Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T11:11:45.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Methods of Biochemical Systems Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Néstor V. Torres
Affiliation:
Universidad de la Laguna, Tenerife
Eberhard O. Voit
Affiliation:
Medical University of South Carolina
Get access

Summary

The appeal of the power-law approximation for representing enzyme-catalyzed reactions has led to the development of an entire modeling framework that is known in the field as Biochemical Systems Theory (BST). Hundreds of theoretical treatises and applications concerned with BST have been published in the peer-reviewed literature, in books, abstracts, and presentations. It is not the purpose of this chapter to provide a detailed and comprehensive treatment, and we will only highlight topics that are of relevance for the remainder of the book. The reader interested in further details, hands-on examples, and exercises is referred to a recent, comprehensive textbook on the subject (Voit 2000).

The typical modeling process contains the following components:

  • Model Design

  • Dynamic Analysis

  • Steady-State Analysis

  • Evaluation and Interpretation of Results

That looks pretty straightforward and simple. In reality, however, the process is not as direct as it may seem, but cyclic in nature. The first model design is seldom all encompassing and optimal. This usually becomes clear from the dynamic and steady-state analyses of the model or during the evaluation and interpretation of results. Indicators of potential problems arise in the form of discrepancies between model and observations, lack of robustness, or predictions that may not even be testable at the present time, but are suspect for one reason or another.

Diagnosis of these flaws may require further analyses that pinpoint the problems as precisely as possible and ultimately suggest a change in model design.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, J. S., Reis, M. A. M., and Carrondo, M. J. T.: Competition between nitrate and nitrite reduction in denitrification by Pseudomonas fluorescence. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 46, 476–84, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, R., and Savageau, M.: Comparing systemic properties of ensembles of biological networks by graphical and statistical methods. Bioinformatics 16, 527–33, 2000aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, R., and Savageau, M.: Systemic properties of ensembles of metabolic networks: Application of graphical and statistical methods to simple unbranched pathways. Bioinformatics 16, 534–47, 2000bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, R., and Savageau, M.: Extending the method of mathematically controlled comparison to include numerical comparisons. Bioinformatics 16, 786–98, 2000cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, R., and Savageau, M.: Effect of overall feedback inhibition in unbranched biosynthetic pathways. Biophys. J. 79, 2290–304, 2000dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Eli, K., and Geiseler, W.: Perturbations around steady states in a continuous stirred tank reactor. J. Phys. Chem. 87, 1352–7, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, P. H., Voit, E. O., and White, R.: A pharmacodynamic model for the action of the antibiotic Imipenem on Pseudomonas in vitro. Bull. Math. Biol. 58(5), 923–38, 1996Google ScholarPubMed
Cascante, M., R. Franco, and E. Canela: Sensitivity analysis: A common foundation of theories for the quantitative study of metabolic control. In E. O. Voit (Ed.), Canonical Nonlinear Modeling. S-System Approach to Understanding Complexity (Chapter 4). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991
Casti, J. L.: Nonlinear System Theory. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1985
Chen, C.-T.: Linear System Theory and Design. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1984
Chevalier, T., Schreiber, I., and Ross, J.: Toward a systematic determination of complex reaction mechanisms. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 6776–87, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, B. L.: Stability of complex reaction networks. Adv. Chem. Phys. 43, 1–215, 1980Google Scholar
Curto, R., Voit, E. O., Sorribas, A., and Cascante, M.: Mathematical models of purine metabolism in man. Math. Biosci. 151, 1–49, 1998CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degn, H., Olsen, L. F., and Perram, J. W.: Bistability, oscillation, and chaos in an enzyme reaction. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 316, 622–37, 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Sierra, R., and Fairén, V.: Simplified method for the computation of parameters of power-law equations from time-series. Math. Biosci. 171, 1–19, 2001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz-Sierra, R., Lozano, J. B., and Fairén, V.: Deduction of chemical mechanisms from the linear response around steady state. J. Phys. Chem. 103, 337–43, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein-Keshet, L.: Mathematical Models in Biology. Birkhäuser Mathematics Series. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988
Fell, D. A.: Metabolic control analysis – a survey of its theoretical and experimental development. Biochem. J. 286, 313–30, 1992CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fell, D. A.: Understanding the Control of Metabolism. Portland Press, London, 1997
Ferreira, A. E. N.: PLAS©: http://correio.cc.fc.ul.pt/~aenf/plas.html, 2000
Gavalas, G. R.: Nonlinear Differential Equations of Chemically Reacting Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1968
Groen, A. K., R. van den Meer, H. V. Westerhoff, R. J. A. Wanders, T. P. M. Akerboom, and J. M. Tager: Control of metabolic fluxes. In H. Sies (Ed.), Metabolic Compartmentation (pp. 9–37). Academic Press, New York, 1982
Guckenheimer, J., and P. Holmes: Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983
Haefner, J. A.: Modeling Biological Systems. Principles and Applications. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1996
Haldane, J. B. S: Enzymes (pp. 28–64). Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1930
Hatzimanikatis, V., Floudas, C. A., and Bailey, J. E.: Optimization of regulatory architectures in metabolic reaction networks. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 52(4), 485–500, 1996a3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzimanikatis, V., Floudas, C. A., and Bailey, J. E.: Analysis and design of metabolic reaction networks via mixed-integer linear optimization. AIChE J. 42(5), 1277–92, 1996bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jou, D., and J. E. Llebot: Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Biological Processes. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990
Jury, E. I.: The inners approach to some problems of systems theory. IEEE Trans. Automatic Contr. AC-16, 233–40, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacser, H., and Burns, J. A.: Molecular democracy: Who shares the controls?Biochem. Soc. Trans. 7, 1149–60, 1979CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopelman, R.: Rate processes on fractals: Theory, simulations, experiments. J. Stat. Phys. 42, 185–200, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopelman, R.: Reaction kinetics in restricted spaces. Israel J. Chem. 31, 147–57, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, S.: A Second Course in Calculus. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 1968
Lewis, D. C.: A qualitative analysis of S-systems: Hopf bifurcations. In E. O. Voit (Ed.), Canonical Nonlinear Modeling. S-System Approach to Understanding Complexity (Chapter 16). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991
Lübbert, A., and R. Simutis: Measurement and control. In: C. Ratledge and B. Kristiansen (Eds.), Basic Biotechnology (Chapter 10). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2001
Mayhan, R. J.: Discrete-Time and Continuous-Time Linear Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1983
Neves, A. R., Ramos, A., Nunes, M. C., Kleerebezem, M., Hugenholtz, J., Vos, W. M., Almeida, J., and Santos, H.: In vivo nuclear magnetic resonance studies of glycolytic kinetics in Lactococcus lactis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 64(2), 200–12, 19993.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogata, K.: Modern Control Engineering (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990
