Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:30:48.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Case study 6: Hierarchical analysis of crayfish community variation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2014

Petr Šmilauer
Affiliation:
University of South Bohemia, Czech Republic
Jan Lepš
Affiliation:
University of South Bohemia, Czech Republic
Get access

Summary

Biotic communities vary at multiple spatial (and temporal) scales, often hierarchically related. To understand this variation, including its relation to biotic and abiotic factors, we must start with testing the variation's existence and quantifying its extent at particular scales. In this chapter, you will study the hierarchical components of spatial variation of the crayfish community in the drainage of Spring River, north central Arkansas and south central Missouri, USA. The data were collected by Dr Camille Flinders (Flinders & Magoulick, 2002). The statistical approach used in this study was already described in Section 10.4.

Data and design

The primary data table consists of 567 records of the crayfish community composition. There are 10 variables, which actually represent only five crayfish species, with each species divided into two size categories, depending on carapace length (above or below 15 mm). The data matrix is quite sparse. In the 5670 data cells, there are only 834 non-zero values; 85% of the data cells are empty. This would suggest high beta diversity and, consequently, use of a unimodal ordination, such as CCA. There is a problem with that choice, however. There are 133 records without any crayfish specimen present and such empty cases are uninformative with respect to species composition. They cannot be compared with the other records using the chi-square distance, which is implied by unimodal ordination methods. If you use a unimodal ordination, the empty records will be automatically omitted from the analysis and some of the permutation tests shown in this case study will not work, due to the introduced unbalancedness of the data. You must, therefore, choose the linear ordination and rely on its robustness.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×