Tech Clusters: Silicon Valley and beyond, Bresnahan, T. and Gambardella, A. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nanda, R. and Sørensen, J. 2010. Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science 56: 1116–1126.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Puga, D. 2010. The magnitude and causes of agglomeration economies. Journal of Regional Science 50: 203–219.Google Scholar

Romanelli, E. and Feldman, M. 2006. The anatomy of cluster development: The case of U.S. biotherapeutics, 1976–2003. Cluster Genesis 27: 87–113.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, S. and Strange, W. 2004. Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4, Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J. F. (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. 1934. Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Sorenson, O. and Audia, P. 2000. The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology 106: 424–462.Google Scholar

Staber, U. 2001. Spatial proximity and firm survival in a declining industrial district: The case of knitwear firms in Baden-Württemberg. Regional Studies 35: 329–341.Google Scholar

Stam, E. 2007. Why butterflies don’t leave: Locational behavior of entrepreneurial firms. Economic Geography 83: 27–50.Google Scholar

Stuart, T. and Sorenson, O. 2003. The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy 32: 229–253.Google Scholar

Weitzman, M. 1998. Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 331–360.Google Scholar

Wenting, R. 2008. Spinoff dynamics and the spatial formation of the fashion design industry, 1858–2005. Journal of Economic Geography 8: 593–614.Google Scholar

Bergek, B. Carlsson, S. Jacobsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne, . 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37: 407–429.Google Scholar

Bergek, Anna, Jacobsson, Staffan, Carlsson, Bo, Lindmark, Sven, and Rickne, Annika. 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37: 407–429.Google Scholar

Carlsson, B. and Stankiewicz, R.. 1991. On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1: 93–118.Google Scholar

Clastres, Cédric. 2011. Smart grids: Another step towards competition, energy security and climate change objectives. Energy Policy 39(9): 5399–5408.Google Scholar

Dasher, Richard B. 2012. The outlook for smart grids, in Fresh Currents – Japan’s Flow from a Nuclear Past to a Renewable Future. Kyoto: Kyoto Journal, Heian-kyo Media.Google Scholar

ECHONET Consortium. 2013a). Application Areas. Retrieved on February 12, 2013. ECHONET Consortium. www.echonet.gr.jp/english/echo/application.htm.Google Scholar

ECHONET Consortium. 2013b). List of Members. Retrieved on February 12, 2013. ECHONET Consortium. www.echonet.gr.jp/english/membership/kigyo.htm.Google Scholar

European Technology Platform for Electricity Networks for the Future. 2016. The SmartGrid European Technology Platform. European Technology Platform for Electricity Networks for the Future. www.smartgrids.eu/ETPSmartGrids. Accessed on February 1, 2016.Google Scholar

Freeman, Christopher. 1988. Japan: A new national innovation system?, in Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar

Hirai, Toshihiro (2013). Personal interview, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, February 18.Google Scholar

Jacobsson, Staffan and Bergek, Anna. 2004. Transforming the energy sector: The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change 13(5): 815–849.Google Scholar

Japan Smart Community Alliance. 2013. Membership (as of February 8, 2013). Retrieved February 13, 2013. Japan Smart Community Alliance: www.smart-japan.org/memberslist/tabid/189/Default.aspx.Google Scholar

Kamp, Linda, Smits, Ruud, and Andriesse, Cornelis. 2004. Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark. Energy Policy 32: 1625–1637.Google Scholar

Lin, Chen-Chun, Yang, Chia-Han, and Shyua, Joseph Z.. 2013. A comparison of innovation policy in the smart grid industry across the pacific: China and the USA. Energy Policy 57: 119–132.Google Scholar

Lundvall, Bengt-Ake. 1988. Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation, in Dosi, Giovanni, Freeman, Christopher, Nelson, Richard, Silverberg, Gerald, and Soete, Luc (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Malerba, Franco. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31(2): 247–264.Google Scholar

Malerba, Franco, ed. 2004. Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malerba, Franco and Adams, Pamela. 2014. Sectoral systems of innovation, in Dodgson, Mark, Gann, David M., and Phillips, Nelson (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mochizuki, Shoji (2013). Personal interview, ECHONET Consortium, Tokyo, October 17.Google Scholar

Morozumi, Satoshi. 2010. NEDO’s Grid Connection Related Research Activities. Expert Group on New and Renewable Energy Technologies.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard, ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard R. 1994. The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change 3(1): 47–63.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard R. 1995. Co-evolution of industry structure, technology and supporting institutions, and the making of comparative advantage. International Journal of the Economics of Business 2(2): 171–184.Google Scholar