Okamoto, M., Morita, Y., Tominaga, D., Tanaka, K., Kinoshita, N., Ueno, J.-I., Miura, Y., Maki, Y., and Eguchi, Y.: Design of virtual-labo-system for metabolic engineering: Development of biochemical engineering system analyzing tool-kit (BEST KIT). Comp. Chem. Eng. 21(Suppl.), S745–50, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, L. F., and Degn, H.: Chaos in an enzyme reaction. Nature 267, 177–8, 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, L. F., and Degn, H.: Oscillatory kinetics of the peroxidase-oxidase reaction in an open system. Experimental and theoretical studies. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 523(2), 321–34, 1978Google Scholar
Palsson, B.Ø., and Lightfoot, E. N.: Mathematical modelling of dynamics and control in metabolic networks. I. On Michaelis-Menten kinetics. J. Theor. Biol. 111, 273–302, 1984CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palsson, B.Ø., Jamier, R., and Lightfoot, E. N.: Mathematical modelling of dynamics and control in metabolic networks. II. Simple dimeric enzymes. J. Theor. Biol. 111, 303–21, 1984CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palsson, B.Ø., Palsson, H., and Lightfoot, E. N.: Mathematical modelling of dynamics and control in metabolic networks. III. Linear reaction sequences. J. Theor. Biol. 113, 231–59, 1985CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, P. H., Procaccia, I., and Ross, J.: Chemical instabilities. Adv. Chem. Phys. 43, 217–68, 1980Google Scholar
Routh, E. J.: Advanced Part of Dynamics of a System of Rigid Bodies (6th edition, Vol. II). Macmillan, London, 1930
Rugen, P., and Callahan, B.: An overview of Monte-Carlo, a fifty year perspective. Human Ecological Risk Assess. 2(4), 671–80, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, P. J., and Voit, E. O.: Flux-based estimation of parameters in S-systems. Ecol. Model. 93, 75–88, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savageau, M. A.: Biochemical Systems Analysis, II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. J. Theor. Biol. 25, 370–79, 1969CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savageau, M. A.: Parameter sensitivity as a criterion for evaluating and comparing the performance of biochemical systems. Nature 229(5286), 542–4, 1971aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savageau, M. A.: Concepts relating behaviour of biochemical systems to their underlying molecular properties. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 145, 612–21, 1971bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savageau, M. A.: The behavior of intact biochemical control systems. Curr. Top. Cell. Reg. 6, 63–129, 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savageau, M. A.: Optimal design of feedback control by inhibition: Dynamic considerations. J. Mol. Evol. 5, 199–222, 1975CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savageau, M. A.: Biochemical Systems Analysis. A Study of Function and Design in Molecular Biology. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1976
Savageau, M. A.: Influence of fractal kinetics on molecular recognition. J. Mol. Recogn. 6, 149–157, 1993CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savageau, M. A.: Michaelis-Menten mechanism reconsidered: Implications of fractal kinetics. J. Theor. Biol. 176, 115–24, 1995aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savageau, M. A.: Enzyme kinetics in vitro and in vivo: Michaelis-Menten revisited. In: E. E. Bittar (Ed.), Principles of Medical Biology (Vol. 4, pp. 93–146). JAI Press, Greenwich, CT 1995b
Segall, J. E, Block, S. M., and Berg, H. C.: Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 8987–91, 1986CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiraishi, F., and Savageau, M. A.: The tricarboxylic acid cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum. II. Evaluation of model consistency and robustness. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 22919–25, 1992Google ScholarPubMed
Sorribas, A., and Savageau, M. A.: Strategies for representing metabolic pathways within biochemical systems theory: Reversible Pathways. Math. Biosci. 94, 239–69, 1989CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorribas, A., Samitier, S., Canela, E. I., and Cascante, M.: Metabolic pathway characterization from transient response data obtained in situ: Parameter estimation in S-system models. J. Theor. Biol. 162, 81–102, 1993CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorribas, A., Lozano, J. B., and Fairén, V.: Deriving chemical and biochemical model networks from experimental measurements. Rec. Devel. Phys. Chem. 2, 553–73, 1998Google Scholar
Steinmetz, C. G., and Larter, R.: The quasiperiodic route to chaos in a model of the peroxidase-oxidase reaction. J. Chem. Phys. 94(2), 1388–96, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tominaga, D., Okamoto, M., Maki, Y., Watanabe, S., and Eguchi, Y.: Nonlinear numerical optimization technique based on genetic algorithm for inverse problem: towards the inference of genetic networks. Proc. German Conf. on Bioinformatics, 127–140, 1999Google Scholar
Torsella, J., and A. M. Bin Razali: An analysis of forestry data. In: E. O. Voit (Ed.), Canonical Nonlinear Modeling. S-System Approach to Understanding Complexity (Chapter 10). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991
U.S. EPA: Guiding Principles for Monte-Carlo Analysis (EPA/630/R-97/001), http://www.epa.gov/ncea/monteabs.htm, 1997
Voit, E. O. (Ed.): Canonical Nonlinear Modeling. S-System Approach to Understanding Complexity, (ⅺ + 365 pp.). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991
Voit, E. O.: Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems. A Practical Guide for Biochemists and Molecular Biologists (ⅻ + 532 pp.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2000
Voit, E. O.: Models-of-data and models-of-processes in the post-genomic era (Mathem. Biosci. (in press))
Voit, E. O., and Del Signore, M.: Assessment of effects of experimental imprecision on optimized biochemical systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 74(5), 443–8, 2001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voit, E. O., and Radivoyevitch, T.: Biochemical systems analysis of genome-wide expression data. Bioinformatics 16(11), 1023–37, 2000CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voit, E. O., and Sands, P. J.: Modeling forest growth. II. Biomass partitioning in Scots pine. Ecol. Model. 86, 73–89, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voit, E. O., and Savageau, M. A.: Power-law approach to modeling biological systems. III. Methods of analysis. J. Ferment. Technol. 60(3), 233–41, 1982Google Scholar
Yamazaki, I., Yokota, K., and Nakajima, R.: Oscillatory oxidations of reduced pyridine nucleotide by peroxidase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 21, 582–6, 1965CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Z., E. O. Voit, and L. H. Schwacke: Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis of S-systems using a genetic algorithm. In: T. Yamakawa and G. Matsumoto (Eds.), Methodologies for the Conception, Design, and Application of Intelligent Systems. World Scientific, Singapore, 1996

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×