Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-rbv74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T10:18:50.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Predictability of seasonal climate variations: a pedagogical review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

By
J. Shukla  and
J. L. Kinter III
Edited by
Tim Palmer  and
Renate Hagedorn
J. Shukla
Affiliation:
Center for Ocean–Land–Atmosphere Studies, Calverton, Maryland
J. L. Kinter III
Affiliation:
Center for Ocean–Land–Atmosphere Studies, Calverton, Maryland
Tim Palmer
Affiliation:
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Renate Hagedorn
Affiliation:
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It is well known that the day-to-day changes in the large-scale atmospheric circulation are not predictable beyond two weeks. The small-scale rainfall patterns associated with the large-scale circulation patterns may not be predictable beyond even a few days. However, the space–time averages of certain atmospheric and oceanic variables are predictable for months to seasons. This chapter gives a pedagogical review of the ideas and the results that have led to our current understanding and the status of the predictability of seasonal climate variations.

We first review the current status of the understanding of the limits of the predictability of weather. We adopt Lorenz' classical definition of the predictability of weather as the range at which the difference between forecasts from two nearly identical initial conditions is as large in a statistical sense as the difference between two randomly chosen atmospheric states. With this definition of predictability, it is implied that the upper limit of predictability depends on the saturation value of the maximum possible error, which, in turn, is determined by the climatological variance. Lorenz provided a simple conceptual model in which the upper limit of weather prediction skill is described by three fundamental quantities: the size of the initial error, the growth rate of the error and the saturation value of the error. This simple model is able to explain the current status of the seasonal, regional and hemispheric variations of numerical weather prediction (NWP) skill.

Type
Chapter
Information
Predictability of Weather and Climate , pp. 306 - 341
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alexander, M. A. and Deser, C. (1995). A mechanism for the recurrence of wintertime midlatitude SST anomalies. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 25, 122–372.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlas, R., Wolfson, N. and Terry, J. (1993). The effect of SST and soil moisture anomalies on GLA model simulations of the 1988 U.S. summer drought. J. Climate, 6, 2034–482.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamzai, A. and Marx, L. (2000). COLA AGCM simulation of the effect of anomalous spring snow over Eurasia on the Indian summer monsoon. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 2575–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, T. P., Dumenil, L., Schlese, U. and Roeckner, E. (1988). The effect of Eurasian snow cover on global climate. Science, 239, 504–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnston, A. G. and Livezey, R. E. (1987). Classification, seasonality and persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 1083–1262.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, U. S., Alexander, M. A., Battisti, D. S., Houghton, D. D. and Keller, L. M. (1998). Atmosphere–ocean interaction in the North Atlantic: near-surface climate variability. J. Climate, 11, 1615–322.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanford, H. F. (1884). On the connexion of the Himalayan snowfall with dry winds and seasons of droughts in India. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., 37, 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, J. (1966). Some remaining problems in numerical weather prediction. In Advances in Numerical Weather Prediction, pp. 61–70. Hartford, CT: Travelers Research CenterGoogle Scholar
Charney, J. (1975). Dynamics of deserts and droughts in the Sahel. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 101, 193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, J. G. and Shukla, J. (1977). Predictability of monsoons. Joint IUTAM/IUGG Symposium on Monsoon Dynamics (5–9 December, 1977), New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
Charney, J. G. and Shukla, J. (1981). Predictability of monsoons. In Monsoon Dynamics, ed. , J. Lighthill and Pearce, R. P., pp. 99–109. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Charney, J., Fleagle, R. G., Riehl, H., Lally, V. E. and Wark, D. Q. (1966). The feasibility of a global observation and analysis experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 47, 200–20Google Scholar
Cohen, J. and Rind, D. (1991). The effect of snow cover on climate. J. Climate, 4, 689–7062.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delworth, T. L. and Manabe, S. (1988). The influence of potential evaporation on the variabilities of simulated soil wetness and climate. J. Climate, 1, 523–472.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delworth, T. L. and Manabe, S. (1989). The influence of soil wetness on near-surface atmospheric variability. J. Climate, 2, 1447–622.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derber, J. and Rosati, A. (1989). A global oceanic data assimilation system. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 19, 1333–472.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, R. E. (1984). Modelling evapotranspiration for three-dimensional global climate models. In Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, pp. 58–72. Geophysical Monograph 29, Maurice Ewing Vol. 5. American Geophysical UnionGoogle Scholar
Dirmeyer, P. A. (2000). Using a global soil wetness data set to improve seasonal climate simulation. J. Climate, 13, 2900–222.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirmeyer, P. A. and Shukla, J. (1993). Observational and modeling studies of the influence of soil moisture anomalies on atmospheric circulation (review). In Prediction of Interannual Climate Variations, ed. Shukla, J., pp. 1–24. NATO ASI Series I: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 6Google Scholar
Dirmeyer, P. A. and Shukla, J. (1996). The effect on regional and global climate of expansion of the world's deserts. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122(530), 451–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennessy, M. J. and Shukla, J. (1999). Impact of initial soil wetness on seasonal atmospheric prediction. J. Climate, 12, 3167–802.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennessy, M. J., Marx, L. and Shukla, J. (1985). General circulation model sensitivity to 1982–83 equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies. Mon. Weather Rev., 115, 858–642.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folland, C. K., Shukla, J., Kinter, J. L. III and Rodwell, M. J. (2002). C20C: the Climate of the Twentieth Century project. CLIVAR Exchanges, 7, 37–9. (Available from International CLIVAR Project Office, Southampton Oceanography Centre, Empress Dock, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK; (www.clivar.org/publications/exchanges/ex24/ex24.pdf)Google Scholar
Goddard, L., Barnston, A. G. and Mason, S. J. (2003). Evaluation of the IRI's “Net Assessment” seasonal climate forecasts: 1997–2001. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1761–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, B. N. and Shukla, J. (1991). Predictability of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. J. Climate, 3, 2–22Google Scholar
Gutzler, D. S. and Shukla, J. (1984). Analogs in the wintertime 500 mb height field. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 177–892.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, D. G. and Manabe, S. (1975). The role of mountains in the south Asian monsoon circulation. J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 1515–412.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, D. and Shukla, J. (1976). An apparent relationship between Eurasia snow cover and Indian monsoon rainfall. J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 2461–32.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, P. and Brezowsky, H. (1969). Katalog der Grosswetterlagen Europas. Ber. Dt. Wetterd., 15Google Scholar
Hu, Z.-Z., Schneider, E. K., Bhatt, U. and Kirtman, B. P. (2004). Potential for influence of land surface processes on ENSO. J. Geophys. Res., 109Google Scholar
Ji, M., Leetmaa, A. and Derber, J. (1995). An ocean analysis system for seasonal to interannual climate studies. Mon. Weather Rev., 123, 460–812.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinter, J. L. III, Shukla, J., Marx, L. and Schneider, E. (1988). A simulation of the winter and summer circulation with the NMC global spectral model. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 2486–5222.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirtman, B. P. (2003). The COLA anomaly coupled model: ensemble ENSO prediction. Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 2324–412.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirtman, B. P., Fan, Y. and Schneider, E. K. (2002). The COLA global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM. J. Climate, 15, 2301–202.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirtman, B. P., Shukla, J., Huang, B., Zhu, Z. and Schneider, E. K. (1997). Multiseasonal predictions with a coupled tropical ocean global atmosphere system. Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 789–8082.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, R. D., Dirmeyer, P. A., Guo, Z., et al. (2004). Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science, 305, 1138–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishnamurthy, V. and Shukla, J. (2001). Observed and model simulated interannual variability of the Indian monsoon. Mausam, 52, 133–50Google Scholar
Leith, C. E. (1971). Atmospheric predictability and two-dimensional turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 148–612.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leith, C. E. and Kraichnan, R. H. (1972). Predictability of turbulent flows. J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 1041–582.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1965). A study of the predictability of a 28-variable model. Tellus, 17, 321–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1969a). The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus, 21, 289–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1969b). Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 636–462.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1979). Forced and free variations of weather and climate. J. Atmos. Sci., 8, 1367–762.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. (1982). Atmospheric predictability experiments with a large numerical model. Tellus, 34, 505–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, S. J., Goddard, L., Graham, N. E., Yulaeva, E., Sun, L. and Arkin, P. A. (1999). The IRI seasonal climate prediction system and the 1997/98 El Niño event. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 1853–732.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyakoda, K., Gordon, C. T., Caverly, R., Stern, W. F., Sirutis, J. J. and Bourke, W. (1983). Simulation of a blocking event in January 1977. Mon. Weather Rev., 111, 846–692.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moura, D. A. and Shukla, J. (1981). On the dynamics of droughts in northeast Brazil: observations, theory and numerical experiments with a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2653–752.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namias, J. (1969). Seasonal interactions between the North Pacific Ocean and the atmosphere during the 1960's. Mon. Weather Rev., 97, 173–922.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namias, J. (1986). Persistence of flow patterns over North America and adjacent ocean sectors. Mon. Weather Rev., 114, 1368–832.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nobre, C. A., Sellers, P. J. and Shukla, J. (1991). Amazonian deforestation and regional climate change. J. Climate, 4, 957–882.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, T. N., Alessandri, A., Andersen, U., et al. (2004). Development of a European multi-model ensemble system for seasonal to inter-annual prediction (DEMETER). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 85, 853–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, T. N. and Shukla, J. (2000). Editorial to DSP/PROVOST special issue. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1989–90CrossRef
Palmer, T. N. and Sun, Z. (1985). A modelling and observational study of the relationship between sea surface temperature in the northwest Atlantic and the atmospheric general circulation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 111, 947–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, D., Curry, J., Battisti, D., et al. (1998). Status of and outlook for large-scale modeling of atmosphere–ice–ocean interactions in the Arctic. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 197–2192.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmusson, E. M. and Carpenter, T. H. (1983). The relationship between eastern equatorial Pacific sea surface temperatures and rainfall over India and Sri Lanka. Mon. Weather Rev., 111, 517–282.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, N., Sellers, P. J., Randall, D. A., et al. (1989). Effects of implementing the Simple Biosphere model (SiB) in a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 2757–822.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, P. J., Mintz, Y., Sud, Y. C. and Dalcher, A. (1986). A Simple Biosphere Model (SIB) for use within general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 505–312.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, J. (1975). Effect of Arabian sea-surface temperature anomaly on Indian summer monsoon: a numerical experiment with GFDL model. J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 503–112.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, J. (1981a). Dynamical predictability of monthly means. J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2547–722.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, J. (1981b). Predictability of the Tropical Atmosphere. NASA Technical Memorandum 83829. Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD: NASA
Shukla, J. (1985). Predictability. In Issues in Atmospheric and Oceanic Modeling. II: Weather Dynamics ed. S. Manabe pp. 87–122. Advances in Geophysics 28B. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Shukla, J. (1998). Predictability in the midst of chaos: a scientific basis for climate forecasting. Science, 282, 728–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shukla, J. and Fennessy, M. (1988). Prediction of time mean atmospheric circulation and rainfall: influence of Pacific SST anomaly. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 9–282.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, J. and Mintz, Y. (1982). The influence of land-surface evapotranspiration on the earth's climate. Science, 214, 1498–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, J. and Misra, B. N. (1977). Relationships between sea surface temperature and wind speed over the Central Arabia Sea, and monsoon rainfall over India. Mon. Weather Rev., 105, 998–10022.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, J. and Wallace, J. M. (1983). Numerical simulation of the atmospheric response to equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies. J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 1613–302.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, J., Anderson, J., Baumhefner, D., et al. (2000a). Dynamical seasonal prediction. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81, 1–142.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, J., Paolino, D. A., Straus, D. M., et al. (2000b). Dynamical seasonal predictions with the COLA atmospheric model. Quart. J. Royal. Meteor. Soc., 126, 2265–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikka, D. R. (1980). Some aspects of the large-scale fluctuations of summer monsoon rainfall over India in relation to fluctuations in the planetary and regional scale circulation parameters. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., 89, 179–95Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J. and Hollingsworth, A. (2002). Some aspects of the improvement in skill of numerical weather prediction. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 647–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. J., Mureau, R. and Petroliagis, T. (1995). Error growth and estimates of predictability from the ECMWF forecasting system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121, 1739–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, J. (1963). General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I: The basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev., 91, 99–1642.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, J. (1969). Problems and promises of deterministic extended range forecasting. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 50, 286–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, D. M. and Molteni, F. (2004). Flow regimes, SST forcing, and climate noise: results from large GCM ensembles, J. Climate, 17, 1641–562.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, D. M. and Shukla, J. (2000). Distinguishing between the SST- forced variability and internal variability in mid-latitudes: analysis of observations and GCM simulations. Quart. J. Royal Meteor. Soc., 126, 2323–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sud, Y. C., Shukla, J. and Mintz, Y. (1988). Influence of land-surface roughness on atmospheric circulation and rainfall: a sensitivity study with GCM. J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 27, 1036–542.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, J. M., Tibaldi, S. and Simmon, A. J. (1983). Reduction of systematic forecast errors in the ECMWF model through the introduction of an envelope orography. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 109, 683–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, D. L. and Kasahara, A. (1971). Adaptation of meteorological variables forced by updating. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 1313–242.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, P.-P. and Arkin, P. A. (1996). Analyses of global monthly precipitation using gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model predictions. J. Climate, 9, 840–582.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, Y. and Shukla, J. (1993). The influence of land surface properties on Sahel climate. I: Desertification. J. Climate, 6, 2232–452.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zebiak, S. E. and Cane, M. A. (1987). A model El Niño–Southern Oscillation. Mon. Weather Rev., 115, 2262–782.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×