Office of Energy and Environmental Industries. 2012. Japan’s Electricity Market and Opportunities for U.S. Renewable Energy and Smart Grid Exporters. Market Intelligence Brief, Manufacturing and Services, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, United States.Google Scholar

Smith, Adrian, Stirling, Andy, and Berkhout, Frans. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34: 1491–1510.Google Scholar

Suurs, Roald. 2009. Motors of Sustainable Innovation: Towards a Theory on the Dynamics of Technological Innovation Systems. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar

Uetake, Kaori. 2013. Smart City Project, Yokohama City, March 19.Google Scholar

Vlieger, Esther and Leydesdorff, Loet. 2010. How to Analyze Frames Using Semantic Maps of a Collection of Messages?: Pajek Manual. leydesdorff.net, Amsterdam: Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Arora, Ashish, Branstetter, Lee G., and Drev, Matej. 2013. Going soft: How The rise of software-based innovation led to the decline of Japan’s IT industry and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(3): 757–775.Google Scholar

Audretsch, David and Feldman, Maryann. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86: 630–640.Google Scholar

Bessen, James and Hunt, Robert. 2007. An empirical look at software patents. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 16(1): 157–189.Google Scholar

Branstetter, Lee, Drev, Matej, and Kwon, Manho. 2015. Get with the Program: Software-Driven Innovation in Traditional Manufacturing. Working paper.Google Scholar

Carlino, Gerald and Kerr, William. 2015. Agglomeration and Innovation. In Duranton, Gilles, Henderson, Vernon, and Strange, William (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics Volume 5. 349–404.Google Scholar

Chen, Henry, Gompers, Paul, Kovner, Anna, and Lerner, Josh. 2010. Buy local? The geography of venture capital. Journal of Urban Economics 67(1): 90–102.Google Scholar

Delgado, Mercedes, Porter, Michael, and Stern, Scott. 2014. Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy 43(10): 1785–1799.Google Scholar

Duranton, G. 2007. Urban evolutions: the fast, the slow, and the still. American Economic Review 97: 197–221.Google Scholar

Ellison, Glenn, Glaeser, Edward L., and Kerr, William R.. 2010. What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. American Economic Review 100(3): 1195–1213.Google Scholar

Franco, April and Mitchell, Matthew. 2008. Covenants not to compete: labor mobility and industry dynamics. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 17(3): 581–606.Google Scholar

Garcia-Vicente, Florencia, Garcia-Swartz, Daniel, and Campbell-Kelly, Martin. 2014. The Hydra of Lerna: Economic-Geography Perspectives on America’s Early Computer Clusters. Working paper, Warwick University.Google Scholar

Glaeser, Edward. 2005. Urban colossus: Why is New York America’s largest city? FRBNY Economic Policy Review December: 7–24.Google Scholar

Graham, Stuart and Mowery, David. 2003. Intellectual property protection in the U.S. software industry, in Cohen, Wesley and Merrill, Stephen (eds.) Patents in the Knowledge Economy. Washington, DC: National Research Council, 219–258.Google Scholar

Graham, Stuart and Vishnubhakat, Saurabh. 2013. Of smart phone wars and software patents. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(1): 67–86.Google Scholar

Hall, Bronwyn, Jaffe, Adam, and Trajtenberg, Manuel. 2005. Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics 36(1): 16–38.Google Scholar

Hall, Bronwyn and MacGarvie, Megan. 2010. The private value of software patents. Research Policy 39(7): 994–1009.Google Scholar

Hall, B. H. and Ziedonis, R.. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND Journal of Economics 32: 101–128.Google Scholar

Hannigan, Thomas J., Cano-Kollmann, Marcelo, and Mudambi, Ram. 2015. Thriving innovation amidst manufacturing decline: The Detroit auto cluster and the resilience of local knowledge production. Industrial and Corporate Change 24(6): 1–22.Google Scholar

Helsley, Robert W. and Strange, William C.. 2014. Coagglomeration, Clusters, and the Scale and Composition of Cities. Journal of Political Economy. 122(5),1064–1093.Google Scholar

Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R.. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3): 577–598.Google Scholar

Jaffe, Adam and Trajtenberg, Manuel. 2002. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kerr, William and Kominers, Scott. 2015. Agglomerative forces and cluster shapes. Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Marx, M. J. Singh and Fleming, L.. 2015. Regional disadvantage? Employee non-compete agreements and brain drain. Research Policy 44(2): 394–404.Google Scholar

Moretti, E. 2012. The New Geography of Jobs. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Nathan. 1963. Technology change in the machine tool industry, 1840–1910. The Journal of Economic History 23(4): 414–443.Google Scholar

Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar